This article argues that post—September 11 political debates and legislation around security necessitate a reconsideration of a right to privacy in Canada. It looks at the proposal for a Canadian Charter of Privacy Rights promoted by Senator Sheila Finestone in the late 1990s and the current challenges of emergent material technologies accelerated by digitization and political technologies of regulation and governance.
Arar Commission Enquiry, opening statement (submitted by Maher Arar and His Council to the Commission of Enquiry). (2004). Retrieved October 20, 2007, from www.maherarar.ca/cms/images/uploads/Arar_opening_statementfinal.pdf
2.
Austin, L. (2003). Privacy and the question of technology. Law and Philosophy, 22, 119-166.
3.
Barlow, M. (2005). Too close for comfort: Canada's future within fortress North America. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: McClelland & Stewart Ltd.
4.
Bassett, C. (2007). Forms of reconciliation: On contemporary surveillance . Cultural Studies, 21(1), 82-94.
5.
British Columbia Freedom of Information and Privacy Association. (2004). Privacy and the USA Patriot Act: Implications for British Columbia public sector outsourcing. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Author. Available at www.oipc.bc.ca/sector_public/archives/usa_patriot_act/pdfs/report/privacy-final.pdf
6.
Bennett, C.J., & Raab, C.D. (2006). The governance of privacy: Policy instruments in global perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
Bennett, C.J., & French, M. (2003). The state of privacy in the Canadian state: The fallout from 9/11. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management , 11(1), 2-11.
8.
Canadian charter of rights and freedoms. (1982). Retrieved October 8, 2007, from http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/charter/
9.
Canadian code of practice for consumer protection in electronic commerce. ( 2004, January 16). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Office of Consumer Affairs, Industry Canada. Retrieved October 20, 2007, from http://cmcweb.ca
10.
Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic. (2006). Compliance with Canadian data protection laws: Are retailers measuring up? Retrieved March 1, 2007, from http://www.cippic.ca/en/bulletin/compliance_report_06-07-06_(color)_(cover-english).pdf
11.
Chester, J. (2007). Digital destiny: New media and the future of democracy . New York: The New Press.
12.
Commission of Enquiries Into the Actions of Canadian Officials in Relation to Maher Arar. (2006). Report of the events relating to Maher Arar: Analysis and recommendations. A new review mechanism for the RCMP's national security activities. Available at www.ararcommission.ca
13.
Council of Europe. (2001). Convention on cybercrime. Retrieved October 20, 2007, from http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/HTML/185.htm
14.
Department of Justice—Canada. (2002). Lawful access—Consultation document. Retrieved October 20, 2007, from http://www.canada.justice.gc.ca/en/cons/la_al/law_access.pdf
15.
Department of Justice—Canada. (2005). Lawful access FAQ. Retrieved October 20, 2007, from http://www.justice.gc.ca/en/cons/la_al/summary/faq.html
16.
Ekos Research Associates. (2006, March). Revisiting the privacy landscape a year later (submitted to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada). Retrieved October 20, 2007, from http://www.privcom.gc.ca/information/survey/2006/ekos_2006_e.asp
17.
Franklin, U. (1996, September). Stormy weather: Conflicting forces in the information society. Closing address at the 18th International Privacy and Data Protection Conference, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (excerpted in House of Commons Standing Committee on Human Rights and the Status of Persons with Disabilities , April 1997, 34).
18.
Geist, M. (2005, August 22). Beware Big Brother disguised as “lawful access.” The Toronto Star, p. C3.
19.
Government of Canada. (1971). Instant world: A report on telecommunications in Canada. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Information Canada.
20.
Government of Canada. (2001, March 15). Debates of the Senate. Hansard, 139(16), 1700. Available at http://www.parl.gc.ca/37/1/parlbus/chambus/senate/deb-e/pdf/016db_2001-03-15-E.pdf
21.
Government of Canada. (2002). Anti-Terrorism Act. Canada Gazette, 24(5), Chapter 41. Available at http://canadagazette.gc.ca/partIII/2002/g3-02405.pdf
22.
Grimes, S., & Shade, L.R. (2005). Neopian economics of play: Children's cyberpets and online communities as immersive advertising in NeoPets.com. The International Journal of Media and CulturalPolitics, 1(2), 181-198.
23.
Hosein, G. (2006). Privacy as freedom. In R. K. Jorgensen (Ed.), Human rights in the global information society (pp. 121-148). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
24.
House of Commons Standing Committee on Human Rights and the Status of Persons With Disabilities. (1997). Privacy: Where do we draw the line? (The Hon. Sheila Finestone, Chair). Retrieved October 20, 2007, from www.privcom.gc.ca/information/02_06_03d_e.pdf
25.
International Campaign Against Mass Surveillance. (n.d.). Campaign declaration. Retrieved October 20, 2007, from https://id306.securedata.net/i-cams/Declaration_Eng.html
26.
