This article examines how minority ethnic audiences are measured, and thus constructed, in the Netherlands today. The analysis shows that this process is tightly woven into the dominant assimilationist and neoliberal discourse. This discourse portrays specific minority groups as deviant in relation to an essentialized notion of Dutchness. Furthermore, it presents social inclusion as an opportunity that is limited to well-adjusted, profitable consumers. Different attempts to represent minority audiences – including efforts to promote a more just minority representation in Dutch media – are compelled to accommodate to this dominant discourse. The article underscores the limited scope for contesting current hegemonic representations of minority groups and national belonging in the Netherlands.
AngI (1991) Desperately Seeking the Audience. London: Routledge.
2.
AwadI (2008) Cultural diversity in the news media: A democratic or a commercial need?Javnost – The Public16(4): 55–72.
3.
AwadIRothA (2011) From minority to cross-cultural programs: Dutch media policy and the politics of integration. International Communication Gazette73(5): 400–418.
ClarkeJ (2010) After neo-liberalism? Markets, states and the reinvention of public welfare. Cultural Studies24(3): 375–394.
12.
DávilaA (2008) Latino Spin: Public Image and the Whitewashing of Race. New York: New York University Press.
13.
DuffieldM (1984) New racism . . . new realism: Two sides of the same coin?Radical Philosophy37: 29–34.
14.
EttemaJSWhitneyDC (eds) (1994a) Audiencemaking: How the Media Create the Audience. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
EttemaJSWhitneyDC (1994b) The money arrow: An introduction to audiencemaking. In: EttemaJSWhitneyDC (eds) Audiencemaking: How the Media Create the Audience. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 1–18.
16.
GeschiereP (2009) The Perils of Belonging: Autochthony, Citizenship, and Exclusion in Africa and Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
GhorashiH (2003) Ayaan Hirsi Ali: Daring or dogmatic? Debates on multiculturalism and emancipation in the Netherlands. Focaal – European Journal of Anthropology42: 163–169.
18.
GirouxHA (2005) The terror of neoliberalism: Rethinking the significance of cultural politics. College Literature32(1): 1–19.
19.
GitlinT (1983) Inside Prime Time. New York: Pantheon.
20.
JoppkeC (2004) The retreat of multiculturalism in the liberal state: Theory and policy. The British Journal of Sociology55(2): 237–257.
LakemanP (1999) Binnen zonder Kloppen: Nederlandse Immigratiepolitiek en de Economische Gevolgen. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.
23.
LeurdijkA (2008) Van Marge naar Mainstream. Essay over Mediabeleid en Culturele Diversiteit 1999–2008. Den Hague: Ministry of Education, Culture and Science.
24.
McQuailD (1997) Audience Analysis. London: Sage.
25.
MillerPV (1994) Made-to-order and standardized audiences: Forms of reality in audience measurement. In: EttemaJSWhitneyDC (eds) Audiencemaking: How the Media Create the Audience. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 57–74.
PenninxR (2005) Bridges between research and policy? The case of post-war immigration and integration policies in the Netherlands. International Journal on Multicultural Studies7(7): 33–48.
RigoniI (2005) Challenging notions and practices: The Muslim media in Britain and France. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies31(3): 563–580.
36.
RobertsDJMahtaniM (2010) Neoliberalizing race, racing neoliberalism: Placing ‘race’ in neoliberal discourses. Antipode, 42(2): 248-57.
37.
RoggebandCVerlooM (2007) Dutch women are liberated, migrant women are a problem: The evolution of policy frames on gender and migration in the Netherlands, 1995–2005. Social Policy and Administration41(3): 271–288.
SrebernyA (2005) ‘Not only, but also’: Mixedness and media. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies31(3): 443–459.
41.
TurowJ (2005) Audience construction and culture production: Marketing surveillance in the digital age. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science597(1): 103–121.
42.
Van de BeekJ (2010) Kennis, Macht en Moraal: De Productie van Wetenschappelijke Kennis over de Economische Effecten van Migratie naar Nederland, 1960–2005. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
YanowDVan der HaarM (2010) ‘Race’ by another name? Categories, counting, and the state – The case of netherlands integration policy discourse. Presentation, Institute for Global and International Studies, George Washington University. Available at: www.gwu.edu/~igis/assets/docs/Yanow_Paper.pdf.
