Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Evaluating the impact and development of digital resources utilization on student performance in distance learning using the DeLone and McLean IS success model
This study investigates the impact and utilization of digital resources on students’ performance in distance learning. Specifically, it explores how digital resources influence academic outcomes among the students in distance learning environment of Allama Iqbal Open University (AIOU) South Punjab campuses. A quantitative research methodology was employed for this study, with data collected via a survey. The research utilized a modified version of the DeLone and McLean Information System (IS) Success Model as its theoretical framework. The purposive and convenience sampling techniques were applied for data collection targeting 350 students, who were asked to complete an electronic questionnaire. Following data cleaning procedures, 308 valid responses were retained for analysis. The data was then analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results revealed that the use of knowledge quality, digital resources system quality and service quality positively affects students’ performance in distance learning environment. Additionally, the personal intention, motivation, and self-efficacy that enhances students’ performance. With this, technological infrastructure within educational organizations, along with positive student success stories, contributes to improving the reputation of the institutions offering distance learning programs. This research provides recommendations for universities aiming to develop or enhance their distance learning platforms. The findings offer actionable insights on how to leverage digital system effectively to enhance students’ educational experiences and overall satisfaction. The study makes a significant contribution to the existing literature on digital resources, emphasizing the role of technology in online education. It also highlights how digital system, and services not only benefits student academic performance but also improves the methods of distance learning in educational institutions.
AhmedYAAhmadMNAhmadN, et al. (2019) Social media for knowledge-sharing: a systematic literature review. Telematics and Informatics37(January 2018): 72–112.
2.
AmmadSAlaloulWSSaadS, et al. (2021) Personal protective equipment (PPE) usage in construction projects: A systematic review and smart PLS approach. Ain Shams Engineering Journal12(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.04.001
3.
AkpenCNAsaoluSAtobateleS, et al. (2024) Impact of online learning on student’s performance and engagement: a systematic review. Discover Education3(1): 205.
4.
Al-FraihatDJoyMMasa’dehR, et al. (2020) Evaluating E-learning systems success: an empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior102: 67–86.
5.
Al-RahmiAMShamsuddinAWahabE, et al. (2022) Social media usage and acceptance in higher education: a structural equation model. Frontiers in Education7(August): 1–14.
6.
AldabbasHElaminAMAhmedAZE, et al. (2025) Assessing Learning Management System success in the UAE universities: how quality measures linked to students’ academic performance. Frontiers in Education10.
7.
AlmajaliDAMasa’dehRMoh’dT, et al. (2016) The role of information technology in motivating students to accept e-learning adoption in universities: a case study in Jordanian universities. Journal of Business & Management (COES&RJ-JBM)4(1): 36–46.
8.
Al NaqbiSH (2024) A mixed-method approach to post-implementation success of technology performance in UAE universities: assessing DeLone and McLean IS success model. Sage Open14(2): 21582440241240828.
9.
AmzatOBAdewojoAA (2023) Metaverse-infused academic libraries: a glimpse into the future. Library Hi Tech News40(10): 17–19.
10.
AndradeC (2020) The inconvenient truth about convenience and purposive samples. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine43(1): 86–88.
11.
AtukundaPKhabusiSPOthienoJ (2024) Analysis of user satisfaction of e-learning systems in Uganda using DeLone and McLean model. Discover Education3(1): 194.
12.
AyreSBrettleAGilroyD, et al. (2018) Developing a generic tool to routinely measure the impact of health libraries. Health Information and Libraries Journal35(3): 227–245.
13.
BadreA (2002) Shaping web usability—interaction design in context. Interactions9(3): 45–47.
14.
BalcioğluYSArtarM (2023) Predicting academic performance of students with machine learning. Information Development: 02666669231213023.
15.
BeckerJMCheahJHGholamzadeR, et al. (2023) PLS-SEM’s most wanted guidance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management35(1): 321–346.
16.
Bonilla-PriegoMJFernández-GiordanoMPacheco-OlivaresMR (n.d.) Evaluating the success of a learning management system for supplemental learning in accounting. Accounting Education: 1–26.
17.
BraninJ (2004) Knowledge management in academic libraries. Journal of Library Administration39(4): 41–56.
18.
BrennenJSKreissD (2016) Digitalization. In: The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy. Wiley Online Library, pp.1–11.
19.
BruceCS (1999) Workplace experiences of information literacy. International Journal of Information Management19(1): 33–47.
