Reforming work patterns or negotiating workloads? Exploring alternative pathways for digital productivity assistants through a problematization lens

Abstract

Digital trace data can be used to capture organizational practices in granular detail and enable the automation of a wide range of managerial tasks. One example is Digital Productivity Assistants (DPA) that harness digital trace data about knowledge workers’ performance and make targeted suggestions for how to improve and optimize their work patterns. Previous research shows that despite benevolent intentions to increase workers’ wellbeing, DPA tend to introduce novel forms of exploitation and control. Inspired by Michel Foucault’s philosophical strategy of ‘problematization,’ which emphasizes how practices are constructed in the form of problems that subsequently shape certain solutions, this paper takes a critical yet constructive view of DPA. Specifically, we conduct a genealogical reading of the DPA tool, Microsoft MyAnalytics, to investigate the problematics that have structured its emergence, as well as how its uses imply certain discursive commitments to philosophical and ethical questions. In the prevailing discourse, DPA cast digital trace data as a learning opportunity and thereby commit to individualizing the responsibility for handling the paradoxical nature of increasingly fluid work arrangements. Conversely, in our account of the history of MyAnalytics, we uncover a ‘lost discourse’ committed to trace data as a resource that can help knowledge workers negotiate excessive workloads. We propose the problematization lens as a way critically to articulate alternatives and speculate about instantiations of digital technology that today seem ‘unthinkable’.

Keywords

Digital productivity assistants algorithmic management management of knowledge work problematization lens critical IS Foucault

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvesson

(2012) Interpreting Interviews. London: Sage Publications.

Alvesson

Sandberg

(2011) Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review 36(2): 247–271.

Bailey

Barley

(2020) Beyond design and use: how scholars should study intelligent technologies. Information and Organization 30(2): 100286. DOI: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.100286.

Barad

(2013) Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Women, Science, and Technology: A Reader in Feminist Science Studies 28(3): 473–494.

Bernhardtz

(2019) Black boxes of cognitive computers and the impact on labor markets. In: Larsson

Teigland

(eds) The Digital Transformation of Labor Automation, the Gig Economy and Welfare. London: Routledge, pp. 100–115.

Bershin

(2015) The Geeks arrive in HR: people analytics is here, Forbes. Available at: www.forbes.com/sites/joshbersin/2015/02/01/geeks-arrive-in-hr-people-analytics-is-here/?sh=31d22f5e73b4 (accessed 17 May 2021).

Bock

(2015) Work Rules! - Insights From Inside Google That will Transform How You Live and Lead. New York: John Murrey.

Boltanski

Chiapello

(1999/2018) The New Spirit of Capitalism. Trans. Elliot G. 2nd edition. London: Verso.

Brandon

(2016) This microsoft app will save you 4 hours of work every week. Available at: www.inc.com/john-brandon/this-microsoft-app-will-save-you-4-hours-of-work-every-week.html (accessed 29 April 2021).

10.

Braun

Clarke

(2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101.

11.

Burgess

(2019) How your workplace will change beyond recognition. Herald Sun-Online , 3 January (accessed with Factiva 8 January 2021. Document ID: NLHRSW0020190103ef13002jq).

12.

Burton-Jones

(2014) What have we learned from the smart machine? Information and Organization 24(2): 71–105.

13.

Captain

(2020) In 20 years your boss may track your every glance, keystroke, and heartbeat. Fast Company . Available at: www.fastcompany.com/90450122/in-20-years-your-boss-may-track-your-every-glance-keystroke-and-heartbeat (accessed 15 May 2020).

14.

Chodan

Krause

Meza-Cuevas

, et al. (2019) The SEBA system: a novel approach for assessing psychological stress continuously at the workplace. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Sensor-Based Activity Recognition and Interaction, Rostock, Germany, September 2019. Association for Computing Machinery (iWOAR ’19). DOI: 10.1145/3361684.3361694.

15.

Cross

Rebele

Grant

(2016) Collaborative overload. Harvard Business Review 94(1): 74–79.

16.

Davenport

(2006) Competing on analytics. Harvard Business Review 84(1): 99–107.

17.

Davison

Martinsons

(2016) Context is king! Considering particularism in research design and reporting. Journal of Information Technology 31(3): 241–249.

18.

Deleuze

(1992) Postscript on the societies of control. October 59: 3–7.

19.

Doolin

(1998) Information technology as disciplinary technology: being critical in interpretive research on information systems. Journal of Information Technology 13(4): 301–311.

20.

