This study investigated French and Spanish EFL (English as a foreign language) learners’ preferred use of three-word lexical bundles with discourse or stance-oriented function with a view to exploring the role of first language (L1) frequency effects in foreign language acquisition. Word combinations were extracted from learner performance data (i.e. argumentative essays), and the frequency of their translation equivalent forms was analysed on the basis of French and Spanish L1 corpora. Strong and positive monotonic correlations were found between the frequency of a lexical bundle in the EFL learners’ written productions and the frequency of its equivalent form in the learners’ first language. Results also suggest that different patterns of use across the two L1 learner populations may be explained by frequency differences in L1 French and Spanish. Overall, the study calls for a more systematic investigation of L1 frequency effects within usage-based perspectives on second language acquisition.
BiberDConradSCortesV (2003) Lexical bundles in speech and writing: An initial taxonomy. In: WilsonARaysonPMcEneryT (eds) Corpus linguistics by the Lune: A festschrift for Geoffrey Leech. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 71–92.
2.
BiberDJohanssonSLeechGConradSFineganE (1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.
3.
BybeeJ (2008) Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In: RobinsonPEllisNC (eds) Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. New York: Routledge, 216–36.
4.
CamachoJ (1999) From SOV to SVO: The grammar of interlanguage word order. Second Language Research15: 115–32.
5.
ConklinKSchmittN (2012) The processing of formulaic language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics32: 45–61.
6.
ConnorU (2002) New directions in contrastive rhetoric. TESOL Quarterly36: 493–510.
7.
ConnorUKaplanRB (1987) Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8.
DemolAHadermannP (2008) An exploratory study of discourse organisation in French L1, Dutch L1, French L2 and Dutch L2 written narratives. In: GilquinGPappSDíez-BedmarMB (eds) Linking up contrastive and learner corpus research. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 255–82.
9.
Díez-BedmarMBPappS (2008) The use of the English article system by Chinese and Spanish learners. In: GilquinGPappSDíez-BedmarMB (eds) Linking up contrastive and learner corpus research. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 147–75.
10.
DurrantPSchmittN (2009) To what extent do native and non-native writers make use of collocations?IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in language teaching47: 157–77.
11.
EllisNC (2002) Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition24: 143–88.
12.
EllisNC (2006a) Cognitive perspectives on SLA: The associative-cognitive CREED. AILA Review19: 100–21.
13.
EllisNC (2006b) Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics27: 1–31.
14.
EllisNC (2008) Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned-attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In: RobinsonPEllisNC (eds) Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. New York: Routledge, 372–405.
15.
EllisNC (2012) Frequency-based accounts of SLA. In: GassSMackeyA (eds) Handbook of second language acquisition. London: Routledge/Taylor Francis, 193–210.
16.
EllisNCCollinsL (2009) Input and second language acquisition: the roles of frequency, form, and function: Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal93: 329–35.
17.
EllisNCFerreira–JuniorF (2009a) Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. The Modern Language Journal93: 370–85.
18.
EllisNCFerreira-JuniorF (2009b) Constructions and their acquisition islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics7: 187–220.
19.
EllisNCLarsen-FreemanD (2009) Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. Language Learning59: 90–125.
20.
EllisNCO’DonnellMBRömerU (2014) Second language verb-argument constructions are sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency, and prototypicality. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism4: 405–31
21.
EllisNCRömerUO’DonnellMB (2015) Second language constructions: Usage-based acquisition and transfer too. In: SchwieterJ (ed.) The Cambridge handbook of bilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 234–54.
22.
EubankL (1991) Point counterpoint Universal Grammar in the second language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
23.
FieldAMilesJFieldZ (2012) Discovering statistics with R. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
24.
GassS (1980) An investigation of syntactic transfer in adult L2 learners. In: ScarcellaRKrashenS (eds) Research in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 69–82.
25.
GassSMMackeyA (2002) Frequency effects and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition24: 249–60.
26.
GilquinG (2008) Combining contrastive and interlanguage analysis to apprehend transfer: Detection, explanation, evaluation. In: GilquinGPappSDiez-BedmarMB (eds) Linking up contrastive and learner corpus research. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 3–33.
27.
GoldbergAE (2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
GrangerSDagneauxEMeunierFPaquotM (2009) The International corpus of learner English: Handbook and CD-ROM. Version 2. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
29.
