Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Internationally the number of young adults living with life-limiting conditions is increasing. Holistic concerns of this population have not been reviewed. It is unclear whether patient reported outcome measures used in this population capture their symptoms and concerns.

Aims:

To: (1) identify and synthesise the symptoms and concerns of young adults (aged 18–39) living with life-limiting conditions; (2) evaluate the content validity of patient reported outcome measures used in this population.

Design:

A mixed-methods systematic review and framework synthesis. PROSPERO ID CRD42024565986.

Data sources:

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, PsycINFO, AMED from inception to 04/07/24.

Results:

A total of 16552 articles identified, 100 included. Among these, 34 studies addressed aim 1. Of these 18 were qualitative, 12 mixed methods, 3 quantitative, and 1 used quantitative and qualitative methodologies. 66 quantitative studies addressed aim 2. They used 65 patient reported outcome measures, and 13 questionnaires to capture pre-defined symptoms and concerns. Symptoms and concerns included: physical (fertility and reproductive health, sexual concerns), psychological (embarrassment, suicidal thoughts and body image), social (loss of independence, balancing roles as a parent, missing out on events), spiritual concerns (uncertain future, life on hold), and quality of healthcare concerns (age-specific caring environments, role of partners as caregivers, involvement in decisions). Of the patient reported outcome measures identified as used with young adults, few were holistic.

Conclusion:

This review highlights the need for holistic, age-specific person-centred outcome measures for young adults living with life-limiting conditions. We present a conceptual framework of symptoms and concerns that can be used to develop or modify existing patient reported outcome measures for this population.

Keywords

young adult palliative care symptom concern patient reported outcome measure content validity

What is already known about this topic?

Young adults living with life-limiting conditions are a heterogeneous population that is increasing in size and complexity.

Young adulthood is a time of physical, emotional, social and cognitive development. A greater understanding of the symptoms and concerns of young adults with life-limiting conditions is critical to deliver high quality care.

The content validity of existing Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to assess the symptoms and concerns of young adults remains unclear.

What this paper adds

This review synthesises evidence from 100 primary studies to identify the symptoms and concerns experienced by young adults (aged 18–39) living with a range of life-limiting conditions.

Symptoms and concerns experienced by young adults include: physical (fertility and reproductive health, sexual concerns), psychological (embarrassment and shame, changes to body image), social (loss of independence and autonomy) and spiritual (life being on hold).

This review demonstrates that existing patient reported outcome measures do not encompass the symptom and concern domains important to young adults identified in this review.

Implications for practice, theory or policy

There is a need for further research exploring the symptoms and concerns of young adults living with life-limiting conditions. There is an absence of research with young adults experiencing significant developmental delays.

This review provides a conceptual framework of symptoms and concerns that can be used to develop or modify existing PROMs for young adults living with life-limiting conditions.

Background

The number of young adults living with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions is increasing.¹ Life-limiting conditions are defined as ‘individuals living with a condition for which there is no reasonable hope of cure and will cause them to die prematurely’.² Life-threatening conditions are ‘those for which curative treatment may be feasible but can fail, for example, cancer’.³ - Within the literature there is no consensus on the definition of ‘young adult’. The definition varies between countries and diagnoses.⁴ In most countries, it is widely accepted that a person becomes an adult at the age of 18. In North America, young adults with cancer are defined by the National Cancer Institute as those aged 15–39 years, a definition derived from the biological characteristics of the types of cancer affecting this age group.⁴

The population of young adults living with life-limiting conditions is heterogeneous, including nearly 400 individual diagnoses.^5,6 The population comprises two main groups: (1) young adults diagnosed with a life-limiting condition in childhood who survive into young adulthood, where conditions such as congenital and neurological conditions are most prevalent,^5,7 and (2) young adults diagnosed in young adulthood with conditions such as cancer who do not experience developmental delays. Internationally, the number of young adults living with life-limiting conditions or complex care needs is increasing, but there is a lack of global epidemiological data.⁸ Meeting the concerns of a population that is increasing in size and complexity is challenging.⁹

Young adults living with life-limiting conditions have unique concerns compared to children and adults receiving palliative and end of life care.¹⁰ They are living with a life-limiting condition at an age of physical, emotional, social and cognitive development. Their concerns may be broader than health, encompassing social concerns such as education and employment.^11,12 Whilst living with their diagnosis they are often managing their age-specific roles and responsibilities and coping with their ‘truncated life trajectories’ which often affect their aspirations and life goals.^13,14

A greater understanding of the symptoms and concerns of the young adult population is critical to deliver high quality care. Previous reviews of the symptoms and concerns of young adults living with life-limiting conditions have focussed on: cancer survivors^15,16; young adults receiving a palliative care intervention¹¹; psychosocial concerns¹⁷; or have assessed the symptoms and concerns of young adults in combination with younger age groups (aged 0–25).^18–20 To the best of our knowledge, the holistic concerns of young adults living with life-limiting conditions, irrespective of diagnoses, have not been reviewed.

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standardised questionnaires that can be used to assess patients’ symptoms, quality of life and wellbeing.¹⁹ Routine use of PROMs in clinical care may facilitate the identification of patient’s concerns, ‘enhance patient/family communication, quality management, evaluation of treatments, and may improve patient outcomes’.²¹

A systematic review of existing PROMs developed, adapted, and validated to assess the health outcomes of young adults (aged 18–25) living with life-limiting conditions found a lack of multi-dimensional PROMs for young adults living with life-limiting conditions, especially for young adults with health conditions other than cancer.²² The review also found limited evidence of their psychometric properties, particularly content validity. Further, most of the identified PROMs had been developed without direct input from patients, resulting in questions about their relevance and appropriateness. It therefore remains unclear whether the PROMs used in this population capture outcomes that are important to young adults living with life-limiting conditions.

This systematic review has two parts, corresponding to its two aims. The aims are to: (1) identify and synthesise the symptoms and concerns of young adults (aged 18–39) living with life-limiting conditions; and (2) to evaluate the content validity of PROMs used in this population.

Methods

Design

The research paradigm underpinning this mixed-methods systematic review is pragmatism.^23,24 We placed primary importance on the research question as opposed to the methods used, or the paradigms underlying the methods.^25–28 Pragmatism represents the different paradigms as ‘two sides of the same coin’. To answer the research questions in our review, it was necessary to synthesise the findings from both quantitative and qualitative studies. Quantitative studies provide information on the presence of symptoms and concerns in the population, while qualitative studies offer rich, contextualised understanding of individuals’ lived experiences. Rather than providing competing metaphysical traits, these aspects provide complementary perspectives²⁹ to understand the symptoms and concerns of this population. Thus, the use of mixed methods in this review provides a more complete picture than could be achieved by either a quantitative or qualitative approach alone.

This review was undertaken with a registered protocol (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024565986).

The review is reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines (Supplemental File 1).³⁰

Searches

We searched MEDLINE; EMBASE; CINAHL; PsycInfo; AMED via Ovid and Cochrane Library from inception to 04/07/2024. Searches were supplemented by hand-searching reference lists of systematic reviews and included articles.

Search strategy

The search was developed in MEDLINE using text words and subject headings with input and support from a librarian at King’s College London with expertise in systematic searches in medical research databases. The search strategy was adapted from previous systematic reviews.^18,31 The search strategy used MeSH terms and synonyms for the following search concepts: ‘young adult’, ‘life-limiting and life-threatening illness’ and ‘symptoms and concerns’ (Supplemental file 2). The search concepts for ‘young adults’ and ‘life-limiting and life-threatening illness’ were adapted from Knighting et al. ’s systematic review of respite care and short breaks for young adults aged 18–40 years with complex healthcare needs.³¹ The search concepts for ‘symptoms and concerns’ were adapted from Namisango et al’s systematic review on symptoms and concerns among children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions.¹⁸

No date or language limits were applied.

Eligibility criteria

Primary full-text peer-reviewed research studies, reporting the symptoms and concerns of young adults living with life-limiting conditions were included. Within the literature there is no consensus on the definition of ‘young adult’.⁴ In most countries, a person becomes an adult at the age of 18. Within cancer young adults include those aged 15–39 years.⁴ For this review, we define young adults as those aged 18–39.

Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Concept	Inclusion criteria	Exclusion criteria
Population	Study population that includes young adults (aged 18–39) living with a life-limiting condition (defined as individuals living with a condition for which there is no reasonable hope of cure and will cause them to die prematurely) and life-threatening condition (for which curative treatment may be feasible but can fail).^2,3 Studies of a mixed population will be considered if the mean/median age falls within the age range 18–39 years. If the mean/median age is not reported, studies of a mixed population will be considered for inclusion if the majority (⩾50%) of participants are aged 18–39 years. Studies of a mixed population will be included where the results are stratified by age.	Study population solely comprising children or adults (i.e., aged < 18 or ⩾40 years). Mean or median age is not reported or does not fall within the range of 18–39 years. Or the percentage of young adults aged 18–39 years is <50%. Or studies of a mixed population that do not stratify their results by age. Cancer survivors.
Context	Patients in all settings, in any country.	No study will be excluded based on the context.
Outcomes	Symptoms and concerns of young adults (aged 18–39 years) living with life-limiting conditions. Patient and proxy (e.g. family and healthcare professional) reported symptoms and concerns will be included.	Focus is on the concerns of the family only (e.g. excluding the young adult). Focus is on the concerns of the healthcare professional only (e.g. excluding the young adult).
Study type	Original, full-text peer-reviewed research studies of all types. There are no publication date limits.	Case studies, descriptive, theoretical, or clinical opinion articles, theses, books, editorials, conference abstracts and protocols. Non-peer reviewed papers. Scoping and systematic reviews (reference lists will be hand-searched). Full text not available.