Faraj

Pachidi

Sayegh

(2018) Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Information and Organization 28(1): 62–70.

21.

Floridi

(2014) The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

22.

Florentine

(2013) How social analytics can improve enterprise IT efficiency. Available at: https://www.cio.com/article/2382868/how-social-analytics-can-improve-enterprise-it-efficiency.html (accessed 23 November 2020).

23.

Foucault

(1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon Books.

24.

Foucault

(1980/1988) Power, moral values, and the intellectual: interview with Michael Bess. History of the Present 1–2(4): 11–13.

25.

Foucault

(1980/1990) The history of sexuality, Vol. 2: The Use of Pleasures. Reissue edition. Hurley, R (trans). New York: Vintage.

26.

Foucault

(1980/1991) Questions of method. In: Burchell

Gordon

Miller

(eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 73–86.

27.

Foucault

(1983/2001) Fearless Speech. In: Pearson

(eds) Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).

28.

Foucault

(1984a) Polemics, politics, and problemizations: an interview with Michel Foucault. In: Rabinow

(eds.) The Foucoult Reader. 1st edition. New York: Pantheon Books, pp. 381–390.

29.

Foucault

(1984b) What is enlightenment? In: Rabinow

(ed) The Foucault Reader. 1st edition. New York: Pantheon Books, pp. 32–50.

30.

Fuller

(2014a) How big data will change everything about managing employees. Available at: https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/236030 (accessed 11 December 2020).

31.

Fuller

(2014b) Quantify how much time your company wastes. Harvard Business Review . Available at: https://hbr.org/2014/05/quantify-how-much-time-your-company-wastes (accessed 28 November 2019).

32.

Fuller

(2015) How to finally kill the useless, recurring meeting. Harvard Business Review . Available at: https://hbr.org/2015/03/how-to-finally-kill-the-useless-recurring-meeting (accessed 29 November 2019).

33.

Fuller

Grus

Nielsen

, et al. (2016) Dervation of Operating Entities and Metrics from Collaboration Data and obtained from Computing Systems. USA: Publication Number: US 2016/0019490 A1.

34.

Fuller

Shikaloff

Cullinan

, et al. (2018) If you multitask during meetings, your team will, too. Harvard Business Review Online . Available at: https://hbr.org/2018/01/if-you-multitask-during-meetings-your-team-will-too (accessed 11 December 2020).

35.

Gal

Jensen

Stein

(2020) Breaking the vicious cycle of algorithmic management: a virtue ethics approach to people analytics. Information and Organization 30(2): 100301. DOI: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2020.100301.

36.

Geiger

(2009) Revisiting the concept of practice: toward an argumentative understanding of practicing. Management Learning 40(2): 129–144.

37.

Gkeredakis

Constantinides

(2019) Phenomenon-based problematization: coordinating in the digital era. Information and Organization 29 (3): 100254. DOI: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.100254.

38.

Glennie

Thrift

(2009) Shaping the Day. Oxford University Press.

39.

Gorgeon

Swanson

(2009) Organizing the vision for web 2.0: a study of the evolution of the concept in Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, WiKiSym 2009, Florida, Orlando, October 2009. DOI: 10.1145/1641309.1641337.

40.

Gregg

(2019) Counterproductive: Time Management in the Knowledge Economy. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

41.

Griffin

Coleman

(2018) How we will work in 2028. Available at: https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/3861479/how-we-will-work-in-20280 (accessed 11 December 2020).

42.

Gudmand-Høyer

(2013) Stemningssindssygdommenes historie i det 19. århundrede : omtydningen af melankolien og manien som bipolære stemningslidelser i dansk sammenhæng under hensyn til dannelsen af moderne følelseslivs relative autonomi : en problematiserings- og erfaringsanal. PhD Thesis. Copenhagen Business School, Denmark.

43.

Hafermalz

Johnston

Hovorka

, et al. (2020) Beyond “mobility”: a new understanding of moving with technology, Information Systems Journal 30(4): 762–786.

44.

Halker

(1991) For democracy, workers, and god: labor song-poems and labor protest, 1865–95. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

45.

Holten

Neff

Simonsen

, et al. (2021) Can workplace tracking ever empower? Collective sensemaking for the responsible use of sensor data at work, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(GROUP). DOI: 10.1145/3463931.

46.

Irwin

(2019) The mystery of the miserable employees: how to win in the winner-take-all economy. The New York Times , 19 June (accessed with Factiva 8 January 2021. Document ID: INHT000020190618ef6j0000e).

47.

