The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of performance feedback on preservice teachers’ use of recommended practices within inclusive early childhood classrooms. A multiple baseline design across behaviors was used to examine the relation between performance feedback delivered via email and practicum students’ use of target-recommended practices across settings and over time. Results indicate performance feedback delivered via email is an effective method for increasing practicum teachers’ use of target behaviors; however, generalization and maintenance varied across teachers. Implications for professional development and future research are discussed.
AlldayR. A.Hinkson-LeeK.HudsonT.Neilsen-GattiS.KleinkeA.RusselC. S. (2012). Training general educators to increase behaviors specific praise: Effects on students with EBD. Behavior Disorders, 37, 87–98.
2.
Artman-MeekerK.FettigA.BartonE. E.PenneyA.ZengS. (2015). Applying an evidence-based coaching framework to the Early Childhood Professional Development literature. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35, 183–196.
3.
Artman-MeekerK.HemmeterM. L. (2013). Supporting teachers’ use of recommended practices through e-mail performance feedback. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 33, 112–123.
4.
Artman-MeekerK.HemmeterM. L.SnyderP. (2014). Effects of distance coaching on teachers’ use of pyramid model practices: A pilot study. Infants & Young Children, 27, 325–344.
5.
BaldwinT. T.MagjukaR. J.LoherB. T. (2006). The perils of participation: Effects of choice of training on trainee motivation and learning. Personnel Psychology, 44, 51–65.
6.
BartonE. E.ChenC.PribbleL.PomesM.ParkY. A. (2013). Coaching pre-service teachers to embed prompting procedures in inclusive preschool classrooms. Teacher Education and Special Education, 36, 330–349.
7.
BartonE. E.KinderK.CaseyA. M.ArtmanK. M. (2011). Finding your feedback fit: Strategies for designing and delivering performance feedback systems. Young Exceptional Children, 14, 29–46.
8.
BartonE. E.PribbleL.ChenC. (2013). Use of e-mail to deliver performance-based feedback to early childhood practitioners. Journal of Early Intervention, 35, 270–297.
9.
BartonE. E.WoleryM. (2007). Evaluation of e-mail feedback on the verbal behavior of preservice teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 30, 55–72.
10.
BriereD. E.SimonsenB.SugaiG.MyersD. (2015). Increasing new teachers specific praise using a with-in school consultation intervention. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17, 50–60.
11.
BrownJ. A.WoodsJ. J. (2011). Performance feedback to support instruction with speech-language pathology students on a family-centered interview process. Infants & Young Children, 24, 42–55.
12.
BruderM. B.DunstC. J. (2015). Parental judgments of early childhood intervention personnel practices: Applying a consumer science perspective. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 34, 200–210.
13.
CaseyA. M.McWilliamR. A. (2005). Where is everybody? Organizing adults to promote child engagement. Young Exceptional Children, 8, 2–10.
14.
CaseyA. M.McWilliamR. A. (2008). Graphical feedback to increase teachers’ use of incidental teaching. Journal of Early Intervention, 30, 251–268.
15.
CaseyA. M.McWilliamR. A. (2011a). Characteristics and effectiveness of feedback interventions applied in early childhood settings. Topics in Early Childhood Education, 31, 68–77.
16.
CaseyA. M.McWilliamR. A. (2011b). Impact of checklist training on teachers’ use of the zone defense schedule. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 397–401.
17.
Division for Early Childhood. (2014). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education 2014. Retrieved from http://www.dec-sped.org/recommendedpractices
18.
FallonL. M.Collier-MeekM. A.MagginD. M.SanettiL. M. H.JohnsonA. H. (2015). Is performance feedback for educators an evidence-based practice? A systematic review and evaluation based on single-case research. Exceptional Children, 81, 227–246.
19.
FixsenD. L.BlaseK. A.DudaM. A.NaoomS. F.Van DykeM. (2010). Implementation of evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents: Research findings and their implications for the future. In WeiszJ. R.KazdinA. E. (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents (2nd ed., pp. 435–450). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
20.
FixsenD. L.BlaseK. A.HornerR.SugaiG. (2009). Intensive technical assistance (Scaling-up brief #2). Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, FPG Child Development Institute.
21.
FixsenD. L.BlaseK.MetzA.Van DykeM. (2013). Statewide implementation of evidence based programs. Exceptional Children, 79, 213–230.
22.
FoxL.HemmeterM. L.SnyderP.BinderD. P.ClarkeS. (2011). Coaching early childhood special educators to implement a comprehensive model for promoting young children’s social competence. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31, 178–192.
23.
