Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2026-2
Decision-making experiences of patients receiving palliative care and their caregivers regarding transitions from hospital to community: A systematic review of qualitative studies
Transitioning from hospital to community represents a vulnerable stage in the palliative care journey for patients with advanced illness. The decision regarding care setting is often shaped by multiple factors and involves a range of challenges and burdens.
Aim:
To synthesise the decision-making experiences of patients with advanced illness and their caregivers during transitions from hospital to community palliative care.
Design:
A systematic review of qualitative studies. Thomas and Harden’s thematic analysis approach was used for data synthesis. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023494617).
Data sources:
PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI, WanFang and Vip were searched up to 22 November 2023.
Results:
Ten papers were included in this review. Three themes emerged: (a) perceived insecurity of transfer, highlighting perceived risks associated with transitions and the resulting decision-making difficulties; (b) balancing priorities in care, reflecting how patients and caregivers weigh multiple considerations, including medical support, caregiving capacity and personal commitment; and (c) love and belonging-regaining meaning of lives, illustrating the spiritual meaning of care settings for patients and caregivers.
Conclusions:
Patients with complex psychosocial needs and their caregivers were particularly vulnerable during the decision-making process, especially when external support was insufficient. Therefore, healthcare providers are recommended to actively engage by enhancing communication skills and utilising decision aid tools to provide comprehensive and sufficient information to patients and caregivers.
MorrisonRS. A national palliative care strategy for Canada. J Palliat Med2018; 21: S63–S75.
2.
RobinsonJGottMGardinerC, et al. The ‘problematisation’ of palliative care in hospital: an exploratory review of international palliative care policy in five countries. BMC Palliat Care2016; 15: 64.
3.
BajwahSOluyaseAOYiD, et al. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hospital-based specialist palliative care for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2020; 9: CD012780.
4.
KaufmanBGGrangerBBSunJL, et al. The cost-effectiveness of palliative care: insights from the PAL-HF trial. J Card Fail2021; 27: 662–669.
5.
CotogniPSainiADe LucaA. In-hospital palliative care: should we need to reconsider what role hospitals should have in patients with end-stage disease or advanced cancer?J Clin Med2018; 7: 18. DOI: 10.3390/jcm7020018
6.
EvansCJBoneAEYiD, et al. Community-based short-term integrated palliative and supportive care reduces symptom distress for older people with chronic noncancer conditions compared with usual care: a randomised controlled single-blind mixed method trial. Int J Nurs Stud2021; 120: 103978.
7.
HamanoJTakeuchiAMoriM, et al. Comparison of survival times of advanced cancer patients with palliative care at home and in hospital. PLoS One2023; 18: e0284147.
8.
Arias-CasaisNLópez-FidalgoJGarraldaE, et al. Trends analysis of specialized palliative care services in 51 countries of the WHO European region in the last 14 years. Palliat Med2020; 34: 1044–1056.
9.
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. March 2024 report to the congress: Medicare payment policy. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, 2024.
10.
SeowHBainbridgeD. The development of specialized palliative care in the community: a qualitative study of the evolution of 15 teams. Palliat Med2018; 32: 1255–1266.
11.
WHO. Quality health services and palliative care: practical approaches and resources to support policy, strategy and practice. WHO, 2021.
12.
KötzschFStielSHeckelM, et al. Care trajectories and survival after discharge from specialized inpatient palliative care–results from an observational follow-up study. Support Care Cancer2015; 23: 627–634.
13.
WangS-YAldridgeMDGrossCP, et al. Transitions between healthcare settings of hospice enrollees at the end of life. J Am Geriatr Soc2016; 64: 314–322.
14.
CasottoVRolfiniMFerroniE, et al. End-of-life place of care, health care settings, and health care transitions among cancer patients: impact of an integrated cancer palliative care plan. J Pain Symptom Manag2017; 54: 167–175.
15.
HausnerDKevorkNPopeA, et al. Factors associated with discharge disposition on an acute palliative care unit. Support Care Cancer2018; 26: 3951–3958.
16.
CamplingNRichardsonAMulveyM, et al. Self-management support at the end of life: patients’, carers’ and professionals’ perspectives on managing medicines. Int J Nurs Stud2017; 76: 45–54.
17.
JuhrmannMLVandersmanPButowPN, et al. Paramedics delivering palliative and end-of-life care in community-based settings: a systematic integrative review with thematic synthesis. Palliat Med2022; 36: 405–421.
18.
KillackeyTLovricsESaundersS, et al. Palliative care transitions from acute care to community-based care: a qualitative systematic review of the experiences and perspectives of health care providers. Palliat Med2020; 34: 1316–1331.
19.
MertensFSercuMDeryckeA, et al. Patients’ experiences of transfers between care settings in palliative care: an interview study. Ann Palliat Med2022; 11: 2830–2843.
20.
MertensFVanderstichelenSDeveugeleM, et al. Family carers’ experiences regarding patient transfers between care settings in palliative care: an interview study. Ann Palliat Med2023; 12: 767–782.
21.
KallianisVJoubertLGormanS, et al. “Unexpected and distressing”: understanding and improving the experience of transferring palliative care inpatients to residential care. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care2017; 13: 193–204.
22.
StajduharKIDaviesB. Variations in and factors influencing family members’ decisions for palliative home care. Palliat Med2005; 19: 21–32.
TongAFlemmingKMcInnesE, et al. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol2012; 12: 181.
25.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ2021; 372: n71.
26.
GarsideR. Should we appraise the quality of qualitative research reports for systematic reviews, and if so, how?Innov Euro J Soc Sci Res2014; 27: 67–79.
27.
ThomasJHardenA. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol2008; 8: 45.