Jha

(2015) Microsoft to acquire VoloMetrix to empower individuals and drive organizational productivity. The Official Microsoft Blog. Available at: https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2015/09/03/microsoft-to-acquire-volometrix-to-empower-individuals-and-drive-organizational-productivity/ (accessed 23 November 2020).

48.

Johnsen

Sørensen

(2015). ‘It’s capitalism on Coke!’: from temporary to permanent liminality in organization studies. Culture and Organization 21(4): 321–337.

49.

Kallinikos

(2004) Farewell to Constructivism: Technology and Context-Embedded Action, Study of Information and Communication Technology, pp. 140–161.

50.

Kellogg

Valentine

Christin

(2019) Algorithms at work: the new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management 14(1): 366–410.

51.

Khovanskaya

Dombrowski

Rzeszotarski

, et al. (2019) The tools of management: adapting historical union tactics to platform-mediated labor. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3: 1–22. DOI: 10.1145/3359310.

52.

Koopman

(2013) Genealogy as Critique: Foucault and the Problems of Modernity. Indiana University Press.

53.

Koopman

(2019) How We Became Our Data : A Genealogy of the Informational Person. 1st edition. Chigago: University of Chicago Press.

54.

Koukouvinou

Holmström

(2022) AI management beyond the narratives of dystopian nightmares and utopian dreams: a systematic review and synthesis of the literature. ECIS 2022 Research Papers . 137. Available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2022_rp/13 (accessed 15 September 2022).

55.

Land

(2010) The use of history in IS research: an opportunity missed. Journal of Information Technology 25(4): 385–394.

56.

Latour

(2004) How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body and Society 10(2–3): 205–229.

57.

Leonardi

(2020) COVID‐19 and the new technologies of organizing: digital exhaust, digital footprints, and artificial intelligence in the wake of remote work. Journal of Management Studies 58(1): 249–253. DOI: 10.1111/joms.12648.

58.

Lewis

(2003) Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game. New York: W.W. Norton.

59.

Luo

Lee

Donghee

, et al. (2018) Time for break: understanding information workers’ sedentary behavior through a break prompting system. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, Canda, April 2018. Association for Computing Machinery (CHI ’18), pp. 1–14.

60.

Mankins

Brahm

Caimi

. (2014) Your scarcest resource. Harvard Business Review 92(5): 74–80.

61.

Marr

(2018) Data-Driven HR: How to Use Analytics and Metrics to Drive Performance. London: Kogan Page.

62.

Mazmanian

Orlikowski

Yates

(2013) The autonomy paradox: the implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science 24(5): 1337–1357.

63.

Microsoft (2018) MyAnalytics elements: 18 July 2018. From Wayback Machine. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20180718005140mp_/https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/workplace-analytics/myanalytics/use/mya-elements (accessed 28 May 2020).

64.

Microsoft (2019) MyAnalytics product site: 12 September 2019. From Wayback Machine. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20190912225920/products.office.com/en-us/business/myanalytics-personal-analytics (accessed 28 May 2020).

65.

Microsoft (2021) MyAnalytics product site: Available at: www.microsoft.com/da-dk/microsoft-365/business/myanalytics-personal-analytics (accessed 9 June 2021).

66.

Moore

(2018) Tracking affective labour for agility in the quantified workplace. Body & Society 24(3): 39–67.

67.

Myers

Klein

(2011) A set of principles for conducting critical research in information systems’. MIS Quarterly 35(1): 17–36.

68.

Nyman

Bødker

Jensen

, et al. (2021) Exploring the Archive: A Problematization Lens for Conducting Critical IS Research. In: ICIS 2021 Proceedings. 7. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2021/adv_in_theories/adv_in_theories/7

69.

O’Neil

(2016) Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Broadway Books.

70.

O’Neill

(2017) Taylorism, the European science of work, and the quantified self at work. Science Technology and Human Values 42(4): 600–621.

71.

Pollock

Williams

(2011) Who decides the shape of product markets? The knowledge institutions that name and categorise new technologies. Information and Organization 21(4): 194–217.

72.

Parkhurst

(2013) Business productivity data startup VoloMetrix raises more than $3M. Bizjournals.com. Available at: https://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/blog/techflash/2013/04/social-data-startup-volometrix-raises.html (accessed 23 November 2020).

73.

Rebele

(2019) Can we really test people for potential? We need a more nuanced approach to predicting job performance. MIT Sloan Management Review 60(3): 10–13.

74.

RescueTime (2021) RescueTime website. www.rescuetime.com/ (accessed 9 June 2021).

