Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objectives:

A meta-analysis and systematic review was conducted to investigate the potential effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on dysphagia in patients with stroke, including different parameters of frequency and stimulation site.

Methods:

PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE databases and the Cochrane Library, were searched for randomized controlled studies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of dysphagia published before March 2016.

Results:

Six clinical randomized controlled studies of a total of 163 stroke patients were included in this meta-analysis. A significant effect size of 1.24 was found for dysphagic outcome (mean effect size, 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.67–1.81). A subgroup analysis based on frequency showed that the clinical scores were significantly improved in dysphagic patients with low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment (P < 0.05) as well as high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment (P < 0.05). A stimulation site stratified subgroup analysis implied significant changes in stroke patients with dysphagia for the unaffected hemisphere (P < 0.05) and the bilateral hemisphere stimulation (P < 0.05), but not for the affected hemisphere (P > 0.05). The analysis of the follow-up data shows that patients in the repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation groups still maintained the therapeutic benefit of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation four weeks after the last session of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy (P < 0.05).

Conclusion:

This meta-analysis indicates that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has a positive effect on dysphagia after stroke. Compared with low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be more beneficial to the patients. This meta-analysis also supports that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on an unaffected – or bilateral – hemisphere has a significant therapeutic effect on dysphagia.

Keywords

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation stroke dysphagia meta-analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Roth

Lovell

Harvey

Heinemann

Semik

Diaz

. Incidence of and risk factors for medical complications during stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2001; 32: 523–529.

Langmore

Miller

. Behavioral treatment for adults with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 1154–1160.

Roth

. Medical complications encountered in stroke rehabilitation. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am 1991; 2: 563–577.

Singh

Hamdy

. Dysphagia in stroke patients. Postgrad Med J 2006; 82: 383–391.

Easterling

Grande

Kern

Sears

Shaker

. Attaining and maintaining isometric and isokinetic goals of the Shaker exercise. Dysphagia 2005; 20: 133–138.

Gow

Rothwell

Hobson

Thompson

Hamdy

. Induction of long-term plasticity in human swallowing motor cortex following repetitive cortical stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115: 1044–1051.

Khedr

Abo-Elfetoh

. Therapeutic role of rTMS on recovery of dysphagia in patients with lateral medullary syndrome and brainstem infarction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010; 81: 495–499.

Khedr

Abo-Elfetoh

Rothwell

. Treatment of post-stroke dysphagia with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Acta Neurol Scand 2009; 119: 155–161.

Kim

Chun

Kim

Lee

. Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on patients with brain injury and dysphagia. Ann Rehabil Med 2011; 35: 765–771.

10.

Lim

Lee

Yoo

Kwon

. Effect of low-frequency rTMS and NMES on subacute unilateral hemispheric stroke with dysphagia. Ann Rehabil Med 2014; 38: 592–602.

11.

Park

Lee

Yeo

Ryu

. The effect of 5 Hz high-frequency rTMS over contralesional pharyngeal motor cortex in post-stroke oropharyngeal dysphagia: A randomized controlled study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013; 25: 324–e250.

12.

Verin

Leroi

. Poststroke dysphagia rehabilitation by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: A noncontrolled pilot study. Dysphagia 2009; 24: 204–210.

13.

Yang

Liu

. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for rehabilitation of post stroke dysphagia: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Clin Neurophysiol 2016; 127: 1907–1913.

14.

Lee

Kim

Lee

. Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation according to the stimulation site in stroke patients with dysphagia. Ann Rehabil Med 2015; 39: 432–439.

15.

Liu

Wang

. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia: A systematic review of the literature. Chin J Cerebrovasc Dis 2014; 11: 250–255.

16.

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

Altman

Group

. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010; 8: 336–341.

17.

Zintzaras

Ioannidis

. HEGESMA: Genome search meta-analysis and heterogeneity testing. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 3672–3673.

18.

Schmidt

Hayes

. Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: Model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2009; 62: 97–128.

19.

Yang

Pyun

Kim

Ahn

Rhyu

. Effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulation in dysphagia subsequent to stroke: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Dysphagia 2015; 30: 383–391.

20.

Pisegna

Kaneoka

William

. Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Neurophysiol 2016; 127: 956–968.

21.

Cheng

Chan

Wong

Cheung

. Preliminary evidence of the effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on swallowing functions in post-stroke individuals with chronic dysphagia. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2015; 50(3): 389–396.

22.

Momosaki

Abo

Kakuda

. Bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with intensive swallowing rehabilitation for chronic stroke Dysphagia: A case series study. Case Rep Neurol 2014; 6: 60–67.

23.

Hamdy

. The organisation and re-organisation of human swallowing motor cortex. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 56: 204–210.

24.

Khedr

Fetoh

. Short- and long-term effect of rTMS on motor function recovery after ischemic stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2010; 28: 545–559.

25.

Hamdy

Aziz

Thompson

Rothwell

. Physiology and pathophysiology of the swallowing area of human motor cortex. Neural Plast 2001; 8: 91–97.

26.

Traversa

Cicinelli

Pasqualetti

. Follow-up of interhemispheric difference of motor evoked potentials from the ‘affected’ and ‘unaffected’ hemispheres in human stroke. Brain Res 1998; 803: 1–8.

27.

Hummel

Celnik

Giraux

. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 2005; 128: 490–499.

28.

Hummel

Cohen

. Non-invasive brain stimulation: A new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 708–712.

29.

Mistry

Verin

Singh

. Unilateral suppression of pharyngeal motor cortex to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals functional asymmetry in the hemispheric projections to human swallowing. J Physiol 2007; 585: 525–538.

30.

Filipovic

Rothwell

Bhatia

. Slow (1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) induces a sustained change in cortical excitability in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol 2010; 121: 1129–1137.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an alternative therapy for dysphagia after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Objectives:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusion:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References