It is argued that new phonological features can be acquired in second languages, but that both feature acquisition and feature re-assembly are affected by the robustness of phonetic cues in the input.
Archibald, J.2004: Interfaces in the prosodic hierarchy: new structure and the phonological parser. The International Journal of Bilingualism8, 29-50.
2.
-- 2005: Second language phonology as redeployment of L1 phonological knowledge. Canadian Journal of Linguistics50, 285-314.
3.
Brown, C.2000: The interrelation between speech perception and phonological acquisition from infant to adult. In Archibald, J., editor, Second language acquisition and linguistic theory . Oxford: Blackwell, 4-63.
4.
Gonzalez, A.2008: Consonantes glotales en maya yucateco: el papel de la prominencia acustica en la adquisition de segmentos en lenguas segundas [Glottal consonants in Yucatec Maya: a paper on acoustic prominence in the acquisition of segments in second languages]. Paper presented at the Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico City. Mexico.
5.
Hawkins, R. and Hattori, H.2006: Interpretation of multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers: a missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research22, 269-301.
6.
Larson-Hall, J.2004: Predicting perceptual success with segments: a test of Japanese speakers of Russian. Second Language Research20, 32-76.
7.
Mah, J., Goad, H. and Steinhauer, K.2007: Francophones and English /h/: an acoustic problem? Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Paper presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development.
8.
Summerell, F.2007: The L2 acquisition of Japanese length contrasts. Unpublished MA Thesis, University of Calgary.
9.
Wright, R.2001: Perceptual cues in contrast maintenance. In Hume, E. and Johnson, K., editors, The role of speech perception in phonology . New York: Academic Press, 252-77.
