Summarize the evidence from randomized controlled trials and controlled trials that examined the effectiveness of electrotherapy in the treatment of patients with orofacial pain.
Data Source
Medline, Embase, CINAHL PLUS with Full text, Cochrane Library Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus.
Review Methods
A data search (last update, July 1, 2022) and a manual search were performed (October 5, 2022). Trials involving adults with orofacial pain receiving electrotherapy compared with any other type of treatment were included. The main outcome was pain intensity; secondary outcomes were mouth opening and tenderness. The reporting was based on the new PRISMA Guidelines.
Results
From the electronics databases and manual search 43 studies were included. Although this study was open to including any type of orofacial pain, only studies that investigated temporomandibular disorders were found. The overall quality of the evidence for pain intensity was very low. Although the results should be carefully used, transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation therapy showed to be clinically superior to placebo for reducing pain after treatment (2.63 [−0.48; 5.74]) and at follow-up (0.96 [−0.02; 1.95]) and reduce tenderness after treatment (1.99 [−0.33; 4.32]) and at follow-up (2.43 [−0.24; 5.10]) in subjects with mixed temporomandibular disorders.
Conclusion
The results of this systematic review support the use of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation therapy for patients with mixed temporomandibular disorders to improve pain intensity, and tenderness demonstrating that transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation is superior to placebo. There is inconsistent evidence supporting the superiority of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation against other therapies.
GremillionHAKlasserGDEhrlichAD. 102—Orofacial pain. In: BrennanPASchliephakeHGhaliGE, et al. (eds) Maxillofacial surgery (Third edition). United States of America: Churchill Livingstone, 2017, pp. 1534–1543.
2.
International classification of orofacial pain, 1st edition (ICOP). Cephalalgia2020; 40: 129–221. DOI:10.1177/0333102419893823.
3.
SmiljicSSavicSStevanovicJ, et al.Prevalence and characteristics of orofacial pain in university students. J Oral Sci2016; 58: 7–13. 2016/03/30. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.58.7.
4.
EgbuniweORentonT. Pain paper 2b: classification of orofacial pain and an update on assessment and diagnosis. Dent Update2015; 42: 336–338, 341–332, 344–335. 2015/06/13. DOI: 10.12968/denu.2015.42.4.336.
5.
GilkeySJPlaza-VillegasF. Evaluation and management of orofacial pain. J Am Acad PA2017; 30: 16–22. DOI:10.1097/01.JAA.0000515539.59451.a9.
McNeelyMLOlivoSAMageeDJ. A systematic review of the effectiveness of physical therapy interventions for temporomandibular disorders. Phys Ther2006; 86: 710–725.
8.
DjordjevicILazicVTodorovicA, et al.Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation therapy in reduction of orofacial pain. Srp Arh Celok Lek2014; 142: 150–154.
9.
LeeJCLinDTHongCZ. The effectiveness of simultaneous thermotherapy with ultrasound and electrotherapy with combined AC and DC current on the immediate pain relief of myofascial trigger points. J Musculoskelet Pain1997; 5: 81–90. Article. DOI:10.1300/J094v05n01_06.
10.
SessleBJ. Orofacial pain: recent advances in assessment, management, and understanding of mechanisms. Canada: International Association for the Study of Pain, 2015.
11.
ChipailaNSgolastraFSpadaroA, et al.The effects of ULF-TENS stimulation on gnathology: the state of the art. Cranio2014; 32: 118–130.
12.
MedlicottMSHarrisSR. A systematic review of the effectiveness of exercise, manual therapy, electrotherapy, relaxation training, and biofeedback in the management of temporomandibular disorder. Phys Ther2006; 86: 955–973.
GibsonWWandBMMeadsC, et al.Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic pain — an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2019; 4: Cd011890. 2019/04/04. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD011890.pub3.
15.
PageMJGreenSKramerS, et al.Electrotherapy modalities for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder). Cochrane Database Syst Rev2014: Cd011324. 2014/10/02. DOI:10.1002/14651858.Cd011324.
16.
FertoutAManière-EzvanALupiL, et al.Management of temporomandibular disorders with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: a systematic review. Cranio2019: 1–12. 2019/11/12. DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2019.1687986.
17.
JedelECarlssonJ. Biofeedback, acupuncture and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation in the management of temperomandibular disorders: a systematic review. Phys Ther Rev2003; 8: 217–223. Review. DOI:10.1179/108331903225003190.
18.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS med2009; 6: e1000097.
19.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg2021; 88: 105906.
20.
Armijo-OlivoSPitanceLSinghV, et al.Effectiveness of manual therapy and therapeutic exercise for temporomandibular disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther2016; 96: 9–25. 2015/08/22. DOI:10.2522/ptj.20140548.
21.