Study selection

The search results were imported into Covidence (www.covidence.org). Covidence was used to manage the large number of references, remove duplicates and to manage the screening and selection of papers.

The first author (RLC) independently screened titles and abstracts against the inclusion criteria. A subset (20%) of papers were randomly selected for double-screening by a second reviewer (HS). There was 97% consensus on papers to be included, excluded and where there was uncertainty. Uncertainties and conflicts were resolved through discussion and consultation with LKF and KES.³²

At full text stage, RLC and HS independently screened all full texts against the inclusion criteria. Conflicts were resolved by discussion. There was 96% consensus on papers to be included, excluded and where there was uncertainty. Uncertainties and conflicts were resolved through discussion and consultation with LKF and KES. Reasons for exclusion at full text were recorded.³²

Data extraction and synthesis

RLC independently extracted data from each study and entered the data into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet using a piloted data extraction template. We extracted data on study characteristics, participant characteristics, symptoms and concerns (aim 1), the name of PROMs (where relevant) and the content of items included in each PROM (aim 2). This information was extracted to later map the symptoms and concerns onto existing PROMs. We extracted direct quotes on symptoms and concerns from qualitative studies where possible.

A subset (20%) of the extracted data was checked by a second reviewer (IT).

For aim 1 a convergent integrated approach was used to synthesise the symptoms and concerns identified by quantitative and qualitative papers.³³

In line with previous mixed-methods reviews,³² numerical and statistical findings from quantitative papers were converted into descriptive summaries. For qualitative data, ‘meaning units’ (comprehensible segments of text which contain one idea or piece of information) were identified and coded drawing on author-reported results and participant quotes.

The study findings were analysed and combined using a framework approach.^34–36 The World Health Organisation’s (WHO) definition of Palliative Care (physical, psychological, social and spiritual) was selected a priori as the framework.^35–37

Within excel, we labelled columns separately for each of the themes (physical, psychological, social and spiritual). We used these themes to deductively code the symptoms and concerns identified. We allowed for symptoms and concerns that did not fit into these four themes by creating a separate column labelled ‘other’.¹⁸ This approach allowed for the framework to be expanded and added to as needed.³⁸ This was completed by one reviewer (RLC) with regular input from the wider research team for sense checking and validation.

Data were then synthesised within the five themes.³⁹ Colour coding was used to group similar symptoms and concerns. To interrogate the data, we developed matrices to compare symptoms and concerns by method of data collection (e.g. clinical record reviews, interviews, blog posts etc.) and diagnostic groups. Data from quantitative and qualitative studies were grouped together into subthemes based on similarity in meaning. Reference was made to the classifications used in Namisango et al’s review of symptoms and concerns of children and young people living with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions,¹⁸ which used a similar method. Subthemes were verified with the primary data sources to ensure accuracy. Themes and subthemes were finalised through discussions as a research team.

Assessment of methodological quality

To assess the methodological quality of studies we used the Hawker et al. checklist for reviewing disparate data systematically.^40,41 The checklist comprises nine questions, assessing the abstract, background, methodology, sampling, data analysis, ethics, results, transferability and implications. Each element is rated on a four-point scale ranging from ‘good’ (4), ‘fair’ (3), ‘poor’ (2) to ‘very poor’ (1). The total score can range from 9 to 36. In line with previous reviews, studies scoring ⩽18 were rated as ‘poor’, 19–27 were rated as ‘fair’ and >27 as ‘good’.^41,42

One reviewer (RLC) independently assessed the methodological quality of included studies. A second reviewer (IT) independently quality appraised 20% of included papers. Scores were compared for consistency. Conflicts were resolved through discussion and consultation with the wider research team. A prior decision was made not to exclude studies for methodological reasons, instead we chose to report the quality assessments to describe the quality of research evidence in this area.^43,44

For aim 2, we constructed a table of patient reported outcome measures for young adults living with life-limiting conditions by extracting validated PROMs from Chambers et al. systematic review of PROMs developed, adapted or validated for the young adult population.²² This was supplemented by PROMs used by studies identified in this review.

The themes and subthemes of symptoms and concerns from aim 1 were used as analytical codes that were mapped onto the content of items from existing PROMs, to examine the degree of content coverage. We calculated the percentage of content coverage for each PROM at subdomain level. A high or strong match was identified when the content of the PROM represented a large majority (greater than 80%) of symptom and concern themes identified by this review.⁴⁵ A moderate match was identified when the content captured 30%–79%. A low or weak match was identified when the content captured less than 30%.⁴⁶

Results

After de-duplication, 16,552 titles and abstracts were screened, 622 full-text papers were reviewed. One hundred papers met the inclusion criteria (see Figure 1).

Figure 1.

PRISMA flow chart detailing search results and reasons for study exclusion.

Aim 1: Identification of symptoms and concerns

Study characteristics

Thirty-four studies were included in the first part of the study (aim 1; Table 2). The 34 papers were published between 1988 and 2024. Of these, 18 were qualitative, using methods such as focus groups, semi-structured interviews and content analysis of blog posts to identify symptoms and concerns. Twelve studies were mixed methods. Some used questionnaires alongside semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions to identify symptoms and concerns. Three studies were quantitative; one study asked patient to self-report symptoms using an app, another extracted self-reported symptoms from clinical records, and the third used a consensus method to identify the most important symptoms and concerns. One study used both quantitative and qualitative methodologies: they translated a patient reported outcome measure, followed by cognitive interviews and a feasibility study.

Table 2.

Characteristics of included studies (n = 34).

