Propensity for paying home visits among general practitioners and the associations with cancer patients’ place of care and death: a register-based cohort study

Abstract

Background:

Previous studies of associations between home visits by general practitioners and end-of-life care for cancer patients have been subject to confounding.

Aim:

To analyse associations between general practitioners’ propensity to pay home visits and the likelihood of hospitalisation and dying out of hospital among their cancer patients.

Design:

A national register cohort study with an ecological exposure. Standardised incidence rates of general practitioner home visits were calculated as a measure for propensity. Practices were grouped into propensity quartiles. Associations between propensity groups and end-of-life outcomes for cancer patients aged 40 or above were calculated.

Setting/participants:

Danish general practitioners and citizens aged 40 or above were included from 2003 to 2012.

Results:

We included 2670 practices with 2,518,091 listed patients (18,364,679 person-years); of whom 116,677 died from cancer. General practitioners were grouped into quartiles based on the general practitioners’ propensity to pay home visits, which varied 6.6-fold between quartiles. Cancer patients in Group 4 (highest propensity) were less hospitalised than patients in Group 1 (lowest propensity): odds ratio: 1.13 (95% confidence interval: 1.08; 1.17) for ⩽3 bed-days and odds ratio: 0.95 (0.91–0.99) for ⩾20 bed-days. Group 4 patients were more likely to die out of hospital (odds ratio: 1.20 (1.16; 1.24)) than Group 1 patients.

Conclusion:

We found a dose–response-like association between general practitioners’ higher propensity to pay home visit and their patients’ likelihood of less end-of-life hospitalisation and more often dying out of hospital.

Keywords

Denmark general practice home visits palliative care

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agar

Currow

Shelby-James

et al . Preference for place of care and place of death in palliative care: are these different questions? Palliat Med 2008; 22: 787–795.

Brogaard

Neergaard

Sokolowski

et al . Congruence between preferred and actual place of care and death among Danish cancer patients. Palliat Med 2012; 27: 155–164.

Neergaard

Bonde Jensen

Sondergaard

et al . Preference for place-of-death among terminally ill cancer patients in Denmark. Scand J Caring Sci 2011; 25: 627–636.

Gomes

Calanzani

Gysels

et al . Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care 2013; 12: 7.

Khan

Gomes

Higginson

IJ.

End-of-life care – what do cancer patients want?

Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2014; 11: 100–108.

Higginson

Sen-Gupta

GJ.

Place of care in advanced cancer: a qualitative systematic literature review of patient preferences. J Palliat Med 2000; 3: 287–300.

Brazil

Howell

Bedard

et al . Preferences for place of care and place of death among informal caregivers of the terminally ill. Palliat Med 2005; 19: 492–499.

Auriemma

Nguyen

Bronheim

et al . Stability of end-of-life preferences: a systematic review of the evidence. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174: 1085–1092.

Jarlbæk

Dødssted og dødsårsager i Danmark 2007–2011 [Place of death and causes of death in Denmark 2007–2011] (in Danish). The Danish Knowledge Centre of Palliative Care, University of Southern Denmark, 2015.

10.

Cohen

Pivodic

Miccinesi

et al . International study of the place of death of people with cancer: a population-level comparison of 14 countries across 4 continents using death certificate data. Br J Cancer 2015; 113: 1397–1404.

11.

Pedersen

Andersen

Sondergaard

General practice and primary health care in Denmark. J Am Board Fam Med 2012; 25 (Suppl. 1): S34–S38.

12.

Burge

Lawson

Johnston

et al . Primary care continuity and location of death for those with cancer. J Palliat Med 2003; 6: 911–918.

13.

Brazil

Bedard

Willison

Factors associated with home death for individuals who receive home support services: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Palliat Care 2002; 1: 2.

14.

Neergaard

Vedsted

Olesen

et al . Associations between home death and GP involvement in palliative cancer care. Br J Gen Pract 2009; 59: 671–677.

15.

Aabom

Kragstrup

Vondeling

et al . Population-based study of place of death of patients with cancer: implications for GPs. Br J Gen Pract 2005; 55: 684–689.

16.

NORDCAN. NORDCAN projektet [NORDCAN project], http://www-dep.iarc.fr/NORDCAN/english/frame.asp (accessed 16 May 2016).

17.

World Health Organization. WHO’s International Classification of Diseases (ICD), http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/ (accessed 14 December 2015).

18.

Pedersen

CB.

The Danish Civil Registration System. Scand J Public Health 2011; 39: 22–25.

19.

Andersen

Olivarius Nde

Krasnik

The Danish National Health Service Register. Scand J Public Health 2011; 39: 34–37.

20.

Statistics Denmark. Documentation of statistics from Statistics Denmark, http://www.dst.dk/en/Statistik/dokumentation/documentationofstatistics (accessed 21 January 2016).

21.

Charlson

Pompei

Ales

et al . A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 373–383.

22.

Lynge

Sandegaard

Rebolj

The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health 2011; 39: 30–33.

23.

Helweg-Larsen

The Danish Register of Causes of Death. Scand J Public Health 2011; 39: 26–29.

24.

Statistics Denmark. Definition of the variable disposable income, http://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/dokumentation/Times/personindkomst/dispon-ny (accessed 15 August 2016).

25.

Timm

Vittrup

Tellervo

Kortlægninger af den speciliserede palliative indsats i Danmark 2009–2012 [Mapping of the specialised palliative care in Denmark 2009–2012]. The Danish Knowledge Centre of Palliative Care, University of Southern Denmark, 2012.

26.

Boerma

Groenewegen

GP home visiting in 18 European countries: adding the role of health system features. Eur J Gen Pract 2001; 7: 132–137.

27.

Neergaard

Olesen

Sondergaard

et al . Are cancer patients’ socioeconomic and cultural factors associated with contact to general practitioners in the last phase of life? Int J Fam Med 2015; 2015: 8.

28.

Aylin

Majeed

Cook

DG.

Home visiting by general practitioners in England and Wales. BMJ 1996; 313: 207–210.

29.

Kronman

Ash

Freund

et al . Can primary care visits reduce hospital utilization among Medicare beneficiaries at the end of life? J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23: 1330–1335.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.39 MB