During study abroad, second language learners encounter real-world language that contrasts with what they have learned. To better support students while abroad, one of the researchers of this study designed explicit instruction around dialects and language variation in the German-speaking world as part of an 8-week summer program in Vienna, Austria and Freiburg, Germany. A qualitative text analysis of questionnaire data collected before, during, and after the program, student diaries, and extemporaneous notes shows that while time abroad in general leads to student growth in their understanding of real-world language use and variation, explicit instruction on dialects allowed students to be better able to make sense of their own experiences with the non-standard varieties. In doing so, they also gained insight into larger sociolinguistic issues, like the role of standard varieties and non-standard varieties in society and education, and the importance of dialects to speakers’ identities.
AmmonU. (1986). Die Begriffe ‚Dialekt‘ und ‚Soziolekt‘ [The terms ‘dialect’ and ‘sociolect’]. In SchöneA. (Ed.), Kontroversen, alte und neue: Akten des VII. Kongresses der Internationalen Vereinigung für germanische Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, Göttingen1985: Volume 4 (pp. 223–231). Max Niemeyer Verlag.
AuerP. (2005). Europe’s sociolinguistic unity, or: A typology of European dialect/standard constellations. In DelbecqueN.Van der AuweraJ.GeeraertsD. (Eds.), Perspectives on variation: Sociolinguistic, historical, comparative (pp. 7–42). Walter de Gruyter.
4.
BaßlerH.SpiekermannH. (2001). Dialekt und Standardsprache im DaF-Unterricht: Wie Schüler urteilen – wie Lehrer urteilen [Dialect and standard language in teaching German as a foreign language: How students judge – how teachers judge]. Linguistik Online, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.9.966
5.
BurnsK.E. (2019). Beyond the idealized native speaker in L2 Spanish contexts: Standard language ideology, authenticity, and consequences for learner identity construction. In DupyB.MichelsonK. (Eds.), AAUSC 2019 volume: Issues in language program direction pathways to paradigm change: Critical examinations of prevailing discourses and ideologies in second language education (pp. 32–52). Cengage.
6.
ClarkB.WagnerJ.LindemalmK.BendtO. (2011). Språkskap: Supporting second language learning ‘in the wild’. In Proceedings of INCLUDE, London, April 2011, pp. 1–10. University of London.
7.
DiaoW. (2017). Between the standard and non-standard: Accent and identity among transnational mandarin speakers studying abroad in China. System, 71, 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.09.013
8.
FaganS.M.B. (2010). German: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press.
9.
FernándezJ. (2016). Authenticating language choices: Out-of-class interactions in study abroad. In van CompernolleR.A.McGregorJ. (Eds.), Authenticity, language and interaction in second language contexts (pp. 131–150). Multilingual Matters.
10.
FukuiH.YashimaT. (2021). Exploring evolving motivation to learn two languages simultaneously in a study-abroad context. The Modern Language Journal, 105, 267–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12695
11.
GeorgeA. (2014). Study abroad in central Spain: The development of regional phonological features. Foreign Language Annals, 47, 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12065
12.
GeorgeA.Hoffman-GonzálezA. (2019). Dialect and identity: US heritage language learners of Spanish abroad. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education, 4, 252–279. https://doi.org/10.1075/sar.17013.geo
13.
GrammonD. (2021). Consequential choices: A language ideological perspective on learners’ (non-)adoption of a dialectal variant. Foreign Language Annals, 54, 607–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12574
14.
HopfC.SchmidtC. (1993). Zum Verhältnis von innerfamilialen sozialen Erfahrungen, Persönlichkeitsentwicklung und politischen Orientierungen: Dokumentation und Erörterung des methodischen Vorgehens in einer Studie zu diesem Thema [On the relationship between intrafamilial social experiences, personality development and political orientations: Documentation and discussion of the methodological approach in a study on this topic]. Institut für Sozialwissenschaften der Universität Hildesheim.
KanwitM.GeeslinK.L.FafulasS. (2015). Study abroad and the SLA of variable structures: A look at the present perfect, the copula contrast, and the present progressive in Mexico and Spain. Probus, 27, 307–348. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2015-0004
18.
KehreinR. (2020). Vertical language change in Germany: Dialects, regiolects, and Standard German. In BrunnS.KehreinR. (Eds.), Handbook of the changing world language map (pp. 1357–1369). Springer.
19.
KingingerC. (2013). Identity and language learning in study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 46, 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12037
20.
KnouseS.M. (2012). The acquisition of dialectal phonemes in a study abroad context: The case of the Castilian theta. Foreign Language Annals, 45, 512–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2013.12003.x
21.
KönigW. (2005). dtv-Atlas: Deutsche Sprache [dtv-Atlas: German language]. dtv.
22.
KuckartzU. (2014). Qualitative text analysis: A guide to methods, practice and using software. Sage.
23.
LiljaN.Piirainen-MarshA. (2019). Connecting the language classroom and the wild: Re-enactments of language use experiences. Applied Linguistics, 40, 594–623. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx045
24.
