Place of death of cancer patients in Israel: the experience of a 'home-care programme'

Abstract

This is an analysis of the eventual place of death of 58 patients with advanced cancer, all of whom died over the course of one year following treatment at home by a home-care programme in an Israeli community. Seventeen (29%) died in their homes, 23 (40%) died in general hospitals and 18 (31 %) died in chronic hospitals. The correlation between place of death and the following factors was examined: the relationship between each patient and his primary care person (PCP), length of treatment by the home-care programme, age, sex, ethnic origin, degree of mobility at commencement of home care and principal symptoms. Only the degree of family relationship of the PCP showed significant correlation with the actual place of death of patients, whether at home or in hospital (p=0.03). None of the patients with a PCP of second-degree relationship died at home. The authors conclude that when the PCP is closely related to the patient and is accompanied by a home-care team trained to offer comprehensive assistance, two-thirds of the patients in an Israeli community could be spared chronic hospitalization and almost half of these could also eventually die at home.

Keywords

death health services (Israel)home care services terminal care

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kalish RA , Reynolds DK Death and ethnicity: psychocultural study. University of Southern California Press, 1976.

Ford G. Terminal care in the National Health Service. In: Saunders C ed, The management of terminal malignant disease, London: Edward Arnold, 1984: 202-17.

Fulton R. , Markusen E. , Owen G. , Schrieber JL Death and dying: challenge and change. San Francisco: Boyd and Fraser, 1981.

Charmaz K. The social process of dying, In: The social reality of death , Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1980.

Saunders C. The philosophy of terminal care. In: Saunders C ed, The management of terminal malignant disease, London: Edward Arnold, 1984: 232-41.

Clench P. The development of home care services in the UK. In: Spilling R ed, Terminal care at home, Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, 1986: 19-33.

Buckingham RW The complete hospice guide. New York, Harper & Row, 1983.

Alkalay L. , Niazov R. , Wallach N. The management of terminal cancer patients at home. Family Physician 1983; 11: 203-208.

Yoseph A. , Mor G. , Carel RS Assessment of an urban home care unit. Harefuah 1985; 108: 532-36.

10.

Waller A. , Adonski A. , Rabinowitz M. Hospice care: first two years of experience. Harefuah 1987; 112: 79-80.

11.

Gallinsky D. , Schneiderman K. , Lowenthal MN A home care unit: geriatrically oriented and hospital-based with the active involvement of the family physician. Isr J Med Sci 1983; 19: 841-44.

12.

Aiken LH Evaluation research and public policy: lessons from the National Hospice Study (Editorial). J Chron Dis 1986; 39: 1-4.

13.

Mor V. , Hiris J. Determinants of site of death among hospice cancer patients. J Health Soc Behav 1983; 24: 375-85.

14.

Bass DM , Pestello FP , Garland TN

Experiences with home-hospice care: determinants of place of death. Death

Education 1984; 8: 199-222.

15.

Greer DS , Mor V. , Morris JN et al. An alternative in terminal care: results of the National Hospice Study. J Chron Dis 1986; 39: 9-26.

16.

Copperman H. Domiciliary hospice care. In: Saunders C ed, The management of terminal malignant disease, London: Edward Arnold, 1984: 176-86.

17.

Krant MJ Sounding board: the hospice movement. N Engl J Med 1978; 299: 546-49.

18.

Kalish RA Death, grief and caring relationships, second edition, Monterey: Brooks, Cole, 1985.

19.

Kane RL , Wales J. , Bernstein L. , Leibowitz A. , Kaplan S. A randomized controlled trial of