This article adopts an input perspective in examining a poverty-of-the stimulus (POS) learning situation in second language acquisition (SLA). Analysis of grammaticality judgement data from 81 English-speaking and 85 Chinese-speaking learners of Japanese isolates triggering input that informed English learners of subtle semantic properties of the ni direct passive underdetermined by second language (L2) input. The study shows a sufficient correlation in the case of English learners between acquisition of the ni direct passive's triggering properties (available through input) and acquisition of its POS properties (unavailable through input). Importantly, those properties are direct consequences of affectivity, an underlying semantic property of the ni direct passive. That correlation does not obtain in the case of Chinese learners due to a positive first language (L1) effect. Additional corroborating evidence comes from acquisition of another Japanese passive, the ni yotte, for which no correlation was found between its non-triggering and non-POS properties for either English or Chinese learners as those properties are available through input. The article proposes that English learners' computation of a target-like conceptual representation of the triggering input leads to the restructuring of their lexical—conceptual representation of the ni direct passive.
Birdsong, D.1989: Metalinguistic performance and interlanguage competence . New York: Springer.
2.
Bley-Vroman, R., Felix, S. and Ioup, G.1988: The accessibility of universal grammar in adult language learning. Second Language Research4, 1—32.
3.
Carroll, S.E.2001: Input and evidence: the raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .
4.
—— 2004: Commentary: some general and specific comments on input processing and processing instruction. In VanPatten, B., editor, Processing instruction: theory, research, and commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum , 293—309.
5.
—— 2005: Input and SLA: adults' sensitivity to different sorts of cues to French gender. Language Learning55, 79—138.
6.
Carroll, S.E. and Swain, M.1993: Explicit and implicit negative feedback: an empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition15, 357—86.
7.
Chomsky, N.1981: Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
8.
DeKeyser, R., Salaberry, R., Robinson, P. and Harrington, M.2002: What gets processed in Processing Instruction? A commentary on Bill VanPatten's `Processing Instruction: An update'. Language Learning52, 805—23.
9.
Dekydtspotter, L. and Sprouse, R.A.2001: Mental design and (second) language epistemology: adjectival restrictions of wh-quantifiers and tense in English—French interlanguage . Second Language Research17, 1—35.
10.
Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R.A. and Anderson, B.1997: The interpretive interface in L2 acquisition: the process—result distinction in English—French interlanguage grammars . Language Acquisition6, 297—332.
11.
Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R.A. and Swanson, K.2001: Reflexes of mental architecture in second-language acquisition: The interpretation of `combien' extractions in English—French interlanguage . Language Acquisition9, 175—227.
12.
Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R.A. and Thyre, R.1999/2000: The interpretation of quantification at a distance in English—French interlanguage: domain specificity and second language acquisition. Language Acquisition8, 265—320.
13.
Emonds, J.2000: Lexicon and grammar: the English syntacticon. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
14.
Feng, F.1993: On influences of the mother tongue: Chinese language: on the learning processes of the Japanese passive voice. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology41, 388—98.
15.
Fox, D. and Grodzinsky, Y.1998: Children's passive: a view from the by-phrase. Linguistic Inquiry29, 311—32.
16.
Goodman, L. and Kruskal, W.1954: Measures of association for cross classifications . Journal of the American Statistical Association49, 732—64.
17.
Gregg, K.2001: Learnability and second language acquisition theory . In Robinson, P., editor, Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 152—80.
18.
Grimshaw, J. and Vikner, S.1993: Obligatory adjuncts and the structure of events . In Reuland, E. and Abraham, W., editors, Knowledge and language . Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 143—55.
19.
Haegeman, L.1985: The get-passive and Burzio's generalization. Lingua66, 53—77.
20.
Han, Z.2000: Persistence of the implicit influence of NL: the case of the pseudo-passive. Applied Linguistics21, 78—105.
21.
