While most patients desire to die at home or in a community-based hospice, the transition from hospital to community settings often lacks streamlined coordination of care to ensure that adequate support is provided in the preferred care setting. The impact of hospital-based palliative care consultations on post-discharge care and outcomes has not been extensively studied.
Aim:
The aim of this study was to appraise available research on the impact of inpatient palliative care consultations on transitions from hospital to community settings.
Design:
We conducted a narrative systematic review and used the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool to appraise the quality of selected studies. Studies were included if they assessed the transition from hospital to community and examined outcomes after an inpatient palliative care consultation. A protocol for this study was registered and published in PROSPERO, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (ID: CRD42018094924).
Data sources:
We searched for quantitative studies indexed in PubMED, CINAHL and Cochrane and published between 1 January 1 2000 and 11 March 2018.
Results:
Our search retrieved 2749 articles. From these, 123 articles were full-text screened and 15 studies met our inclusion criteria. Studies reported that inpatient palliative care consultations are associated with high rates of discharge to community settings, greater provision of services post-discharge, improved coordination and lower rates of rehospitalization.
Conclusion:
Existing evidence suggest that inpatient palliative care consultations have a positive impact on patient outcomes and transitions to the community, demonstrating the potential to improve patient quality of life and relieve overburdened acute care systems.
GomesBHigginsonIJCalanzaniN, et al. Preferences for place of death if faced with advanced cancer: a population survey in England, Flanders, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Portugal and Spain. Ann Oncol2012; 23(8): 2006–2015.
3.
GomesBCalanzaniNGyselsM, et al. Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care2013; 12(1): 7.
4.
BellCSomogyi-ZaludEMasakiK. Factors associated with congruence between preferred and actual place of death. J Pain Symptom Manage2013; 31(3): 477–479.
5.
BillinghamMJBillinghamSJ. Congruence between preferred and actual place of death according to the presence of malignant or non-malignant disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Support Palliat Care2013; 3(2): 144–154.
6.
HallMJLevantSDeFrancesCJ. Trends in inpatient hospital deaths: National Hospital Discharge Survey, 2000–2010. NCHS data brief, no. 118. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2013.
7.
WilsonDMBirchS. Moving from place to place in the last year of life: a qualitative study identifying care setting transition issues and solutions in Ontario. Health Soc Care Community2018; 26(2): 232–239.
8.
TallmanKGreenwaldRReidenouerA, et al. Living with advanced illness: longitudinal study of patient, family, and caregiver needs. Perm J2012; 16(3): 28–35.
9.
MezeyMDublerNNMittyE, et al. What impact do setting and transitions have on the quality of life at the end of life and the quality of the dying process?Gerontologist2002; 42(Suppl 3): 54–67.
10.
BurgeFILawsonBCritchleyP, et al. Transitions in care during the end of life: changes experienced following enrolment in a comprehensive palliative care program. BMC Palliat Care2005; 4(1): 3–7.
11.
JacksonCTTrygstadTKDeWaltDA, et al. Transitional care cut hospital readmissions for North Carolina medicaid patients with complex chronic conditions. Health Aff2013; 32(8): 1407–1415.
12.
MorrisonBRSDietrichJLadwigS, et al. Palliative care consultation teams cut hospital costs for medicaid beneficiaries. Health Aff2011;30(3): 454–463.
13.
YabroffKRMandelblattJSInghamJ. The quality of medical care at the end-of-life in the USA: existing barriers and examples of process and outcome measures. Palliat Med2004; 18(3): 202–216.
BowlesKHNaylorMDFoustJB. Patient characteristics at hospital discharge and a comparison of home care referral decisions. J Am Geriatr Soc2002; 50(2): 336–342.
16.
GomesBCalanzaniNCurialeV, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home palliative care services for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers. Cochrane Libr2013(6): 93.
Armijo-OlivoSStilesCRHagenNA, et al. Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research. J Eval Clin Pract2012; 18(1): 12–18.
19.
AndersonLMPetticrewMRehfuessE, et al. Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews. Res Synth Methods2011; 2(1): 33–42.
LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJ, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and metaanalyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med2009; 151(4): 65–94.
22.
LinERosenthalMAEastmanP, et al. Inpatient palliative care consultation for patients with glioblastoma in a tertiary hospital. Intern Med J2013; 43(8): 942–945.
23.
KötzschFStielSHeckelM, et al. Care trajectories and survival after discharge from specialized inpatient palliative care – results from an observational follow-up study. Support Care Cancer2014; 23(3): 627–634.
GadeGVenohrIConnerD, et al. Impact of an inpatient palliative care team: a randomized controlled trial. J Palliat Med2008; 11(2): 180–190.
26.
AdelsonKParisJHortonJR, et al. Standardized criteria for palliative care consultation on a solid tumor oncology service reduces downstream health care use. J Oncol Pract2017; 13(5): e431–e440, http://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JOP.2016.016808
ParisJMorrisonRS. Evaluating the effects of inpatient palliative care consultations on subsequent hospice use and place of death in patients with advanced GI cancers. J Oncol Pract2014; 10(3): 174–177, http://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JOP.2014.001429
WhitfordKShahNDMoriartyJ, et al. Impact of a palliative care consult service. Am J Hosp Palliat Care2014; 31(2): 175–182.
34.
ZalenskiRJJonesSSCourageC, et al. Impact of palliative care screening and consultation in the ICU: a Multihospital Quality Improvement Project. J Pain Symptom Manage2017; 53(1): 5–12.e3.
35.
CaticAMitchellMJKingMR. Preliminary data from an advanced dementia consult service: integrating research, education, and clinical expertise. J Am Geriatr Soc2014; 61(1): 1–23.
LinYMyallMJarrettN. Uncovering the decision-making work of transferring dying patients home from critical care units: an integrative review. J Adv Nurs2017; 73(12): 2864–2876.
40.
WangSYAldridgeMDGrossCP, et al. Transitions between healthcare settings of hospice enrollees at the end of life. J Am Geriatr Soc2016; 64(2): 314–322.
BlackfordJStreetA. The role of the palliative care nurse consultant in promoting continuity of end-of-life care. Int J Palliat Med2001; 7(6): 273–278.
43.
CarpenterJGBerryPHErsekM. Nursing home care trajectories for older adults following in-hospital palliative care consultation. Geriatr Nurs2017; 38(6): 531–536.
DuyxBUrlingsMSwaenG, et al. Scientific citations favor positive results: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol2017; 88: 92–101.
46.
TanASeahAChuaG, et al. Impact of a palliative care initiative on end-of-life care in the general wards: a before-and-after study. Palliat Med2014; 28(1): 34–41.
47.
PfaffKMarkakiA. Compassionate collaborative care: an integrative review of quality indicators in end-of-life care. BMC Palliat Care2017; 16(1): 65.
48.
SeowHSnyderCFShugarmanLR, et al. Developing quality indicators for cancer end-of-life care: proceedings from a national symposium. Cancer2009; 115(17): 3820–3829.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