20.
CarriónGCNitzlCRoldánJL (2017) Mediation analyses in partial least squares structural equation modeling: guidelines and empirical examples. In: LatanHNoonanR (eds) Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Basic Concepts, Methodological Issues and Applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.173–195.
21.
ChaputulaAHMutulaS (2018) Ereadiness of public university libraries in Malawi to use mobile phones in the provision of library and information services. Library Hi Tech36(2): 270–288.
22.
ChenYWangYNevoS, et al. (2015) IT Capabilities and product innovation performance: the roles of corporate entrepreneurship and competitive intensity. Information and Management52(6): 643–657.
23.
CleffTCleffT (2014) Univariate Data Analysis.
24.
Cleveland-InnesMGauvreauSRichardsonG, et al. (2019) Technology-enabled learning and the benefits and challenges of using the community of inquiry theoretical framework. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education34(1): 1–18.
25.
CorcoranNDuaneA (2018) Using social media to enable staff knowledge sharing in higher education institutions. Australasian Journal of Information Systems22(2015): 1–26.
26.
Dailey-HebertA (2021) Maximizing interactivity in online learning: moving beyond discussion boards. Journal of Educators Online18(3).
27.
DeLoneWHMcLeanER (1992) Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research3(1): 60–95.
28.
DeLoneWHMcLeanER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems19(4): 9–30.
29.
FedorovAMikhalevaG (2020) Current trends in media and information literacy in research and scientific publications of the early 21st century. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy5(2): 153–163.
30.
FernandoETitanSurjandyS, et al. (2020) Factors influence the success of E-learning systems for distance learning at the university. In: 2020 international conference on information management and technology (ICIMTech), 2020, pp.294–299.
31.
FerreiraJDL (2020) Digital culture and teacher education: an analysis from the perspective of undergraduate students in Pedagogy. Educar em Revista36: 1–19.
32.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
33.
GranićAMarangunićN (2019) Technology acceptance model in educational context: a systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology50(5): 2572–2593.
34.
GuJWangJGuoX, et al. (2023) A metaverse-based teaching building evacuation training system with deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems53(4).
35.
GuobadiaFEEkuobaseGO (2024) An estimation of digital learning culture index of secondary education in Nigeria. Education Research International2024: 1–16.
36.
HairJFJrSarstedtMHopkinsL, et al. (2014) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review26(2): 106–121.
37.
HendersonMSelwynNAstonR (2017) What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education42(8): 1567–1579.
38.
HenselerJRingleCMSarstedtM. (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science43(1): 115–135.
39.
HicksAMcKinneyPInskipC, et al. (2023) Leveraging information literacy: mapping the conceptual influence and appropriation of information literacy in other disciplinary landscapes. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science55(3): 548–566.
40.
IslamAYMAAhmadKRafiM, et al. (2020) Performance-based evaluation of academic libraries in the big data era. Journal of Information Science47(4): 458–471. Epub ahead of print 2020.
41.
IslamAYMARafiMAhmadK (2022) Analyzing the impact of technology incentives on community digital inclusion using structural equation modeling. Library Hi Tech. 42(3): 826–848.
42.
JinPYuLAhmadK, et al. (2024) Evaluating the factors influencing the adoption of digital culture among university students in developing areas of South Punjab. Information Development: 02666669241270909.
43.
KaliisaRRientiesBMørchAI, et al. (2022) Social learning analytics in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a systematic review of empirical studies. Computers and Education Open3(January): 100073.
44.
KhanAUMaZLiM, et al. (2023) From traditional to emerging technologies in supporting smart libraries. A bibliometric and thematic approach from 2013 to 2022. Library Hi Tech. Ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print).
45.
KhanAUMaZLiM, et al. (2024) Beyond bookshelves, how 5/6G technology will reshape libraries: Two-stage SEM and SF-AHP analysis. Technology in Society78: 102629.
46.
KhanDDGAbdulPAwanG, et al. (2018) Role of female teachers in increasing literacy rate: a case. 13: 100–109.
47.
KumaraswamyKSNChitaleCM (2012) Collaborative knowledge sharing strategy to enhance organizational learning. Journal of Management Development31(3): 308–322.
48.
LeeCSKelkarRS (2013) ICT and knowledge management: perspectives from the SECI model. The Electronic Library31(2): 226–243.
49.
LeonardAHamutumwaNMMnubi-MchombuC (2020) Use of electronic resources by law academics: a case study from the University of Namibia. Collection and Curation39(3): 57–68.
