Coalbed methane enrichment is crucial for improving energy efficiency and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Membrane separation technology shows significant potential for efficient CH4/N2 separation, making membrane material design a key research focus. Metal-organic framework-based mixed-matrix membranes have attracted much attention due to its good comprehensive performances and superior development potential. However, the balance between gas permeability and selectivity in membranes still needs further improvement. In this study, a novel supported mixed-matrix membrane with Ni-MOF-74 as the functional fillers and SBS polymer as the matrix material was fabricated by a simple dip-coating method, in which Al2O3 porous tube was used as the substrate. This strategy can significantly enhance CH4 permeability while maintaining or improving CH4/N2 permeation selectivity. Results show that porous substrate exhibits good compatibility with the polymer-filler composite separation layer. The ratio of SBS polymer to Ni-MOF-74 particles has a significant impact on the comprehensive performances of the membrane. The as-fabricated SBS/Ni-MOF-74 membrane with 10% Ni-MOF-74 loading displays superior morphology and excellent CH4 permeation performance. Pure CH4 and N2 permeation tests indicate that the optimized membrane exhibits a high CH4 permeability of 66.4 Barrer, which is about 1.5 times higher than that of pure SBS membrane. It has an ideal CH4/N2 selectivity of 3.5, greatly exceeding the 1.6 selectivity of SBS membrane. This improvement can be attributed to the differences in diffusion and solubility coefficients of CH4 and N2 in the membrane. Moreover, this membrane exhibits relatively stable gas permeability and selectivity under different pressure differentials. Therefore, the membrane developed in this study exhibits excellent mechanical and gas permeation properties, showing potential applications in methane enrichment.
TianJFYuLGXueR, et al.Global low-carbon energy transition in the post-COVID-19 era [J]. Applied Energy2022; 307: 118205.
2.
Koohi-FayeghSRosenMA. A review of energy storage types, applications and recent developments [J]. Journal of Energy Storage2020; 27: 101047.
3.
ChenWGuoXNZouEB, et al.A continuous and high-efficiency process to separate coal bed methane with porous ZIF-8 slurry: experimental study and mathematical modelling [J]. Green Energy Environ2020; 5: 347–363.
4.
ZhangNPanZZhangL, et al.Decarburization characteristics of coalbed methane by membrane separation technology [J]. Fuel2019; 242: 470–478.
5.
GaoQHouBZhaoJZ, et al.Coalbed methane hydrate separation: an experimental study using ordered mesoporous materials [J]. Ind Eng Chem Res2023; 62: 4864–4874.
6.
YangZXHussainMZMarínP. Enrichment of low concentration methane: an overview of ventilation air methane [J]. J Mater Chem A2022; 10: 6397–6413.
7.
MaCYangZBGuoXY, et al.Size reduced low crystallinity ZIF-62 for the preparation of mixed-matrix membranes for CH4/N2 separation [J]. J Membr Sci2022; 663: 121069.
8.
LiuHDingWZhouFB, et al.An overview and outlook on gas adsorption: for the enrichment of low concentration coalbed methane [J]. Sep Sci Technol2020; 55: 1102–1114.
9.
BaeJSYuXXSuS, et al.Enrichment of low-quality methane by various combinations of vacuum and temperature swing adsorption processes [J]. Ind Eng Chem Res2022; 61: 14298–14304.
10.
SongYMYangDHYuSN, et al.Hybrid membranes with Cu (II) loaded metal organic frameworks for enhanced desulfurization performance [J]. Sep Purif Technol2019; 210: 258–267.
11.
YangHLiangHYZhangP, et al.Improved CO2 separation performance of mixed matrix membranes via expanded layer double hydroxides and methanol post-treatment [J]. J Membr Sci2023; 670: 121345.
12.
AllegueTAriasAFernandez-GonzalezN, et al.Enrichment of nitrite dependent anaerobic methane oxidizing bacteria in a membrane bioreactor [J]. Micropor Mesopor Mat2018; 347: 721–730.
13.
ShinJHKanMYOhJW, et al.Solubility selectivity-enhanced SIFSIX-3-Ni-containing mixed matrix membranes for improved CO2/CH4 separation efficiency [J]. J Membr Sci2021; 663: 119390.
14.
AlamSFKinMZKinYJ. A new seeding method, dry rolling applied to synthesize SAPO-34 zeolite membrane for nitrogen/methane separation [J]. J Membr Sci2020; 602: 117825.
15.
MinBKordeAYangSW, et al.Separation of C2-C4 hydrocarbons from methane by zeolite MFI hollow fiber membranes fabricated from 2D nanosheets [J]. AIChE Journal2021; 67: 17048.
16.
GohSHLauHSYongWF, et al.Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs)-based mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) for gas separation: a review on advanced materials in harsh environmental applications [J]. Small2022; 18: 2107536.
17.
AydinSAltintasCKeskinS. High-throughput screening of COF membranes and COF/ polymer MMMs for helium separation and hydrogen purification [J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2022; 14: 21738–21749.
18.
DaglarHErucarIKeskinS, et al.Exploring the performance limits of MOF/polymer MMMs for O2/N2 separation using computational screening [J]. J Membr Sci2021; 618: 118555.
19.
WangZRenHZhangS, et al.Polymers of intrinsic microporosity/metal–organic framework hybrid membranes with improved interfacial interaction for high-performance CO2 separation [J]. J Mater Chem A2017; 5: 10968–10977.