GastD. L.LedfordJ. R. (2014). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
GoodmanJ. I.BradyM. P.DuffyM. L.ScottJ.PollardN. E. (2008). The effects of “bug-in-ear” supervision on special education teachers’ delivery of learn units. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 23, 207–216.
25.
GreerR. D.McDonoughS. H. (1999). Is the learn unit a fundamental measure of pedagogy?The Behavior Analyst, 22, 5–16.
26.
HebbelerK.SpikerD.KahnL. (2012). Individuals with disabilities education act’s early childhood programs: Powerful vision and pesky details. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31, 199–207.
27.
HemmeterM. L.SnyderP.KinderK.ArtmanK. (2011). Impact of e-mail performance feedback on preschool teachers’ use of descriptive praise. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 96–109.
28.
HsiehW. Y.HemmeterM. L.McCollumJ. A.OstroskyM. M. (2009). Using coaching to increase preschool teachers’ use of emergent literacy teaching strategies. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24, 229–247.
29.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ. H.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 26–38.
30.
LandryS.SwankP.AnthonyJ. L.AsselM. (2011). An experimental study evaluating professional development activities within a state funded pre-kindergarten program. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 24, 971–1010.
31.
MacyM.SquiresJ. K.BartonE. E. (2009). Providing optimal opportunities: Structuring practicum experiences in early intervention and early childhood special education preservice programs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 28, 209–218.
32.
MarturanaE. R.WoodsJ. J. (2012). Technology-supported performance-based feedback for early intervention home visiting. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 32, 14–23.
33.
ObornK. M.JohnsonL. D. (2015). Coaching via electronic performance feedback to support home visitors’ use of caregiver coaching strategies. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35, 157–169.
34.
OdomS. L. (2009). The tie that binds: Evidence-based practice, implementation science and outcomes for children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29, 53–61.
35.
PiantaR. C.MashburnA. J.DownerJ. T.HamreB. K.JusticeL. (2008). Effects of web-mediated professional development resources on teacher-child interactions in pre-kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 431–451.
36.
PowellD. R.DiamondK. E.BurchinalM. R.KoehlerM. (2010). Effects of an early literacy professional development intervention on head start teachers and children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 299–312.
37.
ReinkeW. M.Lewis-PalmerT.MartinE. (2007). The effect of visual performance feedback on teacher use of behavior-specific praise. Behavior Modification, 31, 247–263.
38.
RockM. L.GreggM.TheadB. K.AckerA. E.GableR. A.ZigmondN. P. (2009). Can you hear me now? Evaluation of an online wireless technology to provide real-time feedback to special education teachers-in-training. Teacher Education in Special Education, 32, 64–82.
39.
ScheelerM. C.CongdonM.StansberryS. (2010). Providing immediate feedback to co-teachers through bug-in-ear technology: An effective method of peer coaching in inclusion classrooms. Teacher Education in Special Education, 33, 83–96.
40.
ScheelerM. C.McAfeeJ. K.RuhlK. L.LeeD. L. (2006). Providing immediate feedback to co-teachers through bug-in-ear technology: An effective method of peer coaching in inclusion classrooms.Teacher Education in Special Education, 33, 83–96.
41.
ScheelerM. C.McKinnonK.StoutJ. (2012). Effects of immediate feedback delivered via webcam and bug-in-ear technology on preservice teacher performance. Teacher Education in Special Education, 35, 77–90.
42.
ScheelerM. C.RuhlK. L.McAfeeJ. K. (2004). Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teacher Education in Special Education, 27, 396–407.
43.
SchepisM. M.ReidD. H.OwnbeyJ.ParsonsM. B. (2001). Training support staff to embed teaching within natural routines o young children with disabilities in an inclusive preschool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 313–327.
44.
SheridanS. M.EdwardsC. P.MarcinC. A.KnocheL. L. (2009). Professional development in early childhood programs: Process issues and research needs. Early Education and Development, 20, 377–401.
45.
SnyderP.HemmeterM. L.McLaughlinT. (2011). Professional development in early childhood intervention: Where we stand on the silver anniversary of PL 99-457. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 357–370.
46.
SolomonB. G.KleinS. A.PolityloB. (2012). The effect of performance feedback on teachers’ treatment integrity: A meta-analysis of the single-case literature. School Psychology Review, 41, 160–175.
47.
StrainP. S.BoveyE. H. (2011). Randomized controlled trial of the LEAP model of early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31, 133–154.
48.
WintonP. J.McCollumJ. A. (2008). Preparing and supporting high-quality early childhood practitioners: Issues and evidence. In WintonP.McCollumJ.CatlettC. (Eds.), Practical approaches to early childhood professional development: Evidence, strategies, and resources (pp. 1–12). Washington, DC: Zero to Three.
