Congruence between preferred and actual place of care and death among Danish cancer patients

Abstract

Background:

Meeting patient’s preferences is an important outcome in palliative care. No Scandinavian study has reported systematically collected preferences from patients regarding place of care (POC) and place of death (POD). The extent of possible incongruence between patients’ preferences and reality remains unknown.

Aim:

The aim of this study was to describe patients’ preferred POC and POD and changes in preferences over time and to evaluate congruence between preferences and reality. Furthermore, the aim was to search for predictive factors regarding patients’ wishes and fulfilment of these.

Method:

This is a prospective interview and questionnaire study.

Setting/participants:

The study was conducted in the former Aarhus County, Denmark and 96 end-stage cancer patients participated.

Results:

Of the patients, who stated a preference, 84% preferred home care and 71% preferred home death. A positive association between living with a partner and both wishing for home care and home death was observed (prevalence ratio (PR): 1.66 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.07, 2.58), p = 0.02 and PR: 2.33 (95% CI: 1.14, 4.77), p = 0.02, respectively).

Marked changes in preferences were observed. Overall, preferences were met for approximately half of the patients, although kappa values were low (κ=0.132 for POC and κ=0.034 for POD).We found a significant association between being cared for in the preferred place and having contact with a palliative care team (PR: 2.01 (95% CI: 1.02, 3.98), p = 0.045).

Conclusion:

Regular discussions with patients on this subject are needed. Social and professional support is of importance in meeting patients’ preferences. Larger scaled studies and research focusing on meeting patients’ preferences are needed.

Keywords

Palliative care patient care planning terminal care death cancer home care services

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Higginson

Sen-Gupta

. Place of care in advanced cancer: a qualitative systematic literature review of patient preferences. J Palliat Med 2000; 3: 287–300.

Bell

Somogyi-Zalud

Masaki

. Methodological review: measured and reported congruence between preferred and actual place of death. Palliat Med 2009; 23: 482–490.

Davies

Higginson

. Palliative care: the solid facts. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, http://www.euro.who.int/document/E82931.pdf (2004, accessed 9 October 2010).

Danish National Board of Health (Sundhedsstyrelsen). Dødsårsagsregisteret 2008. Nye tal fra Sundhedsstyrelsen [The Danish National Register of Causes of Death 2008]. 13th ed. Copenhagen: Danish National Board of Health, 2009 (in Danish). http://www.sst.dk/publ/Publ2009/DOKU/nye_tal/doedsaarsagsreg_2008.pdf (2009, accessed October 9 2010).

Danish National Board of Health (Sundhedsstyrelsen). Dødsårsagsregisteret 2005 [Causes of Death in Denmark 2005], http://www.sst.dk/Planlaegning%20og%20kvalitet/Smertelindring/Tal_fakta.aspx (2007, accessed 9 October 2010) (in Danish).

Cantwell

Turco

Brenneis

. Predictors of home death in palliative care cancer patients. J Palliat Care 2000; 16: 23–28.

Hinton

. Which patients with terminal cancer are admitted from home care? Palliat Med 1994; 8: 197–210.

McCall

Rice

. What influences decisions around the place of care for terminally ill cancer patients? Int J Palliat Nurs 2005; 11: 541–547.

Agar

Currow

Shelby-James

. Preference for place of care and place of death in palliative care: are these different questions? Palliat Med 2008; 22: 787–795.

10.

Bell

Somogyi-Zalud

Masaki

. Factors associated with congruence between preferred and actual place of death. J Pain Symptom Manag 2010; 39: 591–604.

11.

Groenvold

Petersen

Aaronson

. The development of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL: a shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care. Eur J Cancer 2006; 42: 55–64.

12.

Neergaard

. Palliative home care for cancer patients in Denmark – with a particular focus on the primary care sector, GP’s and community nurses. Aarhus: Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Research Unit and Department of General Practice, 2009.

13.

Central Office of Civil Registration. The centralised civil register, http://cpr.dk/cpr/site.aspx?p=34.2010 (2010, accessed October 9 2010).

14.

Sundgren

Nordbotten

. Review of Statistics Denmark. 2003. http://www.dst.dk/en/OmDS/~/media/D0FDDA38949B4F20ADB4327489EE249D.pdf (2003, accessed October 9 2010).

15.

School of Public Health. Research Center for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, http://cap.au.dk/en/ (2010, accessed 9 October 2010).

16.

Danish National Board of Health (Sundhedsstyrelsen). Det moderniserede Cancerregister – metode og kvalitet [The modernised cancer registry – method and quality]. Copenhagen: Danish National Board of Health, 2009 (in Danish).

17.

Olivarius

Hollnagel

Krasnik

. The Danish National Health Service Register. A tool for primary health care research. Dan Med Bull 1997; 44: 449–453.

18.

Nickelsen

. Data validity and coverage in the Danish National Health Registry. A literature review. Ugeskr Laeger 2001; 164: 33–37.

19.

Landis

Koch

. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–174.

20.

Gerstman

. Basic biostatistics: statistics for public health practice. 1st ed. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett, 2008.

21.

Statacorp

. Stata Statistical Software: Release 11.0. College Station, TX: Statacorp LP, 2009.

22.

Beccaro

Costantini

Giorgi

. Actual and preferred place of death of cancer patients. Results from the Italian survey of the dying of cancer (ISDOC). J Epidemiol Commun H 2006; 60: 412–416.

23.

Thomas

Morris

Clark

. Place of death: preferences among cancer patients and their carers. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58: 2431–2444.

24.

Meeussen

Van den Block

Bossuyt

. GPs’ awareness of patients’ preference for place of death. Br J Gen Pract 2009; 59: 665–670.

25.

Shega

Hougham

Stocking

. Patients dying with dementia: experience at the end of life and impact of hospice care. J Pain Symptom Manag 2008; 35: 499–507.

26.

Tang

Mccorkle

. Determinants of congruence between the preferred and actual place of death for terminally ill cancer patients. J Palliat Care 2003; 19: 230–237.