To evaluate the effects and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on aphasia in stroke patients.
Methods:
We searched databases from inception to January 28, 2021. Randomized control trials investigating the effects and safety of rTMS for aphasia patients after stroke were included. Study screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was conducted with Review Manager 5.3 software. The quality of the evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE).
Results:
Twenty-eight studies with 1287 patients were included. All studies were assessed at low or unclear risk of bias in one or more domains. The meta-analysis exhibited rTMS was better than sham rTMS and conventional rehabilitation in language recovery. Low-frequency rTMS showed greater improvement in language recovery except for comprehension than sham rTMS. Low-frequency and bilateral rTMS were superior to conventional rehabilitation in language recovery. High-frequency rTMS was no better than sham rTMS and conventional rehabilitation for improving aphasia. The rTMS had better effects in naming, comprehension and aphasia quotient at 20 sessions. Eleven studies reported rTMS was safe for aphasia patients after stroke. The quality of evidence for all outcomes was low or very low, and publication bias may exist.
Conclusions:
rTMS may be relatively effective and safe for aphasia patients after stroke. However, these findings should be treated with caution due to high heterogeneity and potential biases.
WorrallLFosterA.Does intensity matter in aphasia rehabilitation?Lancet2017; 389(10078): 1494–1495.
2.
AkaboguJNnamaniAOtuMS, et al. Efficacy of cognitive behavior language therapy for aphasia following stroke: Implications for language education research. Medicine (Baltimore)2019; 98(18): e15305.
3.
MusserBWilkinsonJGilbertT, et al. Changes in identity after aphasic stroke: implications for primary care. Int J Family Med2015; 2015: 970345.
4.
BradyMCKellyHGodwinJ, et al. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2016; 6: Cd000425.
5.
FridrikssonJElmJStarkBC, et al. BDNF genotype and tDCS interaction in aphasia treatment. Brain Stimul2018; 11(6): 1276–1281.
6.
LefaucheurJPAlemanABaekenC, et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018). Clin Neurophysiol2020; 131(2): 474–528.
7.
SmithMCStinearCM.Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in stroke: Ready for clinical practice?J Clin Neurosci2016; 31: 10–14.
8.
MartinPINaeserMAHoM, et al. Research with transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of aphasia. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep2009; 9(6): 451–458.
9.
NaeserMAMartinPITregliaE, et al. Research with rTMS in the treatment of aphasia. Restor Neurol Neurosci2010; 28(4): 511–529.
10.
NaeserMAMartinPINicholasM, et al. Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca’s area: an open-protocol study. Brain Lang2005; 93(1): 95–105.
11.
LefaucheurJP.Stroke recovery can be enhanced by using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Neurophysiol Clin2006; 36(3): 105–115.
12.
WangPZhangJQYuJD, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on stroke patients with aphasia: A systematic review. Chinese J Evidence-Based Med2014; 14(12): 1497–1503.
13.
LiYQuYYuanM, et al. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for patients with aphasia after stoke: A meta-analysis. J Rehab Med2015; 47(8): 675–681.
14.
RenCLZhangGFXiaN, et al. Effect of low-frequency rTMS on aphasia in stroke patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One2014; 9(7): e102557.
15.
LiTZengXLinL, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with different frequencies on post-stroke aphasia: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. Medicine2020; 99(24): e20439.
16.
TugwellPWelchVAKarunananthanS, et al. When to replicate systematic reviews of interventions: consensus checklist. BMJ2020; 370: m2864.
17.
SheaBJReevesBCWellsG, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ2017; 358: j4008.
18.
YalingZDonglingZYijieH, et al. Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on aphasia in cerebrovascular accident patients: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine2019; 98(52): e18561.
19.
Department of Disease Control MoH DoN, Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of cerebrovascular diseases in China. Chinese J Modern Nervous Dis2007; 17: 70.
20.
PingLZhongxuanWYunruZ, et al. Stroke diagnosis and curative effect evaluation standard (Trial). J Beijing Univ Traditional Chinese Med1996; 19(001): 55–56.
21.
HigginsJPADSterneJA. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: HigginsJPChurchillRChandlerJCumpstonMS (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.2.0 (updated June 2017): The Cochrane Collaboration; 2017.
22.
GuyattGHOxmanADVistGE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ2008; 336(7650): 924–926.
23.
Rubi-FessenIHartmannAHuberW, et al. Add-on effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on subacute aphasia therapy: enhanced improvement of functional communication and basic linguistic skills. a randomized controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehab2015; 96(11): 1935–1944.
24.
YangN.Observation on the efficacy of YRD transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of aphasia after stroke. Chinese Recuperative Med2018; 27(09): 922–923.
25.
TaoJ.Evaluation on the language training combined with transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of aphasia of stroke. Chin Commu Doctors2018; 34(12): 152–154.
26.
TsaiPYWangCPKoJS, et al. The persistent and broadly modulating effect of inhibitory rTMS in nonfluent aphasic patients: A sham-controlled, double-blind study. Neurorehab Neural Re2014; 28(8): 779–787.
