Crosslinguistic influence of wh-in-situ questions by Korean-English bilingual children

Abstract

Aims and objectives/purpose/research questions:

This study investigates wh-in-situ transfer for sequential bilingual children whose first language (L1) is Korean and early second language (L2) is English. Previous research has shown evidence that bilingual children who speak one in-situ language and one wh-movement language often show transfer from the dominant language to the weaker language, and from the in-situ language to the wh-movement language. The purpose of this study is to explore whether wh-in-situ is transferred to English, under the influence of Korean. The research questions are as follows: Do K-E bilingual children produce more wh-in-situ questions in English than their monolingual counterparts? If so, do these wh-in-situ questions appear in illicit constructions?

Design/Methodology:

The design of this study is longitudinal in nature, in order to best capture a holistic picture of the children’s productions of English over time. Seven K-E children spanning ages 2;4 to 7;11 were observed in their spontaneous play interactions over approximately two years.

Data/Analysis:

The data consists of 120 recordings, which were transcribed and coded in ELAN. Monolingual comparison data were obtained from the CHILDES database.

Findings/Conclusions:

Results show no instances of wh-in-situ in the children’s English; the bilingual children pattern similarly to English-monolingual children in wh-in-situ production. No direct influence from Korean to English for wh-in-situ formation was found, contrary to what has been found in studies with other language pairs.

Originality:

This paper provides new evidence from a language pairing that has not been previously explored for crosslinguistic influence of wh-in-situ questions.

Significance/Implications:

The findings suggest that a dominance approach or structural complexity approach to predicting crosslinguistic influence for bilingual speakers may not fully capture the conditions for such influence to occur and may require some modification.

Keywords

Crosslinguistic influence wh-in-situ transfer Korean English child bilingualism wh-questions bilingual

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Argyri

Sorace

(2007). Crosslinguistic influence and language dominance in older bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 79–99.

Bernardini

Schlyter

(2004). Growing syntactic structure and code-mixing in the weaker language: The Ivy Hypothesis. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(1), 49–69. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904001270

Bliss

(1988). The development of modals. The Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 9, 253–261.

Brown

Cazden

Bellugi

(1969). The child’s grammar from I to III. In Hill

(Ed.), 1967 Minnesota symposia on child psychology (pp. 28–73). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Cantone

Kupisch

Müller

Schmitz

(2008). Rethinking language dominance in bilingual children. Linguistische Berichte, 215, 307–343.

Cole

Gil

Hermon

Tadmor

(2001). The acquisition of in-situ wh-questions and wh-indefinites in Jakarta Indonesian. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Boston University Conference on Language Development, 1, 169–179.

Döpke

(1998). Competing language structures: The acquisition of verb placement by bilingual German-English children. Journal of Child Language, 25(3), 555–584.

Garvey

(1979). An approach to the study of children’s role play. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 12, 69–73.

Gathercole

(1980). Birdies like birdseed the bester than buns: A study of relational comparatives and their acquisition. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Kansas.

10.

Gawlitzek-Maiwald

Tracy

(1996). Bilingual bootstrapping. Linguistics, 34(5), 901–926. http://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1996.34.5.901

11.

Genesee

(1989). Early bilingual development: One language or two? Journal of Child Language, 16(1), 161–179.

12.

Genesee

Nicoladis

(2007). Bilingual first language acquisition. In Hoff

Shatz

(Eds.), Handbook of language development (pp. 324–342). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

13.

Guasti

M. T.

(2000). An excursion into interrogatives in Early English and Italian. In Friedmann

M.-A.

Rizzi

(Eds.), The acquisition of syntax: Studies in comparative developmental linguistics (pp. 105–128). London: Longman.

14.

Hellwig

Van Uytvanck

Hulsbosch

(2001–2015). EUDICO Linguistic Annotator (ELAN) (Version 4.9.1). Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.

15.

Hulk

Müller

(2000). Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(3), 227–244.

16.

Jisa

(2000). Language mixing in the weak language: Evidence from two children. Journal of Pragmatics, 9, 1363–1386. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00104-6

17.

Kim

S. H. O.

Starks

(2008). The role of emotions in L1 attrition: The case of Korean-English late bilinguals in New Zealand. International Journal of Bilingualism, 12(4), 303–319. http://doi.org/10.1177/1367006908098573

18.

Lee

S.-Y.

(2008). Argument-adjunct asymmetry in the acquisition of inversion in wh-questions by Korean learners of English. Language Learning, 58(3), 625–663.

19.

MacWhinney

(2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Third edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

20.

Meisel

(1989). Early differentiation of languages in bilingual children. In Hyltenstam

Obler

L. K.

(Eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan: Aspects of acquisition, maturity and loss (pp. 13–40). New York: Cambridge University Press.

21.

Meisel

(2001). The simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: Early differentiation and subsequent development of grammars. In Cenoz

Genesee

(Eds.), Trends in bilingual acquisition (pp. 11–41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

22.

Mishina-Mori

(2005). Autonomous and interdependent development of two language systems in Japanese/English simultaneous bilinguals: Evidence from question formation. First Language, 25(3), 291–315.

23.

Müller

Hulk

(2001). Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(1), 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1366728901290117

24.

Petersen

(1988). Word-internal code-switching constraints in a bilingual child’s grammar. Linguistics, 26(3), 479–493.

25.

Pires

Taylor

H. L.

(2007). The syntax of wh-in-situ and Common Ground. Paper presented at the 37th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages.

26.

Shin

S. J.

Milroy

L. M.

(2000). Conversational codeswitching among Korean-English bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 4(3), 351–383. http://doi.org/10.1177/13670069000040030401

27.

Soriente

(2007). Cross-linguistic and cognitive structures in the acquisition of wh-questions in an Indonesian-Italian bilingual child. In Kecskes

Albertazzi

(Eds.), Cognitive aspects of bilingualism (pp. 325–362). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

28.

Strik

Pérez-Leroux

A. T.

(2011). Jij doe wat girafe? Wh-movement and inversion in Dutch-French bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(2), 175–205.

29.

Yip

Matthews

(2000). Syntactic transfer in a Cantonese-English bilingual child. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(3), 193–208.

30.

Yip

Matthews

(2007). The bilingual child: Early development and language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

31.

Yip

Matthews

(2009). Conditions on cross-linguistic influence in bilingual acquisition: The case of wh-interrogatives. Paper presented at the 7th International Symposium on Bilingualism, Utrecht, The Netherlands.