In this commentary, differences between feature re-assembly and feature selection are discussed. Lardiere's proposals are compared to existing approaches to grammatical features in second language (L2) acquisition. Questions are raised about the predictive power of the feature re-assembly approach.
Hawkins, R.2005: Revisiting wh-movement: the availability of an uninterpretable [wh]-feature in interlanguage grammars. In Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R.A. and Liljestrand, A., editors, Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2004). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 124-37.
2.
Hawkins, R. and Hattori, H.2006: Interpretation of multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers: a missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research22, 269-301.
3.
Haznedar, B. and Schwartz, B.D.1997: Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In Hughes, E, Hughes, M. and Greenhill, A., editors, Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 257-68.
4.
Ionin, T., Ko, H. and Wexler, K.2004: Article semantics in L2 acquisition: the role of specificity . Language Acquisition12, 3-69.
5.
Lardiere, D.1998a: Case and tense in the `fossilized' steady state. Second Language Research14, 1-26.
6.
-- 1998b: Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent end-state grammar. Second Language Research14, 359-75.
7.
-- 2000: Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition . In Archibald, J., editor, Second language acquisition and linguistic theory. Oxford : Blackwell, 102-29.
8.
-- 2004: Knowledge of definiteness despite variable article omission in second language acquisition. In Brugos, A., Micciulla, L. and Smith, C.E., editors, Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 328-39.
9.
-- 2005: On morphological competence. In Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. and Liljestrand, A., editors, Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2004). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 178-92.
10.
-- 2007: Acquiring (or assembling) functional categories in second language acquisition. In Belikova, A., Meroni, L. and Umeda, M., editors, Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 233-44.
11.
-- 2008: Feature-assembly in second language acquisition. In Liceras, J., Goodluck, H. and Zobl, H., editors, The role of formal features in second language acquisition . New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, 107-40.
12.
Milsark, G.L.1977: Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis3, 1-29.
13.
Prévost, P. and White, L.2000: Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research16, 103-33.
14.
Tsimpli, I.-M. and Dimitrakopoulou, M.2007: The interpretability hypothesis: evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research23, 215-42.
15.
White, L.2003: Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition6, 129-41.
16.
-- 2008a: Different? Yes. Fundamentally? No. Definiteness effects in the L2 English of Mandarin speakers. In Slabakova, R., Rothman, J., Kempchinsky, P. and Gavruseva, E., editors, Proceedings of the 9th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2007). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 251-61.
17.
-- 2008b: Definiteness effects in the L2 English of Mandarin and Turkish speakers. In Chan, H., Jacob, H. and Kapia, E., editors, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 550-61.
