This article analyses the news coverage of German federal presidents’ private lives and personal characteristics. The federal president is the only constitutional entity in Germany to consist of just one person. Automatically, the incumbent’s personality is important in determining how the person exercises the role. Although the federal president’s office possesses little hard power competences, as a politician the federal president has an integrative function and is one of the most powerful opinion leaders of the country. A successful presidency therefore hinges on mediated visibility. Recently, political communication scholars have identified a trend towards intimization politics. This article specifically investigates how news coverage of the German federal president has developed since 1949. The results are twofold: first, the mediated visibility of the federal president has increased over time. Second, the current analysis does not provide evidence for a trend towards intimization politics.
DriessensORaeymaeckersKVerstraetenH. (2010) Personalization according to politicians: A practice theoretical analysis of mediatization. Communications35(3): 309–326.
6.
EsserF (1999) ‘Tabloidization’ of news: A comparative analysis of Anglo-American and German press journalism. European Journal of Communication14(3): 291–324.
7.
EsserFHemmerK (2008) Characteristics and dynamics of election news coverage in Germany. In: StrömbäckJKaidLL (eds) The Handbook of Election News Coverage around the World. New York: Routledge, pp. 289–307.
HesseJJEllweinT (2004) Das Regierungssystem der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [The Governmental System of the Federal Republic of Germany], 9th edn.Berlin: De Gruyter.
11.
Holtz-BachaC (2000) Bundestagswahlkampf 1998: Modernisierung und Professionalisierung [German National Election Campaign 1998: Modernization and Professionalization]. In: Holtz-BachaC (ed.) Wahlkampf in den Medien – Wahlkampf mit den Medien: Ein Reader zum Wahljahr 1998 [Election Campaign in the Media – Election Campaign with the Media: A Reader for the Election Year 1998]. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 9–23.
12.
Holtz-BachaC (2001) Das Private in der Politik: Ein neuer Medientrend? [The Private in Politics: A New Media Trend?]. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte41–42: 20–26.
13.
Holtz-BachaCLangerAIMerkleS (2014) The personalization of politics in comparative perspective: Campaign coverage in Germany and the United Kingdom. European Journal of Communication29(2): 153–170.
14.
Holtz-BachaCLessingerE-MHettesheimerM (1998) Personalisierung als Strategie der Wahlwerbung [Personalization as Strategy of Political Advertisement]. In: ImhofKSchulzP (eds) Die Veröffentlichung des Privaten – Die Privatisierung des Öffentlichen [The Publication of the Private – The Privatization of the Public]. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 240–250.
15.
ImhofK (1998) Die Veröffentlichung des Privaten – die Privatisierung des Öffentlichen [The Publication of the Private – The Privatization of the Public], In: ImhofKSchulzP (eds) Die Veröffentlichung des Privaten – Die Privatisierung des Öffentlichen [The Publication of the Private – The Privatization of the Public]. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 9–14.
KaaseM (1994) Is there personalization in politics? Candidates and voting behavior in Germany. International Political Science Review15(3): 211–230.
19.
KarvonenL (2010) The Personalisation of Politics: A Study of Parliamentary Democracies. Colchester: ECPR.
20.
KepplingerHM (2007) Politiker als Protagonisten der Medien [Politicians as protagonists of the media]. Zeitschrift für Politik54: 272–295.
21.
KepplingerHMBrosiusH-BDahlemS (1994) Charakter oder Sachkompetenz von Politikern: Woran orientieren sich die Wähler?’[Character or Issue Competence of Politicians. What Do Voters Use for Orientation?] In: KlingemannH-DKaaseM (eds) Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 1990 [Elections and Voters: Analyses on the Occasion of the German National Elections 1990]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 472–505.
22.
KleinMOhrD (2000) Gerhard oder Helmut? ‘Unpolitische’ Kandidateneigenschaften und ihr Einfluss auf die Wahlentscheidung bei der Bundestagswahl 1998 [Gerhard or Helmut? ‘Unpolitical’ Character Traits of the Candidates and their Impact on the Voting Decisions in the German National Elections 1998]. Politische Vierteljahresschrift2: 199–224.
23.
LangerAI (2007) A historical exploration of the personalisation of politics in the print media: The British Prime Ministers 1945–1999. Parliamentary Affairs60(3): 371–387.
24.
LangerAI (2010) The politicization of private persona: Exceptional leaders or the new rule? The case of the United Kingdom and the Blair Effect. International Journal of Press/Politics15(1): 60–76.
25.
LangerAI (2011) The Personalization of Politics in the UK: Mediated Leadership from Attlee to Cameron. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
26.
LassJ (1995) Vorstellungsbilder über Kanzlerkandidaten: Zur Diskussion um die Personalisierung von Politik [Images of Candidates for Chancellor. On the Discussion about the Personalization of Politics]. Wiesbaden: DUV.