28.
LewinSGlentonCMunthe-KaasH, et al. Using qualitative evidence in decision making for Health and social interventions: an approach to assess confidence in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses (GRADE-CERQual). PLoS Med2015; 12: 12.
29.
MoreyTScottMSaundersS, et al. Transitioning from hospital to palliative care at home: patient and caregiver perceptions of continuity of care. J Pain Symptom Manag2021; 62: 233–241.
30.
IsenbergSRKillackeyTSaundersS, et al. “Going home [is] just a feel-good idea with no structure”: a qualitative exploration of patient and family caregiver needs when transitioning from hospital to home in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manag2021; 62: E9–E19.
31.
PradoEMarconSKalinkeL, et al. Meanings and experiences of end-of-life patients and their family caregivers in hospital-to-home transitions: a constructivist grounded theory study. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 12987.
32.
CarrilloGMArias-RojasMCarreñoSP, et al. Looking for control at the end of life through the bond: a grounded theory on the hospital discharge process in palliative care. J Hosp Palliat Nurs2018; 20: 296–303.
33.
GuoPPintoCEdwardsB, et al. Experiences of transitioning between settings of care from the perspectives of patients with advanced illness receiving specialist palliative care and their family caregivers: a qualitative interview study. Palliat Med2022; 36: 124–134.
34.
Wennman-LarsenATishelmanC. Advanced home care for cancer patients at the end of life: a qualitative study of hopes and expectations of family caregivers. Scand J Caring Sci2002; 16: 240–247.
35.
FereidouniASalesiMRassouliM, et al. Preferred place of death and end-of-life care for adult cancer patients in Iran: a cross-sectional study. Front Oncol2022; 12: 911397.
36.
WallerASanson-FisherRNairBR, et al. Preferences for end-of-life care and decision making among older and seriously ill inpatients: a cross-sectional study. J Pain Symptom Manag2020; 59: 187–196.
37.
BrogaardTNeergaardMASokolowskiI, et al. Congruence between preferred and actual place of care and death among Danish cancer patients. Palliat Med2013; 27: 155–164.
38.
FischerSMinSCervantesL, et al. Where do you want to spend your last days of life? Low concordance between preferred and actual site of death among hospitalized adults. J Hosp Med2013; 8: 178–183.
39.
HanariKMoodySYSugiyamaT, et al. Preferred place of end-of-life care based on clinical scenario: a cross-sectional study of a general Japanese population. Healthcare2023; 11: 406.
40.
BostwickDWolfSSamsaG, et al. Comparing the palliative care needs of those with cancer to those with common non-cancer serious illness. J Pain Symptom Manag2017; 53: 1079–1084.e1.
41.
LiuAYO’RiordanDLMarksAK, et al. A comparison of hospitalized patients with heart failure and cancer referred to palliative care. JAMA Netw Open2020; 3: e200020.
42.
Cáceres-TitosMJPorras-SantanaJMCabillas-RomeroMR, et al. Managing cultural diversity in end-of-life care: a qualitative study. BMC Palliat Care2025; 24: 124.
43.
ChengSYSuhSYMoritaT, et al. A cross-cultural study on behaviors when death is approaching in East Asian countries: what are the physician-perceived common beliefs and practices?Medicine2015; 94: e1573.
44.
ChenDRYoungYShayyaA, et al. Cultural interplay in end-of-life care decisions: comparing advance directive beliefs and preferences among adults in the U.S. and Taiwan. BMC Palliat Care2025; 24: 104.
45.
LuYGuYYuW. Hospice and palliative care in China: development and challenges. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs2018; 5: 26–32.
46.
CohenJPivodicLMiccinesiG, et al. International study of the place of death of people with cancer: a population-level comparison of 14 countries across 4 continents using death certificate data. Br J Cancer2015; 113: 1397–1404.
47.
LadinKTighiouartHBronziO, et al. Effectiveness of an intervention to improve decision making for older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease : a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med2023; 176: 29–38.
48.
SaeedFDahlSHorowitzRK, et al. Development and acceptability of a kidney therapy decision aid for patients aged 75 years and older: a design-based research involving patients, caregivers, and a multidisciplinary team. Kidney medicine2023; 5: 100671.
49.
HowardMElstonDBorhanS, et al. Randomised trial of a serious illness decision aid (Plan Well Guide) for patients and their substitute decision-makers to improve engagement in advance care planning. BMJ Support Palliat Care2022; 12: 99–106.
50.
MurrayMAO’ConnorAStaceyD, et al. Efficacy of a training intervention on the quality of practitioners’ decision support for patients deciding about place of care at the end of life: a randomized control trial: study protocol. BMC Palliat Care2008; 7: 4.
51.
YamamotoSAraoHMasutaniE, et al. Decision making regarding the place of end-of-life cancer care: the burden on bereaved families and related factors. J Pain Symptom Manag2017; 53: 862–870.
52.
FacchinettiGD’AngeloDPireddaM, et al. Continuity of care interventions for preventing hospital readmission of older people with chronic diseases: a meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud2020; 101: 103396.
53.
TonkikhOZisbergAShadmiE. Association between continuity of nursing care and older adults’ hospitalization outcomes: a retrospective observational study. J Nurs Manag2020; 28: 1062–1069.
54.
BählerCSignorellAReichO. Health care utilisation and transitions between health care settings in the last 6 months of life in Switzerland. PLoS One2016; 11: e0160932.
55.
HaggertyJLReidRJFreemanGK, et al. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ2003; 327: 1219–1221.
56.
SaundersSKillackeyTKurahashiA, et al. Palliative care transitions from acute care to community-based care-a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manag2019; 58: 721–734.e1.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
