Managers have increasingly implemented knowledge databases and knowledge-sharing training to improve team effectiveness. The authors examine whether intranet-based repository use and perception of accurate team knowledge of who knows what were related to perceived team effectiveness. They found that the perception that one's team had accurate who-knows-what knowledge is positively related to perceived team effectiveness. Repository use is not positively related to perceived team effectiveness. Remote work and tenure are not significant moderators of these relationships. These findings imply that perception of an accurate cognitive map of who knows what is more important to perceived team effectiveness than accessing information from repositories, regardless of remote work status or organizational tenure.
Albright, K.S. (2004). Environmental scanning: Radar for success. Information Management Journal, 38, 38-45.
2.
Alvesson, M., Karreman, D., & Swan, J. (2002). Departures from knowledge and/or management in knowledge management. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 282-291.
3.
Austin, J.R. (2003). Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance . Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 866-878.
4.
Badaracco, J.L. (1991). The knowledge link: How firms compete through strategic alliances. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
5.
Begbie, R., & Chudry, F. (2002). The intranet chaos matrix: A conceptual framework for designing an effective knowledge management intranet. Journal of DatabaseManagement, 9, 325-328.
6.
Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16, 1021-1046.
7.
Borgatti, S.P., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49, 432-445.
8.
Brown, K.G. (2001). Using computers to deliver training: Which employees learn and why?Personnel Psychology, 54, 271-296.
Demarest, M. (1997). Understanding knowledge management. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 374-384.
13.
Devine, D.J., Clayton, L.D., Philips, J.L., Dunford, B.B., & Melner, S.B. (1999). Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30, 678-711.
14.
Dyer, J.H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 660-679.
15.
Empson, L. (2001). Fear of exploitation and fear of contamination: Impediments to knowledge transfer in mergers between professional service firms. Human Relations, 54, 839-862.
16.
Flanagin, A. (2002). The elusive benefits of the technological support of knowledge management. Management Communication Quarterly , 16, 242-248.
17.
Flood, P.C., Hannan, E., Smith, K.G., Turner, T., West, M.A., & Dawson, J. (2000). Chief executive leadership style, consensus decision making, and top management team effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9, 401-420.
18.
Fulk, J. (1993). Social construction of communication technology . Academy of Management Journal, 36, 921-950.
19.
Fulk, J., Flanagin, A.J., Kalman, M.E., Monge, P.R., & Ryan, T. (1996). Connective and communal public goods in interactive communication systems. Communication Theory, 6, 60-87.
20.
Fulk, J., Heino, R., Flanagin, A., Monge, P., & Bar, F. (2004). A test of the individual action model for organizational information commons. Organization Science, 15, 569-585.
21.
Geist-Martin, P., Horsley, K., & Farrell, A. (2003). Working well: Communicating individual and collective wellness initiatives. In T. L. Thompson, A. Dorsey, & K. L. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of health communication (pp. 423-443). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hardin, R. (1982). Collective action. Baltimore : John Hopkins University Press.
24.
Haywood, R. (1999). From paper to intranet. IIE Solutions , 31, 47-49.
25.
Hazlett, S., McAdam, R., & Gallagher, S. (2005). Theory building in knowledge management: In search of paradigms. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 31-42.
26.
Heaton, L., & Taylor, J.R. (2002). Knowledge management and professional work: A communication perspective on the knowledge-based organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 210-236.
27.
Hinds, P. (1999). The curse of expertise: The effect of expertise and debiasing methods on predictions of novice performance. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Applied, 5, 205-221.
28.
Hollingshead, A. (1998a). Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 34, 423-442.
29.
Hollingshead, A. (1998b). Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 659-671.
30.
Hollingshead, A., & Brandon, D.P. (2003). Potential benefits of communication in transactive memory systems. Human Communication Research, 29, 607-615.
31.
Hollingshead, A., Fulk, J., & Monge, P. (2002). Fostering intranet knowledge-sharing: An integration of transactive memory and public goods approaches. In P. J. Hinds & S. Keisler (Eds.), Distributed work: New research on working across distance using technology (pp. 335-355). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
International Telework Association and Council. ( 2004, September 2). Work at home grows in past year by 7.5% in U.S. use or broadband for work at home grown by 84%. Retrieved December 28, 2005, from http://www.workingfromanywhere.org/index.html
33.
Iverson, J.O., & McPhee, R.D. (2002). Knowledge management in communities of practice . Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 259-266.
34.
Kirkman, B.L., & Mathieu, J.E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality . Journal of Management, 31, 700-718.
