Patient-satisfaction in an outpatient vein surgery office: A comparison of English- and Spanish-speaking patients

Abstract

Background

In spite of an increasing Latino population and accompanying rise in demand for health care, not much is known about patient-satisfaction in Spanish-speaking patients and how to improve patient-satisfaction when using interpreters. We sought to compare patient-satisfaction with vein surgery office visits between English-speaking and Spanish-speaking patients.

Methods

Directly before and after the office visit, 126 patients completed a socio-demographic survey, a five-point ordinal rating survey of physician and interpreter satisfaction with the encounter. Measures were satisfaction with the provider’s friendliness, respectfulness, concern, ability to make the patient comfortable, and time spent for the exam.

Results

When the provider was fluent in the language that the patient spoke, patients (M = 4.954, SD = 0.21) were significantly more satisfied with their visit at VVHC than patients who required an interpreter (M = 4.762, SD = 0.71), z = 2.230, p = 0.012. Spanish speaking patients were more likely to be satisfied with the visit when they felt their interpreter was friendly (n = 58, p = 0.049). There was no difference found with regard to the provider being thoughtful and comforting.

Conclusion

Spanish-speaking patients are less satisfied with the care provided in a vein surgery office. Patients who communicated through an interpreter were less satisfied with the patient–provider relationship. In light of the growing diversity of the US population and the fact that patient-satisfaction is increasingly tied to reimbursement, additional research might identify potential areas of improvement for the surgeon, interpreter, and patient perspectives.

Keywords

Medical education patient preference patient-satisfaction surgery varicose veins

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gutiérrez

Almaguer

. The new Latino studies reader a twenty-first-century perspective, Oakland: University of California Press, 2016.

Flores

. The impact of medical interpreter services on the quality of health care: a systematic review. Med Care Res Rev 2005; 62: 255–299.

Menendez

Loeffler

Ring

. Patient satisfaction in an outpatient hand surgery office: a comparison of English- and Spanish-speaking patients. Qual Manage Health Care 2015; 24: 183–189.

Gray

Hilder

Donaldson

. Why do we not use trained interpreters for all patients with limited English proficiency? Is there a place for using family members? Aust J Prim Health 2011; 17: 240–249.

Baker

. Use and effectiveness of interpreters in an emergency department. JAMA 1996; 275: 783–783.

Karliner

Pérez-Stable

Gildengorin

. The language divide. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 19: 175–183.

Elderkin-Thompson

Silver

Waitzkin

. When nurses double as interpreters: a study of Spanish-speaking patients in a US primary care setting. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52: 1343–1358.

Green

Ngo-Metzger

Anna

et al.

Interpreter services, language concordance, and health care quality. Experiences of Asian Americans with limited English proficiency. JGIM 2005; 20: 1050–1056.

Jaramillo

Snyder

Dunlap

et al.

The Hispanic clinic for pediatric surgery: a model to improve parent–provider communication for Hispanic pediatric surgery patients. J Pediatr Surg 2016; 51: 670–674.

10.

Dunlap

Jaramillo

Koppolu

et al.

The effects of language concordant care on patient satisfaction and clinical understanding for Hispanic pediatric surgery patients. J Pediatr Surg 2015; 50: 1586–1589.

11.

Rose

Tisnado

Malin

et al.

Use of interpreters by physicians treating limited English proficient women with breast cancer: results from the provider survey of the Los Angeles Women’s Health Study. Health Serv Res 2010; 45: 172–194.

12.

Hsieh

. Interpreters as co-diagnosticians: overlapping roles and services between providers and interpreters. Soc Sci Med 2007; 64: 924–937.

13.

Kuo

Fagan

. Satisfaction with methods of Spanish interpretation in an ambulatory care clinic. J Gen Intern Med 1999; 14: 547–550.

14.

Karliner

Jacobs

Chen

et al.

Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Serv Res 2007; 42: 727–754.

15.

Hudelson

Dao

Perron

et al.

Interpreter-mediated diabetes consultations: a qualitative analysis of physician communication practices. BMC Fam Pract 2013; 14: 163–163.

16.

Wiking

Sundquist

Saleh-Stattin

. Consultations between immigrant patients, their interpreters, and their general practitioners: are they real meetings or just encounters? A qualitative study in primary health care. Int J Fam Med 2013; Article ID 794937: 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/794937.

17.

Morales

Cunningham

Brown

et al.

Are Latinos less satisfied with communication by health care providers?

J Gen Intern Med 1999; 14: 409–417.

18.

Rollins

Bradley

Hayden

et al.

Responding to a changing nation: are faculty prepared for cross-cultural conversations and care?

Fam Med 2013; 45: 728–731.

19.

Morales

Elliott

Weech-Maldonado

et al.

The impact of interpreters on parents' experiences with ambulatory care for their children. Med Care Res Rev 2006; 63: 110–128.

20.

Attard

Mcarthur

Riitano

et al.

Improving communication between health-care professionals and patients with limited English proficiency in the general practice setting. Aust J Prim Health 2015; 21: 96–96.

21.

Moreno

Morales

. Hablamos Juntos (together we speak): interpreters, provider communication, and satisfaction with care. J Gen Intern Med 2010; 25: 1282–1288.

22.

Schinkel

Schouten

Street

et al.

Enhancing health communication outcomes among ethnic minority patients: the effects of the match between participation preferences and perceptions and doctor–patient concordance. J Health Commun 2016; 21: 1251–1259.