Standardized patient simulation versus didactic teaching alone for improving residents’ communication skills when discussing goals of care and resuscitation: A randomized controlled trial
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2017
Standardized patient simulation versus didactic teaching alone for improving residents’ communication skills when discussing goals of care and resuscitation: A randomized controlled trial
Communication skills are important when discussing goals of care and resuscitation. Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of standardized patients for teaching medical trainees to communicate about goals of care.
Objective:
To determine whether standardized patient simulation offers benefit over didactic sessions alone for improving skill and comfort discussing goals of care.
Design and intervention:
Single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of didactic teaching plus standardized patient simulation versus didactic teaching alone.
Participants:
First-year internal medicine residents.
Main measures:
Changes in communication comfort and skill between baseline and 2 months post-training assessed using the Consultation and Relational Empathy measure.
Key results:
We enrolled 94 residents over a 2-year period. Both groups reported a significant improvement in comfort when discussing goals of care with patients. There was no difference in Consultation and Relational Empathy scores following the workshop (p = 0.79). The intervention group showed a significant increase in Consultation and Relational Empathy scores post-workshop compared with pre-workshop (35.0 vs 31.7, respectively; p = 0.048), whereas there was no improvement in Consultation and Relational Empathy scores in the control group (35.6 vs 36.0; p = 0.4). However, when the results were adjusted for baseline differences in Consultation and Relational Empathy scores in a multivariable regression analysis, group assignment was not associated with an improvement in Consultation and Relational Empathy score. Improvement in comfort scores and perception of benefit were not associated with improvements in Consultation and Relational Empathy scores.
Conclusion:
Simulation training may improve communication skill and comfort more than didactic training alone, but there were important confounders in this study and further studies are needed to determine whether simulation is better than didactic training for this purpose.
HeylandDKCookDJRockerGM. Defining priorities for improving end-of-life care in Canada. CMAJ2010; 182(16): E747–E752.
2.
HeylandDKDodekPRockerG. What matters most in end-of-life care: perceptions of seriously ill patients and their family members. CMAJ2006; 174(5): 627–633.
3.
TamblynRAbrahamowiczMDauphineeD. Physician scores on a national clinical skills examination as predictors of complaints to medical regulatory authorities. JAMA2007; 298(9): 993–1001.
4.
BoyleDO’ConnellDPlattFW. Disclosing errors and adverse events in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med2006; 34(5): 1532–1537.
5.
LevinsonWRoterDLMulloolyJP. Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA1997; 277(7): 553–559.
6.
A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. JAMA1995; 274(20): 1591–1598.
7.
HeylandDKFrankCGrollD. Understanding cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision making: perspectives of seriously ill hospitalized patients and family members. Chest2006; 130(2): 419–428.
8.
WrightAAZhangBRayA. Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA2008; 300(14): 1665–1673.
9.
DownarJLukTSibbaldRW. Why do patients agree to a “Do not resuscitate” or “Full code” order? Perspectives of medical inpatients. J Gen Intern Med2011; 26: 582–587.
10.
EhlenbachWJBarnatoAECurtisJR. Epidemiologic study of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the elderly. N Engl J Med2009; 361(1): 22–31.
11.
HoTHBarberaLSaskinR. Trends in the aggressiveness of end-of-life cancer care in the universal health care system of Ontario, Canada. J Clin Oncol2011; 29(12): 1587–1591.
12.
AngusDCBarnatoAELinde-ZwirbleWT. Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med2004; 32(3): 638–643.
13.
NelsonJEAngusDCWeissfeldLA. End-of-life care for the critically ill: a national intensive care unit survey. Crit Care Med2006; 34(10): 2547–2553.
14.
LevinsonWPizzoPA. Patient-physician communication: it’s about time. JAMA2011; 305(17): 1802–1803.
15.
TulskyJAChesneyMALoB. See one, do one, teach one? House staff experience discussing do-not-resuscitate orders. Arch Intern Med1996; 156(12): 1285–1289.
16.
KersunLGyiLMorrisonWE. Training in difficult conversations: a national survey of pediatric hematology-oncology and pediatric critical care physicians. J Palliat Med2009; 12(6): 525–530.
17.
SibbaldRDownarJHawryluckL. Perceptions of “futile care” among caregivers in intensive care units. CMAJ2007; 177(10): 1201–1208.
18.
SchroderCHeylandDJiangX. Educating medical residents in end-of-life care: insights from a multicenter survey. J Palliat Med2009; 12(5): 459–470.
19.
MaguirePFairbairnSFletcherC. Consultation skills of young doctors: I—benefits of feedback training in interviewing as students persist. Br Med J1986; 292(6535): 1573–1576.
20.
BowmanFMGoldbergDPMillarT. Improving the skills of established general practitioners: the long-term benefits of group teaching. Med Educ1992; 26(1): 63–68.
21.
KurtzSMLaidlawTMakoulG. Medical education initiatives in communication skills. Cancer Prev Control1999; 3(1): 37–45.
TulskyJA. Interventions to enhance communication among patients, providers, and families. J Palliat Med2005; 8(Suppl. 1): S95–S102.
24.