LinfordB.G. (2016). The second-language development of dialect-specific morpho-syntactic variation in Spanish during study abroad. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
25.
MilroyJ. (2001). Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5, 530–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00163
26.
PhilippM.Bothorel-WitzA. (2013). Low Alemannic. In RussC.V.J. (Ed.), The dialects of modern German (pp. 313–336). Routledge.
27.
Piirainen-MarshA.LiljaN. (2019). How wild can it get? Managing language learning tasks in real life service encounters. In HellermannJ.EskildsenS.W.DoehlerS.P.Piirainen-MarshA. (Eds.), Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action: The complex ecology of second language interaction ‘in the wild’ (pp. 161–192). Springer.
28.
PozziR. (2021). Learner development of a morphosyntactic feature in Argentina: The case ofvos. Languages, 6, Article 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6040193
29.
PozziR.EscalanteC.BugarínL., et al (2025). Fitting in with Porteños: Case studies of dialectal feature production, investment, and identity during study abroad. Languages, 10, Article 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10040068
30.
RansmayrJ. (2006). Der Status des österreichischen Deutsch an nichtdeutschsprachigen Universitäten: Eine empirische Untersuchung [The status of Austrian German at non-German-speaking universities: An empirical study]. Peter Lang.
31.
RansmayrJ.de CilliaR. (2019). Österreichisches Deutsch macht Schule: Bildung und Deutschunterricht im Spannungsfeld von sprachlicher Variation und Norm [Austrian German in schools: Education and German language teaching in the tension between linguistic variation and norm]. Böhlau.
Ringer-HilfingerK. (2012). Learner acquisition of dialect variation in a study abroad context: The case of the Spanish [θ]. Foreign Language Annals, 45, 430–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01201.x
34.
RuckJ. (2017). Against all standards: On regional variation in the German language classroom. Critical Multilingualism Studies, 5, 112–143.
35.
RuckJ. (2020). The politics and ideologies of pluricentric German in l2 teaching. Critical Multilingualism Studies, 8, 17–50.
36.
Salgado-RoblesF.GeorgeA. (2023). Relationship between external factors and development of regional variation (vosotros vs. ustedes) by L2 learners of Spanish in Spain. In ZahlerS.L.LongA.Y.LinfordB. (Eds.), Study abroad and the second language acquisition of sociolinguistic variation in Spanish (pp. 20–53). John Benjamins.
37.
SalmonsJ. (2012). A history of German: What the past reveals about today’s language. Oxford University Press.
38.
SavickiV. (2013). The effects of affect on study abroad students. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 22, 131–147. https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v22i1.323
39.
SchmidtL.B. (2020). Role of developing language attitudes in a study abroad context on adoption of dialectal pronunciations. Foreign Language Annals, 53, 785–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12489
40.
Schoonmaker-GatesE. (2017). Regional variation in the language classroom and beyond: Mapping learners’ developing dialectal competence. Foreign Language Annals, 50, 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12243
41.
Schoonmaker-GatesE. (2020). The acquisition of dialect-specific phonology, phonetics, and sociolinguistics in L2 Spanish: Untangling learner trends. Critical Multilingualism Studies, 8, 80–103.
42.
SheaC. (2021). L2 proficiency and L2 dialect processing during study abroad. In MenkeM. R.MalovrhP. A (Eds.), Advancedness in second language Spanish: Definitions, challenges, and possibilities (pp. 193–216). John Benjamins.
43.
ShiriS. (2013). Learners’ attitudes toward regional dialects and destination preferences in study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 46, 565–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12058
StevensonP.HornerK.LangerN.ReershemiusG. (2018). The German-speaking world. A practical introduction to sociolinguistic issues. Routledge.
46.
TrentmanE.ShiriS. (2020). The mutual intelligibility of Arabic dialects: Implications for the language classroom. Critical Multilingualism Studies, 8, 104–134.
47.
ValdésG.GonzálezS.V.GarcíaD.L.MárquezP. (2003). Language ideology: The case of Spanish in departments of foreign languages. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 34, 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.2003.34.1.3
48.
VoglU.De WildeT. (2022). Teachers as foreign language makers: On standard language ideology, authenticity and language expertise. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 274, 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2021-0015
49.
WagnerJ. (2015). Designing for language learning in the wild: Creating social infrastructures for second language learning. In CadiernoT.EskildsenS.W. (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 75–101). Walter de Gruyter.
50.
WiesingerP. (2013). The central and southern Bavarian dialects in Bavaria and Austria. In RussC.V.J. (Ed.), The dialects of modern German (pp. 438–519). Routledge.
51.
WirtzM.A.PfenningerS.E. (2024). Signature dynamics of development in second language sociolinguistic competence: Evidence from an intensive microlongitudinal study. Language Learning, 74, 707–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12634
52.
WirtzM.A.PfenningerS.E.KaiserI.EnderA. (2024). Sociolinguistic competence and varietal repertoires in a second language: A study on addressee-dependent varietal behavior using virtual reality. The Modern Language Journal, 108, 385–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12918
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