GlanvilleJMLefebvreCMilesJNV, et al.How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. J Med Libr Assoc2006; 94: 130–136.
22.
HuttonBSalantiGCaldwellDM, et al.The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med2015; 162: 777–784. 2015/06/02. DOI:10.7326/m14-2385.
23.
Beall's List of Potential Predatory Journals and Publishers, https://beallslistnet/#update (2021, accessed February 24, 2022).
24.
ShamseerLMoherDMaduekweO, et al.Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Med2017; 15: 28. 2017/03/17. DOI:10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9.
25.
SterneJACSavovićJPageMJ, et al.RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Br Med J2019; 366: 1–8.
26.
Armijo-OlivoSOspinaMda CostaBR, et al.Poor reliability between Cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Cochrane risk of bias tool in physical therapy trials. PLoS One2014; 9: e96920. 2014/05/16. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0096920.
27.
OlivoSAMacedoLGGadottiIC, et al.Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. Phys Ther2008; 88: 156–175. 2007/12/13. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20070147.
28.
BerardABravoG. Combining studies using effect sizes and quality scores: application to bone loss in postmenopausal women. J Clin Epidemiol1998; 51: 801–807. Article.
29.
DeeksJHigginsJAltmanD. Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: HigginsJGreenS (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 500 [updated February 2008] version 5.0 ed. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2008. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org, February, 2008, pp. 243–296.
30.
DeeksJJHigginsJPTAltmanDG. Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2019, pp. 241–284.
31.
SterneJASmithGD. Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests?Phys Ther2001; 81: 1464–1469. 2001/08/01. DOI:10.1093/ptj/81.8.1464.
32.
CohenJ. The concepts of power analysis. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Academic Press, 1988.
33.
KropmansTJDijkstraPUStegengaB, et al.Smallest detectable difference in outcome variables related to painful restriction of the temporomandibular joint. J Dent Res1999; 78: 784–789. 1999/03/30. DOI:10.1177/00220345990780031101.
34.
GuyattGHOxmanADVistGE, et al.GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Br Med J2008; 336: 924–926. 2008/04/26. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD.
35.
Al-BadawiEAMehtaNForgioneAG, et al.Efficacy of pulsed radio frequency energy therapy in temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction. Cranio2004; 22: 10–20.
36.
De GiorgiICastroflorioTSartorisB, et al.The use of conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in chronic facial myalgia patients. Clin Oral Investig2017; 21: 275–280. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1787-2.
37.
DoguBYilmazFKaranA, et al.Comparative the effectiveness of occlusal splint and TENS treatments on clinical findings and pain threshold of temporomandibular disorders secondary to bruxism. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation2008; 54: 1–7.
38.
FerreiraAPCostaDROliveiraAI, et al.Short-term transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain and improves the masticatory muscle activity in temporomandibular disorder patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Appl Oral Sci2017; 25: 112–120. DOI: 10.1590/1678-77572016-0173.
39.
GomesNCBerni-SchwarzenbeckKCPackerAC, et al.Effect of cathodal high-voltage electrical stimulation on pain in women with TMD. Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia2012; 16: 10–15.
40.
KatoMTKogawaEMSantosCN, et al.TENS And low-level laser therapy in the management of temporomandibular disorders. J Appl Oral Sci2006; 14: 130–135.
41.
KogawaEMKatoMTSantosCN, et al.Evaluation of the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and the microelectric neurostimulation (MENS) in the treatment of myogenic temporomandibular disorders: a randomized clinical trial. J Appl Oral Sci2005; 13: 280–285.
42.
Lopez-MartosRGonzalez-PerezLMRuiz-Canela-MendezP, et al.Randomized, double-blind study comparing percutaneous electrolysis and dry needling for the management of temporomandibular myofascial pain. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal2018; 23: e454–e462. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.22488.
43.
MonacoASgolastraFCiarrocchiI, et al.Effects of transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation on electromyographic and kinesiographic activity of patients with temporomandibular disorders: a placebo-controlled study. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2012; 22: 463–468. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.12.008.
44.
MonacoASgolastraFPietropaoliD, et al.Comparison between sensory and motor transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation on electromyographic and kinesiographic activity of patients with temporomandibular disorder: a controlled clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2013; 14: 168. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-168.
45.
NunezSCGarcezASSuzukiSS, et al.Management of mouth opening in patients with temporomandibular disorders through low-level laser therapy and transcutaneous electrical neural stimulation. Photomed Laser Surg2006; 24: 45–49.
46.
PatilSRAileniKR. Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus home exercise programme in management of temporomandibular joint disorder. J Clin Diagn Res2017; 11: ZC19–ZC22. DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2017/32761.10967.
47.
PerozIChunYHKarageorgiG, et al.A multicenter clinical trial on the use of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent2004; 91: 180–187.
