Effectiveness of complex interventions focused on quality-of-life assessment to improve palliative care patients’ outcomes: A systematic review

Abstract

Background:

One of the most crucial palliative care challenges is in determining how patient’ needs are defined and assessed. Assessing quality of life has been defined as a priority in palliative care, and it has become a central concept in palliative care practice.

Aim:

To determine to what extent interventions focused on measuring quality of life in palliative care practice are effective in improving outcomes in palliative care patients.

Design:

Systematic review according to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and hand searches.

Data sources:

MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published until June 2012, and through hand searching from references lists of included articles. Only studies that included adult palliative care patients, in any palliative care clinical practice setting of care, and with an experimental, quasi-experimental, or observational analytical study design were eligible for inclusion. All studies were independently reviewed by two investigators who scored them for methodological quality by using the Edwards Method Score.

Results:

In total, 11 articles (of 8579) incorporating information from 10 studies were included. Only three were randomized controlled trials. The quality of the evidence was found from moderate to low. Given a wide variability among patients’ outcomes, individual effect size (ES) was possible for 6 out of 10 studies, 3 of which found a moderate ES on symptoms (ES = 0.68) and psychological (ES = 0.60) and social (ES = 0.55) dimensions.

Conclusion:

Effectiveness of interventions focused on quality-of-life assessment is moderate. Additional studies should explore the complexity of the real palliative care world more accurately and understand the effects of independent variables included in complex palliative care interventions.

Keywords

Palliative care outcome assessment quality of life complex intervention systematic review

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Davies

Higginson

(eds). Palliative care: the solid facts. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, 2004, http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/98418/E82931.pdf (accessed 19 May 2014).

Carlson

Morrison

Bradley

EH.

Improving access to hospice care: informing the debate. J Palliat Med 2008; 11: 438–443.

World Health Organization (WHO). WHO definition of palliative care, 2002, http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en (accessed 19 May 2014).

National Comprehensive Cancer Network.NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN guidelines). Palliative care, Version 2.2013, 2013, http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/palliative.pdf (accessed 19 May 2014).

Stiel

Pastrana

Balzer

. Outcome assessment instruments in palliative and hospice care—a review of the literature. Support Care Cancer 2012; 20: 2879–2893.

Bowling

Current state of the art in quality of life assessment. In: Carr

Higginson

Robinson

(eds) Quality of life. London: BMJ Books, 2003, pp. 1–8.

Sprangers

Schwartz

CE.

Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 1507–1515.

Hall

Petkova

Tsouros

. (eds). Palliative care for older people: better practices. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, 2011, http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/143153/e95052.pdf (accessed 19 May 2014).

Murray

Kendall

Boyd

. Illness trajectories and palliative care. BMJ 2005; 330: 1007–1011.

10.

Wentlandt

Krzyzanowska

Swami

. Referral practices of oncologists to specialized palliative care. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 4380–4386.

11.

Catania

Costantini

Beccaro

. Does quality of life assessment in palliative care look like a complex screening program? Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013; 11: 7.

12.

Doran

Pringle

Patient outcome as an accountability. In: Doran

(ed.) Nursing outcomes: state of the science. 2nd ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2011, pp. 1–23.

13.

Slater

Freeman

Patients’ views of using an outcome measure in palliative day care: a focus group study. Int J Palliat Nurs 2004; 10: 343–351.

14.

Valderas

Kotzeva

Espallargues

. The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res 2008; 17: 179–193.

15.

Albers

Echteld

De Vet

. Evaluation of quality-of-life measures for use in palliative care: a systematic review. Palliat Med 2010; 24: 17–37.

16.

Antunes

Harding

Higginson

; on behalf of EUROIMPACT. Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers. Palliat Med 2014; 28: 158–175.

17.

Von Gunten

. Evolution and effectiveness of palliative care. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2012; 20: 291–297.

18.

Higginson

Evans

CJ.

What is the evidence that palliative care teams improve outcomes for cancer patients and their families?