50.
LiuHZhuJDuanY, et al. (2022) Development and students’ evaluation of a blended online and offline pedagogy for physical education theory curriculum in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Technology Research and Development70(6): 2235–2254.
51.
LiuYYangLSunJ, et al. (2018) Collaborative matrix factorization mechanism for group recommendation in big data-based library systems. Library Hi Tech36(3): 458–481.
52.
NaeemSBBhattiR (2020) The COVID-19 ‘infodemic’: a new front for information professionals. Health Information and Libraries Journal37(3): 233–239.
53.
NoreenSMalikMA (2019) Digital technologies for learning at Allama Iqbal Open University (AIOU): investigating needs and challenges. Open Praxis12(1): 39. Epub ahead of print March 2019.
54.
OakleafM (2016) Getting ready & getting started: academic librarian involvement in institutional learning analytics initiatives. The Journal of Academic Librarianship42(4): 472–475.
55.
Okyere-KwakyeEMd NorK (2020) Examining the intentions of a Ghanaian technical university students to use e-library. Digital Library Perspectives38(1): 69–87.
56.
PrabowoHIkhsanRBYuniartyY (2022) Student performance in online learning higher education: a preliminary research. Frontiers in Education7.
57.
RafiMIslamAYMAAhmadK, et al. (2022) Digital resources integration and performance evaluation under the knowledge management model in academic libraries. Libri72(2): 123–140.
58.
RafiMJianMingZAhmadK (2019) Technology integration for students’ information and digital literacy education in academic libraries. Information Discovery and Delivery47(4): 203–217.
59.
RafiqueWDouWHussainK, et al. (2020) Factors influencing programming expertise in a web-based e-learning paradigm. Online Learning Journal24(1): 162–181.
60.
RanjeethSLatchoumiTPPaulPV (2020) A survey on predictive models of learning analytics. Procedia Computer Science167(2018): 37–46.
61.
ReddyPChaudharyKHusseinS (2023) A digital literacy model to narrow the digital literacy skills gap. Heliyon9(4): e14878.
62.
RehmanABurkiMHKKhanS (2022) Literacy in the digital age and Pakistani youth. Journal of Social Sciences Review2(4): 260–272.
63.
Rey-MartíARibeiro-SorianoDPalacios-MarquésD (2016) A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research69(5): 1651–1655.
64.
RosettaAAgatha PriskaMMuslimE, et al. (2021) Evaluating the success of E-learning systems and strategy creation: the perspective of students in Universitas Indonesia. In: Proceedings of the 2020 4th international conference on education and E-learning, New York, NY, USA, 2021, pp. 11–17. ICEEL ‘20. Association for Computing Machinery.
65.
RulinawatySambotengLPurwantoAJ, et al. (2024) Investigating the influence of the updated DeLone and McLean information system (IS) success model on the effectiveness of learning management system (LMS) implementation. Cogent Education11(1): 2365611.
66.
SantosACIglesias RodríguezAPinto-LlorenteAM (2020) Identification of characteristics and functionalities for the design of an academic analytics model for higher education. In: ACM international conference proceeding series, pp.997–1003.
67.
SazonovAAZemlyanskayaNBKazakovaNV (2024) Digitalization of education: problems and realities of digital culture development within the framework of new educational technologies. In: AIP conference proceedings, 2024.
68.
SediyaningsihSRistiyonoMPLaungguK, et al. (2023) De-contextual communication: factors influencing usage intentions of metaverse technology in digital library services. Heliyon9(10): e20388.
69.
ShamsSHaqMAUWaqarY (2020) Open educational resources (OER) usage trends among university students of Pakistan. Education and Information Technologies25(6): 5637–5654.
70.
SuttonC (2017) Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society180(3): 940–941.
71.
TrussAAndersonV (2023) The navigational challenges of a blended learning approach to teaching in business and management. The International Journal of Management Education21(1): 100733.
72.
TsaoWCHsiehMTLinTMY (2016) Intensifying online loyalty! The power of website quality and the perceived value of consumer/seller relationship. Industrial Management and Data Systems116(9): 1987–2010. Epub ahead of print 2016.
73.
VenkateshVDavisFD (1996) A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decision Sciences27(3): 451–481. Epub ahead of print 1996.
74.
WalshR (1994) The making of a shaman: calling, training, and culmination. Journal of Humanistic Psychology34(3): 7–30.
