Cross-border data flows (CBDFs) are increasingly central to the global digital economy, yet governance, institutional, and technological challenges continue to shape their trajectory. This study investigates the determinants of CBDFs by examining the role of cybersecurity readiness, data monetization capacity, and digital infrastructure across 27 economies between 2015 and 2023. Using panel econometric methods, Feasible Generalized Least Squares (FGLS), Panel-Corrected Standard Errors (PCSE), and Granger causality tests, we found that stronger cybersecurity performance and higher levels of software spending significantly promote international data mobility. Conversely, digital infrastructure, proxied by broadband penetration, shows a negative association, reflecting regulatory tightening and localization measures in digitally advanced economies. A cluster-based analysis highlights differences across emerging and mature economies, underscoring the need for context-specific policies. The findings contribute to debates on digital governance and offer practical guidance for policymakers seeking to balance trust, value creation, and openness in the data economy.
AaronsonSA (2019) Data is different, and that’s why the world needs a new approach to governing cross-border data flows. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance21(5): 441–460.
2.
AaronsonSALeblondP (2018) Another digital divide: The rise of data realms and its implications for the WTO. Journal of International Economic Law21(2): 245–272.
BezuidenhoutLMLeonelliSKellyAH, et al. (2017) Beyond the digital divide: Towards a situated approach to open data. Science and Public Policy44(4): 464–475.
5.
BoninaCKoskinenKEatonB, et al. (2021) Digital platforms for development: Foundations and research agenda. Information Systems Journal31(6): 869–902.
6.
BrynjolfssonEHittLMKimHH (2011) Strength in numbers: How does data-driven decisionmaking affect firm performance? Available at SSRN 1819486. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1819486.
ChanderALêUP (2014) Data nationalism. Emory Law Journal64(3): 677–739.
11.
ChenLLiSWeiJ, et al. (2022) Externalization in the platform economy: Social platforms and institutions. Journal of International Business Studies53(8): 1805–1816.
12.
DavisSArrigoB (2021) The dark web and anonymizing technologies: Legal pitfalls, ethical prospects, and policy directions from radical criminology. Crime, Law and Social Change76(4): 367–386.
13.
EconomidesNLianosI (2021) Restrictions on privacy and exploitation in the digital economy: A market failure perspective. Journal of Competition Law & Economics17(4): 765–847.
14.
GaoRY (2023) A battle of the big three?—competing conceptualizations of personal data shaping transnational data flows. Chinese Journal of International Law22(4): 707–787.
HanafizadehPHarati NikMR (2020) Configuration of data monetization: A review of literature with thematic analysis. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management21(1): 17–34.
20.
HasanMKHabibAAShukurZ, et al. (2023) Review on cyber-physical and cyber-security system in smart grid: Standards, protocols, constraints, and recommendations. Journal of Network and Computer Applications209: 103540.
KeckMGillaniSDermishA, et al. (2022) The role of cross-border data flows in the digital economy. United Nations Capital Development Fund. Available online:https://static1. squarespace. com/static/5f2d7a54b7f75718fa4d2eef, 62, 1659726787042.
27.
LafuenteEÁcsZJSzerbL (2024) Analysis of the digital platform economy around the world: A network DEA model for identifying policy priorities. Journal of Small Business Management62(2): 847–891.
28.
MachadoMPKlingenbergCOAbreuJL, et al. (2025) Business processes for data monetization: An exploratory analysis and proposition of design patterns. Business Process Management Journal31(4): 1528–1559.
MeltzerJP (2015) The I nternet, cross-border data flows and international trade. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies2(1): 90–102.
31.
MishraN (2020) The trade:(cyber) security dilemma and its impact on global cybersecurity governance. Journal of World Trade54(4): 567–590.
32.
MitchellADMishraN (2019) Regulating cross-border data flows in a data-driven world: How WTO law can contribute. Journal of International Economic Law22(3): 389–416.
ObstfeldMShambaughJCTaylorAM (2005) The trilemma in history: Tradeoffs among exchange rates, monetary policies, and capital mobility. Review of Economics and Statistics87(3): 423–438.
36.
OECD (2019) Enhancing Access to and Sharing of Data: Reconciling Risks and Benefits for Data Re-use across Societies. Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/276aaca8-en.
PetersMA (2023) Digital trade, digital economy and the digital economy partnership agreement (DEPA) (Vol. 55, pp. 747-755): Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2041413.
39.
RolfSSchindlerS (2023) The US–China rivalry and the emergence of state platform capitalism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space55(5): 1255–1280.
40.
ScheibnerJIencaMKechagiaS, et al. (2020) Data protection and ethics requirements for multisite research with health data: A comparative examination of legislative governance frameworks and the role of data protection technologies. Journal of Law and the Biosciences7(1): lsaa010.
SuckerFBeyleveldA (2024) African rules on cross-border data flows: The significance of regulatory convergence and the AfCFTA Digital Trade Protocol’s potential contribution. Available at SSRN 4741632. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4741632.
44.
TaylorRD (2020) “Data localization”: The internet in the balance. Telecommunications Policy44(8): 102003.
WaltonSWheelerPRZhangY, et al. (2021) An integrative review and analysis of cybersecurity research: Current state and future directions. Journal of Information Systems35(1): 155–186.
YuanHFengW (2025) Free Trade, Fraught Tech: the impact of pilot free trade zone establishment on digital inequality within cities–evidence from China. Information, Communication & Society, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2025.2542359.