AlexanderSCKeitzSASloaneR. A controlled trial of a short course to improve residents’ communication with patients at the end of life. Acad Med2006; 81(11): 1008–1012.
25.
FallowfieldLJenkinsVFarewellV. Efficacy of a Cancer Research UK communication skills training model for oncologists: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet2002; 359(9307): 650–656.
26.
LienardAMerckaertILibertY. Is it possible to improve residents breaking bad news skills? A randomised study assessing the efficacy of a communication skills training program. Br J Cancer2010; 103(2): 171–177.
27.
LorinSRhoLWisniveskyJP. Improving medical student intensive care unit communication skills: a novel educational initiative using standardized family members. Crit Care Med2006; 34(9): 2386–2391.
28.
DownarJKnickleKGrantonJT. Using standardized family members to teach communication skills and ethical principles to critical care trainees. Crit Care Med2012; 40(6): 1814–1819.
29.
CookDAHatalaRBrydgesR. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA2011; 306(9): 978–988.
30.
IssenbergSBMcGaghieWCPetrusaER. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach2005; 27(1): 10–28.
31.
MercerSWMaxwellMHeaneyD. The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Fam Pract2004; 21(6): 699–705.
32.
MercerSWMcConnachieAMaxwellM. Relevance and practical use of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in general practice. Fam Pract2005; 22(3): 328–334.
33.
MercerSWMurphyDJ. Validity and reliability of the CARE measure in secondary care. Clin Govern Int J2008; 13(4): 269–283.
SkeffKStratosGBergenMR. Evaluation of a medical faculty development program. A comparison of traditional pre/post and retrospective pre/post self-assessment ratings. Eval Health Prof1992; 15: 350–366.
HeylandDKBarwichDPichoraD. Failure to engage hospitalized elderly patients and their families in advance care planning. JAMA Intern Med2013; 173: 778–787.
38.
YouJJFowlerRAHeylandDK. Just ask: discussing goals of care with patients in hospital with serious illness. CMAJ. Epub ahead of print 15July2013. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.121274.
39.
ZhangBWrightAAHuskampHA. Health care costs in the last week of life: associations with end-of-life conversations. Arch Intern Med2009; 169(5): 480–488.
40.
DeepKSGriffithCHWilsonJF. Communication and decision making about life-sustaining treatment: examining the experiences of resident physicians and seriously-ill hospitalized patients. J Gen Intern Med2008; 23(11): 1877–1882.
41.
BerkhofMvan RijssenHJSchellartAJ. Effective training strategies for teaching communication skills to physicians: an overview of systematic reviews. Patient Educ Couns2011; 84(2): 152–162.
42.
HelferRE. An objective comparison of the pediatric interviewing skills of freshman and senior medical students. Pediatrics1970; 45(4): 623–627.
43.
MaguirePFairbairnSFletcherC. Consultation skills of young doctors: II—most young doctors are bad at giving information. Br Med J1986; 292(6535): 1576–1578.
44.
GyselsMRichardsonAHigginsonIJ. Communication training for health professionals who care for patients with cancer: a systematic review of training methods. Support Care Cancer2005; 13(6): 356–366.
45.
BosseHMNickelMHuwendiekS. Peer role-play and standardised patients in communication training: a comparative study on the student perspective on acceptability, realism, and perceived effect. BMC Med Educ2010; 10: 27.
46.
JacksonVABackAL. Teaching communication skills using role-play: an experience-based guide for educators. J Palliat Med2011; 14(6): 775–780.
47.
BackALArnoldRMBaileWF. Efficacy of communication skills training for giving bad news and discussing transitions to palliative care. Arch Intern Med2007; 167(5): 453–460.
48.
BaysAMEngelbergRABackAL. Interprofessional communication skills training for serious illness: evaluation of a small-group, simulated patient intervention. J Palliat Med2014; 17(2): 159–166.
49.
DicksonRPEngelbergRABackAL. Internal medicine trainee self-assessments of end-of-life communication skills do not predict assessments of patients, families, or clinician-evaluators. J Palliat Med2012; 15(4): 418–426.
50.
ZendejasBBrydgesRWangAT. Patient outcomes in simulation-based medical education: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med2013; 28(8): 1078–1089.
51.
HeavenCCleggJMaguireP. Transfer of communication skills training from workshop to workplace: the impact of clinical supervision. Patient Educ Couns2006; 60(3): 313–325.
52.
CurtisJRBackALFordDW. Effect of communication skills training for residents and nurse practitioners on quality of communication with patients with serious illness: a randomized trial. JAMA2013; 310(21): 2271–2281.
53.
BaileWFBuckmanRLenziR. SPIKES—a six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist2000; 5(4): 302–311.
54.
CurtisJRWhiteDB. Practical guidance for evidence-based ICU family conferences. Chest2008; 134(4): 835–843.
55.
DownarJHawryluckL. What should we say when discussing “code status” and life support with a patient? A Delphi analysis. J Palliat Med2010; 13: 185–195.
56.
LautretteACiroldiMKsibiH. End-of-life family conferences: rooted in the evidence. Crit Care Med2006; 34(11 Suppl.): S364–S372.
57.
MakoulG. Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: the Kalamazoo consensus statement. Acad Med2001; 76(4): 390–393.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
