Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Wh-phrases in Korean are ambiguous due to the lexical ambiguity of “wh” words: wh-pronouns as in a wh-question, or indefinite pronouns as in a yes/no-question. Furthermore, since a wh-word in Korean is in-situ (i.e. not moved to the front of a sentence as in English), wh-questions are not distinguished from echo questions in their surface forms. In this paper, we investigated prosodic characteristics disambiguating these three types of wh-phrases: 1) wh-question, 2) yes/no-question, and 3) incredulity question, a kind of echo question giving an incredulity meaning. Production and perception data were examined to discover what prosodic features are used to distinguish these three types of wh-phrases and which feature is more salient and reliable in perceiving such differences. The production results show that yes/no-questions and other types of questions are distinguished by different accentual phrasing, while incredulity and wh-questions are distinguished by different peak amplitudes, pitch ranges, and boundary tones. Interestingly, not all speakers used the same strategy to distinguish incredulity from wh-questions. The results of the perception test suggest that accentual phrasing is significantly related to the perception of three types while amplitude and boundary tones are significantly related to the perception of wh-and incredulity questions, respectively.

Keywords

accentual phrasing incredulous question prosodic hyperarticulation speaker strategy wh-question yes/no-question

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BOLINGER, D. (1989). Intonation and its uses: Melody in grammar and discourse. London: Edward Arnold.

CHANG, S.J. (1973). A generative study of discourse: Pragmatic aspects of Korean with reference to English. Language Research, 9 (2). (Supplement), Seoul National University.

CHO, Y.Y. (1990). Syntax and phrasing in Korean. In S. Inkelas & D. Zec (eds.), The phonology-syntax connection (pp. 47–62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

CHOE, J.-W. (1985). Pitch-accent and q/wh words in Korean. In S. Kuno , J. Whitman , I.- H. Lee , & Y.-S. Kang (eds.), Harvard studies in Korean linguistics (pp. 113–123). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

HIRSCHBERG, J. , & WARD, G. (1992). The influence of pitch range, duration, amplitude and spectral features on the interpretation of the rise-fall-rise intonation contour in English. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 241–251.

JOHNSON, K. , FLEMMING, E. , & WRIGHT, R. (1993). The hyperspace effect: Phonetic targets are hyperarticulated. Language, 69 (3), 505–528.

JUN, S.-A. (1993). The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University.

JUN, S.-A. (1996). Influence of microprosody on macroprosody: A case of phrase-initial strengthening. Poster presented at Laboratory Phonology 5 conference, Evanston, IL.

KANG, O. (1992). Korean prosodic phonology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.

10.

LADD, D.R. (1980). The structure of intonational meaning. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

11.

LEE, H.-Y. (1990). The structure of Korean prosody. Doctoral dissertation. University College London [published by Hanshin Publishing Co., Seoul, Korea].

12.

MAEKAWA, K. (1991). Perception of intonational characteristics of wh and non-wh questions in Tokyo Japanese. Proceedings of the XIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 4, 202–205. Aix-en-Provence, France.

13.

MAEKAWA, K. (1994). Intonational structure of Kumamoto Japanese: A perceptual validation. Proceedings of 1994 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing: Vol. 1, 119–122.

14.

MARTIN, S.E. (1951). Korean phonemics. Language, 27, 519–533.

15.

NESPOR, M. , & VOGEL, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.

16.

OH, M., & LEE, H.-Y. (1993). Teaching intonation of Korean as a foreign language. Paper presented at IAKL, Seoul, Korea.

17.

SELKIRK, E.O. (1986). On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3, 371–405.

18.

SILVA, D.J. (1989). Determining the domain for intervocalic stop voicing in Korean. In S. Kuno , I.-H. Lee , J. Whitman , S.-Y. Bak , Y.-S. Yang , & Y.-J. Kim (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics III (pp. 177–188). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

19.

WARD, G., & HIRSCHBERG, J. (1988). Intonation and propositional attitude: The pragmatics of L*+HLH%. Proceedings of the Fifth Meeting of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, pp. 512--522. Philadelphia, PA.

A Prosodic Analysis of Three Types of Wh-Phrases in Korean

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References