The goal of this project is to identify guidelines for privacy policies that children and teens can accurately interpret with relative ease. A three-pronged strategy was used to achieve this goal. First, an analysis of the relevant literature on reading was undertaken to identify the document features that affect comprehension. Second, focus groups were conducted to examine their experience and practices in the interpretation of privacy policies found on sites that have been identified as favorite kids’ sites. Based on the results of the literature review and focus groups, a set of potential guidelines were identified. Finally, the efficacy of these guidelines was tested in the final phase of the research project. The result of this work is a set of 14 guidelines for the drafting of privacy policies that make a difference, by improving the comprehensibility of privacy policies encountered by Canadian children and teens as they surf the Net.
Antón, A.I., Earp, J.B., Bolchini, D., He, Q., Jensen, C., & Stufflebeam, W. (2003). The lack of clarity in financial privacy policies and the need for standardization (Tech. Rep. No. 2003-14). Raleigh: North Carolina State University.
2.
Baumann, J.F. ( 1986). Effect of rewritten content textbook passages on middle grade students. Journal of Reading Behavior, 18(1), 1-21.
3.
Bernard, M.L., Chaparro, B.S., Mills, M.M., & Halcomb, C.G. ( 2002). Examining children’s reading performance and preference for different computer-displayed text. Behaviour & Information Technology, 21, 87-96.
4.
Bostian, L.R. ( 1983). How active, passive and nominal styles affect readability of science writing. Journalism Quarterly, 60, 635-640.
5.
Britt, M.A., Rouet, J.F., & Perfetti, C.A. (1996). Using hypertext to study and reason about historical evidence. In J. F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 43-72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Brown, A.L., & Day, J.D. ( 1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour , 22, 1-14.
7.
Burkell, J., & Steeves, V. ( 2005, November). Children and online privacy: Privacy policies on kids’ favourite web sites. Paper presented at the 6th Annual Privacy and Security Workshop on Privacy and Security: Disclosure , University of Toronto, Ontario , Canada.
8.
Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic. ( 2006). Com pliance with Canadian data protection laws: Are retailers mea suring up? Retrieved February 16, 2010, from http://www.idtrail.org/files/PIPEDAComplianceReport.pdf
9.
Carey, R., & Burkell, J. ( 2009). A heuristics approach to understanding privacy-protecting behaviors in digital social environments. In I. Kerr, V. Steeves, & C. Lucock (Eds.), Lessons from the identity trail (pp. 65-82). London: Oxford University Press.
10.
Charrow, V. ( 1988). Readability vs. comprehensibility: A case study in improving a real document. In A. Davison & G. M. Green (Eds.), Linguistic complexity and text comprehension: Readability issues reconsidered (pp. 85-102). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Clarke, J. ( 2002). Building accessible web sites. Boston : New Riders.
12.
Creaghead, N.A., & Donnelly, K.G. (1982). Comprehension of superordinate and subordinate information by good and poor readers. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 13, 177-186.
13.
Eveland, W.P., & Dunwoody, S. ( 2001). User control and structural isomorphism or disorientation and cognitive load? Learning from the Web versus print. Communication Research, 28(1), 48-78.
14.
Felker, D.F., Pickering, F., Charrow, V., Holland, V.M., & Redish, J. ( 1981). Guidelines for document designers. Washington, DC: American Institute for Research.
Forster, K.L., & Ryder, L.A. ( 1971). Perceiving the structure and meaning of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 285-296.
17.
Fry, E.B. ( 1988). Writeability: The principles of writing for increased comprehension. In B. L. Zakaluk & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Readability: Its past, present and future (pp. 77-95). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
18.
Fuqua, R.W., & Phye, G.D. ( 1978). The effects of physical structure and semantic organization on the recall of prose. Contemporary Educational Psychology , 3, 105-107.
19.
Gauthier, M., & Evetts, J. ( 2002). Assessing the complexity of lit eracy tasks: A guide to analysis with examples and exercises. Retrieved February 16, 2010, from http://www.nald.ca/library/research/plain2/litasks/index.htm
20.
Gilutz, S., & Nielsen, J. ( 2002). Usability of websites for children: Seventy design guidelines . Fremont, CA: Nielsen Norman Group . Glynn, S.M., & DiVesta , F.J. (1979). Control of prose processing via instructional and typographical cues. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 595-603.
21.
Goldman, S.R., & Rakestraw, J.A. , Jr. (2000). Structural aspects of constructing meaning from texts. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 311-336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
Goldman, S.R., & Saul, E.U. ( 1990). Flexibility in text processing: A strategy competition model. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 181-219.
23.
Goldman, S.R., Saul, E.U., & Cote, N. ( 1995). Paragraphing, reader and task effects on discourse comprehension . Discourse Processes, 20, 273-305.
24.
Hall, R.H., & Hanna, P. ( 2004). The impact of web page text-background colour combinations on readability, retention, aesthetics and behavioural intention. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23, 183-195.
25.
Haviland, S., & Clark, H.H. ( 1974). What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior , 13, 512-521.
26.
Hill, A.L., & Scharff, L.F.V. (1999). Readability of computer displays as a function of colour, saturation, and background texture. Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, 4, 123-130.
27.
Hudson, P.T.W., & Bergman, M.W. ( 1985). Lexical knowledge in word recognition: Word length and word frequency in naming and lexical decision tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(1), 46-58.
28.
Jarvella, R.J., & Herman, S.J. ( 1972). Clause structure of sentences and speech processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 381-384.
29.
