Hospital doctors’ understanding of use and withdrawal of the Liverpool Care Pathway: A qualitative study of practice-based experiences during times of change

Abstract

Background:

The Liverpool Care Pathway was used in UK hospitals (late 1990s to July 2014) in an attempt to generate hospice-style high-quality end-of-life care in acute settings. Despite being widely established, there was limited research or contextual evidence regarding this approach or its impact. Growing criticism from the public, media, politicians and healthcare professionals culminated with a critical independent review (July 2013) and subsequent withdrawal of the Liverpool Care Pathway.

Aim:

This research explores experiences of doctors using the Liverpool Care Pathway, prior to and during its withdrawal, to better understand shortfallings and inform future initiatives in hospital end-of-life care.

Design:

Individual semi-structured audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and concurrently analysed using thematic analysis.

Setting/participants:

Following ethical approval, volunteer participants from an acute UK hospital were sought (n = 73). A total of 18 specialist doctors were purposively selected.

Results:

Seven themes shaped doctors’ experiences of using the Liverpool Care Pathway: (1) changing perceptions according to length of clinical practice, (2) individual interpretation and application of the Liverpool Care Pathway, (3) limitations arising from setting, speciality and basic end-of-life care competence, (4) understanding and acceptance of medical uncertainty at the end-of-life, (5) centrality of communication and fear of discussing dying, (6) external challenges, including a culture to cure, role modelling and the media and (7) desire for reassurance in end-of-life care decisions.

Conclusion:

Future initiatives in hospital end-of-life care must address doctors’ fears, (in)abilty to tolerate medical uncertainty, communication skills and understanding of the dying phase, in order to provide optimum care in the last days of life.

Keywords

Health personnel palliative care terminal care ‘Liverpool Care Pathway’qualitative research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

National End of Life Care Intelligence Network. End-of-life care CCG profile: place of death, http://www.endoflifecare-intelligence.org.uk/profiles/CCGs/Place_of_Death/atlas.html (2011–2013, accessed 26 March 2016).

Gomes

Higginson

. Where people die (1974–2030): past trends, future projections and implications for care. Palliat Med 2008; 22: 33–41.

Mills

Davies

Macrae

. Care of dying patients in hospital. BMJ 1994; 309: 583–586.

Ellershaw

Smith

Overill

et al . Care of the dying: setting standards for symptom control in the last 48 hours of life. J Pain Symptom Manage 2001; 21(1): 12–17.

Ellershaw

Ward

. Care of the dying patient: the last hours or days of life. BMJ 2003; 326: 30–34.

UK Department of Health. End of life care strategy: promoting high quality care for all adults at the end of life. London: Department of Health, 2008.

UK Department of Health. Quality markers and measures for end of life care. London: Department of Health, 2009.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Quality standard for end of life care for adults. Manchester: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2011.

Marie Curie Palliative Care Institute Liverpool and Royal College of Physicians. National Care of the dying audit – hospitals: round 3. Generic report 2011/2012, 2012. Liverpool: Marie Curie Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, http://www.mcpcil.org.uk/media/16537/ncdah%20generic%20report%202011-2012%20final.doc%2017.11.11.pdf

10.

Devlin

. Sentenced to death on the NHS. The Telegraph, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/6127514/Sentenced-to-death-on-the-NHS.html (2009, accessed 2 September 2009).

11.

Doughty

. Top doctor’s chilling claim: the NHS kills off 130,000 elderly patients every year. The Daily Mail, http://www.dailtymail.co.uk/news/article-2161869/Top-doctors-chilling-claim-The-NHS-kills-130-000-elderly-patients-year.html (2012, accessed 20 June 2012).

12.

Neuberger

Guthrie

Aaronovitch

et al . More Care, less pathway: a review of the Liverpool care pathway. London: Department of Health, 2013.

13.

Chan

Webster

. End-of-life care pathways for improving outcomes in caring for the dying. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 1: CD008006.

14.

Di Leo

Beccaro

Finelli

et al . Expectations about and impact of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient in an Italian hospital. Palliat Med 2011; 25(4): 293–303.

15.

Di Leo

Romoli

Higginson

et al . ‘Less ticking the boxes, more providing support’: a qualitative study on health professionals’ concerns towards the Liverpool Care of the Dying Pathway. Palliat Med 2015; 29(6): 529–537.

16.

Sleeman

Koffman

Bristowe

et al . ‘It doesn’t do the care for you’: a qualitative study of health care professionals’ perceptions of the benefits and harms of integrated care pathways for end of life care. BMJ Open 2015; 5(9): e008242.

17.

Clark

Sheward

Marshall

et al . Staff perceptions of end-of-life care following implantation of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient in the acute care setting: a New Zealand perspective. J Palliat Med 2012; 15(4): 468–473.

18.

Thurston

Waterworth

. ‘Making sense’: nurses’ experiences of changing practice in caring for dying patients in New Zealand. Int J Palliat Nurs 2012; 18(10): 500–507.

19.

Jack

Gambles

Murphy

et al . Nurses’ perceptions of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient in the acute hospital setting. Int J Palliat Nurs 2003; 9(9): 375–381.

20.

Lhussier

Carr

Wilcockson

. The evaluation of an end-of-life integrated care pathway. Int J Palliat Nurs 2007; 13(2): 74–81.

21.

O’Hara

. Nurses’ views on using the Liverpool Care Pathway in an acute hospital setting. Int J Palliat Nurs 2011; 17(5): 239–244.

22.

Pope

Mays

. Qualitative research: reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ 1995; 311: 42

23.

Mezirow

. Learning as transformation: critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2000.

24.

Yardley

Teunissen

Dornan

. Experien-tial learning: AMEE guide no. 63. Med Teach 34(2): e102–e115, http://informahealthcare.com/doi/full/10.3109/0142159X.2012.650741 (2012, accessed 11 August 2014)

25.

Office of National Statistics. Deaths registered in England and Wales (series DR), http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_284566.pdf (2011, accessed 21 January 2013)

26.

NVivo qualitative data analysis Software; QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 10, 2012.

27.

Barnett-Page

Thomas

. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009; 9: 59

28.

Veerbeek

van Zuylen

Swart

et al . The effect of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying: a multi-centre study. Palliat Med 2008; 22: 145–151.

29.

Leadership Alliance for the Care of Dying People. One chance to get it right: improving people’s experience of care in the last few days and hours of life. London: Leadership Alliance for the Care of Dying People, 2014.