Manipulation of operant responding for an ethanol-paired conditioned stimulus in the rat by pharmacological alteration of the serotonergic system

Abstract

It is becoming increasingly clear that environmental stimuli play a critical role in the maintenance of drug taking behaviour. This has led to investigations into the neural mechanisms by which environmental stimuli can come to control behaviour using paradigms such as conditioned reinforcement. The majority of this work has involved the use of food-paired conditioned stimulus rodent paradigms. Relatively few studies have attempted to investigate the neuropharmacology of behaviour maintained by presentation of a stimulus paired with ethanol drinking. Several lines of research support an important role for brain serotonin (5-HT) neurotransmitter systems in the control of alcohol drinking behaviour. The aim of the present study was, initially, to establish a procedure in which rats respond for an ethanol-paired conditioned stimulus, and second, to study the effects of a range of serotonergic compounds previously shown to be effective in reducing oral ethanol self-administration, on responding for this conditioned stimulus. Results showed that the 5-HT releaser d-fenfluramine, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine, the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-hydroxy-2[di-n-propylamino]tetralin, the partial 5-HT1A receptor agonist buspirone, and the 5-HT1B/5-HT2C receptor agonist 1-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine, but not the 5-HT2A/5-HT2C receptor agonist 1-(2, 5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenylaminopropane)-2, selectively reduced responding on a lever leading to presentation of an ethanol paired conditioned stimulus. In addition the non-specific D1/D2 dopamine receptor antagonist haloperidol was active in this paradigm. Results are consistent with involvement of the dopaminergic and 5-HT systems, in particular activation of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor subtypes, in mediation of the conditioned or secondary reinforcing properties of ethanol.

Keywords

5-HT agonists conditioned reinforcer dopamine antagonist ethanol operant responding rat 5-HT receptors

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barrett J E (1985) Modification of the behavioural effects of drugs by environmental variables. Neurol. Neurobiol, 13: Behavioral pharmacology: the current status, pp. 7–22. Alan R. Liss, Inc, New York

Baum W M (1993) Performances on ratio and interval schedules of reinforcement: data and theory. J Exp Anal Behav 59: 245–264

Beninger R J (1989) Receptor subtype-specific dopaminergic agents and conditioned behaviour. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 13: 113–122

Cador M , Taylor J R , Robbins T W (1991) Potentiation of the effects of reward-related stimuli by dopaminergic dependent mechanisms in the nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology 104: 377–385

Fletcher P J (1995) Effects of d-fenfluramine and metergoline on responding for conditioned reward and the response potentiating effect of nucleus accumbens d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology 118: 155–163

Grant K A , Colombo G (1993) Substitution of the 5-HT1 agonist trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine (TFMPP) for the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol: effect of training dose. Psychopharmacology 113: 26–30

Hyytiä P , Sinclair J D (1991) Stimulus-controlled responding for ethanol in AA and Wistar rats. Alcohol 8: 229–234

Jentsch J D , Taylor J R (1999) Impulsivity resulting from frontostriatal dysfunction in drug abuse: implications for the control of behaviour by reward-related stimuli. Psychopharmacology 146: 373–390

Kelley A E , Delfs M M (1991) Dopamine and conditioned reinforcement II Contrasting effects of amphetamine microinjection into the nucleus accumbens with peptide microinjection into the ventral tegmental area. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 103: 197–203

10.

LeMarquand D , Pihl RO , Benkelfat, C (1994) Serotonin and alcohol intake, abuse and dependence: findings of animal studies. Biol Psychiatry 36: 395–421

11.

Levine D G (1974) Needle freaks: compulsive self-injections by drug users. Am J Psychiatry 131: 297–300

12.

Markou A , Weiss F , Gold L H , Caine S B , Schulties G , Koob G F (1993) Animal models of drug craving. Psychopharmacology 112: 163–182

13.

Maurel S , Schreiber R , De Vry J (1998) Role of 5-HT1B, 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors in the generalisation of 5-HT receptor agonists to the ethanol cue in the rat. Behav Pharmacol 9: 337–343

14.

Pettinati H M (1996) Use of serotonin selective pharmacotherapy in the treatment of alcohol dependence. Alcoholism: Clin Exp Res 20: 23A–29A

15.

Roberts DCS , Richardson N R (1992) Self-administration of psychomotor stimulants using progressive ration schedules of reinforcement. In Boulton A , Baker G , Wu P H (eds), Neuromethods, 24: animal models of drug addiction, pp. 223–269. The Humana Press Inc, Totowa, NJ

16.

Robinson T E , Berridge K C (1993) The neural basis of craving: an incentive-sensitisation theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev 18: 247–291

17.

Sellers E M , Higgins G A , Sobell M B (1992) 5-HT and alcohol abuse. TIPS 13: 69–75

18.

Signs S A , Schechter M D (1988) The role of dopamine and serotonin receptors in mediation of the ethanol interoceptive cue. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 30: 55–64

19.

Slawecki C J , Samson H H , Chapell A (1997) Intranucleus accumbens amphetamine infusions enhance responding maintained by a stimulus complex paired with oral ethanol self-administration. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 58: 1065–1073

20.

Smith S G , Werner T E , Davis W M (1977) Alcohol-associated conditioned reinforcement. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 53: 223–226

21.

Smith J K , Neill J C , Costall B (1997) Bi-directional effects of dopamine D2 receptor antagonists on responding for a conditioned reinforcer. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 57: 843–849

22.

Spealman R D (1985) Environmental factors determining the control of behaviour by drugs. Behavioral pharmacology: the current status, pp. 23–38. Alan R. Liss, Inc, New York

23.

Spealman R D , Goldberg S R (1978) Drug self-administration by laboratory animals: control by schedules of reinforcement. Ann. Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 18: 313–339

24.

Spears D J , Katz J L (1991). Cocaine and food as reinforcers: Effects of reinforcer magnitude and response requirement under second-order fixed ratio and progressive ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav 56: 261–275

25.

Szeliga K T , Grant K A (1998) Analysis of the 5-HT2 receptor ligands dimethoxy-4-indophenyl-2-aminopropane and ketanserin in ethanol discriminations. Alcoholism: Clin Exp Res 22: 646–651

26.

Taylor J R , Robbins T W (1984) Enhanced behavioural control by conditioned reinforcers following microinjections of d-amphetamine into the nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology 84: 405–412

27.

Taylor J R , Robbins T W (1986) 6-Hydroxydopamine lesions of the nucleus accumbens but not the caudate nucleus, attenuate enhanced responding with reward-related stimuli produced by intra-accumbens d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology 90: 390–397

28.

Wilson A W , Neill J C , Costall B (1996) The effect of serotonergic agonists on the discriminative stimulus cue produced by ethanol in the rat. Br J Pharmacol 119: 250P-250P

29.

Wilson A W , Neill J C , Costall B (1997) Strain differences in ethanol preference and reinforced behaviour: a comparison of two-bottle choice and operant self-administration paradigms. Behav Pharmacol 8: 37–46

30.

Wilson A W , Neill J C , Costall B (1998). An investigation into the effects of 5-HT agonists and receptor antagonists on ethanol self-administration in the rat. Alcohol 16: 249–270

31.

Winer B J (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (student edn). McGraw-Hill Inc, London