GriesSThWulffS (2005) Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics3: 182–200.
30.
GyllstadHWolterB (2015) Collocational processing in the light of a phraseological continuum model: Does semantic transparency matter?Language Learning. Retrieved from: http://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12143 (November2015).
31.
HuangPYWibleDKoHW (2012) Frequency effects and transitional probabilities in L1 and L2 speakers’ processing of multiword expressions. In: GriesSThDivjakD (eds) Frequency effects in language learning and processing. Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton, 145–76.
32.
JarvisS (2000) Methodological rigor in the study of transfer: Identifying L1 influence in the interlanguage lexicon. Language Learning50: 245–309.
33.
JarvisSPavlenkoA (2008) Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York and London: Routledge.
34.
KamimotoTShimuraAKellermanE (1992) A second language classic reconsidered: The case of Schachter’s avoidance. Second Language Research8: 251–77.
35.
KellermanE (1977) Towards a characterization of the strategy of transfer in second language learning. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin2: 58–145.
36.
KilgarriffAKosemI (2012) Corpus tools for lexicographers. In: GrangerSPaquotM (eds) Electronic lexicography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 31–56.
LowieWVerspoorM (2004) Input versus transfer?: The role of frequency and similarity in the acquisition of L2 prepositions. In: AchardMNiemeierS (eds) Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 77–94.
39.
MacWhinneyB (1992) Transfer and competition in second language learning. In: HarrisR (ed.) Cognitive processing in bilinguals. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 371–90.
40.
MacWhinneyB (2008) A unified model. In: RobinsonPEllisNC (eds) Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. New York: Routledge, 341–71.
41.
MitchellRMylesFMardsenE (2013) Second language learning theories. 3rd edition. New York/London: Routledge.
42.
O’DonnellMBRömerUEllisNC (2013) The development of formulaic sequences in first and second language writing: Investigating effects of frequency, association, and native norm. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics18: 83–108.
43.
OdlinT (1989) Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
PaquotM (2008) Exemplification in learner writing: A cross-linguistic perspective. In: MeunierFGrangerS (eds) Phraseology in language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 101–19.
45.
PaquotM (2010) Academic vocabulary in learner writing: From extraction to analysis. London/New York: Continuum.
46.
PaquotM (2013) Lexical bundles and L1 transfer effects. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics18, 391–417.
47.
PaquotM (2014) Cross-linguistic influence and formulaic language: Recurrent word sequences in French learner writing. In: RobertsLVedderIHulstijnJ (eds) EUROSLA Yearbook. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 216–37.
48.
R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from: http://www.R-project.org (November2015).
49.
RömerUO’DonnellMBEllisNC (2014) Second language learner knowledge of verb–argument constructions: Effects of language transfer and typology. Modern Language Journal98: 952–75.
50.
SchachterJ (1974) An error in error analysis. Language Learning24: 205–14.
51.
SchwartzBDSprouseRA (1996) L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research12, 40–72.
52.
ScottM (2008) WordSmith Tools 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53.
SelinkerL (1966) A psycholinguistic study of language transfer. Unpublished PhD thesis, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
54.
SelinkerL (1969) Language transfer. General Linguistics9: 67–92.
55.
SelinkerL (1992) Rediscovering interlanguage. London and New York: Longman.
56.
SelinkerLDouglasD (1985) Wrestling with ‘context’ in interlanguage theory. Applied Linguistics6, 190–204.
57.
VanderbauwhedeG (2012) The Integrated Contrastive Model evaluated: The French and Dutch demonstrative determiner in L1 and L2. International Journal of Applied Linguistics22: 392–413.
58.
WangWWenQ (2002) L1 use in the L2 composing process: An exploratory study of 16 Chinese EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing11: 225–46.
59.
WeinreichU (1953) Languages in contact: Findings and problems. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York.
60.
WhiteL (2003) Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
WolterBGyllstadH (2013) Frequency of input and L2 collocational processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition35: 451–82.
62.
WulffS (2013) Input matters: The processor as a statistician. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism3: 362–66.
63.
ZuffereySMakWDegandLSandersT (2015) Advanced learners’ comprehension of discourse connectives: The role of L1 transfer across on-line and off-line tasks. Second Language Research31: 389–411.