Author, year	Country	Study design	Outcome measure	Aim(s)	Setting	Sample size	Age (mean, SD)	Gender	Race/ethnicity	Hawker et al.′s quality score⁴⁰
Cancer
Alander et al. 2021⁴⁷	Sweden	Qualitative; narrative analysis	Not applicable	To explore the lived experience of young adults diagnosed with cancer and to increase our understanding of how to help them with their caring needs	Online blog	8	Range 20–29	Female 100%	Not reported	30; Good
Ameringer et al. 2015⁴⁸	United States	Mixed methods	Memorial symptom assessment scale	(1) To explore symptoms and symptom clusters from the perspectives of AYAs using the Computerised Symptom Capture Tool (C-SCAT) (2) To describe symptoms, symptom clusters, and priority symptoms within clusters (3) To describe the perceived causes of individual symptoms (4) To examine the complexity of symptoms and symptom clusters	Medical centres	72	18.5 (4.2)	Female 43.1% Male 56.9%	White/Non-Hispanic 79.2% Black/African American 9.7% Hispanic 5.6% Asian/Pacific Islander 4.2% Other 1.4%	33; Good
Avutu et al. 2022⁴⁹	United States	Qualitative; focus groups	Not applicable	(1) To explore the unique experiences of cancer care as an AYA, including self-identified physical, social, and emotional concerns (2) To identify AYA-specific information needs and communication preferences, including the appropriateness, timing, and depth of information delivered (3) To provide recommendations and direct for service provision and delivery, and accommodations for AYAs throughout their cancer experience	Medical centres	25	26.8 (5.9) Range 16–39	Female 54.2% Male 41.7% Genderqueer/Gender non-binary 4.2%	Caucasian/White 70.8% Black/African American 12.5% Asian 8.3% Prefer not to answer 8.3%	30; Good
Barakat et al. 2016⁵⁰	United States	Mixed methods	Not applicable	To better understand psychosocial care needs and programme preferences to inform development of more easily accessible and effective AYA psychosocial programmes	Cancer centre	111	17.37 (2.73) Range 12–25	Female 52.4%	Not reported	32; Good
Choi et al. 2022⁵¹	United States Australia Canada England South Africa	Mixed methods	Not applicable	To identify and compare the unmet needs of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer by age and gender	Online blog	100	29.22 (6.71) Range 18–39	Female 50.0% Male 50.0%	Not reported	33; Good
David et al. 2012⁵²	Wales	Qualitative: focus groups	Not applicable	To facilitate a small scale qualitative, focus group for TYA patients who had received radiotherapy treatment within Wales to identify any issues related to psychological support	Cancer centre	4	Range 18–24	Female 75.0% Male 25.0%	Not reported	28; Good
Erickson et al. 2019⁵³	United States	Mixed methods	PROMIS self-efficacy for managing symptoms scale	To examine the effects of a heuristic symptom assessment tool, the Computerised Symptom Capture Assessment Tool (C-SCAT) on AYA’s self-efficacy for symptom management, their self-regulation abilities related to symptoms, ad negotiated collaboration, as operationalised by AYA’s perceptions of communication with their providers about symptoms	Medical centres	85	20.9 (4.92) Range 15–29	Female 46% Male 54%	White 72% Other or more than one race 13% African-American 12% Native American/Alaska Native 2% Asian 1%	33; Good
Hirayama et al. 2023⁵⁴	Japan	Quantitative and qualitative; validation study	Japanese version of the distress thermometer and problem-list	(1) To develop a screening tool for determining distress and supportive care needs of adolescent and young adult cancer patients (AYAs) based on the NCCN’s Distress Thermometer and Problem List (DTPL) (2) To evaluate its feasibility, discriminant validity, and test–reliability	Hospital	40	Development phase 26.7 (7.0) Range 15–39 Feasibility phase: 25.7 (8.1) Range 15–39	Development phase Female 50% Male 50% Feasibility phase Female 55.7% Male 44.3%	Not reported	34; Good
Kohi et al. 2019⁵⁵	Tanzania	Qualitative; focus groups	Not applicable	To explore cancer-related concerns and needs of care and support among young adults and children who are receiving cancer treatment in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania	Hospital	8	21.0 (2.6)	Female 50% Male 50%	Not reported	30; Good
Lea et al. 2020⁵⁶	United Kingdom	Mixed methods	Not applicable	To understand the needs of young people with cancer, how these needs are currently being met, and how best to provide information and support at the end of active treatment	Cancer settings	Interviews 11	Range 19–26	Female 73%	Not reported	27; Good
Lidington et al. 2021⁵⁷	United Kingdom	Qualitative: interviews and focus groups	Not applicable	(1) To explore the specific experiences of young adults diagnosed with cancer in the UK context (2) To describe the age-specific psychosocial impact and practical challenges of cancer and its treatment	Hospital	65	33.6 Range 25–42	Female 60.0% Male 40.0%	White 74.6% Asian/Asian British 16.4% Black/African/Caribbean/Black British 3.0% Mixed/Multiple ethnic groups 3.0%	35; Good
Linder et al. 2019⁵⁸	United States	Mixed methods	Memorial symptom assessment scale	(1) To describe the frequency and characteristics of priority symptoms (2) To explore reasons for a symptom’s designation as a priority symptom, perceived causes of priority symptoms, and strategies AYAs use to manage priority symptoms	Medical centres	86	21 (5.0) Range 15–29	Female 47.7% Male 52.3%	White 70.9% Other/more than one race 14% African-American 11.6% Native American/Alaska Native 2.3% Asian 1.2%	29; Good
Locatelli et al. 2023⁵⁹	Denmark	Quantitative; cross-sectional	Not applicable	(1) To investigate symptom patterns in young adults with cancer using a smartphone-based app (2) To explore symptom frequency and severity, cluster patients based on their symptom severity, investigate the co-occurrence of severe symptoms, and explore the relationship between symptoms and activities	Hospital	161	25.49 (4.68)	Female 75%	Not reported	27; Good
Odh et al. 2016⁶⁰	Sweden	Qualitative; content analysis	Not applicable	To elucidate the theoretical framework of Yalom and his four ‘givens’ which were expressed in blogs written by young adults living with various cancer diagnosis in Sweden	Online blog	13	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	29; Good
Park et al. 2023⁶¹	South Korea	Mixed methods	Not applicable	To evaluate the care needs of AYAs with cancer considering the cultural background and health care system for cancer treatment in South Korea	Cancer centre	Survey 77 Focus groups 10	Survey 21.1 (7.4) Range 15–39 Focus groups Range 15–39 15–18 (50%) 19–39 (50%)	Female 46.8% Male 53.2%	Not reported	31; Good
Patterson et al. 2012⁶²	Australia	Qualitative; focus groups and interviews	Not applicable	To inform our understanding of the needs of emerging adults with a diagnosis of cancer from a developmental perspective that appreciates the key transitional tasks of emerging adulthood	Hospital	14	22 Range 20–25	Female 57.1% Male 42.9%	Not reported	29; Good
Rana et al. 2017⁶³	Canada	Qualitative; focus groups and interviews	Not applicable	To gather and analyse the physical, psycho-social and informational needs of YWBC at a regional cancer centre	Cancer centre	16	37 Range 30–40	Female 100%	Not reported	29; Good
Ruddy et al. 2013⁶⁴	United States	Qualitative; focus groups	Not applicable	To elucidate which issues are most disturbing to this breast cancer patients and which might be amenable to intervention	Cancer centre	36	37.8 (4.7) Range 26–44	Female 100%	White non-Hispanic 94%	30; Good
Ruddy et al. 2015⁶⁵	United States Canada	Qualitative; interviews	Not applicable	To elucidate which issues are most disturbing to this breast cancer patients and which might be amenable to intervention	Hospital	20	35.9 (5.0) Range 26–42	Female 100%	White non-Hispanic 50% Hispanic 25% Black 15% Other (native Hawaiian, Caribbean) 10%	31; Good
Simon et al. 2023⁶⁶	United States	Mixed methods	Not applicable	To assess the most salient health care needs of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) who undergo cancer treatment	Medical centres	10	21 Range 16–29	Female 40% Male 60%	White 60% Hispanic 20% Asian/Pacific Islander 10% Multiracial 10%	32; Good
Takeuchi et al. 2019⁶⁷	Japan	Qualitative; medical records content analysis	Not applicable	To identify support needs among young cancer patients regarding fertility-related issues to describe multidimensional support provided by nonphysician health care providers	Hospital	51	0–19 (2.0%) 20–29 (11.8%) 30–39 (54.9%) 40+ (31.4%)	Female 78.4% Male 21.6%	Not reported	31; Good
Tan et al. 2024⁶⁸	United States	Mixed methods	Reproductive concerns after cancer scale	To explore and differentiate the reproductive concerns of AYAs	Cancer centres	27	19.1 (3.7)	Female 37.0% Male 63.0%	White 81.5% Asian 18.5%	33; Good
Spina bifida
Starowicz et al. 2021⁶⁹	Canada	Quantitative; retrospective cohort chart review	Not applicable	To identify the most common health concerns among TranLC patients with SB at initial clinical consultation	Healthcare centre	94	29.04 (13.8) Range 13–77	Female 70.2% Male 29.8%	Not reported	31; Good
Cystic fibrosis
Brissette et al. 1988⁷⁰	Canada	Mixed methods	Not reported	To understand the concerns of cystic fibrosis severely ill young adults	Home	12	Range 17–27	Not reported	Not reported	17; Poor
Dellon et al. 2010⁷¹	United States	Qualitative; interviews	Not applicable	To describe symptom prevalence, symptom management, and frequency of use of disease-specific treatments for patients dying from complications of CF	Not reported	27	Mean age at death 24 Range 8–47	Female 67%	Not reported	31; Good
Hailey et al. 2019⁷²	United States	Qualitative; interviews	Cystic fibrosis questionnaire-revised	(1) To describe the parenting and reproductive health concerns of parents and non-parents with cystic fibrosis, including men and women (2) To identify the psychosocial and educational needs of individuals with cystic fibrosis who are considering parenthood or are parents	Hospital	20	Median 28.5 Range 22–46	Female 50% Male 50%	Caucasian 90% African American 10%	33; Good
Congenital heart disease
Chen et al. 2017⁷³	Taiwan	Quantitative; delphi survey	Not applicable	This study systematically identified the healthcare needs of adolescents with CHD transitioning into young adults by collecting the perspectives of patients, parents, and healthcare providers	Clinic	29	Median 20.8 Range 15–24	Female 41.4% Male 58.6%	Not reported	33; Good
HIV
Jameson et al. 2008⁷⁴	South Africa	Qualitative; interviews	Not applicable	To investigate the palliative care needs of patients with stage 3 and 4 HIV infection in Settlers Hospital, Grahamstown	Hospital	50	36	Female 70%	Not reported	22; Fair
Selman et al. 2013⁷⁵	Kenya Uganda	Qualitative; interviews	Not applicable	(1) To describe the palliative care needs of HIV outpatients and the management of multidimensional problems by HIV outpatient services in Kenya and Uganda (2) To inform the provision of HIV care and support in sub-Saharan Africa	Outpatient	83	36 Range 18–61	Female 58%	Not reported	35; Good
Uwimana et al. 2007⁷⁶	Rwanda	Mixed methods	Not applicable	(1) To identify palliative care needs of people living with HIV/AIDS in selected areas in Rwanda (2) To determine if these needs were met or unmet	Hospitals Health centres Day centres	250	38	Female 71% Male 29%	Not reported	30; Good
Chronic kidney disease
Kubiak et al. 2023⁷⁷	Germany	Qualitative; interviews	Not applicable	To identify the point of view of adolescent and young adult patients as well as caregivers of younger children with advanced CKD	Hospital	5	Median 19 Range 16–22	Female 60% Male 40%	Not reported	31; Good
Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Rosero et al. 2024⁷⁸	United States	Mixed methods	Not applicable	(1) To determine the prevalence and relative importance of symptoms experienced by individuals with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (2) To identify factors associated with a higher disease burden	Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy clinic	Interviews 13 Survey 87	Phase 2 25.74 (13.31) Range 10–74	Phase 2 Female 6.90% Male 91.95% Other 1.15%	Phase 2 White 85.06% Hispanic/Latino 13.79% Other 6.90% Asian 5.75% Black/African-American 2.30%	30; Good
Barth syndrome
Gwaltney et al. 2021⁷⁹	United States	Qualitative; validation study, interviews	Barth syndrome-symptom assessment	(1) To develop symptom-focussed patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures for use in clinical studies with adolescents and adults with Barth Syndrome (2) To describe the initial development of the BTHS-SA and evidence supporting its content validity as defined in regulatory guidance documents and expert guidelines (i.e. that the BTHS-SA targets relevant and important symptoms of BTHS and is both understood and used as intended by respondents	Not reported	Concept elicitation: 15 Cognitive debriefing: 12	Concept elicitation: 22.9 (5.8) Range 16–34 Cognitive debriefing: 22.9 (6.1) Range 16–35	Not reported	Cognitive elicitation: White 93.3% Black or African American 6.7% Cognitive debriefing: White 100%	32; Good
Sickle cell disease
Matthie et al. 2016⁸⁰	United States	Qualitative; interviews	Not applicable	To describe the perceptions of young adults with sickle cell disease concerning their disease experience	Clinics	29	25.8 (4.8) Range 20–31	Female 79.3%	African-American 100%	34; Good

Twenty-seven were from high-income countries: 13 from the USA, 3 each from Canada and the UK, 2 each from Japan and Sweden, and 1 each from Australia, Denmark, Germany and South Korea. Four were from low- and middle- income countries, one each from: Tanzania, Rwanda, South Africa and Taiwan. Three were multi-national (see Table 2).

