Progress-monitoring data collection is an essential skill for teachers serving children for whom the general curriculum is insufficient. As the field of early childhood education moves toward tiered service provision models, the importance of routine data collection is heightened. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of a training package on preschool teachers’ implementation of progress-monitoring strategies to collect data on children in need of supports beyond those provided through the general curriculum. This study employed a single-case experimental design in which generalized teacher behavior was collected within the context of the design. In addition, masked reliability data collectors were used throughout the study and an analysis of bias was conducted by a researcher unaffiliated with the study. Social and ecological validity data were collected using a multi-method approach.
AkersL.Del GrossoP.SnellE. K.Atkins-BurnettS.WasikB.CartaJ.. . . MonahanS. (2016). Tailored teaching: Emerging themes from the literature on teachers’ use of ongoing child assessment to individualize instruction. NHSA Dialog, 19, 133–150.
2.
ArtmanK.WoleryM.YoderP. (2012). Embracing our visual inspection and analysis tradition: Graphing interobserver agreement data. Remedial and Special Education, 33(2), 71–77.
3.
Artman-MeekerK.FettigA.BartonE. E.PenneyA.ZengS. (2015). Applying an evidence-based framework to the early childhood coaching literature. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35, 183–196.
4.
BrickerD.CaptB.Pretti-FrontczakK. (2002). Assessment, evaluation, and programming system for infants and children: Test birth to three years and three to six years (2nd ed., Vol. 2). Brookes.
5.
BuysseV.Peisner-FeinbergE.SoukakouE.FettigA.SchaafJ.BurchinalM. (2016). Using recognition & response (R&R) to improve children’s language and literacy skills: Findings from two studies. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 11–20.
6.
CartaJ. J.YoungR. M. (2019). Multi-tiered systems of support for young children: Driving change in early education. Paul H. Brookes.
7.
CataniaC. N.AlmeidaD.Liu-ConstantB.ReedF. D. D. (2009). Video modeling to train staff to implement discrete-trial instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(2), 387–392.
8.
ChazinK. T.LedfordJ. R.BartonE. E.OsborneK. C. (2018). The effects of antecedent exercise on engagement during large group activities for young children. Remedial and Special Education, 39, 158–170.
9.
CollinsB. C. (2012). Systematic instruction for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Brookes.
10.
ConroyM. A.SutherlandK. S.AlginaJ. J.WilsonR. E.MartinezJ. R.WhalonK. J. (2015). Measuring teacher implementation of the BEST in CLASS intervention program and corollary child outcomes. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 23(3), 144–155.
11.
CookB. G. (2014). A call for examining replication and bias in special education research. Remedial and Special Education, 35(4), 233–246.
12.
CookB. G.BuysseV.KlingnerJ.LandrumT. J.McWilliamR. A.TankersleyM.TestD. W. (2015). CEC’s standards for classifying the evidence base of practices in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 36(4), 220–234.
13.
Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children, National Association for the Education of Young Children, & National Head Start Association. (2013). Frameworks for response to intervention in early childhood: Description and implications. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 35, 108–119.
14.
GreenwoodC. R.AbbottM.BeecherC.AtwaterJ.PetersenS. (2017). Development, validation, and evaluation of Literacy 3D: A package supporting Tier 1 preschool literacy instruction implementation and intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 37(1), 29–41.
15.
Grisham-BrownJ. L.HemmeterM. L. (2017). Blended practices for teaching young children in inclusive settings. Brookes.
16.
Grisham-BrownJ. L.HemmeterM. L.Pretti-FrontczakK. (2005). Blended practices for teaching young children in inclusive settings. Brookes.
17.
Grisham-BrownJ. L.Pretti-FrontczakK. (2011). Assessing young children in inclusive settings: The blended practices approach. Brookes.
18.
HawkinsR. P.DotsonV. A. (1975). Reliability scores that delude: An Alice in Wonderland trip through the misleading characteristics of inter-observer agreement scores in interval recording. In RampE.SembG. (Eds.), Behavior analysis: Areas of research and application (pp. 359–376). Prentice-Hall.
19.
KoutsoftasA. D.HarmonM. T.GrayS. (2009). The effect of Tier 2 intervention for phonemic awareness in a response-to-intervention model in low-income preschool classrooms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 116–130.
20.
LambertJ. M.LloydB. P.StaubitzJ. L.WeaverE. S.JenningsC. M. (2014). Effect of an automated training presentation on pre-service behavior analysts’ implementation of trial-based functional analysis. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23, 344–367.
21.
LaneJ. D.LedfordJ. R. (2014). Using interval-based systems to measure behavior in early childhood special education and early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 34, 83–93.
22.
LawsheC. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563–575.
23.
LeblancM. P.RicciardiJ. N.LuiselliJ. K. (2005). Improving discrete trial instruction by paraprofessional staff through an abbreviated performance feedback intervention. Education and Treatment of Children, 28(1), 76–82.
24.
LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.). (2018). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. Routledge.
25.
LedfordJ. R.GastD. L.LuscreD.AyresK. M. (2008). Observational and incidental learning by children with autism during small group instruction. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(1), 86–103.
26.
LedfordJ. R.LaneJ. D.BartonE. E. (2019). Methods for teaching in early education: Contexts for inclusive classrooms. Routledge.
27.
LedfordJ. R.LaneJ. D.ElamK. L.WoleryM. (2012). Using response-prompting procedures during small-group direct instruction: Outcomes and procedural variations. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117, 413–434.
28.
LedfordJ. R.LaneJ. D.ZimmermanK. N.ChazinK. T.AyresK. A. (2016, April). Single case analysis and review framework (SCARF). http://ebip.vkcsites.org/scarf/
29.
LedfordJ. R.WoleryM. (2013). The effects of graphing a second observer’s data on judgments of functional relations when observer bias may be present. Journal of Behavioral Education, 22, 312–324.
30.
McLeanM. E.BaileyD. B.WoleryM. (2004). Assessing infants and preschoolers with special needs. Merrill.
31.
MissallK. N.CartaJ. J.McConnellS. R.WalkerD.GreenwoodC. R. (2008). Using individual growth and development indicators to measure early language and literacy. Infants & Young Children, 21, 241–253.
32.
NeelyL.GarciaE.BankstonB.GreenA. (2018). Generalization and maintenance of functional communication training for individuals with developmental disabilities: A systematic and quality review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 79(1), 116–129.
33.
Pretti-FrontczakK. (2014). Addressing targeted outcomes as part of a multi-tiered system of support. B2K Solutions.
34.
RubleL. A.McGrewJ. H.TolandM. D.DalrympleN. J.JungL. A. (2013). A randomized controlled trial of COMPASS web-based and face-to-face teacher coaching in autism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81, 566–572.
35.
SarokoffR. A.SturmeyP. (2004). The effects of behavioral skills training on staff implementation of discrete-trial teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37(4), 535–538.
36.
ShepleyC.LaneJ. D.Grisham-BrownJ.SpriggsA. D.WinsteadO. (2018). Effects of a training package to increase teachers’ fidelity of naturalistic instructional procedures in inclusive preschool classrooms. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41(4), 321–339
37.
ShepleyC.Grisham-BrownJ. (2019). Multi-tiered systems of support for preschool-aged children: A review and meta-analysis. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 47, 296–308.
WoleryM.AultM. J.DoyleP. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities: Use of response prompting strategies. Longman.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
