Social media has been attributed as beneficial by aiding fast and reliable communication which cuts across time and geographical boundaries. In South Africa, reports indicate that most people have access to social media. Such attributes can be harnessed by municipalities to educate about water conservation, especially considering the drought and water crisis that was experienced in Eastern Cape, South Africa. This paper focused on local municipalities in Amathole District in the Eastern Cape Province, which was declared a high risk zone due to the drought that prevailed in 2016 till 2017. The Government to Citizen Model (G2C) was used as a theoretical framework which supports participation. Purposive sampling was used, with water messages being prioritised. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyse content on the local municipalities’ social media platforms. The researchers found that local municipalities in Amathole District, excluding the district municipality, were not using social media platforms for participatory water conservation education.
AbrahamsYMhlongoSNapoV (2011) A gendered analysis of water and sanitation services policies and programmes in South Africa: 2006 – 2010. Agenda25(2): 71–79.
AuerbachCFSilversteinLB (2003) Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press.
4.
AwanFGauntlettD (2012) Remote living: Exploring online (and offline) experiences of young people living in rural areas. European Journal of Cultural Studies16(1): 3–23.
5.
BarreiraA (2003) The participatory regime of water governance in the Iberian Peninsula. Water International28(3): 350–357.
6.
BaxterLABabbieE (2004) The basics of communication research. Canada: Thompson Wardsworth.
7.
CharalabidisYLoukisEAndroutsopoulouA (2014) Fostering social innovation through multiple social media combinations. Information Systems Management31(3): 225–239.
8.
CheonJLeeSCrooksSMSongJ (2012) An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behaviour. Computers & Education59:1054–1064.
Farmer’s Weekly (2017) Dry spell should cue a rethink on farming in SA. Farmer’s Weekly17015: 6–7.
12.
HannaRRohmACrittendenVL (2011) We’re all connected: The power of the social media ecosystem. Business Horizons54(3): 265–273.
13.
HarouJJGarronePRizzoliAEMaziotisACastellettiAFraternaliPNovakJWissmann-AlvesRCeschiPA (2014) Smart metering, water pricing and social media to stimulate residential water efficiency: Opportunities for the SmartH2O project. Procedia Engineering89:1037–1043.
14.
Heller-BairdCParasnisG (2011) From social media to social customer relationship management. Strategy & Leadership39(5): 30–37.
15.
HortonW (2006) E-learning by design. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
16.
ImkunieneDZinkeviciuteV (2014) Social media in communication of temporary organisations: Role, needs, strategic perspective. Journal of Business Economics and Management15(5): 899–914.
17.
JinYLiuBFAustinLL (2014) Examining the role of social media in effective crisis management: The effects of crisis origin, information form and source on publics’ crisis responses. Communication Research41: 74–94.
KaplanAHaenleinM (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons53: 59–68.
20.
KaplanAMHaenleinM (2011) Two hearts in three-quarter time: How to waltz the social media/viral marketing dance. Business Horizons54(3): 253–263.
21.
KietzmannJHHermkensKMcCarthyIPSilvestreB (2011) Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons54: 241–251.
22.
KimSKimHJLeeH (2009) An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly26:42–50
23.
KrippendorffK (2004) Content analysis. An Introduction to its methodology. (2nd ed). London: Sage.
24.
LeeGKwakYH (2012) An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly29:492–503.
25.
LewisSPeaRRosenJ (2010) Beyond participation to co-creation of meaning: mobile social media in generative learning communities. Social Science Information49(3): 351–369.
26.
LuJHaoQJingM (2016) Consuming, sharing, and creating content: How young students use new social media in and outside school. Computers in Human Behaviour64:55–64.
PinaVTorresL (2001) Analysis of the efficiency of local government services delivery. An application to urban public transport. Policy and Practice35: 929–944.
36.
RajahN (2015) E-government in Zimbabwe: An overview of progress made and challenges ahead. Journal of Global Research in Computer Science6(12):11–16.
SafkoL (2010) The social media bible: Tactics, tools, and strategies for business success. (2nd ed). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
39.
SantraTGiriVN (2009) Analysing computer-mediated communication and organisational effectiveness. Review of Communication9(1):100–109.
40.
SchreierM (2012) Qualitative content analysis in practice. London: Sage Publications.
41.
SeoDBBernsenM (2016) Comparing attitudes toward e-government of non-users versus users in a rural and urban municipality. Government Information Quarterly33: 270–282.
ThomasJCStreibG (2005) E-democracy, e-commerce, and e-research: Examining the electronic ties between citizens and governments. Administration & Society37: 259–280.
Van DijkJAGM (2006) The network society: Social aspects of new media. (2nd ed). Netherlands: Sage Publications.
47.
Van KoppenBSchreinerB (2014) Moving beyond integrated water resource management: developmental water management in South Africa. International Journal of Water Resources Development30(3): 543–558.
48.
WhiteCM (2012) Social media crisis and emergency management. Leveraging Web 2.0 technologies. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
49.
YoungJA (2016) Facebook, Twitter, and blogs: The adoption and utilisation of social media in non-profit human service organisations. Human Service Organisations: Management, Leadership & Governance41(1):1–14.