Most studies included patients living with cancer (n = 22). Other studies recruited patients living with cystic fibrosis (n = 3), HIV/AIDS (n = 3), sickle cell disease (n = 1), spina bifida (n = 1), Duchenne muscular dystrophy (n = 1), congenital heart disease (n = 1), Barth syndrome (n = 1), and chronic kidney disease (n = 1).

Quality of included studies

Of the 34 studies, Hawker et al’s quality scores ranged from 17 to 34 out of a possible score of 40. The range of scores were 27–33 (fair-good) for quantitative studies, 17–33 (fair-good) for mixed method studies, 22–35 (fair-good) for qualitative studies and 34 (good) for a study that used quantitative and qualitative methodologies (see Table 2). Studies often scored lower in the following domains: ethics, sampling and implications of findings. Most stated that ethical approval was obtained but did not mention issues of confidentiality, sensitivity and consent, or researcher reflexivity for qualitative studies. Some authors did not adequately describe how they recruited participants and provided limited information on participant characteristics (e.g. age, gender, race/ethnicity).

Within the 5 themes (physical, psychological, social, spiritual and quality healthcare), 15 subthemes were identified (see Figure 2). The synthesis of results by themes and subthemes is summarised below and in detail in Supplemental File 4.

Figure 2.

Synthesised findings of the symptoms and concerns of young adults living with life-limiting conditions.

Physical

Disease-related symptoms included pain fatigue and breathlessness.

I just struggle day to day just to make it and not have pain (Young adult living with Sickle Cell Disease)⁸⁰ (p. 1445).

Treatment-related concerns included fertility and reproductive health. These concerns were reported by young adults living with cancer, spina bifida, cystic fibrosis and HIV. Other treatment related concerns for young adults living with cancer included hair loss, premature menopause, and hot flushes. HIV patients reported side-effects of antiretroviral therapy including loss of appetite, vomiting and dizziness.

The fertility issue is a big issue, and to have to make a decision on that, in that head space, I think, is really challenging. There’s so much pressure. ‘Oh, my God, I have to decide if I want to have kids in 5 years, right this minute!’ Which is a really weird place to be in where you’re thinking about your own mortality. (Young adult living with cancer)⁶⁴ (p. 155).

Some symptoms including nausea and constipation could be classified as both disease-related and treatment-related.

Young adults expressed the impact of their disease on their physical function including their mobility, and their ability to perform personal care tasks such as bathing.

They gave me a zimmer frame. I actually looked at it and said, no, I’m not using that. . . I’m 37 years old. I’m not 78 years old. I didn’t want to do it. I’m very proud and private and I didn’t want to be seen as old and frail. . . (Young adult living with cancer)⁵⁷ (p. 5).

Sexual concerns were also included within physical function and were reported by young adults living with cancer, sickle cell disease, spina bifida and cystic fibrosis. These concerns included changes to sexual function (such as erectile dysfunction) and loss of libido.

The one thing that was never addressed . . . is how all of this affects or can affect a woman’s sex drive. . . (Young adult living with cancer)⁶³ (p. 6).

Psychological

Across all diagnoses, young adults highlighted emotional concerns, describing the negative effect of their illness experience and the impact on their mood. Mood-related symptoms included depression, anxiety, and feeling fearful, particularly around the trajectory of their disease. Individuals living with cancer reported fears of relapse, recurrence and of their cancer spreading. Patients living with chronic kidney disease were similarly fearful of recurrence, whilst patients living with cystic fibrosis reported fears of disease progression.

Young adults expressed feelings of embarrassment and shame because of their illness. Further, suicidal thoughts and ideation were reported by a minority of young adults living with cancer and cystic fibrosis.

I wonder if I’m ever going to be free from the dark thoughts. They are eating me up from the inside out. (Young adult living with cancer)⁶⁰ (p. 57).

Cognitive concerns were reported across diagnoses. These included attention difficulties, memory problems, confusion, difficulties concentrating, and communication difficulties.

Young adults described changes to their body image and their perception of self because of their illness. Young adults living with cancer described an altered sense of self due to changes in their physical appearance. In one qualitative study, young adults described acquiring an illness identity.

. . .I want to be me and I haven’t been able to be me since being diagnosed and I will never be me again (Young adult living with cancer)⁵⁷ (p. 5).

Social

Young adults wanted interpersonal support from their romantic partners, friends and family. Young adults were concerned about disclosing their diagnosis to others for fear of being treated differently and wanting to protect their loved ones from the emotional impact of their disease, particularly their children:

. . .having that conversation I have yet to have with my children because they are just too young explaining to them what CF is, how it affects me, and trying to educate them on what’s going on with me and not to scare them, I don’t want them thinking I am going to die tomorrow. (Young adult living with cystic fibrosis)⁷² (p. 1230).

Young adults expressed difficulties balancing their role as a parent, with their new identity as a patient.

Finding the balance between keeping myself as healthy as possible while keeping our family a happy working family unit . . . that’s always going to be a bit of a struggle (Young adult living with cystic fibrosis)⁷² (p. 1228).

Some young adults described being different to other people living with cancer, because of their age, and wanted to talk to others who shared similar experiences in the form of peer support groups. This was predominately reported by young adults living with cancer but was also reported by some young adults living with congenital heart disease and spina bifida.

A lot of times when you go to treatments or appointments, you’re the only young person there. Everyone’s older, so you kind of—feel like an outsider I guess. It’s nice to connect with other people going through the same thing (Young adult living with cancer)⁴⁹ (p. 8).

Some young adults limited their recreational activities (sports, social activities) because of their illness. Unlike their peers, young adults often missed out on important life events, typical for their developmental age, such as going to school or ‘doing crazy teenager things’⁶² (p. 36):

All your friends are doing ‘crazy teenager’ things, and you have to deal with the possibility of dying. (Young adult living with cancer)⁶² (p. 36).

Some also experienced disruptions to their work. Prior to their diagnosis, young adults prioritised their career, but often, their diagnosis forced them to take a period of absence.

I lost a lot of jobs behind being sick and in pain and lot of jobs were challenging because of the pains. (Young adult living with Sickle Cell Disease)⁸⁰ (p. 1446).

A loss of independence and autonomy due to their diagnosis was also described as being difficult to accept. Some compared their life pre- and post-diagnosis, emphasising a sense of loss over the life they used to have:

I was living away from home, working when I was diagnosed. When I was diagnosed, I relocated back home and was living with my parents then after being away for six years. And I felt like it was challenging. My parents were great, and they attended all of my meetings and came to the hospital with me every day, but it was difficult going from being independent to then depending on my parents again. (Young adult with cancer)⁴⁹ (p. 8).

Spiritual

Worries about death and dying were reported by young adults living with cancer, congenital heart disease and sickle cell disease. Specifically, young adults living with cancer reported thoughts about dying, fearing death, and coming to terms with the possibility of their own mortality.

I’m afraid. So incredibly afraid of dying. I’m afraid of the anxiety you would feel before. Or if you knew there was nothing more to do. (Young adult living with cancer)⁶⁰ (p. 58).

Some young adults used their spirituality and connection with faith and religion to cope with their diagnosis and expressed a desire for inner peace. Patients felt comforted by this existential support:

Religion plays a huge role. My family . . .religion has always been an essential thing in our family and my relationship with the Lord and just involvement in church, it played a big role for me and as far as my sickle cell and, number one, just helping me to stay positive to realize that, OK, yeah, I might have this, but there is obviously a purpose or reason for it and even though I don’t understand it, that I’m going to be OK and just helping me to stay positive. (Young adult living with Sickle Cell Disease)⁸⁰ (p. 1445).

Young adults expressed existential concefrns such as uncertainty about the future and feeling like their life is on hold because of their illness. Others shared that their illness led them to find meaning and purpose in their lives, and some accepted their disease.

Yeah, I would love to not have sickle cell no more, but I’ve grown to accept it. It’s a part of me. . .It’s not who I am, but this is what I have to live with (Young adult living with Sickle Cell Disease)⁸⁰ (p. 1445).

Quality of healthcare

Some symptoms and concerns identified could not be categorised into the themes of palliative care. These concerns centred around the overarching theme of quality of healthcare.

Young adults wanted an honest and trustworthy relationship with their healthcare professionals. They wanted to be treated as an adult, not as a child:

Doctors don’t really know how to talk to you and approach you, they treat you like a child. (Young adult living with cancer)⁶² (p. 35).

In one study,⁴⁹ young adults wanted their healthcare professionals to acknowledge the role of their partners as primary caregivers, and to not automatically assume that this role was assigned to their parents. Keeping this information up to date was seen as important:

So one of my providers were used to deferring to the mother and not recognizing that the person who lived with me and built a life with me was probably a little bit more attuned to how I was behaving, even though my mother had been my primary caregiver [in] the past [ . . . ] nobody had talked to me before I started treatment again about updating my proxy, even though they knew very well that my social situation had changed and that my partner would be my primary caregiver. They didn’t think to tell me to update my proxy and so I didn’t (Young adult living with cancer)⁴⁹ (p. 11).

Young adults shared that they were sometimes cared for in paediatric or adult settings where they felt uncomfortable and out of place:

When I was hospitalized for chemotherapy, I was always the youngest in the hospital room. I felt uncomfortable when other patients and their families looked at me like ‘why is that child here?’ (Young adult living with cancer)⁶¹ (p. 404).

