Mass media are often portrayed by populist politicians as biased, elitist, and antagonist of the people. This study uses a social identity theory framework to examine the relationship between four dimensions of populist attitudes and attitudes towards mass media. Findings from a two-wave panel survey of the Italian adult population (W1 = 1,107, W2 = 832) confirm that anti-elite attitudes have negative effects on media evaluations and media trust. Anti out-group attitudes have detrimental effects for evaluations of media quality, while they enhance trust in commercial news and trust in right-wing tabloids. People with strong attitudes related to homogeneity of the people evaluate the quality of news reporting positively and they tend to trust right-wing tabloids.
AkkermanAMuddeCZasloveA (2014) How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies47(9): 1324. 1353.
2.
AnselmiM (2017) Populism: An Introduction. London, UK: Routledge.
3.
ArteroJP (2015) Political parallelism and media coalitions in Western Europe. Working Paper.
4.
AslanidisP (2020) The social psychology of populism. In: Mapping Populism. London, UK: Routledge, 166–175.
5.
BasileLBorriR (2022) Sovereignty of what and for whom? The political mobilisation of sovereignty claims by the Italian Lega and Fratelli d’Italia. Comparative European Politics 20(3): 365–389.
6.
Boccia ArtieriGGigliettoFStanzianoA (2023) Citizens’ engagement with the ‘seaside campaign’on Instagram and Facebook. In: Italy at the Polls 2022: The Right Strikes Back. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 79–103.
7.
BorrielloABrackN (2021) ‘I want my sovereignty back!’A comparative analysis of the populist discourses of podemos, the 5 star movement, the FN and UKIP during the economic and migration crises. In: Understanding Conflicts of Sovereignty in the EU. London, UK: Routledge, 17–37.
8.
CaianiM (2019) The populist parties and their electoral success: Different causes behind different populisms? The case of the five-star movement and the league. Contemporary Italian Politics11(3): 236–250.
9.
CanovanM (2002) Taking politics to the people: Populism as the ideology of democracy. In: Democracies and the Populist Challenge. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 25–44.
10.
CarlsonMRobinsonSLewisSC (2021) Digital press criticism: The symbolic dimensions of donald trump’s assault on US journalists as the ‘enemy of the people”. Digital Journalism9(6): 737–754.
CiagliaA (2013) Politics in the media and the media in politics: A comparative study of the relationship between the media and political systems in three European countries. European Journal of Communication28(5): 541–555.
DeseriisM (2020) Digital movement parties: A comparative analysis of the technopolitical cultures and the participation platforms of the movimento 5 stelle and the piratenpartei. Information. Communication & Society23(12): 1770–1786.
16.
DonàA (2022) The rise of the radical right in Italy: The case of fratelli d’Italia. Journal of Modern Italian Studies 27(5): 775–794.
17.
EvelandWPShahDV (2003) The impact of individual and interpersonal factors on perceived news media bias. Political Psychology24: 101–117.
18.
FaggianoMP (2022) The analysis of digital campaigns: The case study of the Italian general elections. In: Content Analysis in Social Research. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill, 61–95.
19.
FawziN (2019) Untrustworthy news and the media as ‘enemy of the people?’ how a populist worldview shapes recipients’ attitudes toward the media. The International Journal of Press/Politics24(2): 146–164.
20.
FawziNKrämerB (2021) The media as part of a detached elite? Exploring antimedia populism among citizens and its relation to political populism. International Journal of Communication15: 23.
21.
FawziNMothesC (2020) Perceptions of media performance: Expectation evaluation discrepancies and their relationship with media-related and populist attitudes. Media and Communication8(3): 335–347.
22.
GandiniACeronALodettiP (2022) Populists or influencers? The use of Facebook videos by populist leaders. International Journal of Communication16: 5226–5246.
23.
GreeneS (2004) Social identity theory and party identification. Social Science Quarterly85(1): 136–153.
24.
GuntherACMcLaughlinBGotliebMR, et al. (2017) Who says what to whom: Content versus source in the hostile media effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research29(3): 363–383.
25.
HallinDCManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
HameleersM (2019) Putting our own people first: The content and effects of online right-wing populist discourse surrounding the European refugee crisis. Mass Communication and Society22(6): 804–826.
27.
HameleersM (2020) Populist disinformation: Exploring intersections between online populism and disinformation in the US and the Netherlands. Politics and Governance8(1): 146–157.
28.
HuddyL (2001) From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology22(1): 127–156.
IvaldiGLanzoneMEWoodsD (2017) Varieties of populism across a left right spectrum: The case of the front national, the northern league, podemos and five star movement. Swiss Political Science Review23(4): 354–376.
32.
IvaldiGMazzoleniO (2021) Economic populism and sovereigntism: The economic supply of European radical right-wing populist parties. In: Sovereignism and Populism. London, UK: Routledge, 52–68.
33.
JacobsLMeeusenCd’HaenensL (2016) News coverage and attitudes on immigration: Public and commercial television news compared. European Journal of Communication31(6): 642–660.
