This study investigated the comprehension of which-questions among French-speaking monolingual (n = 26) and bilingual (n = 28) children aged 3 to 12 years, examining the roles of verbal working memory (WM) and length of exposure to an additional language (L2). We assessed comprehension of subject- and object-questions with a character-selection task, measured verbal WM with a non-word repetition task, and quantified linguistic exposure through a parental questionnaire. Results confirmed the well-known subject–object asymmetry, with object-questions posing greater difficulty than subject-questions for both groups. Additionally, verbal WM significantly impacted comprehension of object-questions among bilinguals, but not monolinguals, with higher WM associated with better performance. Importantly, it was bilinguals with longer exposure to a language other than French who demonstrated improved verbal WM, leading to increased comprehension of object-questions compared to bilingual peers with less L2 exposure. These findings underscore the crucial role of WM in language comprehension and suggest that bilingualism can confer cognitive advantages that in turn enhance complex syntactic processing.
AdaniFVan der LelyHKForgiariniMGuastiMT (2010) Grammatical feature dissimilarities make relative clauses easier: A comprehension study with Italian children. Lingua120: 2148–66.
2.
AdesopeOOLavinTThompsonTUngerleiderC (2010) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cognitive correlates of bilingualism. Review of Educational Research80: 207–45.
3.
ArnonI (2010) Rethinking child difficulty: The effect of NP type on children’s processing of relative clauses in Hebrew. Journal of Child Language37: 27–57.
4.
ArosioFYatsushiroKForgiariniMGuastiMT (2012) Morphological information and memory resources in children’s processing of relative clauses in German. Language Learning and Development8: 340–64.
BaddeleyADHitchGJ (1974) Working memory. In: BowerGH (ed.) The psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press, pp. 47–89.
7.
BaracRBialystokE (2011) Cognitive development of bilingual children. Language Teaching44: 36–54.
8.
BatesDMächlerMBolkerBWalkerS (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software67: 1–48.
9.
BenteaA (2016) Comprehension of wh-questions in child Romanian: A case about case and lexical restriction. In: ChoiJDemirdashHLunguOVoeltzelL (eds) Language acquisition at the interfaces: Proceedings of GALA 2015. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, pp. 1–18.
10.
BenteaADurrlemanS (2014) To move or not to move. The role of optionality in the acquisition of A’-dependencies in French. In: CostaJFiéisAJoão FreitasMLoboMSantosAL (eds) New directions in the acquisition of Romance languages: Selected proceedings of the Romance Turn V. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, pp. 78–101.
11.
BenteaADurrlemanS (2017) Now you hear it, now you don’t: Number mismatch in the comprehension of relative clauses in French. In: LaMendolaMScottJ (eds) Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD 41). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 60–73.
12.
BenteaADurrlemanSRizziL (2016) Refining intervention: The acquisition of featural relations in object A-bar dependencies. Lingua169: 21–41.
13.
BialystokE (2010) Global–local and trail-making tasks by monolingual and bilingual children: Beyond inhibition. Developmental Psychology46: 93–105.
14.
BialystokECraikFIMKleinRViswanathanM (2004) Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging19: 290–303.
15.
BlomEKüntayACMesserMVerhagenJLesemanP (2014) The benefits of being bilingual: Working memory in bilingual Turkish–Dutch children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology128: 105–19.
16.
BoothJRMacWhinneyBHarasakiY (2000) Developmental differences in visual and auditory processing of complex sentences. Child Development71: 981–1003.
17.
BrandtSLievenETomaselloM (2016) German children’s use of word order and case marking to interpret simple and complex sentences: Testing differences between constructions and lexical items. Language Learning and Development12: 156–82.
18.
ButlerYGHakutaK (2006) Cognitive factors in children’s L1 and L2 reading. Academic Exchange Quarterly10: 23–27.
19.
CantoneKF (2022) Language exposure in early bilingual and trilingual acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism19: 402–17.
20.
CarlsonSMMeltzoffAN (2008) Bilingual experience and executive functioning in young children. Developmental Science11: 282–98.
21.
Castilla-EarlsARonderosJFittonL (2022) Can bilingual children self-report their bilingual experience and proficiency? The Houston Questionnaire. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research65: 3835–53.
22.