Young adults wanted information about their disease and diagnosis. They specifically wanted information about the causes of symptoms, treatment options, and information about their transition from child to adult services. Other information needed included birth control methods, family planning, the impact of pregnancy on their health, fertility preservation and treatment, and the heritability of their own disease and how it may impact their children.

Some young adults living with cancer expressed a desire to be involved in decision-making, to advocate for themselves and their own preferences for care.

Aim 2: Content validity of patient reported outcome measures

This review identified 66 quantitative studies that were included in the second part of the study (aim 2). Of these 53^10,81–133 used 65 patient reported outcome measures and 13 used questionnaires to capture pre-defined symptoms and concerns^59,134–145 (see Supplemental File 3). In addition to the 65 PROMs identified, we included an additional 52 PROMs from Chambers et al. systematic review of PROMs developed, adapted or validated for the young adult population.²²

Content coverage of all 117 PROMs was mapped against the themes and subthemes identified in Aim 1. The results are presented in Supplemental File 5. Of the 117 PROMs, 60 had less than 30% content coverage, 53 had coverage of 30%–79% of the subthemes, and 4 PROMs had at least 80% content coverage.

Eighty-one PROMs (69.2%) assessed physical symptoms and concerns, often disease and treatment-related symptoms. Of these, one-third (n = 27, 33.3%) assessed concerns surrounding physical function. Over three quarters of PROMs (n = 91, 77.8%) assessed psychological concerns, mostly assessing emotional and cognitive function. Of these, a small number of PROMs (n = 16, 17.6%) assessed concerns around identity. 82 PROMs (70.1%) assessed social concerns. Most focussed on interpersonal relationships and lifestyle restrictions. Of these, few captured welfare concerns (e.g. financial or housing concerns; n = 15, 18.3%). Some PROMs assessed spiritual concerns (n = 40, 34.2%). Most of these PROMs captured existential concerns (e.g. uncertainty about the future, life being on hold). Twenty-three PROMs (19.7%) assessed quality of healthcare.

Discussion

Main findings of the study

This review identified a large volume of literature describing the symptoms and concerns of young adults (aged 18–39) living with life-limiting conditions. Results show the symptoms and concerns of this population are multidimensional, spanning physical, psychological, social, spiritual and quality of care domains. These findings align with previous research which shows that the concerns of individuals living with life-limiting conditions are holistic.^11,18 We identified a range of concerns that were specific to young adults and may be related to their developmental stage.¹¹ We identified 117 patient reported outcome measures being used with the young adult population, however even the most comprehensive tools do not capture all domains important to young adults living with life-limiting conditions.

What this study adds

Our review identified many studies reporting the symptoms and concerns of young adults living with cancer. Many non-cancerous conditions were under-represented in this review, especially complex neurodisability, demonstrating an absence of research. Whilst it may not be possible to have representation across all diagnoses, there is a need for research exploring the symptoms and concerns of young adults living with a range of conditions to ensure their symptoms and concerns are represented,¹⁴⁶ particularly those experiencing significant developmental delays.

Previous research has shown that care providers should encourage young adults to develop autonomy through the care they provide, and involve their young adult patients in decisions about their care,¹⁴⁷ a concern that was identified by this review. We also found that young adults wanted a good relationship with healthcare professionals to allow for direct and honest communication. This finding aligns with previous research which highlights changes in social and professional relationships across the illness trajectory, and how these can be acknowledged and managed by healthcare professionals.^148,149

We identified four PROMs that had at least 80% coverage, but the number of items included in each measure ranged from 42 to 139. In PROM development there is a need for balance between comprehensiveness and feasibility and acceptability. Long measures may burden patients with questionnaire fatigue, particularly for individuals approaching the end of life.¹⁵⁰ The European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) task force on outcome measurement has called for researchers and clinicians to consider patient burden when selecting measures for use and to select sufficiently brief measures where possible.¹⁵¹ There are existing holistic measures that have been developed to assess the symptoms and concerns of adults (e.g. Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale¹⁵²) and children (Children’s Palliative care Outcome Scale¹⁵³) living with life-limiting conditions. These measures were not identified by our searches due to our inclusion criteria for age. But these measures are sufficiently brief (⩽17 items) and, if modified or adapted, may better capture the symptoms and concerns of young adults living with life-limiting conditions.

Most PROMs identified assessed physical, psychological and social symptoms and concerns, with few assessing spiritual concerns and quality of healthcare. This finding may be explained by the small number of measures validated in this population and the lack of involvement of patients, their families and health and social care professionals in the development of existing measures.⁸⁶ Patient involvement in PROM development and modification has been recommended by researchers and is a requirement in US Food and Drug Administration guidelines.¹⁵⁴ Development or modification of PROMs should involve young adults throughout the research process to ensure PROMs are valid and accurately reflect the patient’s perspective.¹⁵⁵ Existing measures do not comprehensively capture the symptoms and concerns affecting this population. Future research may take existing PROMs and modify them to improve the comprehensibility and relevance for young adults living with life-limiting conditions.

Strengths and limitations of the study

A strength of this review is the broad and robust search strategy that was not limited by language or date restrictions. Whilst we used multiple databases to conduct our search we may not have captured the literature published within regional databases. We did not identify any papers published in a language other than English. This may have introduced geographic and linguistic bias and may affect the generalisability of the findings of this review.

We used a conceptual framework of palliative care to guide our synthesis of symptoms and concerns. In some instances, symptoms and concerns could have been placed into multiple categories (e.g. fatigue could be physical or psychological). Using a framework synthesis may have ‘detracted from the likely interconnectedness’ of symptoms and concerns across domains.¹⁵⁶

We acknowledge that some of the PROMs identified aimed to measure a specific aspect of health (e.g. anxiety, depression) and did not aim to be comprehensive in their assessment of symptoms and concerns. But we did identify four PROMs with more than 80% content coverage of the identified symptom and concern themes in this review.

Conclusion

Young adults living with life-limiting conditions experience a wide range of symptoms and concerns. We identified a large number of PROMs available for use in this population, but even the most comprehensive PROMs do not capture the holistic symptoms and concerns of young adults living with life-limiting conditions.

This review provides a conceptual framework of symptoms and concerns that can be used to develop or modify existing patient reported outcome measures for young adults living with life-limiting conditions.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-2-pmj-10.1177_02692163251405370 – Supplemental material for What are the symptoms and concerns of young adults living with life-limiting conditions and how well are they captured by patient reported outcome measures? A mixed-methods systematic review and framework synthesis

Supplemental material, sj-docx-2-pmj-10.1177_02692163251405370 for What are the symptoms and concerns of young adults living with life-limiting conditions and how well are they captured by patient reported outcome measures? A mixed-methods systematic review and framework synthesis by Rachel L. Chambers, India Tunnard, Hannah Scott, Lorna K. Fraser and Katherine E. Sleeman in Palliative Medicine

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-3-pmj-10.1177_02692163251405370 – Supplemental material for What are the symptoms and concerns of young adults living with life-limiting conditions and how well are they captured by patient reported outcome measures? A mixed-methods systematic review and framework synthesis

Supplemental material, sj-docx-3-pmj-10.1177_02692163251405370 for What are the symptoms and concerns of young adults living with life-limiting conditions and how well are they captured by patient reported outcome measures? A mixed-methods systematic review and framework synthesis by Rachel L. Chambers, India Tunnard, Hannah Scott, Lorna K. Fraser and Katherine E. Sleeman in Palliative Medicine

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-4-pmj-10.1177_02692163251405370 – Supplemental material for What are the symptoms and concerns of young adults living with life-limiting conditions and how well are they captured by patient reported outcome measures? A mixed-methods systematic review and framework synthesis

Supplemental material, sj-docx-4-pmj-10.1177_02692163251405370 for What are the symptoms and concerns of young adults living with life-limiting conditions and how well are they captured by patient reported outcome measures? A mixed-methods systematic review and framework synthesis by Rachel L. Chambers, India Tunnard, Hannah Scott, Lorna K. Fraser and Katherine E. Sleeman in Palliative Medicine

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-5-pmj-10.1177_02692163251405370 – Supplemental material for What are the symptoms and concerns of young adults living with life-limiting conditions and how well are they captured by patient reported outcome measures? A mixed-methods systematic review and framework synthesis

Supplemental material, sj-docx-5-pmj-10.1177_02692163251405370 for What are the symptoms and concerns of young adults living with life-limiting conditions and how well are they captured by patient reported outcome measures? A mixed-methods systematic review and framework synthesis by Rachel L. Chambers, India Tunnard, Hannah Scott, Lorna K. Fraser and Katherine E. Sleeman in Palliative Medicine

Supplemental Material

sj-pdf-1-pmj-10.1177_02692163251405370 – Supplemental material for What are the symptoms and concerns of young adults living with life-limiting conditions and how well are they captured by patient reported outcome measures? A mixed-methods systematic review and framework synthesis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-pmj-10.1177_02692163251405370 for What are the symptoms and concerns of young adults living with life-limiting conditions and how well are they captured by patient reported outcome measures? A mixed-methods systematic review and framework synthesis by Rachel L. Chambers, India Tunnard, Hannah Scott, Lorna K. Fraser and Katherine E. Sleeman in Palliative Medicine

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Adam Gartside, Senior Library Assistant, KCL for supporting the development of the search strategy.

