Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective:

To assess single-session effects of three different types of stimuli known to increase cortical excitability when combined with functional task practice.

Design:

Randomized cross-over trial.

Participants:

A total of 24 participants with chronic cervical spinal cord injury.

Interventions:

One 30-minute session of each, applied concurrently with functional task practice: transcranial direct current stimulation, vibration, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

Measurements:

Nine-hole Peg Test, pinch force, visuomotor tracking, and cortical excitability were collected at pretest, posttest and late posttest (30 minutes after). Early effects (posttest minus pretest) and short-term persistence (late posttest minus pretest) were assessed using a general linear mixed model. Magnitude of effect size was assessed using the Cohen’s d.

Results:

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation was associated with moderate, significant early effects and short-term persistence on Nine-hole Peg Test performance (1.8 ±1.8, p = 0.003, d = 0.59; 2.0 ±2.5, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.65, respectively). Transcranial direct current stimulation (1.8 ±2.5, p = 0.003, Cohen’s d = 0.52) was also associated with significant short-term persistence of moderate size on Nine-hole Peg Test performance (1.8 ±2.5, p = 0.003, Cohen’s d = 0.52) and visuomotor tracking performance (p = 0.05, d = 0.51). Early effects on corticomotor excitability were significant for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (p = 0.003), approached significance for transcranial direct current stimulation (p = 0.07), and only vibration was associated with significant short-term persistence (p = 0.006).

Conclusions:

Meaningful improvements in aspects of hand-related function that persisted at least 30 minutes after intervention were observed with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation, when combined with functional task practice.

Keywords

Cervical spinal cord injury transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation transcranial direct current stimulation vibration functional task practice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Snoek

IJzerman

Hermens

Maxwell

Biering-Sorensen

. Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: Impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics. Spinal Cord 2004; 42: 526–532.

Simpson

Eng

Hsieh

Wolfe

and Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence Scire Research Team. The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. J Neurotrauma 2012; 29: 1548–1555.

Kokotilo

Eng

Curt

. Reorganization and preservation of motor control of the brain in spinal cord injury: A systematic review. J Neurotrauma 2009; 26: 2113–2126.

Hoffman

Field-Fote

. Functional and corticomotor changes in individuals with tetraplegia following unimanual or bimanual massed practice training with somatosensory stimulation: A pilot study. J Neurol Phys Ther 2010; 34: 193–201.

Beekhuizen

Field-Fote

. Massed practice versus massed practice with stimulation: Effects on upper extremity function and cortical plasticity in individuals with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005; 19: 33–45.

Beekhuizen

Field-Fote

. Sensory stimulation augments the effects of massed practice training in persons with tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 602–608.

Marconi

Filippi

Koch

. Long-term effects on cortical excitability and motor recovery induced by repeated muscle vibration in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25: 48–60.

Meesen

Cuypers

Rothwell

Swinnen

Levin

. The effect of long-term TENS on persistent neuroplastic changes in the human cerebral cortex. Hum Brain Mapp 2011; 32: 872–882.

Bolognini

Vallar

Casati

. Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25: 819–829.

10.

Williams

Pascual-Leone

Fregni

. Interhemispheric modulation induced by cortical stimulation and motor training. Phys Ther 2010; 90: 398–410.

11.

Gomes-Osman

Field-Fote

. Bihemispheric anodal corticomotor stimulation using transcranial direct current stimulation improves bimanual typing task performance. J Mot Behav 2013; 45: 361–367.

12.

Davey

Smith

Wells

. Responses of thenar muscles to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998; 65: 80–87.

13.

Bunday

Perez

. Motor recovery after spinal cord injury enhanced by strengthening corticospinal synaptic transmission. Curr Biol 2012; 22: 2355–2361.

14.

Hoffman

Field-Fote

. Cortical reorganization following bimanual training and somatosensory stimulation in cervical spinal cord injury: A case report. Phys Ther 2007; 87: 208–223.

15.

Bikson

Datta

Elwassif

. Establishing safety limits for transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2009; 120: 1033–1034.

16.

Earhart

Cavanaugh

Ellis

Ford

Foreman

Dibble

. The 9-hole peg test of upper extremity function: Average values, test-retest reliability, and factors contributing to performance in people with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Phys Ther 2011; 35: 157–163.

17.

Lindberg

Roche

Robertson

Roby-Brami

Bussel

Maier

. Affected and unaffected quantitative aspects of grip force control in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Brain Res 2012; 1452: 96–107.

18.

Rossini

Barker

Berardelli

. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 91: 79–92.

19.

Wellek

Blettner

. On the proper use of the crossover design in clinical trials: Part 18 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2012; 109: 276–281.

20.

Perneger

. What’s wrong with bonferroni adjustments. BMJ 1998; 316: 1236–1238.

21.

Cohen

. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1977.

22.

Panizza

Nilsson

Roth

Basser

Hallett

. Relevance of stimulus duration for activation of motor and sensory fibers: Implications for the study of H-reflexes and magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 85: 22–29.

23.

Radhakrishnan

Sluka

. Deep tissue afferents, but not cutaneous afferents, mediate transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-induced antihyperalgesia. J Pain 2005; 6: 673–680.

24.

Asanuma

Mackel

. Direct and indirect sensory input pathways to the motor cortex; its structure and function in relation to learning of motor skills. Jpn J Physiol 1989; 39: 1–19.

25.

Butler

Shuster

O’Hara

Hurley

Middlebrooks

Guilkey

. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb motor recovery in stroke survivors. J Hand Ther 2013; 26: 162–170.

26.

Bastani

Jaberzadeh

. Does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhance excitability of the motor cortex and motor function in healthy individuals and subjects with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurophysiol 2012; 123: 644–657.

27.

Antal

Nitsche

Kruse

Kincses

Hoffmann

Paulus

. Direct current stimulation over V5 enhances visuomotor coordination by improving motion perception in humans. J Cogn Neurosci 2004; 16: 521–527.

28.

Antal

Begemeier

Nitsche

Paulus

. Prior state of cortical activity influences subsequent practicing of a visuomotor coordination task. Neuropsychologia 2008; 46: 3157–3161.

29.

Nitsche

Paulus

. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 2000; 527: 633–639.

30.

Nitsche

Paulus

. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 2001; 57: 1899–1901.

31.

Nitsche

Schauenburg

Lang

. Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. J Cogn Neurosci 2003; 15: 619–626.

32.

Nitsche

Fricke

Henschke

. Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. J Physiol 2003; 553: 293–301.

33.

Rosenkranz

Rothwell

. Differences between the effects of three plasticity inducing protocols on the organization of the human motor cortex. Eur J Neurosci 2006; 23: 822–829.

34.

Ness

Field-Fote

. Effect of whole-body vibration on quadriceps spasticity in individuals with spastic hypertonia due to spinal cord injury. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2009; 27: 621–631.

35.

Perez

Floeter

Field-Fote

. Repetitive sensory input increases reciprocal ia inhibition in people with incomplete spinal cord injury. JNPT 2004; 28: 114–121.

36.

Kirshblum

Waring

Biering-Sorensen

. Reference for the 2011 revision of the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2011; 34: 547–554.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB

Cortical vs. afferent stimulation as an adjunct to functional task practice training: a randomized,comparative pilot study in people with cervical spinal cord injury

Abstract

Objective:

Design:

Participants:

Interventions:

Measurements:

Results:

Conclusions:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material