27.
McAllisterI (2007) The personalization of politics. In: KlingemannH-DDaltonRJ (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 571–588.
28.
MerkleS (2015) Personalisierung und genderspezifische Berichterstattung im Bundestagswahlkampf 2013 – ‘Ausnahmefall‘ Angela Merkel oder typisch Frau [Personalization and Gender Specific News Coverage During the 2013 National Election Campaign – ‘Exceptional Case‘ Angela Merkel or Typical Woman]. In: Holtz-BachaC (ed.) Die Massenmedien im Wahlkampf. Die Bundestagswahl 2013 [Mass Media in Election Campaigns. The German National Elections 2013]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 217–247.
29.
MöllerH (1999) Einführung [Introduction]. In: JäckelEMöllerHRudolphH (eds) Von Heuss bis Herzog: Die Bundespräsidenten im politischen System der Bundesrepublik [From Heuss to Herzog: The Federal Presidents in the Political System of the Federal Republic of Germany]. Stuttgart: DVA, pp. 7–13.
30.
MorseyR (1997) Der Bundespräsident in der Kanzlerdemokratie: Amtsverständnis, Amtsführung und Traditionsbildung von Theodor Heuss bis Walter Scheel (1949–1979) [The Federal President in the Chancellor Democracy: Understanding of Office, Execution of Office and Tradition-building from Theodor Heuss to Walter Scheel (1949-1979)]. In: von HehlUHockertsHGMöllerH. (eds) Von Windthorst bis Adenauer: Ausgewählte Aufsätze zu Politik, Verwaltung und politischem Katholizismus im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert [From Windthorst to Adenauer: Selected Essays on Politics, Administration and Political Catholicism in the 19th and 20th Century]. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, pp. 571–590.
PeterJde VreeseCH (2004) In search of Europe. A cross-national comparative study of the European Union in National Television News. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics09(4): 3–24.
RahatGSheaferT (2007) The personalization(s) of politics: Israel 1949–2003. Political Communication24(1): 65–80.
36.
ReinemannCWilkeJ (2007) It’s the debates, stupid! How the introduction of televised debates changed the portrayal of chancellor candidates in the German press 1949–2005. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics12(4): 92–111.
37.
RohowskiT (2009) Das Private in der Politik: Politiker-Homestories in der deutschen Unterhaltungspresse [The Private in Politics: Homestories about Politicians in the German Tabloid Press]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
38.
SpathF (1990) Das Bundespräsidialamt [The Office of the Federal President], 4th edn.Düsseldorf: Droste.
Van AelstPSheaferTStanyerJ (2012) The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism13(2): 203–220.
43.
Van ZoonenL (1998) ‘Finally, I Have My Mother Back’: Politicians and their families in popular culture. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics3(1): 48–64.
44.
Van ZoonenLHoltz-BachaC (2000) Personalisation in Dutch and German politics: The case of Talkshows. Javnost – The Public7(2): 45–56.
45.
VetterABrettschneiderF (1998) ‘Idealmaße’ für Kanzlerkandidaten [‘Ideal Measures‘ for Candidates for Chancellor]. ZUMA Nachrichten43: 90–115.
46.
VogtL (2002) Scharping im Pool. Über Chancen und Risiken der Privatisierung des Politischen [Scharping in the pool. On opportunities and risks of the privatization of the political]. In: SchichaCBrosdaC (eds) Politikvermittlung in Unterhaltungsformaten: Medieninszenierung zwischen Popularität und Populismus [Mediated Politics in Entertainment Formats: Media Staging between Popularity and Populism]. Münster: LIT Verlag, pp. 134–151.
47.
WattenbergMP (1991) The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics: Presidential Elections of the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
WeischenbergS (1995) Journalistik: Medientechnik, Medienfunktionen, Medienakteure [Journalism: Media Techniques, Media Functions, Media Actors]. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
49.
WesterbarkeyJ (1998) Wir Voyeure: Zur Attraktivität publizierter Privatheit [We Voyeurs: On the Attractiveness of Published Privacy]. In: ImhofKSchulzP (eds) Die Veröffentlichung des Privaten – Die Privatisierung des Öffentlichen [The Publication of the Private – The Privatization of the Public]. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 312–317.
50.
WirthWVoigtR (2000) Der Aufschwung ist meiner! Personalisierung von Spitzenkandidaten im Fernsehen zur Bundestagswahl 1998 [The Boom is Mine! Personalization of Top Candidates on TV During the German National Election 1998]. In: Holtz-BachaC (ed.) Wahlkampf in den Medien – Wahlkampf mit den Medien: Ein Reader zum Wahljahr 1998 [Election Campaign in the Media – Election Campaign with the Media: A Reader for the Election Year 1998]. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 136–161.
