The purpose of this study is to analyze French general practitioners’ attitudes toward prescribing opiate painkillers for dying patients and compare them with their attitudes toward making frequent home visits. One hundred and fifteen general practitioners indicated the acceptability of prescribing opiates in 48 scenarios of terminal cancer patients with different levels of age, gender, stated pain, request for painkillers, and signs of depression; 103 of them also indicated the acceptability of making frequent home visits in the same 48 scenarios. The responses were analyzed using analysis of variance and cluster analysis. For prescribing opiates, four clusters of physicians were found: 13 prescribed primarily in response to stated pain; 43 to request for painkillers; 43 to the combination of pain, request, and depression; and 16 in virtually all cases. Using the same clusters to analyze visiting gave results that were very consistent with those for prescribing. We conclude that French general practitioners have differing and consistent styles in prescribing painkillers and making home visits to dying cancer patients.
Larue F., Colleau SM, Fontaine A., Brasseur L.Oncologists and primary care physicians’ attitudes toward pain control and morphine prescribing in France. Cancer1995; 76: 2375 2382.
2.
Pargeon KL, Hailey BJBarriers to effective cancer pain management: a review of the literature . J Pain Sympt Manag1999; 18: 358 368 .
3.
Morize V., Nguyen DT, Lorente C., Desfosses G.Descriptive epidemiological survey on a given day in all palliative care patients hospitalized in a French university hospital. Palliat Med1999; 13: 105 117.
Morrison LJ , Morrisson RSPalliative care and pain management. Med Clin N Am2006; 90: 983 1004.
6.
Holtan A., Aass N., Nordoy T., et al. Prevalence of pain in hospitalised cancer patients in Norway: a national survey. Palliat Med2007; 21: 7 13.
7.
Marquie L., Raufaste E., Lauque D., Marine C., Ecoiffier M., Sorum P.Pain rating by patients and physicians: evidence of systematic pain miscalibration . Pain2003; 102: 289 296 .
8.
Marquie L., Sorum PC, Mullet E.Emergency physicians’ pain judgments: cluster analyses on scenarios of acute abdominal pain. Qual Life Res2007 ; 16: 12671273.
9.
Cleeland CS, Gonin R., Baez L., Loehrer P., Pandva KJPain and treatment of pain in minority patients with cancer. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Minority Outpatient Pain Study. Ann Intern Med1997; 127: 813 816.
10.
Weisse CS, Sorum PC, Sanders KN, Syatt BLGender and racial bias in decisions about pain management. J Gen Intern Med2001; 16: 211 217 .
11.
Weisse CS, Sorum PC, Dominguez REThe influence of gender and race on physicians’ pain management decisions . J Pain2003; 4: 505 510 .
12.
Minotti V., Betti M.Attitudes of Italian general practitioners in the treatment of cancer pain . Tumori1997; 83: 729 731 .
13.
Levin ML, Berry JI, Leiter J.Management of pain in terminally ill patients: physician report of knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. J Pain Sympt Manag1998; 15: 27 40.
14.
Ger L-P. , Ho S-T., Wang J-J.Physicians’ knowledge and attitudes toward the use of analgesics for cancer pain management: a survey of two medical centers in Taiwan. J Pain Sympt Manag2000 ; 20: 335 344.
15.
Salvato C., Aretini G., Serraglia D., et al. Opiod prescription for terminally ill outpatients in a district of northern Italy: a retrospective survey. Pharmacol Res2003; 48: 75 82.
16.
Anderson NHFoundations of Information Integration Theory . New York : Academic Press, 1981.
17.
Anderson NHA. FunctionalTheory of Cognition. Malawah, CA: Erlbaum, 1996.
18.
Anderson NHUnified Social Cognition.Malawah, CA: Erlbaum, 2008.
19.
Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene REManual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press, 1970.
20.
Levin IP, Louviere JJ, Schepanski AA, Norman KLExternal validity of laboratory studies of information integration . Organ Behav Hum Perform1983; 31: 173 193 .
21.
Fruchart E. , Rulence-Paques P., Mullet E.Ecological validity test of laboratory studies on information integration. Teorie Modelli2007; 12: 281 288.
22.
Michiels E. , Deschepper R., Van Der Kelen G., et al. The role of general practitioners in continuity of care at the end of life: a qualitative study of terminally ill patients and their next of kin. Palliat Med2007; 21: 409 415.
23.
Lloyd-Williams M., Dennis M., Taylor F.A prospective study to determine the association between physical symptoms and depression in patients with advanced cancer . Palliat Med2004; 18: 558 563 .
24.
Cleeland CS , Cleeland LM, Dar R., Rinehardt LCFactors influencing physician management of cancer pain. Cancer1986; 58: 796 800 .
25.
Purvis Cooper C., Merritt TL, Ross LE, John LV, Jorgensen CMTo screen or not to screen, when clinical guidelines disagree: primary care physicians’ use of the PSA test. Prev Med2004; 38: 182 189.
26.
Linder SK, Hawley ST, Cooper CP, Scholl LE, Jibaja-Weiss M., Volk RJPrimary care physicians’ reported use of pre-screening discussions for prostate cancer screening: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Fam Pract2008; 10: 19. Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/10/19 (accessed on 5 July 2009).
27.
Organisation mondiale de la sante. (1987). Traitement de la douleur cancereuse. Geneve: OMS, 1987.
28.
Singer Y., Carmel S.Teaching end-of-life care to family medicine residents-what do they learn?Med Teach2009; 31: e47-e50.
29.
Mulder SF, Bleijenberg G., Verhagen SC, Stuyt PM, Schijven MP, Tack CJImproved competence after a palliative care course for internal medicine residents . Palliat Med2009; 2: 360 368 .
30.
Alvarez MP, Agra Y.Systematic review of educational interventions in palliative care for primary care physicians. Palliat Med2006 ; 20: 673 683.
31.
Cheraghi-Sohi S., Bower P.Can the feedback of patient assessments, brief training, or their combination, improve the interpersonal skills of primary care physicians? A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res2008; 21: 179. Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-6963-8-179.pdf (accessed on 5 July 2009).
