Short-term results of isolated phlebectomy with preservation of incompetent great saphenous vein (ASVAL procedure) in primary varicose veins disease

Abstract

Objective

To establish an effect of isolated phlebectomy in patients with incompetent great saphenous vein (Ambulatory Selective Varices Ablation under Local anesthesia (ASVAL) procedure) on the reflux and diameter of the trunk and to assess recurrence rate of varicose veins at one year.

Material and methods

We conducted a prospective study on patients with primary varicose veins and with C2 or C2,3 or C2,3,4 or C2,4 classes of chronic venous disease and great saphenous vein incompetence. The study included 67 patients (51 women and 16 men; 75 limbs in total). Age varied from 17 to 71 years; mean age was 46.8 years (SD 13.9). We recorded the presence or absence of reflux in the great saphenous vein with duplex ultrasound before and after surgery. The recurrence of varicose veins was evaluated at 12 months. All the patients underwent isolated phlebectomy with preservation of incompetent great saphenous vein (ASVAL procedure) under local anesthesia.

Results

At one year after removing of tributaries of the incompetent trunk, 66% of them were competent. Reflux persisted in 17% of great saphenous veins with reflux above mid-thigh and in 61% of trunks with reflux extended below the mid-thigh (p = 0.0004). The diameter of all the veins decreased significantly no matter reflux disappeared or not. Varicose veins reoccurred in 13.5% cases. In 6.5% of limbs with a reflux above the mid-thigh, the recurrence was registered at one year, while in the limbs with the reflux below the mid-thigh at a baseline, the recurrence rate was 25% (p = 0.036).

Conclusion

Isolated phlebectomy with a preservation of incompetent great saphenous vein leads to disappearance of reflux in a majority of cases and to significant decrease of vein diameter in all the cases. ASVAL procedure could be considered as a less aggressive and less expensive approach in selected cases. Clear indications for isolated phlebectomy need to be established.

Keywords

Varicose veins isolated phlebectomy ASVAL

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Nicolaides

Kakkos

Eklof

et al.

Management of chronic venous disorders of the lower limbs. Guidelines according to scientific evidence. Int Angiol 2014; 33: 87–208.

Wittens

Davies

Bækgaard

et al.

Management of chronic venous disease. Clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 49: 678–737.

Bellmunt-Montoya

Escribano

Dilme

et al.

CHIVA method for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 6: CD009648–CD009648.

Labropoulos

Kang

Mansour

et al.

Primary superficial vein reflux with competent saphenous trunk. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1999; 18: 201–201.

Labropoulos

Giannoukas

Delis

et al.

Where does venous reflux start?

J Vasc Surg 1997; 26: 736–736.

Pittaluga

Chastanet

Rea

et al.

Classification of saphenous refluxes: implications for treatment. Phlebology 2008; 23: 2–9.

Zamboni

Cisno

Marchetti

et al.

Reflux elimination without any ablation or disconnection of the saphenous vein. A haemodynamic model for venous surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2001; 21: 361–369.

Pittaluga

Rea

Barbe

. Methode ASVAL (Ablation Selective des Varices sous Anesthesie Locale): principes et resultats preliminaires. Phlebologie 2005; 58: 175–181.

Pittaluga

Chastanet

Rea

et al.

Midterm results of the surgical treatment of varices by phlebectomy with conservation of a refluxing saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg 2009; 50: 107–118.

10.

Eklöf

Rutherford

Bergan

et al.

Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: consensus statement. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40: 1248–1252.

11.

Siribumrungwong

Noorit

Wilasrusmee

et al.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing endovenous ablation and surgical intervention in patients with varicose vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012; 44: 214–223.

12.

Rasmussen

Lawaetz

Bjoern

et al.

Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with clinical and duplex outcome after 5 years. J Vasc Surg 2013; 58: 421–426.

13.

Zamboni

Gianesini

Menegatti

et al.

Great saphenous varicose vein surgery without saphenofemoral junction disconnection. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 820–825.

14.

Biemans

Anke

van den Bos

et al.

The effect of single phlebectomies of a large varicose tributary on great saphenous vein reﬂux. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disorder 2014; 2: 179–187.

15.

Pittaluga

Chastanet

Locret

et al.

The effect of isolated phlebectomy on reflux and diameter of the great saphenous vein: a prospective study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 40: 122–128.

16.

Pittaluga

Chastanet

. Predictive value of a preoperative test for the reversibility of the reflux after phlebectomy with preservation of the great saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disorder 2014; 2: 105–105.