48.
RaiSRanjanVMisraD, et al.Management of myofascial pain by therapeutic ultrasound and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: a comparative study. Eur J Dent2016; 10: 46–53. DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.175680.
49.
RajpurohitBKhatriSMMetgudD, et al.Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and microcurrent electrical nerve stimulation in bruxism associated with masticatory muscle pain–a comparative study. Indian J Dent Res2010; 21: 104–106. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.62816.
50.
RezazadehFHajianKShahidiS, et al.Comparison of the effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and low-level Laser therapy on drug-resistant temporomandibular disorders. J Dent2017; 18: 187–192.
51.
SeifiMEbadifarAKabiriS, et al.Comparative effectiveness of low level Laser therapy and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation on temporomandibular joint disorders. J Lasers Med Sci2017; 8: S27–S31. DOI: 10.15171/jlms.2017.s6.
52.
ShanavasMChatraLShenaiP, et al.Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation therapy: an adjuvant pain controlling modality in TMD patients — A clinical study. Dent Res J (Isfahan)2014; 11: 676–679.
53.
ZuimPRGarciaARTurcioKH, et al.Evaluation of microcurrent electrical nerve stimulation (MENS) effectiveness on muscle pain in temporomandibular disorders patients. J Appl Oral Sci2006; 14: 61–66.
54.
de Paiva TosatoJBiasotto-GonzalezDACariaPHF. Effect of massage therapy and of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain and electromyographic activity in patients with temporomandibular dysfunction. Fisioterapia e Pesquisa2007; 14: 21–26.
55.
Rodrigues-BigatonDAlmeidaAFNBerniKCS, et al.Use of different electrical stimulations for treating pain in women with temporomandibular disorders. Braz J Phys Ther / Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia2008; 12: 476–481.
56.
BertolucciLEGreyT. Clinical comparative study of microcurrent electrical stimulation to mid-laser and placebo treatment in degenerative joint disease of the temporomandibular joint. Cranio1995; 13: 116–120. Article. DOI: 10.1080/08869634.1995.11678054.
57.
CrockettDJForemanMEAldenL, et al.A comparison of treatment modes in the management of myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome. Biofeedback Self Regul1986; 11: 279–291. Article. DOI: 10.1007/BF01000164.
58.
KavuncuVDanisgerSKozakciogluM, et al.Comparison of the efficacy of TENS and ultrasound in temporomandibular joint dysfunction syndrome. J Rheumatol Med Rehabil1994; 5: 38–42. Article.
59.
KrugerLRVan Der LindenWJCleaton-JonesPE. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the treatment of myofascial pain dysfunction. S Afr J Surg1998; 36: 35–38. Article.
60.
LindeCIsacssonGJonssonBG. Outcome of 6-week treatment with transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation compared with splint on symptomatic temporomandibular joint disk displacement without reduction. Acta Odontol Scand1995; 53: 92–98. Article. DOI: 10.3109/00016359509005953.
61.
Wieselmann-PenknerKJandaMLorenzoniM, et al.A comparison of the muscular relaxation effect of TENS and EMG-biofeedback in patients with bruxism. J Oral Rehabil2001; 28: 849–853. Review.
62.
ZhangYZhangJWangL, et al.Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on jaw movement-evoked pain in patients with TMJ disc displacement without reduction and healthy controls. Acta Odontol Scand2020; 78: 309–320. 2019/12/27. DOI: 10.1080/00016357.2019.1707868.
63.
RameshDVNairDKempwadeP, et al.Comparative evaluation of the effect of therapeutic ultrasound and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation in temporalis and masseter myofascial pain. J Nat Sci Biol Med2020; 11: 7.
64.
ElerianAEAbdelftahEElmakakyAM, et al.Effect of dextrose phonophoresis versus pulsed electromagnetic field on temporomandibular dysfunction: a randomized, controlled study. J Bodyw Mov Ther2021; 26: 347–352. 2021/05/17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.12.001.
65.
DebreEAlptekinKAlptekinJÖ, et al.Study on the effect of TENS, exercise and friction massage on the masseter regarding masseter-derived cervical myofascial pain. Adv Rehabil2020; 34: 1–9.
66.
ChellappaDThirupathyM. Comparative efficacy of low-level laser and TENS in the symptomatic relief of temporomandibular joint disorders: a randomized clinical trial. Indian J Dent Res2020; 31: 42–47. 2020/04/05. DOI: 10.4103/ijdrIJDR_735_18.
67.
EkiciÖDündarÜBüyükbosnaM. Comparison of the efficiency of high-intensity Laser therapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation therapy in patients with symptomatic temporomandibular joint disc displacement with reduction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg2022; 80: 70–80.
68.
