Vendor capabilities development has been an important research stream in the information systems (IS) sourcing literature. The existing research, which was based on the context of implementing centralized enterprise systems, focused on the adoption of deliberate learning and implicit learning, with the assumption that effective selection between these two learning approaches is sufficient for service providers to acquire vendor capabilities. However, this assumption may not hold in implementing a decentralized system based on enterprise blockchain. Because an enterprise blockchain system affords a new way of governing transactions and demands a new governance mode, it creates an uncertain and complex landscape in which the mere selection between deliberate learning and implicit learning becomes insufficient. Addressing this gap is crucial because many enterprise blockchain projects fail due to the incompetence of service providers. By conducting an in-depth case study of a successful blockchain service provider, our study reveals a new mechanism for developing vendor capabilities: parallel play. As with parallel play by preschoolers, the service provider combines a set of learning approaches featuring borrowing from peers and learning through experimentation. Our study extends the IS sourcing literature on vendor capabilities development from the context of implementing centralized enterprise systems to the context of implementing decentralized enterprise blockchain systems. Our findings also provide guidelines for blockchain service providers to follow when acquiring vendor capabilities and for clients to use when selecting service providers.
BakemanRBrownleeJR (1980) The strategic use of parallel play: a sequential analysis. Child Development51(3): 873–878.
2.
BinghamLBO’LearyR (2006) Conclusion: parallel play, not collaboration: missing questions, missing connections. Public Administration Review66(1): 161–167.
3.
ChenYRichterJIPatelPC (2021) Decentralized governance of digital platforms. Journal of Management47(5): 1305–1337.
4.
CloutierCLangleyA (2020) What makes a process theoretical contribution?Organization Theory1(1): 1–32.
5.
DavenportTH (1998) Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review76(4): 121–131.
6.
DrummerDNeumannD (2020) Is code law? Current legal and technical adoption issues and remedies for blockchain-enabled smart contracts. Journal of Information Technology35(4): 337–360.
7.
DuWPanSL (2013) Boundary spanning by design: toward aligning boundary-spanning capacity and strategy in IT outsourcing. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management60(1): 59–76.
8.
DuWPanSLLeidnerDE, et al. (2019) Affordances, experimentation and actualization of FinTech: a blockchain implementation study. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems28(1): 50–65.
9.
DuWPanSLWuJ (2020) How do IT outsourcing vendors develop capabilities? An organizational ambidexterity perspective of a multi-case study. Journal of Information Technology35(1): 49–65.
10.
EisenhardtKM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review14(4): 532–550.
11.
EthirajSKKalePKrishnanMS, et al. (2005) Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry. Strategic Management Journal26(1): 25–45.
12.
FeenyDLacityMCWillcocksLP (2005) Taking the measure of outsourcing providers. MIT Sloan Management Review46(3): 41–48.
GehmanJGlaserVLEisenhardtKM, et al. (2018) Finding theory–method fit: a comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. Journal of Management Inquiry27(3): 284–300.
15.
GioiaDACorleyKGHamiltonAL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods16(1): 15–31.
16.
GoldsbyCHanischM (2022) The boon and bane of blockchain: getting the governance right. California Management Review64(3): 141–168.
17.
GrodalSAntebyMHolmAL (2021) Achieving rigor in qualitative analysis: the role of active categorization in theory building. Academy of Management Review46(3): 591–612.
18.
GulatiR (1999) Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal20(5): 397–420.
19.
HaneltABohnsackRMarzD, et al. (2021) A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies58(5): 1159–1197.
20.
HanischMGoldsbyCMFabianNE, et al. (2023) Digital governance: a conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Business Research162: 113777.
21.
HarperLVHuieKS (1985) The effects of prior group experience, age, and familiarity on the quality and organization of preschoolers’ social relationships. Child Development56(3): 704–717.
22.
HastigGMSodhiMS (2020) Blockchain for supply chain traceability: business requirements and critical success factors. Production and Operations Management29(4): 935–954.
23.
HowesCMathesonCC (1992) Sequences in the development of competent play with peers: social and social pretend play. Developmental Psychology28(5): 961–974.
24.
JarvenpaaSLMaoJY (2008) Operational capabilities development in mediated offshore software services models. Journal of Information Technology23(1): 3–17.
25.
JensenTHedmanJHenningssonS (2019) How TradeLens delivers business value with blockchain technology. MISQ Executive18(4): 221–243.
26.
