Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Contemporary privacy debates regarding new technologies often define privacy in terms of control over personal information such that the privacy “problem” is a lack of control and the privacy “solution” is increased control. This article questions the control-paradigm by pointing to its parallels with earlier debates in the philosophy of technology regarding technology that was out-of-control. What first-generation philosophers of technology understood was that at the root of the questioning of technology lay a need to question the modern self itself. Legal debates regarding privacy renew the importance of this question, for the control-paradigm perpetuates a view of the self as an individual with an inner core transparent to itself on solitary introspection and revealed to others through self-conscious acts of disclosure. Increasingly, this model fails to account for the challenges raised by new technologies and calls for rethinking.

Keywords

privacy theory privacy law philosophy of technology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achterhuis, H. (Ed.). (2001). American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Aubry v. Éditions Vice-Versa, 1 SCR 591 (1998).

Austin, L.M. ( 2003). Privacy and the question of technology. Law and Philosophy, 22, 119-166.

Austin, L.M. ( 2006a). Is consent the foundation of fair information practices? Canada’s experience under PIPEDA. University of Toronto Law Journal, 56, 181.

Austin, L.M. ( 2006b). Reviewing PIPEDA: Control, privacy and the limits of fair information practices. Canadian Business Law Journal , 44, 21.

Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic. ( 2008). PIPEDA complaint: Facebook. Retrieved November 2, 2009, from http://www.cippic.ca/uploads/CIPPICFacebookComplaint_29May08.pdf

Ellul, J. ( 1964). The technological society. New York : Vintage Books.

Ellul, J. ( 1990). The technological bluff. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.

Feenberg, A. ( 1999). Questioning technology. London: Routledge.

10.

Goffman, E. ( 1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.

11.

Heidegger, M. ( 1993). The question concerning technology. In D. F. Krell (Ed.), Martin Heidegger: Basic writings (2nd rev. ed.). New York: HarperCollins. (Original work published 1954) pp. 307-342.

12.

Horkheimer, M. , & Adorno, T. ( 1999). Dialectic of enlightenment. New York : Continuum. (Original work published 1944)

13.

Ihde, D. ( 1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.

14.

Ihde, D. ( 1993). Philosophy of technology: An introduction. New York: Paragon House.

15.

Marcel, G. ( 2006). Man against mass society (G. S. Fraser, Trans.). Chicago: Henry Regnery Company. (Original work published 1962)

16.

People against the new Terms of Service. (2009). Retrieved November 2, 2009, from http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=77069107432

17.

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, S.C. 2000, c . 5.

18.

R. v. Plant, 3 SCR 281 (1993).

19.

Raphael, J.R. ( 2009, February 18). Facebook’s privacy flap: What really went down, and what’s next. PC World. Retrieved November 2, 2009, from http://www.pcworld.com/article/159743/facebooks_privacy_flap_what_really_went_down_and_whats_next.html

20.

Westin, A. ( 1967). Privacy and freedom. New York: Athaneum.

21.

Winner, L. ( 2003). Social constructivism: Opening the black box and finding it empty. In R. C. Scharff & V. Dusek (Eds.), Philosophy of technology: The technological condition, an anthology (pp. 233-243). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Control Yourself,or at Least Your Core Self

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References