Jensen, C., & Potts, C. ( 2004, April). Privacy policies as decision making tools: A usability evaluation of online privacy notices. Paper presented at the proceedings of ACM CHI 2004 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria.
30.
Jones, S. ( 1966). The effect of a negative qualifier in an instruction . Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 497-501.
31.
Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1976). The relation between comprehending and remembering some complex sentences. Memory & Cognition , 4, 318-322.
32.
Kimble, J. ( 2002). The elements of plain language. Retrieved February 16, 2010, from http://www.plainlanguage.gov/whatisPL/definitions/Kimble.cfm
33.
Kimble, J. ( 2006). Lifting the fog of legalese. Essays on plain lan guage. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
34.
Kools, M., Ruiter, A.C., van de Wiel, M.W.J., & Kok, G. ( 2004). Increasing readers’ comprehension of health education brochures: A qualitative study into how professional writers make texts coherent . Health Education & Behavior, 31, 720-740.
35.
Larkin, W., & Burns, D. ( 1977). Sentence comprehension and memory for embedded structure . Memory & Cognition, 5, 17-22.
36.
Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. ( 2003). UK children go online: Lis tening to young people’s experiences. London: Economic and Social Research Council.
37.
Livingstone, A., & Bober, M. ( 2004). UK children go online: Sur veying the experiences of young people and their parents. London: Economic and Social Research Council.
38.
Lorch, R.F., & Lorch, E.P. ( 1986). On-line processing of summary and importance signals in reading. Discourse Processes, 9, 489-496.
39.
MacGregor, S.K., & Lou, Y. ( 2004-2005). Web-based learning: How task scaffolding and web site design support knowledge acquisition. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37, 161-175.
40.
Maes, A., van Geel, A., & Cozijn, R. ( 2006). Signposts on the digital highway. The effect of semantic and pragmatic hyperlink previews. Interacting With Computers , 18, 265-282.
41.
Mandler, G. ( 1970). Words, lists, and categories: An experimental view of organized memory. In J. L. Cowan (Ed.), Studies in thought and language (pp. 42-58). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
42.
McKoon, G. ( 1977). Organization and information in text memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 246-260.
43.
Media Awareness Network. (2001). Young Canadians in a wired world: The students’ view. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.
44.
Media Awareness Network. (2003). Young Canadians in a wired world-Phase II: Focus groups. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.
45.
Millis, K.K., & Just, M.A. ( 1994). The influence of connectives on sentence comprehension . Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 128-147.
46.
Nielsen, J. ( 2000). Designing web usability. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders.
47.
Potelle, H., & Rouet, J.-F. ( 2003). Effects of content representation and readers’ prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 327-345.
48.
Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. ( 1998). The design diary: A tool to support students in learning science by design. In A. Bruckman, M. Guzdial, J. L. Kolodner , & A. Ram (Eds.), Proceedings of ICLS 98 (pp. 35-41). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
49.
Salmeron, L., Cañas, J.J., Kintsch, W., & Fajardo, I. ( 2005). Reading strategies and hypertext comprehension. Discourse Processes, 40, 171-191.
50.
Shieh, K., & Lin, C. ( 2000). Effects of screen type, ambient illumination, and color combination on VDT visual performance and subjective preference. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 26, 527-536.
51.
Schriver, K.A. ( 1997). Dynamics in document design. New York : John Wiley.
52.
Schultz, L.D., & Spyridakis, J.H. (2004). The effect of heading frequency on comprehension of online information. Technical Communication , 51, 504-516.
53.
Spears, G., Seydegart, K., & Zulinov, P. ( 2005). Young Canadians in a wired world-Phase II: Student survey . Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Media Awareness Network.
54.
Spyridakis, J.H., & Standal, T.C. ( 1987). Signals in expository prose: Effects on reading comprehension . Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 285-198.
55.
Spyridakis, J.H., & Wenger, M.J. ( 1992). Writing for human performance: Relating reading research to document design. Technical Communication, 39, 202-213.
56.
Steeves, V. ( 2005). Young Canadians in a wired world-Phase II: Trends and recommendations. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Media Awareness Network. Retrieved February 16, 2010, from http://www.media-awareness.ca/english/research/YCWW/phaseII/trends_recommendations.cfm
57.
Tinker, M.A. ( 1963). Legibility of print. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
58.
Trollip, S.R., & Sales, G. ( 1986). Readability of computer-generated fill-justified text . Human Factors: Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 28, 159-163.
59.
Tullis, T.S. ( 1988). Screen design. In M. Helander (Ed.), Hand book of human computer interaction (pp. 503-532). Amsterdam: Elsevier .
60.
Turow, J. ( 2001). Privacy policies on children’s websites: Do they play by the rules?Philadelphia: Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania.
61.
Turow, J., & Nir, L. ( 2000). The Internet and the family: The view from parents, the view from kids. Philadelphia: Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania.
62.
Waltz, J. ( 2001). Reading hypertext: Lower level processes. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 475-494.
63.
Wang, A., Fang, J., & Chen, C. ( 2003). Effects of VDT leading-display design on visual performance of users in handling static and dynamic display information dual-tasks. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 32, 93-104.
64.
Williams, T.R. ( 2000). Guidelines for designing and evaluating the display of information on the web. Technical Communication, 47, 383-397.
65.
Williams, T.R., & Spyridakis, J.H. (1992). Visual discriminality of headings in text. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication , 35(2), 64-70.
66.
Wright, P., & Reid, F. ( 1973). Written information: Some alternatives to prose for expressing the outcomes of complex contingencies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 160-166.