ORCID iDs

Rachel L. Chambers

India Tunnard

Hannah Scott

Lorna K. Fraser

Katherine E. Sleeman

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Rachel L Chambers and India Tunnard are funded by the BuildPall capacity building programme at the Cicely Saunders Institute, funded by Cicely Saunders International (charity reg. 1087195). Hannah Scott, King’s College London, is supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration South London (NIHR ARC South London) at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, through which their PhD is funded (Grant ID: NIHR-INF-2158). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Lorna K. Fraser is funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Research Professor Award (NIHR304252). This publication presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Katherine E. Sleeman is the Laing Galazka Chair in palliative care at King’s College London, funded through an endowment from Cicely Saunders International and the Kirby Laing Foundation.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Data availability statement

Data extracted and data extraction template are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Supplemental material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Knighting

Bray

Downing

, et al. Meeting the needs of young adults with life-limiting conditions: a UK survey of current provision and future challenges for hospices. J Adv Nurs 2018; 74(8): 1888–1898.

Fraser

Moran

. Children in Scotland requiring palliative care: identifying numbers and needs (The ChiSP study). 2015. http://bit.ly/1Krn2EU

A core care pathway for children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions , 3rd ed. https://www.togetherforshortlives.org.uk/app/uploads/2018/01/ProRes-Core-Care-Pathway.pdf (2013, accessed 10 June 2024).

Rosenberg

Wolfe

. Palliative care for adolescents and young adults with cancer. Clin Oncol Adolesc Young Adults 2013; 3: 41–48.

Fraser

. A changing population: young adults with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions. In: Earle

Blackburn

(eds) Sex, intimacy and living with life-shortening conditions. Routledge, 2023, pp.11–17.

Noyes

Edwards

Hastings

, et al. Evidence-based planning and costing palliative care services for children: novel multi-method epidemiological and economic exemplar. BMC Palliat Care 2013; 12(1): 17.

Fraser

Gibson-Smith

Jarvis

, et al. Making every child count. Estimating current and future prevalence of children and young people with life-limiting conditions in the UK. Together for Short Lives, 2020.

Bowers

. Planning for paediatric palliative care services in Queensland: characteristics, demographics and health needs of children and young people with life-limiting conditions. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 2020.

Ziegler

Fraser

. Palliative care for teenagers and young adults - the need for more evidence. Palliat Med 2022; 36(3): n3–n4.

10.

Abdelaal

Mosher

Gupta

, et al. Supporting the needs of adolescents and young adults: integrated palliative care and psychiatry clinic for adolescents and young adults with cancer. Cancers 2021; 13(4): 770.

11.

Abdelaal

Avery

Chow

, et al. Palliative care for adolescents and young adults with advanced illness: a scoping review. Palliat Med 2023; 37(1): 88–107.

12.

Cook

Bergeron

. Palliative care for young adults with life-limiting conditions: public health recommendations. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2022; 12(e2): e256–e263.

13.

. A developmental perspective on existential distress and adaptation to advanced disease. Psycho-Oncol 2018; 27: 2657–2660.

14.

Ting

Chen

Poh

, et al. ‘I really feel like I am ageing early’: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of the lived experience of young adults with life-limiting conditions (YALLC). BMJ Public Health 2024; 2(1): e000343.

15.

Galán

de la Vega

Miró

. Needs of adolescents and young adults after cancer treatment: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care 2018; 27(6): e12558.

16.

Law

Salam

McCabe

, et al. Experiences and unmet needs of adolescent and young adult survivors of a brain tumor (aged 15–39 years): a systematic review and meta-ethnography. Cancer Nurs 2023; 48(4): 307–315.

17.

Neylon

Condren

Guerin

, et al. What are the psychosocial needs of adolescents and young adults with cancer? a systematic review of the literature. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2023; 12: 799–820.

18.

Namisango

Bristowe

Allsop

, et al. Symptoms and concerns among children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions: a systematic review highlighting meaningful health outcomes. The Patient 2019; 12: 15–55.

19.

Albritton

Bleyer

. The management of cancer in the older adolescent. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39: 2584–2599.

20.

Barnett

McDonnell

DeRosa

, et al. Psychosocial outcomes and interventions among cancer survivors diagnosed during adolescence and young adulthood (AYA): a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv 2016; 10: 814–831.

21.

Bajgain

Mendoza

Naqvi

, et al. Prioritizing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) to use in the clinical care of youth living with mental health concerns: a nominal group technique study. The Patient 2024; 8(1): 20.

22.

Chambers

Hocaoglu

Higginson

, et al. Evaluating the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for young adults with life-limiting conditions: a systematic review. Palliat Med 2025; 39(7): 765–791.

23.

Creswell

Plano Clark

(eds). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd ed. Sage Publications Inc, 2017.

24.

Kaushik

Walsh

. Pragmatism as a research paradigm and its implications for social work research. Soc Sci 2019; 8(9): 255.

25.

Shannon-Baker

. Making paradigms meaningful in mixed methods research. J Mix Methods Res 2016; 10: 319–334.

26.

Kishino

Ellis-Smith

Afolabi

, et al. Family involvement in advance care planning for people living with advanced cancer: a systematic mixed-methods review. Palliat Med 2022; 36(3): 462–477.

27.

Meadows

. A philosophical perspective on the development and application of patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs). Qual Life Res 2022; 31(6): 1703–1709.

28.

Tashakkori

Teddlie

(eds). Mixed methodology: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. 1st ed. Sage Publications Inc, 1998.

29.

Morgan

. Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Qual Inq 2014; 20: 1045–1053.

30.

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Br Med J 2009; 339: b2535.

31.

Knighting

Pilkington

Noyes

, et al. Respite care and short breaks for young adults aged 18–40 with complex health-care needs: mixed-methods systematic review and conceptual framework development. Health Serv Deliv Res 2021; 9(6): 1–268.

32.

Taylor

Booth

Beresford

, et al. Specialist paediatric palliative care for children and young people with cancer: a mixed-methods systematic review. Palliat Med 2020; 34(6): 731–775.

33.

Lizarondo

Stern

Carrier

, et al. Chapter 8: Mixed methods systematic reviews. In: Aromataris

Lockwood

Porritt

, et al. (eds) JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI 2024: 312–363.

34.

Gale

Heath

Cameron

, et al. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013; 13(1): 117.

35.

Ritchie

Lewis

Nicholls

, et al. (eds). Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. 2nd ed. Sage Publications Ltd, 2013.

36.

McLorie

Hackett

Barrett

, et al. Healthcare professionals’ perspectives of providing end-of-life care for infants, children and young people in acute settings: a multi-site qualitative study. Palliat Med 2025; 39(4): 483–498.

37.

Dixon-Woods

. Using framework-based synthesis for conducting reviews of qualitative studies. BMC Med 2011; 9: 39.

38.

Carroll

Booth

Cooper

. A worked example of ‘‘best fit’’ framework synthesis: a systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011; 11: 29.

39.

Gullick

Lin

Massey

, et al. Structures, processes and outcomes of specialist critical care nurse education: an integrative review. Aust Crit Care 2019; 32(4): 331–345.

40.

Hawker

Payne

Kerr

, et al. Appraising the evidence: reviewing disparate data systematically. Qual Health Res 2002; 12(9): 1284–1299.

41.

den Boer

de Veer

AJE

Schoonmade

, et al. A systematic review of palliative care tools and interventions for people with severe mental illness. BMC Psychiatry 2019; 19: 106–111.

42.

Jordan

Allsop

ElMokhallalati

, et al. Duration of palliative care before death in international routine practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2020; 18: 368.

43.

Colquhoun-Flannery

Goodwin

Walshe

. How clinicians recognise people who are dying: an integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud 2024; 151: 104666.

44.

Moreno-Alonso

Porta-Sales

Monforte-Royo

, et al. Palliative care in patients with haematological neoplasms: an integrative systematic review. Palliat Med 2018; 32(1): 79–105.

45.

Shunmugasundaram

Rutherford

Butow

, et al. Content comparison of unmet needs self-report measures used in patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Psycho-Oncol 2019; 28(12): 2295–2306.

46.

Rothman

Burke

Erickson

, et al. Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR good research practices for evaluating and documenting content validity for the use of existing instruments and their modification PRO task force report. Value Health 2009; 12(8): 1075–1083.

47.

Alander

MEJ

Klaeson

Nyqvist

, et al. Lived experiences and caring needs in young adults diagnosed with cancer. Nurs Forum 2021; 56(4): 781–790.

48.

Ameringer

Erickson

Macpherson

, et al. Symptoms and symptom clusters identified by adolescents and young adults with cancer using a symptom heuristics app. Res Nurs Health 2015; 38(6): 436–448.

49.

Avutu

Lynch

Barnett

, et al. Psychosocial needs and preferences for care among adolescent and young adult cancer patients (ages 15–39): a qualitative study. Cancers 2022; 14(3): 710.

50.

Barakat

Galtieri

Szalda

, et al. Assessing the psychosocial needs and program preferences of adolescents and young adults with cancer. Support Care Cancer 2016; 24: 823–832.

51.

Choi

Becker

Kim

. Unmet needs in adolescents and young adults with cancer: a mixed-method study using social media. J Pediatr Nurs 2022; 64: 31–41.

52.

David

Williamson

Tilsley

. A small scale, qualitative focus group to investigate the psychosocial support needs of teenage young adult cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy in Wales. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2012; 16(4): 375–379.

53.

Erickson

Ameringer

Linder

, et al. Using a heuristic app to improve symptom self-management in adolescents and young adults with cancer. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2019; 8(2): 131–141.

54.

Hirayama

Fujimori

Yanai

, et al. Development and evaluation of the feasibility, validity, and reliability of a screening tool for determining distress and supportive care needs of adolescents and young adults with cancer in Japan. Palliat Support Care 2023; 21(4): 677–687.

55.

Kohi

von Essen

Masika

, et al. Cancer-related concerns and needs among young adults and children on cancer treatment in Tanzania: a qualitative study. BMC Cancer 2019; 19: 82–89.