TripathiPMathurHTripathiS, et al.Miseries and remedies of myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome: comparative study. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol2019; 31: 210.
69.
VeerabhadrappaSKAnbananthanTDYingCX, et al.Effectiveness of TENS and home exercises as an adjunct to drug therapy in the management of myogenous masticatory pain: a comparative study. J Oral Med Oral Surg2021; 27: 40.
70.
JoJHJangYChungG, et al.Long-term efficacy and patient satisfaction of pulsed radiofrequency therapy in temporomandibular disorders: a randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore)2021; 100: 52.
71.
BudakotiAPuriNDhillonM, et al.A comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy, ultrasound therapy, and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation in the treatment of patients with TMDs: a prospective study. Lasers Dent Sci2019; 3: 257–267.
72.
TreacyK. Awareness/relaxation training and transcutaneous electrical neural stimulation in the treatment of bruxism. J Oral Rehabil1999; 26: 280–287. 1999/05/08. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00381.x.
73.
MogerGI. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation therapy in temporomandibular disorder–A clinical study. India: Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology, 2006.
74.
SinghHSunilMKKumarR, et al.Evaluation of TENS therapy and placebo drug therapy in the management of TMJ pain disorders: a comparative study. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol2014; 26: 139.
75.
SaranyaBAhmedJShenoyN, et al.Comparison of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) and microcurrent nerve stimulation (MENS) in the management of masticatory muscle pain: a comparative study. Pain Res Manage2019; 2019: 1–5.
76.
MishraASinhaAMehrotraP, et al.A comparative study on efficacy of three different treatment modalities for temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction. Oral Health Dent Manag2015; 3: 27–32.
77.
YadavURaveena and ChowdharyS. A comparative study on efficacy of three different treatment modalities for temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction. Turk J Physiother Rehabil2017; 32: 19077–19081.
78.
HigginsJPThompsonSGDeeksJJ, et al.Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J2003; 327: 557–560. 2003/09/06. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.
79.
CochraneHJSavovićJPageM, et al.Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019) 2019.
80.
Armijo-OlivoSDennettLArientiC, et al.Blinding in rehabilitation research: empirical evidence on the association between blinding and treatment effect estimates. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2020; 99: 198–209. 2020/01/09. DOI: 10.1097/phm.0000000000001377.
81.
AbrahaICherubiniACozzolinoF, et al.Deviation from intention to treat analysis in randomised trials and treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study. Br Med J2015; 350: h2445. 2015/05/29. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h2445.
82.
DworkinRHTurkDCFarrarJT, et al.Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain2005; 113: 9–19. 2004/12/29. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012.
83.
DoguBYilmazFKaranA, et al.Comparative the effectiveness of occlusal splint and TENS treatments on clinical findings and pain threshold of temporomandibular disorders secondary to bruxism. [Turkish]. Turkiye Fiziksel Tip ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi2009; 55: 1–7.
84.
JohnsonMI. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS): research to support clinical practice. England: Oxford University Press, 2014.
85.
GuoLKubatNJNelsonTR, et al.Meta-analysis of clinical efficacy of pulsed radio frequency energy treatment. Ann Surg2012; 255: 457–467. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182447b5d
FuentesJPArmijo OlivoSMageeDJ, et al.Effectiveness of interferential current therapy in the management of musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther2010; 90: 1219–1238. 2010/07/24. DOI:10.2522/ptj.20090335.
88.
PalmerSTMartinDJSteedmanWM, et al.Alteration of interferential current and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation frequency: effects on nerve excitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1999; 80: 1065–1071. 1999/09/17. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90062-x.
89.
ShiXYuWWangT, et al.A comparison of the effects of electroacupuncture vs transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pain control in knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore)2019; 98: e16265. 2019/07/16. DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000016265.
GaneshGSKumariRPattnaikM, et al.Effectiveness of Faradic and Russian currents on plantar flexor muscle spasticity, ankle motor recovery, and functional gait in stroke patients. Physiother Res Int2018; 23: e1705. 2018/02/09. DOI: 10.1002/pri.1705.
92.
AtyaAM. Efficacy of microcurrent electrical stimulation on pain, proprioception accuracy and functional disability in subacromial impingement: RCT. Physiother Occup Therapy2012; 6: 15.
93.
PickerRI. Low-volt pulsed microamp stimulation. Part II Clin Manage1989; 9: 28–33.
94.
RajfurJPasternokMRajfurK, et al.Efficacy of selected electrical therapies on chronic low back pain: a comparative clinical pilot study. Med Sci Monit2017; 23: 85–100. 2017/01/08. DOI: 10.12659/msm.899461.
95.
PrenticeWE. Therapeutic modalities: For sports medicine and athletic training. United States of America: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2008.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