34.
KrämerB (2018) Populism, media, and the form of society. Communication Theory28(4): 444–465.
35.
KrauseWGieblerH (2020) Shifting welfare policy positions: The impact of radical right populist party success beyond migration politics. Representation56(3): 331–348.
36.
LeeTT (2005) The liberal media myth revisited: An examination of factors influencing perceptions of media bias. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media49(1): 43–64.
37.
MangumMBlockRJr (2018) Social identity theory and public opinion towards immigration. Social Sciences7(3): 41.
38.
ManucciL (2017) Populism and the Media. The Oxford Handbook of Populism 1: 467–492.
39.
MariniRGerliM (2017) Le forme di un tema. L'immigrazione nell'arena dei quality papers italiani. Comunicazione politica18(3): 481–506.
40.
MatthesJ (2012) The affective underpinnings of hostile media perceptions. Communication Research40: 360–387.
41.
MazzoleniG (2008) Populism and the media. In: Twenty-first Century Populism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 49–64.
42.
MazzoleniGBraccialeR (2018) Socially mediated populism: The communicative strategies of political leaders on Facebook. Palgrave Communications4(1): 1–10.
MoscaLTronconiF (2019) Beyond left and right: The eclectic populism of the five star movement. West European Politics42(6): 1258–1283.
45.
MuddeC (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 234.
46.
NaabT (2013) Naive Medientheorien und Third-Person Perception. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG.
47.
PapathanassopoulosS (2007) Political communication and professionalisation in Greece. The Professionalisation of Political Communication 3: 125.
48.
PapathanassopoulosS (2017) Greece: A continuous interplay between media and politicians. In: Media in Third-wave Democracies: Southern and Central-Eastern Europe in a Comparative Perspective. Paris, France: L'Harmattan.
49.
PasquinoGValbruzziM (2023) The 2022 general Italian elections. The long awaited victory of the right. Journal of Modern Italian Studies28(1): 1–21.
50.
PerloffRM (2015) A three-decade retrospective on the hostile media effect. Mass Communication and Society18(6): 701–729.
51.
PiccolinoGScavoAIserniaP (2022) Mirror, mirror on the wall, who is the most populist of them all? A comparison of league and five star movement voters. Italian Journal of Electoral Studies QOE-IJES85(1): 63–75.
52.
PirroAL (2018) The polyvalent populism of the 5 star movement. Journal of Contemporary European Studies26(4): 443–458.
PuleoLPiccolinoG (2022) Back to the post-fascist past or landing in the populist radical right? The brothers of Italy between continuity and change. South European Society and Politics27: 359–383.
ReidSA (2012) A self-categorization explanation for the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication62(3): 381–399.
57.
RoccatoMCavazzaNCollocaP, et al. (2020) Three roads to populism? An Italian field study on the 2019 European election. Social Science Quarterly101(4): 1222–1235.
58.
RoncaroloFManciniP (2018) The traditional media, political parallelism and public opinion on contentious issues in the 2018 Italian election campaign. Contemporary Italian Politics10(3): 243–266.
59.
SchmidtF (2020) Party populism and media access: The news value of populist communication and how it is handled by the mass media. International Journal of Communication14: 23.
60.
SchulzAMüllerPSchemerC, et al. (2018) Measuring populist attitudes on three dimensions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research30(2): 316–326.
61.
SchulzAWirthWMüllerP (2020) We are the people and you are fake news: A social identity approach to populist citizens’ false consensus and hostile media perceptions. Communication Research47(2): 201–226.
62.
SeddoneABobbaGRoncaroloF (2019) European versus domestic politics: Media negativity during the 2019 European Elections campaign in Italy. Italian Political Science14(2): 73–92.
63.
Sondel-CedarmasJ (2022) Giorgia meloni's new Europe: Europe of sovereign nations in the brothers of Italy party manifestos. In: The Right-Wing Critique of Europe. London, UK: Routledge, 60–75.
64.
StanleyB (2008) The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies13(1): 95–110.
65.
TaggartP (2000) Populism. Buckingham, PA: Open University Press.
66.
TajfelHTurnerJC (2004) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Political Psychology. Hove, UK: Psychology Press, 276–293.
67.
ThussuDK (2011) Infotainment inc.: The ascent of a global ideology. In: Media Perspectives for the 21st Century. London, UK: Routledge, 68–82.
68.
ThussuDK (2015) Infotainment. In: The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication. London, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 1–9.
Van KesselS (2011) Explaining the electoral performance of populist parties: The Netherlands as a case study. Perspectives on European Politics and Society12(1): 68–88.
VociA (2006) The link between identification and in-group favouritism: Effects of threat to social identity and trust-related emotions. British Journal of Social Psychology45(2): 265–284.
73.
WirthWEsserFWettsteinM, et al. (2016) The appeal of populist ideas, strategies, and styles: A theoretical model and research design for analyzing populist political communication. In: NCCR democracy Working Paper series, (88).