ChiatSPolišenskáKYanushevskayaIAntonijevicS (2020) Language Neutral Crosslinguistic Nonword Repetition Test (CL-NWR). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. Available at: https://www.bi-sli.org/cl-nonword-repetition (accessed June 2025).
23.
ContemoriCCarlsonMMarinisT (2018) On-line processing of English which-questions by children and adults: A visual world paradigm study. Journal of Child Language45: 415–41.
24.
CostaAHernándezMCosta-FaidellaJSebastián-GallésN (2009) On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: Now you see it, now you don’t. Cognition113: 135–49.
25.
CuzaAMillerL (2015) The protracted acquisition of past tense aspectual values in child heritage Spanish. In: KlassenRLicerasJMValenzuelaE (eds) Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone linguistics: Volume 4. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 211–30.
26.
De CatCKašćelanDPrévostP, et al (2022) Quantifying Bilingual EXperience (Q-BEx): questionnaire manual and documentation. Available at: https://osf.io/v7ec8/ (accessed June 2025).
27.
De VincenziMArduinoLCiccarelliLJobR (1999) Parsing strategies in children’s comprehension of interrogative sentences. In BagnaraS (ed.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Science (pp. 301–08). Istituto di Psicologia del CNR.
28.
DiesselHTomaselloM (2005) A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language81: 882–906.
29.
DurrlemanSBenteaA (2021) Locality in the acquisition of object A’-dependencies: Insights from French. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics6: Article106.
30.
DurrlemanSMarinisTFranckJ (2016) Syntactic complexity in the comprehension of wh-questions and relative clauses in typical language development and autism. Applied Psycholinguistics37: 1501–27.
31.
FensonLMarchmanVAThalDJ, et al (1993) MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories: User’s guide and technical manual. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
32.
FensonLMarchmanVAThalDJ, et al (2007) MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
33.
FrazierLD’ArcaisGBF (1989) Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language28: 331–44.
34.
FrazierLFodorJD (1978) The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition6(4): 291–325.
35.
FriedmannNBellettiARizziL (2009) Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua119: 67–88.
36.
FriedmannNNovogrodskyR (2011) Which questions are most difficult to understand?: The comprehension of Wh questions in three subtypes of SLI. Lingua121: 367–82.
37.
FriedmannNRizziLBellettiA (2017) No case for case in locality: Case does not help interpretation when intervention blocks A-bar chains. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics2: Article 33.
38.
GibsonE (1998) Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition68: 1–76.
39.
GibsonE (2000) The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In MarantzAMiyashitaYO’NeilW (eds) Image, language, brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 95–126.
40.
GoodluckH (2005) D(iscourse)-linking and question formation: Comprehension effects in children and broca’s aphasics. In Di SciulloAM (ed.) UG and external systems: Language, brain and computation: Volume 75. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 185–92.
41.
GuastiMTBranchiniCArosioF (2012) Interference in the production of Italian subject and object wh-questions. Applied Psycholinguistics33: 185–223.
42.
HamannC (2006) Speculations about early syntax: The production of wh-questions by normally developing French children and French children with SLI. Catalan Journal of Linguistics5: 143–89.
43.
HamdaniSChanAKanR, et al (2025) Identifying developmental language disorder (DLD)in multilingual children: A case study tutorial. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology27: 157–71.
44.
HantmanRMChoiBHartwickKNadlerZLukG (2023) A systematic review of bilingual experiences, labels, and descriptions in autism spectrum disorder research. Frontiers in Psychology14: Article 1095164.
45.
JakubowiczC (2011) Measuring derivational complexity: New evidence from typically developing and SLI learners of L1 French. Lingua121: 339–51.
46.
JaredDKrollJF (2001) Do bilinguals activate phonological representations in one or both of their languages when naming words?Journal of Memory and Language44: 2–31.
47.
JustMACarpenterPA (1992) A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review99: 122–49.
48.
KaanEHarrisAGibsonEHolcombP (2000) The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes15: 159–201.
49.
KharkhurinAV (2008) The effect of linguistic proficiency, age of second language acquisition, and length of exposure to a new cultural environment on bilinguals’ divergent thinking. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition11: 225–43.
50.
KohnertK (2010) Bilingual children with primary language impairment: Issues, evidence and implications for clinical actions. Journal of Communication Disorders43: 456–73.