27.
RenCZhangGXuX, et al. The effect of rTMS over the different targets on language recovery in stroke patients with global aphasia: a randomized sham-controlled study. BioMed Res Int2019; 2019: 4589056.
28.
HuXYZhangTRajahGB, et al. Effects of different frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke patients with non-fluent aphasia: a randomized, sham-controlled study. Neurological Res2018; 40(6): 459–465.
29.
QuY.Observation on the efficacy of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of non-fluent aphasia after subacute stroke. Chin Modern Doctor2020; 58(17): 112–115.
30.
HaghighiMMazdehMRanjbarN, et al. Further evidence of the positive influence of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on speech and language in patients with aphasia after stroke: results from a double-blind intervention with sham condition. Neuropsychobiol2017; 75(4): 185–192.
31.
SeniówJWaldowskiKLeśniakM, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with speech and language training in early aphasia rehabilitation: a randomized double-blind controlled pilot study. Top Stroke Rehabil2013; 20(3): 250–261.
32.
YinZ.Efficacy of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of postlateral aphasia after stroke. J Modern Med Health2020; 36(17): 2781–2784.
33.
FanC.Observation on the effect of repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with speech training in the treatment of aphasia after stroke. Nurs Res Chin2017; 31(14): 1783–1784.
34.
WangJLiJZhangY, et al. Effect of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on non-fluent aphasia after stroke. Chin J Rehab Med2018; 33(12): 1463–1464.
35.
YanFZangWZhangJ, et al. Clinical study of bilateral rTMS on patients with aphasia after cerebral infarction. Chin J Pract Nervous Dis2018; 21(2): 129–132.
36.
ChenF.Therapeutical effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cerebral infarction aphasia and its effect on brain electrical activity. Chin J Cerebrovascular Dis2011; 5(2): 96–101.
37.
ChenL.Influence of transcranial magnetic stimulation on language function score in adult patients with sensory aphasia after stroke. Clin Pract2020; 24(31): 4482–4483.
38.
GuHWangH.Effects of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with speech training on speech function reconstruction in patients with ischemic stroke. Neural Injury Functional Reconstruct2019; 14(10): 525–526.
39.
GuoC.Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with memantine hydrochloride and speech therapy on the treatment of motor aphasia after cerebral infarction. Chin Med Herald2016;13(5).
40.
LiZZhaoYRenC, et al. Mechanism in the treatment of subacute motor aphasia with low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation by quantitative electroencephalography. Chin J Rehab Med2018; 33(7): 794–799.
41.
WangC-PHsiehC-YTsaiP-Y, et al. Efficacy of synchronous verbal training during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with chronic aphasia. Stroke2014; 45(12): 3656–3662.
42.
PanL.Electro-acupuncture combined with high frequency ｒepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of motor aphasia after atroke. Acta Chin Med2019; 9: 1985–1989.
43.
PengHZhouC.Clinical study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with speech rehabilitation training in the treatment of aphasia after cerebral infarction. J Clin Med Pract2020; 24(17): 36–40.
44.
QiuLCaiYJiangY, et al. Effects of response elaboration training combined with rTMS in patients with non-fluent aphasia. Chin J Rehab Med2020; 35(10): 1192–1197.
45.
ShenS.Effects and mechanisms of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment of left hemisphere cerebral infarction aphasia. System Med2018; 3(09): 42–52.
46.
WaldowskiKSeniówJLeśniakM, et al. Effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on naming abilities in early-stroke aphasic patients: A prospective, randomized, double-blind sham-controlled study. Sci World J2012; 2012: 518568.
47.
ZhangX.Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on aphasia in patients with ischemic stroke. J Brain Neurol Dis2020; 28(6): 331–333.
48.
ZhouQShenYZhangS, et al. Efectiveness of constraint induced language therapy combined with low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for non-fluent aphasia. Neurorehab Neural Repair2018; 32(4–5): 397.
49.
CaoX.The effect of nonfluent aphasia after stroke: a comparative study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and the improvement of cognitive impairment [master]: Southern Medical University, 2018.
50.
YanZ.Comparison of t-DCS and r-TMS in rehabilitation of aphasia patients after stroke [master]: China Medical University, 2020.
51.
WassermannEM.Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1998; 108(1): 1–16.
52.
AndohJMartinotJ-L.Interhemispheric compensation: a hypothesis of tms-induced effects on language-related areas. Eur Psychiatry2008; 23(4): 281–288.
53.
RossiniPMRossiS.Transcranial magnetic stimulation: diagnostic, therapeutic, and research potential. Neurology. 2007; 68(7): 484–488.
54.
RossiSHallettMRossiniPM, et al. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol2009; 120(12): 2008–2039.
55.
KhedrEEl-FetohNAAliA, et al. Dual-hemisphere repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for rehabilitation of post-stroke aphasia: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Brain Injury2016; 30(5-6): 808.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
