This article studies the internet media communication of 12 organizations representing Czech trade union, feminist, human rights and environmental movements. Drawing on Foucault’s concept that discourse has a formative influence resulting in a specific system of statement allocation, the study investigates the discursive characteristics of activists’ communication. The research is methodologically based on a quantitative exploration of co-occurrences of frequent lexical items. The computer-assisted text analysis reveals an important characteristic of the communication — an internal split in two discursive areas: on the one hand, the ‘conditions area’, dedicated to phrasing the existential conditions of subjects of contest or protection, and, on the other hand, the ‘contention area’, referring to strategies and negotiation with movement opponents. In the study’s interpretation, the discourse constrains activist organizations to communicate both about the life conditions of actors/subjects and about their claims and negotiations, but in large measure separately.
Baker, P. ( 2006) Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
3.
Baker, P., C. Gabrielatos, M. Khosravinik, M. Krzyzanowski, A.M. McEnery and R. Wodak ( 2008) ‘A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press’, Discourse and Society19(3): 273-306.
4.
Benford, R. and S. Hunt ( 1992) ‘Dramaturgy and Social Movements: The Social Construction and Communication of Power’, Sociological Inquiry2(1): 36-55.
5.
Benford, R.D. and D.A. Snow ( 2000) ‘Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment’, Annual Review of Sociology26: 611-39.
6.
Chung, Y.M. and J.Y. Lee ( 2001) ‘A Corpus-Based Approach to Comparative Evaluation of Statistical Term Association Measures’, Journal of the American Society for Information and Technology52(4): 283-96.
7.
Coy, P.G., L.N. Woehrle and G.M. Maney ( 2008) ‘A Typology of Oppositional Knowledge: Democracy and the US Peace Movement’, Sociological Research Online13(4); at: www.socresonline.org.uk/13/4/3.html
8.
Dagan, I. ( 2000) ‘Contextual Word Similarity’, pp 459-76 in R. Dale, H. Moisl and H. Somers (eds) Handbook of Natural Language Processing. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
9.
Deacon, D. ( 2007) ‘Yesterday’s Papers and Today’s Technology: Digital Newspaper Archives and "Push Button" Content Analysis’, European Journal of Communication22(1): 5-25.
10.
Deleuze, G. ( 1988) Foucault, trans. S. Hand. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press. (Orig. pub. 1986.)
11.
Eyerman, R. and A. Jamison ( 1991) Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach. University Park: University of Pennsylvania Press.
12.
Fairclough, N. ( 2003) Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research . London and New York: Routledge.
13.
Ferree, M.M. ( 2003) ‘Resonance and Radicalism: Feminist Framing in the Abortion Debates in the United States and Germany’, American Journal of Sociology109(2): 304-44
14.
Foucault, M. ( 1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London : Routledge. (Orig. pub. 1969.)
15.
Foucault, M. ( 1981) ‘The Order of Discourse’, pp. 48-78 in R. Young (ed.) Untying the Text: A Post-Structural Anthology . Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Orig. pub. 1971.)
16.
Franzosi, R. and J.W. Mohr ( 1997) ‘New Direction in Formalization and Historical Analysis’ , Theory and Society26(2-3): 133-60.
17.
Hájek, M. ( 1995) ‘ "Tanec na hraně nože": strategie konstrukce sociálních problémů’ [‘Walking on a Knife Edge’: Strategies in the Construction of Social Problems] , Sociologický časopis31: 100-17.
18.
Hájek, M., J. Kabele and K. Vojtíšková (2006) ‘ "Zázemí" a "bojiště" v usilování o spravedlnost: textová analýza odborářské, feministické a lidskoprávní mediální komunikace’ [The ‘Background’ and ‘Battlefield’ in the Struggle for Justice: Text Analysis of Trade Union, Feminist and Human Rights Media Communications], Sociologický časopis42(2): 269-90.
19.
Klandermans, B. and S. Goslinga ( 1996) ‘Media Discourse, Movement Publicity, and the Generation of Collective Action Frames: Theoretical and Empirical Exercises in Meaning Construction’, pp. 312-37, in D. McAdam , J.D. McCarthy and M.N. Zald (eds) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Koopmans, R. ( 2004) ‘Movements and Media: Selection Processes and Evolutionary Dynamics in the Public Sphere’, Theory and Society33(3-4): 367-91.
21.
Mohr, J.W. ( 1998) ‘Measuring Meaning Structures’, Annual Review of Sociology24: 345-70.
22.
Morris, C.E. and S.H. Browne ( 2006) Readings on the Rhetoric of Social Protest. State College, PA: Strata.
23.
Popping, R. ( 2000) Computer-Assisted Text Analysis. London : Sage.
24.
Roberts, C.W. (ed.) (1997) Text Analysis for the Social Sciences: Methods for Drawing Statistical Inferences from Texts and Transcripts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Steinberg, M.W. ( 1998) ‘Tilting the Frame: Considerations on Collective Action Framing from a Discursive Turn’, Theory and Society27(6): 845-72.
26.
Steinberg, M.W. ( 1999) ‘The Talk and Back Talk of Collective Action: A Dialogic Analysis of Repertoires of Discourse among Nineteenth-Century English Cotton Spinners’, American Journal of Sociology105(3): 736-80.
27.
Stubbs, M. ( 1996) Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell .
28.
Stubbs, M. ( 2001) ‘Text, Corpora, and Problems of Interpretation: A Response to Widdowson’, Applied Linguistics22(2): 149-72.
29.
Taylor D.E. ( 2000) ‘The Rise of the Environmental Justice Paradigm: Injustice Framing and the Social Construction of Environmental Discourses’ , American Behavioral Scientist43(4): 508-80.
30.
Tilly, C. and S. Tarrow ( 1998) Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Ward, S. and W. Lusoli ( 2003) ‘Dinosaurs in Cyberspace? British Trade Unions and the Internet’, European Journal of Communication18(2): 147-79.
32.
Widdowson, H.G. ( 2000) ‘On the Limitation of Linguistics Applied’ , Applied Linguistics21(1): 3-25.