20.
SinghNDalakotiSWambaHN, et al.Preparation of Cu-BTC MOF extrudates for CH4 separation from CH4/N2 gas mixture [J]. Micropor Mesopor Mat2023; 360: 112723.
21.
XinQPZhangXHShaoW, et al.COF-based MMMs with light-responsive properties generating unexpected surface segregation for efficient SO2/N2 separation [J]. J Membr Sci2023; 665: 121109.
22.
PalNAgarwalM. Advances in materials process and separation mechanism of the membrane towards hydrogen separation [J]. Int J Hydrogen Energ2021; 46: 27062–27087.
23.
Luque-AlledJMAmeenAWAlbertoM, et al.Gas separation performance of MMMs containing (PIM-1)-functionalized GO derivatives [J]. J Membr Sci2021; 623: 118902.
24.
JusohNYeongYFChewTL. Current development and challenges of mixed matrix membranes for CO2/CH4 separation [J]. Sep Purif Rev2016; 45: 321–344.
25.
WuCHZhangKXWangHL, et al.Enhancing the gas separation selectivity of mixed-matrix membranes using a dual-interfacial engineering approach [J]. J Am Chem Soc2020; 142: 18503–18512.
26.
ChengYWangZZhaoD, et al.Mixed matrix membranes for natural gas upgrading: current status and opportunities [J]. Ind Eng Chem Res2018; 57: 4139–4169.
27.
ZhangYMusselmanIHFerrarisJP, et al.Gas permeability properties of Matrimid ®membranes containing the metal-organic framework cu–BPY–HFS. [J] J Membr Sci2008; 313: 170–181.
28.
BuonomennaMGGolemmeGToneCM, et al.Amine-functionalized SBA-15 in poly (styrene-bbutadiene-b-styrene) (SBS) yields permeable and selective nanostructured membranes for gas separation [J]. J Mater Chem2013; 38: 11853–11866.
29.
WangSMGuoQPLiangSJ, et al.Preparation of Ni-MOF-74/SBS mixed matrix membranes and its application of CH4/N2 separation [J]. Sep Purif Technol2018; 199: 206–213.
30.
ShiQWangJShangH, et al.Effective CH4 enrichment from N2 by SIM-1 via a strong adsorption potential SOD cage [J]. Sep Purf Technol2020; 230: 115850.
31.
SuNCSunDTBeaversCM, et al.Enhanced permeation arising from dual transport pathways in hybrid polymer-MOF membranes [J]. Energy Environ Sci2016; 9: 922–931.
32.
YuZJGuZJLeiJB, et al.Vacuum treated amorphous MOF mixed matrix membrane for methane/nitrogen separation [J]. J Solid State Chem2023; 320: 123852.
33.
GuZJYangZBGuoXY, et al.Vacuum resistance treated ZIF-8 mixed matrix membrane for effective CH4/N2 separation [J]. Sep Purf Technol2021; 272: 118845.
34.
KimSMarandEIdaJ, et al.Polysulfone and mesoporous molecular sieve MCM-48 mixed matrix membranes for gas separation [J]. Chem Mater2006; 18: 1149–1155.
35.
MuraliRSIsmailAFRahmanMA, et al.Mixed matrix membranes of Pebax-1657 loaded with 4A zeolite for gaseous separations [J]. Sep Purf Technol2014; 129: 1–8.
36.
PerezEVBalkusKJFerrarisJP, et al.Mixed-matrix membranes coating MOF-5 for gas separations [J]. J Membr Sci2009; 328: 165–173.
37.
FeijaniEARezakazemiM. A comprehensive proposed model for gas separation prediction of mixed matrix membranes containing tubular fillers [J]. J Appl Polym Sci2023; 140: 54101.
38.
GaoZGIqbalAHassanT, et al.Texture regulation of metal-organic frameworks, microwave absorption mechanism-oriented structural optimization and design perspectives [J]. Advanced Science2022; 9: 202204151.
39.
GuanPLuoJLiW, et al.Enhancement of gas permeability for CH4/N2 separation membranes by blending SBS to Pebax polymers [J]. Macromolecular Research2017; 25: 1007–1014.
40.
ZhangYFMusselmanIHFerrarisJP, et al.Gas permeability properties of Matrimid® membranes containing the metal-organic framework Cu–BPY–HFS [J]. J Membr Sci2008; 313: 170–181.
41.
BuddPMMcKeownNBGhanemBS, et al.Gas permeation parameters and other physicochemical properties of a polymer of intrinsic microporosity: polybenzodioxane PIM-1 [J]. J Membr Sci2008; 325: 851–860.
42.
ChenZAZhaoBYXinJH, et al.A new segment-level mixing strategy to improve the gas separation performances of carbon molecular sieve membrane derived from polymer blends [J]. J Membr Sci2024; 695: 122481.
43.
XinxiHLidanCShizhengC, et al.Reconstruction of mixed matrix membranes by in situ vapor aminolysis for CO2/N2 and CH4/N2 separations [J]. J Membr Sci2023; 685: 121984.
44.
NafisiVHäggMB. Development of dual layer of ZIF-8/PEBAX-2533 mixed matrix membrane for CO2 capture [J]. J Membr Sci2014; 459: 244–255.
45.
MaJZhangJHYuanY, et al.HOF-21 nanofillers incorporated mixed matrix membranes for high-performance N2/CH4 separation [J]. J Membr Sci2023; 677: 121626.
