An actual case is used to highlight ethical and psychological problems which may arise in the care of terminally ill patients. The case is structured and analysed, focusing on five different situations in which more than one alternative action is possible.
This study shows that between description and prediction on the one hand, and decision making on the other, the interpretation of the situation and the consideration of possible alternative actions both play an important role. Different factors that may influence the interpretations made by the staff include their values, knowledge, experiences and empathy.
Hermerén G. Interpretation: types and criteria. Grazer Philosophische Studien1983; 19: 131–163.
2.
Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics, 4th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
3.
Neuman W. Social research methods qualitative and quantitative approaches. New York: Allyn & Bacon, 1991: 327–342.
4.
Taylor S, Bogdan R. Introduction to qualitative research methods. The search for meaning. Chichester: John Wiley, 1984: 123–149.
5.
Hoy D. The critical circle: literature and history in contemporary hermeneutics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1978.
6.
Beck-Friis B, Strang P. Palliativ medicin (in Swedish). Almqvist & Wiksell Medicin Liber Utbildning, 1995: 62.
7.
Andrae M. Facing death. Physicians' difficulties and coping strategies in cancer care. Umeå universitets tryckeri, 1994.
8.
Dworkin G. Paternalism. In: Becker LC, Becker CB eds. Encyclopedia of ethics. London: St James' Press, 1992: 939–942.
9.
McCormick R. The principle of the double effect. In: McCormick R ed. How brave a new world? Dilemmas in bioethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1981: 413–429.
10.
Quinn W. Actions, intensions, and consequences: the doctrine of double effect. Philosophy and Public Affairs1989; 18: 334–351.
11.
Speck P. Unconscious communications [Editorial]. Palliat Med1996; 10: 273–274.