51.
LinckJAWeissDJ (2011) Working memory predicts the acquisition of explicit L2 knowledge. In: SanzCLeowRP (eds) Implicit and explicit language learning: Conditions, processes, and knowledge in SLA and bilingualism. Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press, pp. 101–14.
MacWhinneyB (1982) Basic syntactic processes. In: KuczajS (ed.) Language acquisition; Syntax and semantics: Volume 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 73–136.
54.
MartinKIEllisNC (2012) The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition34: 379–413.
55.
MiyakeAFriedmanNPEmersonMJ, et al (2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex ‘frontal lobe’ tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology41: 49–100.
56.
MonnierCBoichéJArmandonPBaudoinSBellocchiS (2022) Is bilingualism associated with better working memory capacity? A meta-analysis. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism25: 2229–55.
57.
NovickJMTrueswellJCThompson-SchillSL (2005) Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience5: 263–81.
58.
O’GradyW (2007) Syntactic development. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
59.
OmakiADavidson WhiteIGoroTLidzJPhillipsC (2014) No fear of commitment: Children’s incremental interpretation in English and Japanese wh-questions. Language Learning and Development10: 206–33.
60.
OmakiALidzJ (2015) Linking parser development to acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Language Acquisition22: 158–92.
61.
PoarchGJVan HellJG (2012) Executive functions and inhibitory control in multilingual children: Evidence from second-language learners, bilinguals, and trilinguals. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology113: 535–51.
62.
PontikasGCunningsIMarinisT (2023) Online processing of which-questions in bilingual children: Evidence from eye-tracking. Journal of Child Language50: 1082–1118.
63.
PontikasGCunningsIMarinisT (2024) Sentence processing in bilingual children: Evidence from garden-path sentences. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism14: 476–511.
64.
PozzanLTrueswellJC (2015) Revise and resubmit: How real-time parsing limitations influence grammar acquisition. Cognitive Psychology80: 73–108.
65.
R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing [software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.R-project.org (accessed June 2025).
66.
RizziL (1990) Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67.
RizziL (2004) Locality and left periphery. In: BellettiA (ed.) Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structure: Volume 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 223–51.
68.
RoeschADChondrogianniV (2016) ‘Which mouse kissed the frog?’ Effects of age of onset, length of exposure, and knowledge of case marking on the comprehension of wh-questions in German-speaking simultaneous and early sequential bilingual children. Journal of Child Language43: 635–61.
69.
SchlesewskyMBornkesselI (2006) Context-sensitive neural responses to conflict resolution: Electrophysiological evidence from subject–object ambiguities in language comprehension. Brain Research1098: 139–52.
70.
SchouwenaarsAHendriksPRuigendijkE (2018) German children’s processing of morphosyntactic cues in wh-questions. Applied Psycholinguistics39: 1279–1318.
71.
StavrakakiS (2006) Developmental perspectives on Specific Language Impairment: Evidence from the production of wh-questions by Greek SLI children over time. Advances in Speech Language Pathology8: 384–96.
72.
StoweLA (1986) Parsing wh-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes1: 227–45.
73.
SussmanRSSedivyJ (2003) The time-course of processing syntactic dependencies: Evidence from eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes18: 143–63.
74.
ThanePD (2024) Acquiring morphology through adolescence in Spanish as a heritage language: The case of subjunctive mood. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition28: 373–86.
75.
TingleyDYamamotoTHiroseKKeeleLImaiK (2014) Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. Journal of Statistical Software59: 1–38. Available at: http://www.jstatsoft.org/v59/i05/ (accessed June 2025).
76.
TorregrossaJFloresCRinkeE (2023) What modulates the acquisition of difficult structures in a heritage language? A study on Portuguese in contact with French, German, and Italian. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition26: 179–92.
77.
TrueswellJCSekerinaIHillNMLogripML (1999) The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition73: 89–134.
78.
UnsworthS (2016) Quantity and quality of language input in bilingual language development. In NicoladisEMontanariS (eds.) Bilingualism across the lifespan: Factors moderating language proficiency. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 103–21.
79.
WeighallAR (2008) The kindergarten path effect revisited: Children’s use of context in processing structural ambiguities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology99: 75–95.
