In this commentary I explore how non-generative approaches to phonology might address some of the issues Archibald mentions in his keynote. I end by encouraging researchers to think broadly and flexibly about the research questions they pose and how best to answer them.
AmbridgeB (2020) Abstractions made of exemplars or ‘You’re all right, and I’ve changed my mind’: Response to commentators. First Language40: 640–59.
2.
ArchibaldJ (1997) The acquisition of English stress by speakers of nonaccentual languages: Lexical storage versus computation of stress. Linguistics35: 167–81.
3.
ArchibaldJ (1998) Second language phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4.
ArchibaldJ (2014) Phonological acquisition and phonological theory. Hove: Psychology Press.
5.
ArchibaldJ (2024a) Phonological features and phonetic variation in multilingual grammars: Restructuring an L3 contrastive hierarchy. In: BabatsouliE (ed.) Multilingual acquisition and learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 348–79.
6.
ArchibaldJ (2024b) Phonology in multilingual grammars: Representational complexity and linguistic interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
ArchibaldJ (2025) Waiting in the wings: The place of phonology in the study of multilingual grammars. Second Language Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583241270763
8.
BabelMSeniorBBishopS (2019) Do social preferences matter in lexical retuning?Laboratory Phonology10: 4.
9.
BlevinsJ (2004) Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge University Press.
10.
Cabrelli AmaroJ (2017) The role of prosodic structure in the L2 acquisition of Spanish stop lenition. Second Language Research33: 233–69.
11.
ChomskyN (1986) Knowledge of language: ITs nature, origin and use. Praeger.
12.
ChristiansenMH (2023) Large language models demonstrate the potential of statistical learning in language. Cognitive Science47: Article e13256.
13.
CohnACRenwickME (2021) Embracing multidimensionality in phonological analysis. The Linguistic Review38: 101–139.
14.
ColeJ (2009) Emergent feature structures: Harmony systems in exemplar models of phonology. Language Sciences31: 144–60.
15.
CurtinSMintzTHChristiansenMH (2005) Stress changes the representational landscape: Evidence from word segmentation. Cognition96: 233–62.
DevlinJ (2018) Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv:1810.04805.
18.
Domínguez MartínezACuetos VegaF (2018) The contrastive value of lexical stress in visual word recognition: Evidence from Spanish. Psicothema30: 276–82.
19.
DresherBE (2009) The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
ErnestusM (2014) Acoustic reduction and the roles of abstractions and exemplars in speech processing. Lingua142: 27–41.
21.
EscuderoPBoersmaP (2004) Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in second Language Acquisition26(4): 551–585.
22.
FinkA.GoldrickM (2015) The influence of word retrieval and planning on phonetic variation: Implications for exemplar models. Linguistics Vanguard1(1): 215–225.
23.
FlegeJEBohnO (2021) The revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). In: WaylandR (ed.) Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–83.
GarciaGD (2017) Weight gradience and stress in Portuguese. Phonology34: 41–79.
26.
GarciaGD (2019) When lexical statistics and the grammar conflict: Learning and repairing weight effects on stress. Language95: 612–41.
27.
GarciaGDGuzzoNB (2022) Lexical access in Portuguese stress. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics21: 1–24.
28.
GoldEM (1967) Language identification in the limit. Information and Control10: 447–74.
29.
GoldingerSD (1998) Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review105: 251–79.
30.
GoldrickMColeJ (2023) Advancement of phonetics in the 21st century: Exemplar models of speech production. Journal of Phonetics99: 101–254.
31.
GuionSGClarkJJHaradaTWaylandRP (2003) Factors affecting stress placement for English nonwords include syllabic structure, lexical class, and stress patterns of phonologically similar words. Language and Speech46: 403–27.
32.
Hayes-HarbRBarriosSLTrippA (2022) Whose input matters? The influence of socially-differentiated input sources in adult Lx phonetic learning. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation8: 363–88.
33.
HoneybonePSalmonsJ (Eds.) (2015) The Oxford handbook of historical phonology. Oxford University Press.
34.
KapnoulaECJevtovićMMagnusonJS (2024) Spoken word recognition: A focus on plasticity. Annual Review of Linguistics10: 233–56.
35.
KimJY (2020) Discrepancy between heritage speakers’ use of suprasegmental cues in the perception and production of Spanish lexical stress. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition23: 233–50.
36.
Moore-CantwellCBoschDKahnEKimCShoemakerG (2024) Production priming of stress in nonwords. Laboratory Phonology15(1).
37.
MurrayRW (2015) The early history of historical phonology. In: HoneybonePSalmonsJ (eds) The Oxford handbook of historical phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 11–31.
38.
NatvigDSalmonsJ (2021) Connecting structure and variation in sound change. Cadernos de Lingüistica2(1): 1–20.
39.
OrtínRSimonetM (2022) Phonological processing of stress by native English speakers learning Spanish as a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition44: 460–82.
40.
ÖzçelikÖSprouseRA (2017) Emergent knowledge of a universal phonological principle in the L2 acquisition of vowel harmony in Turkish: A ‘four’-fold poverty of the stimulus in L2 acquisition. Second Language Research33(2): 179–206.
41.
PiantadosiST (2023) Modern language models refute Chomsky’s approach to language. Lingbuzz Preprint, 7180.
42.
PierrehumbertJ B (2003) Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech46(2–3): 115–154.
43.
PierrehumbertJ B (2006) The next toolkit. Journal of Phonetics34(4): 516–530.
44.
PierrehumbertJ B (2016) Phonological representation: Beyond abstract versus episodic. Annual Review of Linguistics2(1): 33–52.
45.
PisoniDBLeviSV (2007) Representations and representational specificity in speech perception and spoken word recognition. In: GaskellMG (ed) The oxford handbook of psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–18.
46.
ProtopapasAPanagakiEAndrikopoulouAGutiérrez PalmaNArvanitiA (2016) Priming stress patterns in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance42: 1739–60.
47.
SagarraNFernández-ArroyoLLozano-ArgüellesCCasillasJV (2024) Unraveling the complexities of second language lexical stress processing: The impact of first language transfer, second language proficiency, and exposure. Language Learning74: 574–605.
48.
SantolinCSaffranJR (2018) Constraints on statistical learning across species. Trends in Cognitive Sciences22: 52–63.
49.
SchillerNOFikkertPLeveltCC (2004) Stress priming in picture naming: An SOA study. Brain and Language90: 231–40.
50.
SimonetMAmengualM (2020) Increased language co-activation leads to enhanced cross-linguistic phonetic convergence. International Journal of Bilingualism24: 208–221.
51.
ToddSPierrehumbertJBHayJ (2019) Word frequency effects in sound change as a consequence of perceptual asymmetries: An exemplar-based model. Cognition185: 1–20.
52.
TrubetzkoyN. (1939/1969) Grundzuge der phonology, Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, 7 (English translation by C. Baltaxe). Berkeley: University of California Press.