Cancer J 2010; 16: 423–435.

19.

Gomes

Calanzani

Curiale

. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home palliative care services for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 6: CD007760.

20.

Craig

Dieppe

Macintyre

. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008; 337: a1655.

21.

Petticrew

Anderson

Elder

. Complex interventions and their implications for systematic reviews: a pragmatic approach. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66: 1209–1214.

22.

Campbell

Fitzpatrick

Haines

. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 2000; 321: 694–696.

23.

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

.; The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097.

24.

Flemming

Asking answerable questions. Evid-Based Nurs 1998; 2: 36–37.

25.

Hawe

Shiell

Riley

Complex interventions: How “out of control” can a randomised controlled trial be?

BMJ 2004; 328: 1561–1563.

26.

Edwards

Hood

Matthews

. The effectiveness of one-to-one risk communication interventions in health care: a systematic review. Med Decis Making 2000; 20: 290–297.

27.

Cohen

The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: a review. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 1962; 65: 145–153.

28.

Detmar

Muller

Schornagel

. Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288: 3027–3034.

29.

Snyder

Blackford

Aaronson

. Can patient reported outcome measures identify cancer patients’ most bothersome issues? J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 1216–1220.

30.

McMillan

Small

Haley

WE.

Improving hospice outcomes through systematic assessment: a clinical trial. Cancer Nurs 2011; 34: 89–97.

31.

Mills

Murray

Johnston

. Does a patient-held quality-of-life diary benefit patients with inoperable lung cancer? J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 70–77.

32.

Hill

Use of quality-of-life scores in care planning in a hospice setting: a comparative study. Int J Palliat Nurs 2002; 8: 540–547.

33.

Waller

Girgis

Johnson

. Improving outcomes for people with progressive cancer: interrupted time series trial of a needs assessment intervention. J Pain Symptom Manage 2012; 43: 569–581.

34.

Jocham

Dassen

Widdershoven

. Quality-of-life assessment in a palliative care setting in Germany: an outcome evaluation. Int J Palliat Nurs 2009; 15: 338–345.

35.

Chapman

Whale

Landy

. Clinical evaluation of the Mood and Symptom Questionnaire (MSQ) in a day therapy unit in a palliative support centre in the United Kingdom. Palliat Support Care 2008; 6: 51–59.

36.

Brechtl

Murshed

Homel

. Monitoring symptoms in patients with advanced illness in long-term care: a pilot study. J Pain Symptom Manage 2006; 32: 168–174.

37.

Stevens

Gwilliam

A’hern

. Experience in the use of the palliative care outcome scale. Support Care Cancer 2005; 13: 1027–1034.

38.

Bruera

Kuehn

Miller

. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 1991; 7: 6–9.

39.

Emanuel

LL.

The promise of a good death. Lancet 1998; 351: 21–29.

40.

Guyatt

DiCenso

Farewell

. Randomized trials versus observational studies in adolescent pregnancy prevention. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 167–174.

41.

Segerstrom

Stanton

Alden

. A multidimensional structure for repetitive thought: what’s on your mind, and how, and how much? J Pers Soc Psychol 2003; 85: 909–921.

42.

National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. PARiHS framework for implementing research into practice. Hamilton, ON, Canada: McMaster University, 2011, http://dev.nccmt.ca/registry/view/eng/85.html (accessed 19 May 2014).

43.

Higginson

Evans

Grande

. Evaluating complex interventions in end of life care: the MORECare statement on good practice generated by a synthesis of transparent expert consultations and systematic reviews. BMC Med 2013; 11: 111.

44.

Costantini

Higginson

IJ.

Experimental and quasi-experimental designs. In: Addington-Hall

Bruera

Higginson

. (eds) Research methods in palliative care. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 85–113.

45.

Bausewein

Daveson

Benalia

. Outcome measurement in palliative care—the essentials, 2011, http://www.eapcnet.eu/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=-T62WTgTHtU%3d&tabid=1577 (accessed 19 May 2014).