Hara, M.2002: On the acquisition of Japanese passives by English speakers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University , East Lansing, MI.
22.
Hara, M. and Ma, C.-H.2004: Why do L2 learners optionally choose a certain divergent analysis of TL over a TL-like one? In F oster-Cohen, S., Sharwood Smith, M., Sorace, A. and Ota, M., editors, EUROSLA Yearbook 4. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 7—40.
23.
Hashimoto, M.1988: The structure and typology of the Chinese passive construction . In Shibatani, M., editor, Passive and voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 329—54.
24.
Hawkins, R.2001: The theoretical significance of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition. Second Language Research17, 345—67.
25.
—— 2003: `Representational deficit' theories of (adult) SLA: evidence, counterevidence and implications. The 13th European Second Language Association Annual International Conference
26.
Hawkins, R. and Chan, C.Y.-H.1997: The partial availability of universal grammar in second language acquisition: the `failed functional features hypothesis'. Second Language Research13, 187—226.
27.
Hoshi, H.1994: Passive, causative, and light verbs: a study on theta role assignment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
28.
—— 1999: Passives. In Tsujimura, N., editor, The handbook of Japanese linguistics. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 191—235.
29.
Howard, I. and Niyekawa-Howard, A.1976: Passivization. In Shibatani, M., editor, Syntax and semantics: Japanese generative grammar. New York: Academic Press, 201—37.
30.
Inagaki, S.2001: Motion verbs with goal PPs in the L2 acquisition of English and Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition23, 157—70.
31.
—— 2002: Japanese learners' acquisition of English manner-of-motion verbs with locational/directional PPs. Second Language Research18, 3—27.
32.
Inoue, K.1976: Henkei-bunpoo to nihon-go: transformational grammar and Japanese. Vol. Zyoo (1). Tokyo: Taisyuukan.
33.
Izumi, S. and Lakshmanan, U.1998: Learnability, negative evidence, and the L2 acquisition of the English passive. Second Language Research14, 62—101.
34.
Jackendoff, R.1983: Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
—— 1990: Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
36.
—— 1991: Parts and boundaries. Cognition41, 9—45.
37.
—— 1996: The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory14, 305—54.
38.
Jacobsen, W.1992: The transitive structure of events in Japanese . Tokyo: Kurosio.
39.
Juffs, A.1998: The acquisition of semantics—syntax correspondences and verb frequencies in ESL materials. Language Teaching Research2, 93—123.
40.
—— 2000: An overview of the second language acquisition of links between verb semantics and morpho-syntax. In Archibald, J., editor, Second language acquisition and linguistic theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 187—227.
41.
Kuno, S.1973: The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
Kuroda, S.-Y.1979: On Japanese passives. In B edell, G., Inoue, K., Kobayashi, E. and Muraki, M., editors, Explorations in linguistics. Tokyo: Kenkyusha, 305—47.
43.
Lasnik, H. and Fiengo, R.1974: Complement object deletion. Linguistic Inquiry5, 535—71.
44.
Levin, B. and Rappaport Hovav, M.1999: Two structures for compositionally derived events. In Matthews, T. and Strolovitch, D., editors, Semantics and linguistic theory. Volume IX. University of California, Santa Cruz, CA: CLC Publications, Cornell University, 199—223.
45.
Li, C. and Thompson, S.1981: Mandarin Chinese: a functional reference grammar . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
46.
Masuko, M.1996: Expressing adversity. Language Sciences18, 195—211.
47.
Masuoka, T.1982: On the semantics of Japanese passives. Gengo Kenkyu82, 48—64.
48.
Montrul, S. and Slabakova, R.2002: The L2 acquisition of morphosyntactic and semantic properties of the aspectual tenses preterite and imperfect. In Perez-Leroux, A. and Liceras, J., editors, The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax: the L1/L2 connection . Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 115—51.
49.