56.

Lea

Martins

Fern

, et al. The support and information needs of adolescents and young adults with cancer when active treatment ends. BMC Cancer 2020; 20(1): 13.

57.

Lidington

Vlooswijk

Stallard

, et al. ‘This is not part of my life plan’: a qualitative study on the psychosocial experiences and practical challenges in young adults with cancer age 25 to 39 years at diagnosis. Eur J Cancer Care 2021; 30(5): e13458.

58.

Linder

Stegenga

Erickson

, et al. Priority symptoms, causes, and self-management strategies reported by AYAs with cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag 2019; 58(5): 774–783.

59.

Locatelli

Pasta

Bentsen

, et al. Symptom patterns in young adults with cancer: an app-based study. Semin Oncol Nurs 2023; 39(5): 151476.

60.

Odh

Löfving

Klaeson

. Existential challenges in young people living with a cancer diagnosis. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2016; 24: 54–60.

61.

Park

Kwon

Yun

, et al. Care needs of adolescents and young adults with cancer undergoing active treatment in South Korea: a mixed methods study. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2022; 12(3): 398–407.

62.

Patterson

Millar

Desille

, et al. The unmet needs of emerging adults with a cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study. Cancer Nurs 2012; 35(3): E32–E40.

63.

Rana

Ratcliffe

Sussman

, et al. Young women with breast cancer: needs and experiences. Cogent Med 2017; 4(1): 1278836.

64.

Ruddy

Greaney

Sprunck-Harrild

, et al. Young women with breast cancer: a focus group study of unmet needs. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2013; 2(4): 153–160.

65.

Ruddy

Greaney

Sprunck-Harrild

, et al. A qualitative exploration of supports and unmet needs of diverse young women with breast cancer. J Community Support Oncol 2015; 13(9): 323–329.

66.

Simon

Pyke-Grimm

Nasr

. Assessing the needs of adolescents and young adults receiving cancer treatment: a mixed methods study. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2023; 12(1): 43–52.

67.

Takeuchi

Shimizu

Miyata

, et al. A content analysis of multidimensional support needs regarding fertility among cancer patients: how can nonphysician health care providers support? J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2019; 8(2): 205–211.

68.

Tan

Francis-Levin

Stelmak

, et al. Differentiating gender-based reproductive concerns among adolescent and young adult cancer patients: a mixed methods study. J Psycho-Oncol 2024; 42(4): 526–542.

69.

Starowicz

Cassidy

Brunton

. Health concerns of adolescents and adults with spina bifida. Front Neurol 2021; 12: 745814.

70.

Brissette

Zinman

Reidy

. Disclosure of psychosocial concerns of young adults with advanced cystic fibrosis (CF) by a nurse home visiting program. Int J Nurs Stud 1988; 25(1): 67–72.

71.

Dellon

Shores

Nelson

, et al. Family caregiver perspectives on symptoms and treatments for patients dying from complications of cystic fibrosis. J Pain Symptom Manag 2010; 40(6): 829–837.

72.

Hailey

Tan

Dellon

, et al. Pursuing parenthood with cystic fibrosis: reproductive health and parenting concerns in individuals with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 2019; 54(8): 1225–1233.

73.

Chen

Chiang

, et al. Healthcare needs of adolescents with congenital heart disease transitioning into adulthood: a Delphi survey of patients, parents, and healthcare providers. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2017; 16(2): 125–135.

74.

Jameson

. The palliative care needs of patients with stage 3 and 4 HIV infection. Indian J Palliat Care 2008; 14(1): 1.

75.

Selman

Simms

Penfold

, et al. ‘My dreams are shuttered down and it hurts lots’–a qualitative study of palliative care needs and their management by HIV outpatient services in Kenya and Uganda. BMC Palliat Care 2013; 12: 35.

76.

Uwimana

Struthers

. Met and unmet palliative care needs of people living with HIV/AIDS in Rwanda. SAHARA-J 2007; 4(1): 575–585.

77.

Kubiak

Fehrenbach

Prüfe

, et al. Do we need palliative care in pediatric nephrology? patients’ and caregivers’ disease experience. Children 2023; 10(2): 324.

78.

Rosero

Weinstein

Seabury

, et al. Patient- and caregiver-reported impact of symptoms in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve 2024; 70: 120–129.

79.

Gwaltney

Stokes

Aiudi

, et al. Development and content validity of the Barth syndrome symptom assessment (BTHS-SA) for adolescents and adults. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2021; 16(1): 264.

80.

Matthie

Hamilton

Wells

, et al. Perceptions of young adults with sickle cell disease concerning their disease experience. J Adv Nurs 2016; 72(6): 1441–1451.

81.

Ameringer

Elswick

Stegenga

, et al. Symptom profiles of adolescents and young adults in active cancer treatment by diagnostic groups. Cancer Nurs 2022; 45(4): 306–315.

82.

Ann-Yi

Wong

, et al. Physical and psychosocial symptoms of young adult patients referred to the supportive care mobile team. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2022; 12(3): 440–444.

83.

Bártolo

Santos

Valério

, et al. Depression and health-related quality of life among young adult breast cancer patients: the mediating role of reproductive concerns. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2020; 9(3): 431–435.

84.

Bellin

Dosa

Zabel

, et al. Self-management, satisfaction with family functioning, and the course of psychological symptoms in emerging adults with spina bifida. J Pediatr Psychol 2013; 38(1): 50–62.

85.

Bellin

Zabel

Dicianno

, et al. Correlates of depressive and anxiety symptoms in young adults with spina bifida. J Pediatr Psychol 2010; 35(7): 778–789.

86.

Chan

Poon

Goh

, et al. Assessment of psychological distress among Asian adolescents and young adults (AYA) cancer patients using the distress thermometer: a prospective, longitudinal study. Support Care Cancer 2018; 26: 3257–3266.

87.

Dahiya

Prakesh

Mahajan

, et al. Psychological symptoms, quality of life and adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients: a cross-sectional study. J Kidney Care 2020; 5(6): 264–271.

88.

Botura

CDA

Ames

Botura

ACDA

, et al. Pain symptoms in patients with severe cerebral palsy: prevalence among patients with higher degree of locomotor impairment. Trop J Pharm Res 2017; 16(6): 1431–1436.

89.

Dicianno

Kinback

Bellin

, et al. Depressive symptoms in adults with spina bifida. Rehabil Psychol 2015; 60(3): 246–253.

90.

Dury

Perotin

Ravoninjatovo

, et al. Identifying specific needs in adult cystic fibrosis patients: a pilot study using a custom questionnaire. BMC Pulm Med 2021; 21: 270–278.

91.

Dyson

Thompson

Palmer

, et al. The relationship between unmet needs and distress amongst young people with cancer. Support Care Cancer 2012; 20: 75–85.

92.

Elsenbruch

Schmid

Lutz

, et al. Self-reported quality of life and depressive symptoms in children, adolescents, and adults with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a cross-sectional survey study. Neuropediatrics 2013; 44: 257–264.

93.

Friedman

Linnemann

Altstein

, et al. The CF-CARES primary palliative care model: a CF-specific structured assessment of symptoms, distress, and coping. J Cyst Fibros 2018; 17(1): 71–77.

94.

Goldbeck

Besier

Hinz

, et al. Prevalence of symptoms of anxiety and depression in German patients with cystic fibrosis. Chest 2010; 138(4): 929–936.

95.

Gupta

Edelstein

Albert-Green

, et al. Assessing information and service needs of young adults with cancer at a single institution: the importance of information on cancer diagnosis, fertility preservation, diet, and exercise. Support Care Cancer 2013; 21: 2477–2484.

96.

Gupta

Nathan

, et al. Prevalence, severity, and predictors of symptom burden among adolescents and young adults with cancer. Cancer Med 2023; 12(10): 11773–11785.

97.

Harper

Maseja

Parkinson

, et al. Symptom severity and trajectories among adolescent and young adult patients with cancer. JNCI Cancer Spectrum 2023; 7(6): 1–13.

98.

Hayee

Watson

Campbell

, et al. A high prevalence of chronic gastrointestinal symptoms in adults with cystic fibrosis is detected using tools already validated in other GI disorders. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2019; 7(7): 881–888.

99.

Hirayama

Ishiki

Yanai

, et al. Feasibility of an electronic patient-reported outcome tool for screening distress and supportive care needs of adolescents and young adults with cancer. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2024; 13(1): 138–146.

100.

Houwen-van Opstal

SLS

Heutinck

Jansen

, et al. Occurrence of symptoms in different stages of Duchenne muscular dystrophy and their impact on social participation. Muscle Nerve 2021; 64(6): 701–709.

101.

Hughes

Holland

Zanino

, et al. Prevalence and intensity of pain and other physical and psychological symptoms in adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer on referral to a palliative care service. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2015; 4(2): 70–75.

102.

Jaudszus

Zeman

Jans

, et al. Validity and reliability of a novel multimodal questionnaire for the assessment of abdominal symptoms in people with cystic fibrosis (CFAbd-Score). The Patient 2019; 12: 419–428.

103.

Kelly

Egan

Reiter-Purtill

, et al. A controlled study of internalizing symptoms in older adolescents with sickle cell disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015; 62(4): 637–642.

104.

Knudsen

Pressler

Mortensen

, et al. Associations between adherence, depressive symptoms and health-related quality of life in young adults with cystic fibrosis. Springerplus 2016; 5(1): 8.

105.

Lewington

Namukwaya

Limoges

, et al. Provision of palliative care for life-limiting disease in a low income country national hospital setting: how much is needed? BMJ Support Palliat Care 2012; 2(2): 140–144.

