Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate patient satisfaction following endothermal ablation for varicose veins (VVs). Methods: A 12-question survey was sent to consecutive patients treated with endothermal ablation—questions related to preprocedure symptoms, recurrence, further treatments, and patient satisfaction. Results: Questionnaires sent a median 12 (range 6-22) months postintervention were returned by 177 (60.0%) of 295 patients; 63 (35.6%) of 177 received treatment for recurrent VVs. Preintervention symptoms included aching (141 [79.7%] of 177), swelling (86 [48.6%] of 177), and heaviness (72 [40.7%] of 177). Improvements in preoperative symptoms were reported by 82.5% (146 of 177). Postintervention recurrence was reported by 87 (49.4%) of 177; 61 (70.1%) of 87 reported a few recurrent varicosities only. Further treatment was required by 11 (6.2%) of 177; 79 (44.6%) of 177 of patients reported no complications. The majority (151 [85.8%] of 176) were satisfied with their treatment. In all, 16 (25.4%) of 62 of patients treated for recurrent VVs were dissatisfied versus 9 (7.9%) of 114 of those with primary VVs (P = .0026). Conclusions: The majority of patients are satisfied with results following endothermal ablation. Dissatisfaction may be more likely following treatment for recurrent VVs.

Keywords

patient satisfaction varicose veins recurrent varicose veins radiofrequency ablation endovenous laser therapy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Davies AH , Steffen C. , Cosgrove C. , Wilkins DC Varicose vein surgery: patient satisfaction. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1995;40(5):298-299.

Campbell WB , Vijay Kumar A. , Collin TW , Allington KL , Michaels JA Randomised and economic analysis of conservative and therapeutic interventions for varicose veins study. The outcome of varicose vein surgery at 10 years: clinical findings, symptoms and patient satisfaction. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2003;85(1):52-57.

Campbell B. Varicose veins and their management. BMJ. 2006; 333(7562):287-292.

Markides GA , Subar D. , Al-Khaffaf H. Litigation claims in vascular surgery in the United Kingdom’s NHS. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;36(4):452-457.

VNUS Medical Technologies I. A minimally invasive treatment for pain and swelling caused by varicose veins. http://www.vnus.com/. Accessed October 28, 2009.

Scurr JR , Hufton A. , Jeffrey V. , Vallabhaneni SR www.Accurateinformationforvaricoseveinpatients.com? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90(7):554-556.

Rasmussen LH , Bjoern L. , Lawaetz M. , Blemings A. , Lawaetz B. , Eklof B. Randomized trial comparing endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with high ligation and stripping in patients with varicose veins: short-term results. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46(2):308-315.

Darwood RJ , Theivacumar N. , Dellagrammaticas D. , Mavor AI , Gough MJ Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with surgery for the treatment of primary great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2008;95(3):294-301.

Hinchliffe RJ , Ubhi J. , Beech A. , Ellison J. , Braithwaite BD A prospective randomised controlled trial of VNUS closure versus surgery for the treatment of recurrent long saphenous varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;31(2):212-218.

10.

Theivacumar NS , Darwood R. , Gough MJ Neovascularisation and recurrence 2 years after varicose vein treatment for sapheno-femoral and great saphenous vein reflux: a comparison of surgery and endovenous laser ablation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;38(2):203-207.

11.

Lurie F. , Creton D. , Eklof B. , et al. Prospective randomised study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure) versus ligation and vein stripping (EVOLVeS): two-year follow-up . Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;29(1):67-73.

12.

Rautio T. , Ohinmaa A. , Perala J. , et al. Endovenous obliteration versus conventional stripping operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: a randomized controlled trial with comparison of the costs. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(5):958-965.

13.

Bream E. , Black N.

What is the relationship between patients’ and clinicians’ reports of the outcomes of elective surgery?

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009;14(3):174-182.

14.

National Health Service. Patient reported outcomes and measures. Updated 2009. http://www.ic.nhs.uk/proms. Accessed September 19, 2009.

15.

Palfreyman SJ , Drewery-Carter K. , Rigby K. , Michaels JA , Tod AM Varicose veins: a qualitative study to explore expectations and reasons for seeking treatment. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13(3):332-340.

16.

Goode SD , Kuhan G. , Altaf N. , et al. Suitability of varicose veins for endovenous treatments. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009; 32(5):988-991.

17.

Wolf B. , Brittenden J. Surgical treatment of varicose veins. J R Coll Surg Edinb . 2001;46(3):154-158.

18.

Davies AH Outcome assessment of varicose vein surgery. Phlebology. 2003;18(2):53.

A Study of Patient Satisfaction Following Endothermal Ablation for Varicose Veins

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References