Reports show that media freedom is under pressure worldwide. Violence against journalists has a legal facet that takes the form of Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs) that aim at silencing critical speech. While in some countries there are legal protections against SLAPPs, in Europe a debate is only recently being carried out, mainly fostered by professional journalist associations and civil society. This article explores the role that European journalistic self-regulatory bodies perceive they (could) have in fighting SLAPPs, analysing 16 qualitative answers gathered via a questionnaire. Self-regulation has historically been a way to protect the independence of journalism and uphold its ethical standards. The open-ended responses help to understand how SLAPPs put into question the representations that media councils and professional associations use to construct their ‘professional jurisdiction’, and therefore, their ‘territory’ and the way in which they see their role in society. Our results provide food for thought on the handling of legal attacks against journalists.
AbbottA (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AbbottA (2003) Écologies liées: à propos du système des professions. Les professions et leurs sociologies. Modèles théoriques, catégorisations, évolutions. In Menger, P-M (ed.) Les professions et leurs sociologies: 29–50.
BayerJBárdPVosyliūtėL, et al. (2021) Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) in the European union. A Comparative Study.
7.
BeckerH (1988) Les mondes de l’art. Paris: Flammarion.
8.
BertrandC-J (2000) Media Ethics & Accountability Systems. New Brunswick, NJ; London: Transaction Publishers.
9.
Bonello GhioRNasreddinD (2022) Shutting Out Criticism: How SLAPPs ThreatenEuropean Democracy. A report by The Coalition Against SLAPPs in Europe (CASE), March 2022. https://www.the-case.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/CASEreportSLAPPsEurope.pdf
DonsonF (2010) Libel cases and public debate–some reflections on whether Europe should be concerned about SLAPP. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law19(1): 83–94.
17.
EberweinTFenglerSLaukEet al, eds. (2011) Mapping Media Accountability–In Europe an Beyond. Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag.
18.
European Commission (EC) (2022) Commission Recommendation on protecting journalists and human rights defenders who engage in public participation from manifestly unfounded or abusive court proceedings (“Strategic lawsuits against public participation”). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri = CELEX:32022H0758
19.
FrostC (2000) Media Ethics and Self-regulation. London: Longman.
20.
GoreWHorganJ (2010) Practice review: Maintaining freedom with responsibility. ‘the evolving role of non-statutory press councils in a changing media landscape’. Journalism Practice4(4): 523–532.
HanitzschTVosTP (2017) Journalistic roles and the struggle over institutional identity: The discursive constitution of journalism. Communication Theory27(2): 115–135.
23.
HartzlerS (2007) Protecting informed public participation: Anti-Slapp Law and the Media defendant. Valparaiso University Law Review41(3): 1235–1284.
24.
Le CamFPereiraFHRuellanD (2021) Violences publiques envers les journalistes et les médias : Introduction. Sur Le Journalisme, About Journalism, Sobre Jornalismo10: 6–9.
25.
MenardR (2004) ‘Democracies must set an example’, in A. Karlsreiter, A. and H. Vuokko (eds.) Ending the Chilling Effect. Working to repeal criminal libel and insult laws. OSCE: 13–14. https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/2/3/13573.pdf
26.
MhainínJ (2021) Fighting back against the menace of Slapps. Index on Censorship50(1): 12–13.
27.
PereiraFHTrédanOLangonnéJ (2018) Penser les mondes du journalisme. Hermes, La Revue82(3): 99–106.
28.
PetersCWitschgeT (2015) From grand narratives of democracy to small expectations of participation: Audiences, citizenship, and interactive tools in digital journalism. Journalism Practice9(1): 19–34.
29.
PringGW (1989) SLAPPs: Strategic lawsuits against public participation. Pace Environmental Law Review7(1): 2–19.
30.
PringGWCananP (1992) Strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs): An Introduction for bench, bar and bystanders. University of Bridgeport Law Review12(4): 937–962.
31.
PringGWCananP (1996) SLAPPs: Getting Sued for Speaking Out. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
32.
PritchardD (1991) The role of press councils in a system of media accountability: The case of Quebec. Canadian Journal of Communication16(1).
33.
ShapiroP (2010) SLAPPs: Intent or content? Anti-SLAPP legislation goes International. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law19(1): 14–27.
34.
StraussA (1992) La trame de la négociation. Sociologie qualitative et interactionnisme. Textes réunis et présentés par Isabelle Baszanger. Paris: L’Harmattan, Coll. Logiques Sociales.