KendallKE (1997) The significance of information systems research on emerging technologies: seven information technologies that promise to improve managerial effectiveness. Decision Sciences28(4): 775–792.
27.
KleinHKMyersMD (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly23(1): 67–93.
28.
KshetriN (2018) Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives. International Journal of Information Management39(1): 80–89.
29.
LacityMC (2018) Addressing key challenges to making enterprise blockchain applications a reality. MISQ Executive17(3): 201–222.
30.
LacityMCvan HoekR (2021) What we’ve learned so far about blockchain for business. MIT Sloan Management Review62(3): 48–54.
31.
LacityMCKhanSYanA, et al. (2010) A review of the IT outsourcing empirical literature and future research directions. Journal of Information Technology25(4): 395–433.
32.
LacityMCKhanSAYanA (2016) Review of the empirical business services sourcing literature: an update and future directions. Journal of Information Technology31(3): 269–328.
33.
LacityMSabherwalRSørensenC (2019) Special issue editorial: delivering business value through enterprise blockchain applications. MISQ Executive18(4): ix–xix.
34.
LangleyA (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review24(4): 691–710.
LevinaNRossJW (2003) From the vendor’s perspective: exploring the value proposition in information technology outsourcing. MIS Quarterly27(3): 331–364.
37.
LevinaNVaastE (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quarterly29(2): 335–363.
38.
LiangTPKohliRHuangHC, et al. (2021) What drives the adoption of the blockchain technology? A fit-viability perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems38(2): 314–337.
39.
LumineauFWangWSchilkeO (2021) Blockchain governance – a new way of organizing collaborations?Organization Science32(2): 500–521.
40.
MattkeJMaierCHundA, et al. (2019) How an enterprise blockchain application in the U.S. pharmaceuticals supply chain is saving lives. MISQ Executive18(4): 245–261.
NakamotoS (2008) Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Available at. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf(accessed 20 January 2021).
44.
NevoDKotlarskyJ (2014) Primary vendor capabilities in a mediated outsourcing model: can IT service providers leverage crowdsourcing?Decision Support Systems65: 17–27.
45.
NotheisenBCholewaJBShanmugamAP (2017) Trading real-world assets on Blockchain - an application of trust-free transaction systems in the market for lemons. Business & Information Systems Engineering59(6): 425–440.
46.
PanSLTanB (2011) Demystifying case research: a structured–pragmatic–situational (SPS) approach to conducting case studies. Information and Organization21(3): 161–176.
47.
PartenMB (1932) Social participation among pre-school children. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology27(3): 243–269.
48.
PedersenABRisiusMBeckR (2019) A ten-step decision path to determine when to use blockchain technologies. MISQ Executive18(2): 99–115.
49.
RobinsonSEGaddisBS (2012) Seeing past parallel play: survey measures of collaboration in disaster situations. Policy Studies Journal40(2): 256–273.
50.
RubinKHBukowskiWMParkerJG (2006) Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In: EisenbergNDamonWLernerRM (eds). Handbook of child psychology: social, emotional, and personality development. 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Vol. 3, 571–645.
51.
SmithPK (1978) A longitudinal study of social participation in preschool children: solitary and parallel play reexamined. Developmental Psychology14(5): 517–523.
52.
StraussACorbinJM (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
53.
SuN (2013) Internationalization strategies of Chinese IT service suppliers. MIS Quarterly37(1): 175–200.
54.
SuN (2015) Cultural sensemaking in offshore information technology service suppliers: a cultural frame perspective. MIS Quarterly39(4): 959–984.
55.
SuFMaoJYJarvenpaaSL (2014) How do IT outsourcing vendors respond to shocks in client demand? A resource dependence perspective. Journal of Information Technology29(3): 253–267.
UnderwoodS (2016) Blockchain beyond Bitcoin. Communications of the ACM59(11): 15–17.
58.
VerhoefPCBroekhuizenTBartY, et al. (2021) Digital transformation: a multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research122: 889–901.
59.
VialG (2019) Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems28(2): 118–144.
60.
WalshamG (1995) Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems4(2): 74–81.
61.
WesselLBaiyereAOlogeanu-TaddeiR, et al. (2021) Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and IT-enabled organizational transformation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems22(1): 102–129.
62.
ZiolkowskiRMiscioneGSchwabeG (2020) Decision problems in blockchain governance: old wine in new bottles or walking in someone else’s shoes?Journal of Management Information Systems37(2): 316–348.
