This article examines the process of acquisition of relative clauses in second language (L2) Italian. Despite the fact that linguistic research clearly evidences a distinction between restrictive relative clauses and non-restrictive relative clauses, second language acquisition studies have so far investigated the acquisition of relative clauses disregarding this fundamental and functional difference. Based on the analysis of oral data of 96 L2 Italian students of two different Common European Framework of Reference proficiency levels (B1 and C2), this study examines occurrences of target language relative clauses and of other strategies of relativization (i.e. coordinated sentences), analysing proficiency and first language (L1) influence on distribution. The significant differences in the distribution of alternative relativization strategies between the two groups and the non-restrictive function of coordinated sentences lead to the hypothesis that there are two distinct patterns of acquisition: one for restrictive and another for non-restrictive relative clauses.
AmbrosoSBonvinoE (2009) Configurazioni di discorso. Un’unità di analisi del parlato italiano L2 [Discourse configurations: An unit of analysis for spoken L2 Italian]. In: AndornoCRastelliS (eds) Corpora di italiano L2: Tecnologie, metodi, spunti teorici. Perugia: Guerra Edizioni, pp.153–75.
2.
ArnauldALancelotC (1968) Grammaire générale et raisonée de Port Royal [General and reasoned grammar of Port Royal]. Geneva: Slatkine.
3.
BanfiE (2003) Alcune caratteristiche della frase relativa cinese e frasi relative nell’italiano di cinesi [Some characteristics of Chinese relative clause and Italian relative clauses of Chinese learners]. In: BanfiE (ed.) L’italiano L2 di cinesi: Percorsi acquisitionali. Milan: Franco Angeli, 92–119.
4.
BenincàP (1993) Sintassi. In: SobreroAA (ed.) Introduzione all’italiano contemporaneo. Le strutture [Introduction to the structure of Italian]. Bari: Laterza, 127–50.
5.
BonvinoE (2005) Le sujet postverbale [Postverbal subject]. Paris: Ophrys.
6.
BonvinoEMasiniFPietrandreaP (2009) List constructions: A semantic network: Grammar in Construction(s). Proceedings of the 3rd International AFLiCo Conference. Paris: University of Paris Ouest, Nanterre la Défense.
Council of Europe (1996) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CroteauKC (1995) Second language acquisition of relative clause structures by learners of Italian. In: EckmanFRHighlandDLeePWMilehamJWeberRR (eds) Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 115–28.
10.
De MauroTManciniFVedovelliMVogheraM (1993) Lessico di frequenza dell’italiano parlato [Lexicon of frequency of spoken Italian]. Milan: Etas-Fondazione IBM.
11.
DiesselH (2004) The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
DiesselHTomaselloM (2000) The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech. Cognitive Linguistics11: 131–51.
13.
DiesselHTomaselloM (2001) The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics12: 97–141.
14.
DiesselHTomaselloM (2005) A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language81: 882–906.
15.
DikS (1997a) The theory of functional grammar: The structure of the clause: Volume 1. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
16.
DikS (1997b) The theory of functional grammar: Complex and derived constructions: Volume 2. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
17.
DoughtyC (1991) Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition13: 431–69.
18.
EckmanFRBellLNelsonD (1988) On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics9: 1–20.
19.
EllisNC (1996) Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition18: 91–126.
20.
EllisNC (2003) Constructions, chunking and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In: DoughtyCJLongMH (eds) The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell, 63–103.
21.
EllisR (1994) The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
FosterPTonkynAWigglesworthG (2000) Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics21: 354–75.
23.
GassS (1979) Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning29: 327–45.
24.
GassS (1982) From theory to practice. In: HinesMRutherfordW (eds) TESOL81: Selected papers from the Annual Conference of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. Washington, DC: TESOL, 120–39.
25.
Giacalone RamatA (1999) Functional typology and strategies of clause connection in second language acquisition. Linguistics37: 519–48.
26.
Giacalone RamatA (ed.) (2003) Verso l’italiano: Percorsi e strategie di acquisizione [Towards Italian: Acquisitional paths and strategies]. Rome: Carocci.
27.
GoldbergAECasenhiserD (2008) Construction learning and second language acquisition. In: RobinsonPEllisNC (eds) Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge, 197–215.
28.
GumperzJBerenzN (1993) Transcribing conversational exchanges. In: EdwardsJALampertMD (eds) Transcribing and coding methods for language research. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum, 91–112.
29.
HakutaK (1974) Prefabricated patterns and the emergence of structure in second language acquisition. Language Learning24: 287–98.
30.
KeenanEComrieB (1977) Noun phrase accessability and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry8: 63–99.
31.
KrashenSScarcellaR (1978) On routines and patterns in language acquisition and performance. Language Learning28: 283–300.
32.
Larsen-FreemanDLongM (1991) An introduction to second language acquisition research. London/New York: Longman.
33.
LehmannC (1988) Towards a typology of clause linkage. In: HaimanJThompsonSA (eds) Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 181–225.
34.
LiCNThompsonSA (1981) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
35.
LuziE (2010) Trascrivere e annotare un corpus in italiano L2: Riflessioni funzionali alla sua costituzione [Transcribing and annotating a corpus of L2 Italian: Functional considerations about its composition]. Studi Italiani di Lingusitica Teorica a Applicata39: 291–317.
36.
LuziE (2011) L’apprendimento di costruzioni complesse in italiano L2 [Acquisition of complex constructions in L2 Italian]. München: Lincom.
37.
MacWhinneyB (2000) The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
MellowD (2006) The emergence of second language syntax: A case study of the acquisition of relative clause. Applied Linguistics27: 620–44.
40.
OzekiHShiraiY (2007) Does the noun phrase accessability hierarchy predict the difficulty order in the acquisition of Japanese relative clauses?Studies in Second Language Acquisition29: 169–96.
41.
PavesiM (1986) Markedness, discoursal modes, and relative clause formation in a formal and an informal context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition81: 38–55.
42.
SacksHSchegloffEJeffersonG (1974) A simplest systematic for the organizatiton of turn-taking for conversation. Language50: 696–735.
43.
SatoCJ (1990) The syntax of conversation in interlanguage development. Tübigen: Narr.
44.
TomaselloM (2003) Constructing a language. A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
ValentiniA (1992) L’italiano di cinesi. Questioni di sintassi [Italian of Chinese learners: Syntax issues]. Perugia: Guerini.
46.
ValentiniA (1997). Frasi relative in italiano L2. Linguistica e Filologia5: 195–221.
47.
YausaESadockJ (2002) Pseudo-subordination: A Mismatch between syntax and semantics. Journal of Linguistics38: 87–111.
