The Liverpool Care Pathway for cancer patients dying in hospital medical wards: A before–after cluster phase II trial of outcomes reported by family members

Abstract

Background:

Hospital is the most common place of cancer death but concerns regarding the quality of end-of-life care remain.

Aim:

Preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of the Liverpool Care Pathway on the quality of end-of-life care provided to adult cancer patients during their last week of life in hospital.

Design:

Uncontrolled before–after intervention cluster trial.

Settings/participants:

The trial was performed within four hospital wards participating in the pilot implementation of the Italian version of the Liverpool Care Pathway programme. All cancer patients who died in the hospital wards 2–4 months before and after the implementation of the Italian version of Liverpool Care Pathway were identified. A total of 2 months after the patient’s death, bereaved family members were interviewed using the Toolkit After-Death Family Interview (seven 0–100 scales assessing the quality of end-of-life care) and the Italian version of the Views of Informal Carers - Evaluation of Services (VOICES) (three items assessing pain, breathlessness and nausea-vomiting).

Results:

An interview was obtained for 79 family members, 46 (73.0%) before and 33 (68.8%) after implementation of the Italian version of Liverpool Care Pathway. Following Italian version of Liverpool Care Pathway implementation, there was a significant improvement in the mean scores of four Toolkit scales: respect, kindness and dignity (+16.8; 95% confidence interval = 3.6–30.0; p = 0.015); family emotional support (+20.9; 95% confidence interval = 9.6–32.3; p < 0.001); family self-efficacy (+14.3; 95% confidence interval = 0.3–28.2; p = 0.049) and coordination of care (+14.3; 95% confidence interval = 4.2–24.3; p = 0.007). No significant improvement in symptom’ control was observed.

Conclusions:

These results provide the first robust data collected from family members of a preliminary clinically significant improvement, in some aspects, of quality of care after the implementation of the Italian version of Liverpool Care Pathway programme. The poor effect for symptom control suggests areas for further innovation and development.

Keywords

Cancer palliative care end-of-life care Liverpool Care Pathway hospital quality of health care

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cohen

Bilsen

Addington-Hall

. Population-based study of dying in hospital in six European countries. Palliat Med 2008; 22(6): 702–710.

Beccaro

Costantini

Giorgi Rossi

. Actual and preferred place of death of cancer patients. Results from the Italian Survey of the Dying of Cancer. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60: 412–416.

Ferrand

Jabre

Vincent-Genod

. Circumstances of death in hospitalized patients and nurses’ perceptions. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168(8): 867–875.

Toscani

Di Giulio

Brunelli

. How people die in hospital general wards: a descriptive study. J Pain Symptom Manage 2005; 30: 33–40.

Becker

Sarhatlic

Olschewski

. End-of-life care in hospital: current practice and potentials for improvement. J Pain Symptom Manage 2007; 33(6): 711–719.

Beccaro

Caraceni

Costantini

End-of-life care in Italian hospitals: quality and satisfaction of care from the caregivers’ point of view – results from the Italian Survey of Dying Cancer Patients (ISDOC). J Pain Symptom Manage 2010; 39(6): 1003–1015.

Higginson

Finlay

Goodwin

. Is there evidence that palliative care teams alter end-of-life experiences of patients and their caregivers? J Pain Symptom Manage 2003; 25: 150–168.

Higginson

Evans

CJ.

What is the evidence that palliative care teams improve outcomes for cancer patients and their families?

Cancer J 2010; 16: 423–435.

Bailey

Burgio

Woodby

LL.

Improving processes of hospital care during the last hours of life. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 1722–1727.

10.

Ellershaw

Ward

Care of the dying patient: the last hours or days of life. BMJ 2003; 326: 30–34.

11.

Chan

Webster

End-of-life care pathways for improving outcomes in caring for the dying. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 20(1): CD008006.

12.

Jack

Gambles

Murphy

. Nurses’ perceptions of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient in the acute hospital setting. Int J Palliat Nurs 2003; 9: 375–381.

13.

O’ Hara

. Nurses’ views on using the Liverpool Care Pathway in an acute hospital setting. Int J Palliat Nurs 2011; 17: 239–244.

14.

Di Leo

Beccaro

Finelli

. Expectations about and impact of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient in an Italian hospital. Palliat Med 2011; 25(4): 293–303.

15.

Veerbeek

van Zuylen

Swart

. The effect of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying: a multi-centre study. Palliat Med 2008; 22: 145–151.

16.

Veerbeek

van der Heide

de Vogel-Voogt

. Using the LCP: bereaved relatives’ assessments of communication and bereavement. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2008; 25: 207–214.

17.

Costantini

Di Leo

Beccaro

Methodological issues in a before-after study design to evaluate the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying patient in hospital. Palliat Med 2011; 25: 766–773.

18.

Raijmakers

van Zuylen

Furst

. Variation in medication use in cancer patients at the end of life: a cross-sectional analysis. Support Care Cancer 2013; 21: 1003–1011.

19.

LCP Central Team UK Marie Curie Palliative Care Institute. 10 step continuous quality improvement programme (CQUIP) for care of the dying using the LCP framework, http://www.mcpcil.org.uk (2009, accessed 18 November 2012).

20.

Costantini

Beccaro

Merlo

The last three months of life of Italian cancer patients. Methods, sample characteristics and response rate of the Italian Survey of the Dying of Cancer (ISDOC). Palliat Med 2005; 19(8): 628–638.

21.

Costantini

Ripamonti

Beccaro

. Prevalence, distress, management, and relief of pain during the last 3 months of cancer patients’ life. Results of an Italian mortality follow-back survey. Ann Oncol 2009; 20(4): 729–735.

22.

Teno

Casey

Welch

. Patient-focused, family-centred end-of-life medical care: views of the guidelines and bereaved family members. J Pain Symptom Manage 2001; 22: 738–751.

23.

Teno

Clarridge

Casey

. Validation of toolkit after-death bereaved family member interview. J Pain Symptom Manage 2001; 22: 752–758.

24.

Snijders

TAB

Bosker

. Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: SAGE, 1999.

25.

Higginson

Wade

McCarthy

Palliative care: views of patients and their families. BMJ 1990; 301(6746): 277–281.

26.

Ioannidis

Haidich

Pappa

. Comparison of evidence of treatment effects in randomized and nonrandomized studies. JAMA 2001; 286(7): 821–830.

27.

Okiishi

Lambert

Nielsen

. Waiting for supershrink: an empirical analysis of therapist effects. Clin Psychol Psychother 2003; 10: 361–373.

28.

Wampold

Brown

GS.

Estimating variability in outcomes attributable to therapists: a naturalistic study of outcomes in managed care. J Consult Clin Psychol 2005; 73: 914–923.

29.

Costantini

Ottonelli

Canavacci

. The effectiveness of the Liverpool Care Pathway in improving end of life care for dying cancer patients in hospital. A cluster randomised trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11: 13.