35.
Kuhn, T. (2002). Negotiating boundaries between scholars and practitioners: Knowledge, networks, and communities of practice. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 106-112.
36.
Lai, V.S. (2001). Intraorganizational communication with intranets . Association for Computing Machinery, 44, 95-100.
37.
Lewis, K. (2004). Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Science, 50, 1519-1533.
38.
Liedtka, J.M., Haskins, M.E., Rosenblum, J.W., & Weber, J. (1997). The generative cycle: Linking knowledge and relationships . Sloan Management Review, 39, 47-58.
39.
Lowendahl, B.R., Revang, O., & Fosstenlokken, S.M. (2001). Knowledge and value creation in professional service firms: A framework for analysis. Human Relations, 54, 911-931.
40.
Maruping, L.M., & Agarwal, R. (2004). Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: A task-technology fit perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 975-990.
41.
McPhee, R.D., Corman, S.R., & Dooley, K. (2002). Organizational knowledge expression and management: Centering resonance analysis on organizational discourse. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 274-281.
42.
Moreland, R. (1999). Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. In L. L. Thompson , D. M. Messick, & J. M. Levine (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 3-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
Moreland, R., Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (1996). Socially shared cognition and work: Transactive memory and group performance. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What's social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (pp. 57-84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
Murgolo-Poore, M.E., Pitt, L.E., Berthon, P.R., & Prendegast, G. (2003). Corporate intelligence dissemination as a consequence of intranet effectiveness: An empirical study . Public Relations Review, 29, 171-184.
45.
Nonaka, A.Y. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation . Organization Science, 5, 14-37.
46.
Palazzolo, E.T. (2005). Organizing for information retrieval in transactive memory systems. Communication Research, 32, 726-761.
47.
Palazzolo, E.T., Serb, D.A., She, Y., Su, C., & Contractor, N.S. (2006). Coevolution of communication and knowledge networks in transactive memory systems: Computational models for theoretical development. Communication Theory, 16, 223-250.
48.
Peiser, W., & Peter, J. (2000). Third-person perception of television-viewing behavior. Journal of Communication, 50, 25-45.
49.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavior research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies . Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
50.
Pollock, T.C., Whitbred, R.C., & Contractor, N. (2000). Social information processing and job characteristics: A simultaneous test of two theories with implications for job satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 26, 292-310.
51.
Raghuram, S., Garud, R., Wiesenfeld, B., & Gupta, V. (2001). Factors contributing to virtual work adjustment . Journal of Management, 27, 383-405.
52.
Schmitz, J., & Fulk, J. (1991). Organizational colleagues, media richness, and electronic mail: A test of the social-influence model of technology use. Communication Research, 18, 487-523.
53.
Sias, P.M., & Cahill, D.J. (1998). From co-workers to friends: The development of peer friendships in the workplace. Western Journal of Communication , 62, 273-299.
54.
Swan, J., Newell, S., Scarbrough, H., & Hislop, D. (1999). Knowledge management and innovation: Networks and networking [Electronic version]. Journal ofKnowledge Management, 3, 262-275.
Trethewey, A., & Corman, S. (2001). Anticipating k-commerce: E-commerce, knowledge management, and organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 619-628.
57.
Vaast, E. (2004). O brother, where are thou? From communities to networks of practices through intranet use. Management Communication Quarterly, 18, 5-44.
58.
Vaill, P.B. (1996). Learning as a way of being: Strategies for survival in a world of permanent white water. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
59.
Walsham, G. (2002). What can knowledge management systems deliver ? Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 267-273.
60.
Wegner, D.M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In W. J. Ickes (Ed.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-208). New York: Springer-Verlag.
61.
Wegner, D.M. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition, 12, 319-339.
62.
Yen, D.C., & Chou, D.C. (2001). Intranets for organizational innovation. Information Management & Computer Security, 9, 80-87.
63.
Yuan, Y., Fulk, J., Shumate, M., Monge, P.R., Bryant, J.A., & Matsaganis, M. (2005). Individual participation in organizational information commons: The impact of team level social influence and technology-specific competence. Human Communication Research , 31, 212-240.
64.
Zhou, A.Z., & Fink, D. (2003). The intellectual capital web: A systematic linking of intellectual capital and knowledge management. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4, 34-48.
65.
Zorn, T.E., & Taylor, J.R. (2004). Knowledge management and/as organizational communication . In D. Tourish & O. Hargie (Eds.), Key issues in organizational communication (pp. 96-112). London: Routledge .