LeBreton, M. (2001, December 14). Thirteenth report of the Standing Committee on Social Affairs, Science, and Technology. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: The Senate of Canada. Available at http://www.parl.gc.ca/37/1/parlbus/commbus/senate/com-e/soci-e/rep-e/rep13dec01-e.htm
27.
Lyon, D. (2003). Introduction. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Surveillance as social sorting: Privacy, risk and digital discrimination (pp. 1-9). London: Routledge.
28.
MacLeod, I. (2004, December 11). A question of balance. The Ottawa Citizen, p. A1.
29.
Mitrovica, A. (2007). Hear no evil, write no lies. The Walrus, December/January, 37-42.
30.
Nissenbaum, H. (2004). Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review, 79(1), 101-139.
31.
Office of the Privacy Commission of Canada. ( 2002). Annual report to Parliament, 2001-02. Retrieved October 20, 2007, from http://www.privcom.gc.ca/information/02_05_e.asp#002
32.
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. ( 2005). Response to the Government of Canada's “lawful access” consultations. Retrieved October 20, 2007, from http://www.privcom.gc.ca/information/pub/sub_la_050505_e.asp
33.
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. ( 2006a). Annual report to Parliament 2005: Report on the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act. Retrieved October 20, 2007, from http://www.privcom.gc.ca/information/ar/200506/2005_pipeda_e.pdf
34.
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. ( 2006b). Annual report to Parliament 2005-2006. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada. Available at http://www.privcom.gc.ca/information/ar/200506/200506_pa_e.pdf
35.
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. ( 2006c). PIPEDA review discussion document: Protecting privacy in an intrusive world. Retrieved October 20, 2007, from http://www.privcom.gc.ca/information/pub/pipeda_review_060718_e.asp
36.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2007). Participative web and user-created content: Web 2.0, wikis, and social networking (report drafted by Sacha Wunsch-Vincent and Graham Vickery, OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry) . Retrieved October 5, 2007, from www.sourceoecd.org/science/T/9789264037464
37.
Oscapella, E. (2000). Canada's Privacy Rights Charter: A report. Privacy Laws and Business International Newsletter31. Retrieved October 20, 2007, from http://www.worldlii.org/int/journals/PLBIN/2000/31.html
38.
Peissl, W. (2003). Surveillance and security: A dodgy relationship . Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 11(1), 19-24.
39.
Perkins, T. (2006, July 17). Privacy chief eyes US border— Federal court asked to overturn commissioner's ruling. Toronto Star. Retrieved March 1, 2007, from http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&call_pageid=971358637177&c=Article&cid=115308-7815066
40.
Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, S.C. 2000, c.5, updated 2006. Available at http://www.privcom.gc.ca/legislation/02_06_01_e.asp
41.
The Privacy Act, R.S., 1985, c. P-21. Available at http://lois.justice.gc.ca/en/P-21/index.html
42.
R. v. Duarte, 1 S.C.R. 30 at 46 (1990). Available at http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1990/1990rcs1-30/1990rcs1-30.html
43.
Regan, P.M. (2004). Old issues, new context: Privacy, information collection, and homeland security. Government Information Quarterly, 21, 481-497.
44.
Risen, J. (2005, December 15). Bush lets US spy on callers without courts. The New York Times. Retrieved March 1, 2007, from http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/16/politics/16program.html?ei=5090&en=e32072d786623ac1&ex=1292389200
45.
Rotenberg, M. (2007, February 23). Remarks made at Internet Privacy Symposium: Research findings from the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada Contributions Program. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: University of Ottawa, Law & Technology Group.
46.
Sallot, J. (2007, February 28). Terror vote fails as Dion reigns in liberals. The Globe and Mail, p. A1.
47.
Senate of Canada. (2001, March 13). Bill S-21:An act to guarantee the human right to privacy. First reading. The Honourable Senator Sheila Finestone, P.C. Retrieved October 5, 2007, from http://192.197.82.11/LEGISINFO/index.asp?Language=E&Session=9&query=2828&List=toc
48.
Steeves, V. (2006). Privacy and new media. In P. Attallah & L. R. Shade (Eds.), Mediascapes: New patterns in Canadian communication (2nd ed., pp. 250-265). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Thomson Nelson.
49.
Steinhardt, B. (2003). Does privacy have a future after 9/11?Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 11(1), 32-36.
50.
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. (2006 ). Privacy matters: The federal strategy to address concerns about the USA PATRIOT act and transborder data flows. Retrieved October 20, 2007, from http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pubs_pol/gospubs/TBM_128/pm-prp/pm-prp_e.pdf
51.
Canadian boys with same name land on `no fly' list. (2007, June 30). CBC News Online. Retrieved October 20, 2007, from http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/06/29/nofly-kids.html
52.
United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. Retrieved October 20, 2007, from http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html
53.
United States Federal Trade Commission. (n.d.). Guide to COPPA. Retrieved October 20, 2007, from http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/online/kidsprivacy.htm
54.
Webb, M. (2007). Illusions of security: Global surveillance and democracy in the post-9/11 world. San Francisco: City Lights.