75.

Rewari

(2021) Daily briefing and MyAnalytics branding updates to reflect Microsoft Viva, Microsoft Tech Community. Available at: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/microsoft-viva-blog/daily-briefing-and-myanalytics-branding-updates-to-reflect/ba-p/2681246 (accessed 10 February 2021).

76.

Riemer

Peter

(2020). The robo-apocalypse plays out in the quality, not in the quantity of work. Journal of Information Technology 35(4): 310–315.

77.

Romano

(2014) Xconomy: VoloMetrix Raises $12M to market ‘people analytics’ Software, Xconomy. Available at: https://xconomy.com/seattle/2014/10/13/volometrix-raises-12m-to-market-people-analytics-software/ (accessed 23 November 2020).

78.

Rowe

(2018) Being critical is good, but better with philosophy! From digital transformation and values to the future of IS research. European Journal of Information Systems 27(3): 380–393.

79.

Schaule

Johanssen

Bruegge

, et al. (2018) Employing consumer wearables to detect office workers’ cognitive load for interruption management. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2(1): DOI: 10.1145/3191764.

80.

Schultze

van den Heuvel

Niemimaa

(2020) Enacting accountability in is research after the sociomaterial turn(Ing). Journal of the Association for Information Systems 21(4): 811–835.

81.

Skog

Wimelius

Sandberg

(2018) Digital service platform evolution: how spotify leveraged boundary resources to become a global leader in music streaming. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences: 4564–4573.

82.

Stahl

(2011) Critical social information systems research. In: Galliers

Currie

(eds) The Oxford Handbook of Management Information Systems: Critical Perspectives and New Directions. Oxford: OUP Oxford.

83.

Suchman

(1987) Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.

84.

Swanson

Ramiller

(1997) The organizing vision in information systems innovation. Organization Science 8(5): 458–474.

85.

Sørensen

(2017) Beyond mobile it: ubiquitous digitality and work. In Galliers

Stein

(eds) The Routledge Companion to Management Information Systems. London: Routledge. pp. 466–480.

86.

The Economist (2018a) AI-spy - The workplace of the future. Available at: https://www-economist-com.esc-web.lib.cbs.dk:8443/leaders/2018/03/28/the-workplace-of-the-future (accessed 27 April 2020).

87.

The Economist (2018b) Future workplaces: Smile, you’re on camera. https://www.economist.com/special-report/2018/03/28/there-will-be-little-privacy-in-the-workplace-of-the-future (accessed 27 May 2021).

88.

Thompson

(1967) Time, work-dicipline, and industrial capitalism. Past and Present. 38(1): 56–97.

89.

Tso

(2017) Workplace analytics what workplace networks reveal about your collaboration patterns and influence - workplace analytics. Available at: https://insights.office.com/productivity/workplace-networks-reveal-collaboration-patterns-influence/ (accessed 15 April 2021).

90.

VoloMetrix (2011) VoloMetrix.com: Nov. 19 2011. From Wayback Machine. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20111119005759/http://www.volometrix.com/ (accessed 23 November 2020).

91.

VoloMetrix (2014) VoloMetrix.com: Nov. 1 2014. From Wayback Machine. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20141101013115/http://www.volometrix.com/ (accessed 23 November 2020).

92.

Wajcman

(2019) The digital architecture of time management. Science Technology and Human Values 44(2): 315–337.

93.

Wesche

Sonderegger

(2019) When computers take the lead: the automation of leadership. Computers in Human Behavior 01: 197–209.

94.

Winikoff

Cranefield

, et al. (2021) The advent of digital productivity assistants : the case of Microsoft MyAnalytics. In: Conference: 54th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). Kauai, January 2021. 338–339. DOI: 10.24251/HICSS.2021.040.

95.

Wood

Graham

Lehdonvirta

, et al. (2019) Networked but commodified: the (Dis)Embeddedness of digital labour in the gig economy. Sociology 53(5): 931–950.

96.

Zuboff

(1988) In The Age of the Smart Machine : The Future of Work and Power. New York: Basic Books.

97.

Zuboff

(2015) Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology 30(1): 75–89.

98.

Zuboff

(2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. London: Profile Books.

99.

Züger

Corley

Meyer

, et al. (2017) Reducing interruptions at work: a large-scale field study of FlowLight. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, Denver, USA, May 2017, 61–72.

100.

Østerlund

Crowston

Jackson

(2020) Building an apparatus: refractive, reflective, and diffractive readings of trace data. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 21(1): 1–22.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.89 MB