106.

Lidington

Darlington

Din

, et al. Describing unmet supportive care needs among young adults with cancer (25–39 years) and the relationship with health-related quality of life, psychological distress, and illness cognitions. J Clin Med 2021; 10(19): 4449.

107.

Link

Thompson

, et al. Understanding the symptoms and concerns of adolescents and young adults with cancer in Alberta: a comparative cohort study using patient-reported outcomes. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2023; 12(2): 199–206.

108.

Markwardt

Taghavi

Shear

, et al. Health disparities in young adults: a direct comparison of distress and unmet needs across cancer centers. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2024; 8: 1–11.

109.

McCarthy

McNeil

Drew

, et al. Information needs of adolescent and young adult cancer patients and their parent-carers. Support Care Cancer 2017; 26: 1655–1664.

110.

Millar

Patterson

Desille

. Emerging adulthood and cancer: how unmet needs vary with time-since-treatment. Palliat Support Care 2010; 8(2): 151–158.

111.

Moens

Siegert

Taylor

, et al. Symptom clusters in people living with HIV attending five palliative care facilities in two sub-Saharan African countries: a hierarchical cluster analysis. PLoS One 2015; 10(5): e0126554.

112.

Naik

Leung

Laskin

, et al. Emotional distress and psychosocial needs in patients with breast cancer in British Columbia: younger versus older adults. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 179: 471–477.

113.

Okamura

Fujimori

Sato

, et al. Unmet supportive care needs and associated factors among young adult cancer patients in Japan. BMC Cancer 2021; 21: 17.

114.

Olveira

Sole

Girón

, et al. Depression and anxiety symptoms in Spanish adult patients with cystic fibrosis: associations with health-related quality of life. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2016; 40: 39–46.

115.

Ovayolu

Kaplan

, et al. Symptoms and quality of life: before and after stem cell transplantation in cancer. Pak J Med Sci 2013; 29(3): 803–808.

116.

Pasek

Bazaliski

Sawicka

. The need for support among cancer patients–a preliminary study. Age 2016; 158(36): 49–52.

117.

Peersmann

SHM

Grootenhuis

van Straten

, et al. Insomnia symptoms and daytime fatigue co-occurrence in adolescent and young adult childhood cancer patients in follow-up after treatment: prevalence and associated risk factors. Cancers 2022; 14(14): 3316.

118.

Perl

Nordheimer

Lando

, et al. Young patients and gastrointestinal (GI) tract malignancies - are we addressing the unmet needs? BMC Cancer 2016; 16: 630–638.

119.

Reid

Siu

McCrindle

, et al. Sexual behavior and reproductive concerns among adolescents and young adults with congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2008; 125(3): 332–338.

120.

Robbins

Carroll

North

. Psychological symptom screening in an adult sickle cell disease clinic and predictors of treatment follow up. Psychol Health Med 2020; 25(10): 1192–1200.

121.

Roberts

Severinsen

Carraway

, et al. Life changes and problems experienced by young adults with cancer. Psycho-Oncol 1997; 15(1): 15–25.

122.

Sanford

Zhao

Salsman

, et al. Symptom burden among young adults with breast or colorectal cancer. Cancer 2014; 120(15): 2255–2263.

123.

Sawyer

McNeil

McCarthy

, et al. Unmet need for healthcare services in adolescents and young adults with cancer and their parent carers. Support Care Cancer 2017; 25: 2229–2239.

124.

Sender

Friedrich

Leuteritz

, et al. Unmet supportive care needs in young adult cancer patients: associations and changes over time. Results from the AYA-Leipzig study. J Cancer Surviv 2019; 13: 611–619.

125.

Simms

Gikaara

Munene

, et al. Multidimensional patient-reported problems within two weeks of HIV diagnosis in East Africa: a multicentre observational study. PLoS One 2013; 8(2): e57203.

126.

Smith

Bellizzi

Keegan

THM

, et al. Health-related quality of life of adolescent and young adult patients with cancer in the United States: the adolescent and young adult health outcomes and patient experience study. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31(17): 2136–2145.

127.

Smrke

Leung

Srikanthan

, et al. Distinct features of psychosocial distress of adolescents and young adults with cancer compared to adults at diagnosis: patient-reported domains of concern. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2020; 9(4): 540–545.

128.

Sogutlu

Levenson

McClish

, et al. Somatic symptom burden in adults with sickle cell disease predicts pain, depression, anxiety, health care utilization, and quality of life: the PiSCES project. Psychosomatics 2011; 52(3): 272–279.

129.

Soleimani

Kollmannsberger

Bates

, et al. Patient-reported psychosocial distress in adolescents and young adults with germ cell tumours. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29: 2105–2110.

130.

Sun

Yang

Zhang

, et al. Fear of cancer recurrence, anxiety and depressive symptoms in adolescent and young adult cancer patients. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2019; 15: 857–865.

131.

Trandel

Pilewski

Dellon

, et al. Symptom burden and unmet existential needs in adults with cystic fibrosis. West J Nurs Res 2019; 41(10): 1448–1464.

132.

Wettergren

Langius

Björkholm

, et al. Post-traumatic stress symptoms in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. Acta Oncol 1999; 38(4): 475–480.

133.

Zebrack

Corbett

Embry

, et al. Psychological distress and unsatisfied need for psychosocial support in adolescent and young adult cancer patients during the first year following diagnosis. Psycho-Oncol 2014; 23(11): 1267–1275.

134.

Allen

Reda

Martin

, et al. The needs of adolescents and young adults with chronic illness: results of a quality improvement survey. Children 2022; 9(4): 500.

135.

Choi

Bae

, et al. Discrepancies in educational needs for transition in adolescents and young adults with spina bifida in South Korea: use of the Borich needs assessment model. J Pediatr Nurs 2021; 61: 318–324.

136.

Collins

Harding

. Improving HIV management in sub-Saharan Africa: how much palliative care is needed? AIDS Care 2007; 19(10): 1304–1306.

137.

Graetz

Fasciano

Rodriguez-Galindo

, et al. Things that matter: adolescent and young adult patients’ priorities during cancer care. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66(9): 1–8.

138.

Hamel

Johnson

Tawil

, et al. Patient-reported symptoms in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (PRISM-FSHD). Neurol 2019; 93(12): e1180–e1192.

139.

Jonker-Pool

Hoekstra

van Imhoff

, et al. Male sexuality after cancer treatment–needs for information and support: testicular cancer compared to malignant lymphoma. Patient Educ Couns 2004; 52(2): 143–150.

140.

Kirchhoff

Fowler

Warner

, et al. Supporting adolescents and young adults with cancer: oncology provider perceptions of adolescent and young adult unmet needs. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2017; 6(4): 519–523.

141.

Oosterhuis

Goodwin

Kiernan

, et al. Concerns about infertility risks among pediatric oncology patients and their parents. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008; 50(1): 85–89.

142.

Osunkwo

Andemariam

Minniti

, et al. Impact of sickle cell disease on patients’ daily lives, symptoms reported, and disease management strategies: results from the international sickle cell world assessment survey (SWAY). Am J Hematol 2021; 96(4): 404–417.

143.

Pulewka

Strauss

Hochhaus

, et al. Clinical, social, and psycho-oncological needs of adolescents and young adults (AYA) versus older patients following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2021; 147: 1239–1246.

144.

Zebrack

. Information and service needs for young adult cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2008; 16: 1353–1360.

145.

Zebrack

Block

Hayes-Lattin

, et al. Psychosocial service use and unmet need among recently diagnosed adolescent and young adult cancer patients. Cancer 2013; 119(1): 201–214.

146.

Jarvis

. (2022) Is transition from paediatric to adult healthcare with a life-limiting condition associated with more unplanned hospital care?. PhD thesis, University of York.

147.

Kerr

Price

Nicholl

, et al. Transition from children’s to adult services for young adults with life-limiting conditions: a realist review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud 2017; 76: 1–27.

148.

Johnston

Jindal-Snape

Pringle

, et al. Understanding the relationship transitions and associated end of life clinical needs of young adults with life-limiting illnesses: a triangulated longitudinal qualitative study. Sage Open Med 2016; 4: 2050312116666429.

149.

Linane

Tanjavur

Sullivan

. A scoping review of guidelines and frameworks for advance care planning for adolescents and young adults with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions. Palliat Med 2024; 38(5): 504–516.

150.

Antunes

Harding

Higginson

. Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers. Palliat Med 2014; 28(2): 158–175.

151.

Bausewein

Daveson

Currow

, et al. EAPC white paper on outcome measurement in palliative care: improving practice, attaining outcomes and delivering quality services - recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) task force on outcome measurement. Palliat Med 2016; 30(1): 6–22.

152.

Murtagh

Ramsenthaler

Firth

, et al. A brief, patient- and proxy-reported outcome measure in advanced illness: validity, reliability and responsiveness of the integrated palliative care outcome scale (IPOS). Palliat Med 2019; 33(8): 1045–1057.

153.

Coombes

Braybrook

Harðardóttir

, et al. Cognitive testing of the children’s palliative outcome scale (C-POS) with children, young people and their parents/carers. Palliat Med 2024; 38(6): 644–659.

154.

Administration. USFaD: Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Washington. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidances/ucm193282.pdf (2009, accessed 24 July 2025).

155.

Wiering

de Boer

Delnoij

. Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures: the developers’ perspective. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17(1): 635.

156.

Moghaddam

Coxon

Nabarro

, et al. Unmet care needs in people living with advanced cancer: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2016; 24: 3609–3622.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

0.06 MB

0.05 MB

0.16 MB