Pustejovsky, J.1992: The syntax of event structure. In Levin, B. and Pinker, S. , editors, Lexical and conceptual semantics. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 47—81.
50.
Rappaport Hovav, M. and Levin, B.2001: An event structure account of English resultatives . Language77, 766—97.
51.
SchŸtze, C.1996: The empirical base of linguistics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
52.
Schwartz, B.D.1998: The second language instinct. Lingua106, 133—60.
53.
Schwartz, B.D. and Gubala-Ryzak, M.1992: Learnability and grammar reorganization in L2A: against negative evidence causing the unlearning of verb movement. Second Language Research8, 1—38.
54.
Schwartz, B.D. and Sprouse, R.A.1994: Word order and nominative case in non-native language acquisition. In Hoekstra, T. and Schwartz, B.D., editors, Language acquisition studies in generative grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 317—68.
55.
—— 1996: L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research12, 40—72.
56.
Shi, D.1997: Issues on Chinese passive. Journal of Chinese Linguistics25, 41—70.
57.
Shibatani, M.1990: The language of Japan. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
58.
Shirai, Y.2000: The semantics of the Japanese imperfective -teiru: an integrative approach. Journal ofPragmatics32, 327—61.
59.
Shirai, Y. and Andersen, R.W.1995: The acquisition of tense—aspect morphology: a prototype account. Language71, 743—62.
60.
Shirai, Y. and Kurono, A.1998: The acquisition of tense—aspect marking in Japanese as a second language. Language Learning48, 245—79.
61.
Slabakova, R.1999: The parameter of aspect in second language acquisition . Second Language Research15, 283—317.
62.
—— 2003: Semantic evidence for functional categories in interlanguage grammars. Second Language Research19, 42—75.
63.
Slabakova, R. and Montrul, S.2002: On viewpoint aspect interpretation and its L2 acquisition: a UG perspective. In Salaberry, R. and Shirai, Y., editors, The L2 acquisition of tense—aspect morphology. Amsterdam : Benjamins, 363—95.
64.
—— 2003: Genericity and aspect in L2 acquisition. Language Acquisition11, 165—96.
65.
Tanaka, M.1992: Examination of failure to use the passive by Japanese language learners. Language Research Bulletin6, 152—68.
66.
—— 1993: A study of JSL students' interlanguage: an analysis of the use of the passive in complex/compound sentences. Language Research Bulletin8, 87—117.
67.
Tenny, C.1992: The aspectual interface hypothesis. In Sag, I.A. and Szabolcsi, A., editors, Lexical matters, Stanford, CA: CSLI, 1—28.
68.
Thomas, M.2002: Development of the concept of `the poverty of the stimulus '. Linguistic Review19, 51—71.
69.
Ting, J.1995: A non-uniform analysis of the passive construction in Mandarin Chinese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
70.
Trahey, M.1996: Positive evidence in second language acquisition: some long-term effects. Second Language Research12, 111—39.
71.
Trahey, M. and White, L.1993: Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition15, 181—204.
72.
VanPatten, B.2002: Processing Instruction: an update. Language Learning52, 755—803.
VanPatten, B., Williams, J., Rott, S. and Overstreet, M., editors, 2004: Form—meaning connections in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum Associates.
75.
Watabe, M., Brown, C. and Ueta, Y.1991: Transfer of discourse function: passives in the writing of ESL and JSL learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics29, 115—34.
76.
Watanabe, A.1996: Case absorption and wh-agreement. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
77.
White, L.1991: Adverb placement in second language acquisition: some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research7, 133—61.
78.
—— 1992: On triggering data in L2 acquisition: a reply to Schwartz and Gubala-Ryzak. Second Language Research8, 120—37.
79.
—— 2003: Second language acquisition and universal grammarCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80.
Yang, J.C. and Akahori, K.1998: Error analysis in Japanese writing and its implementation in a computer assisted language learning system on the World Wide Web. CALICO15, 47—66.
