This paper addresses the adoption and non-adoption of communication methods such as social media and explores the implementation of Web 2.0 technologies and their use in academic libraries. I interviewed 16 library employees from six academic university libraries in the Flanders region of Belgium and in South Africa. I explored five academic university libraries in the urban regions of Flanders and South Africa and one situated in a rural region of South Africa. This article discusses the benefits of using social media as a communication tool to engage with students. The results demonstrate that ‘ease of use’ was portrayed as a beneficial construct and has a positive influence on behavioural intention and use of Web 2.0 technologies. A comparison on the adoption of social media between the two countries indicate that financial resources, infrastructure and management support are crucial determining factors in service delivery.
AkbarF (2013) What affects students’ acceptance and use of technology? Unpublished Senior Honors Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, USA. Available at: http://repository.cmu.edu/hsshonors/179/ (accessed 28 April 2015).
2.
AkinolaOT (2015) Social media as weapon of mass instruction in training library and information science students. In: TellaA (ed.) Social Media Strategies for Dynamic Library Service Development. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp.175–202.
3.
AlKarousiRSJabrNHHarrassiN, et al. (2015) Adoption of Web 2.0 applications in Omani academic libraries. In: Proceedings of the SLA–AGC 21st annual conference, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 17–19 March 2015. Available at: http://www.qscience.com/doi/pdf/10.5339/qproc.2015.gsla.1 (accessed 30 August 2016).
4.
AyuARRAbrizahA (2011) Do you Facebook? Usage and applications of Facebook page among academic libraries in Malaysia. International Information & Library Review43(4): 239–249.
5.
BazeleyPJacksonK (2013) Qualitative Data Analysis with NVIVO. 2nd edn.Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
6.
BeckRS (2000) The History of South Africa. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
7.
BellS (2008) Design thinking. American Libraries39(1/2): 44–49.
8.
BradleyP (2015) Social Media for Creative Libraries: How to Use Web 2.0 in your Library. 2nd edn.London: Facet.
9.
BrymanA (2004) Social Research Methods. 2nd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
Cape Peninsula University of Technology (2016) History of the Cape Peninsula University of Technology. Available at: http://www.cput.ac.za/about/history (accessed 22 August 2016).
CharnigoLBarnett-EllisP (2007) Checking out Facebook.com: The impact of a digital trend on academic libraries. Information Technology and Libraries26(1): 23–34.
14.
ChuSKWDuHS (2012) Social networking tools for academic libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science45(1): 64–75.
15.
ChuSKWWooMKingRB, et al. (2011) Examining the application of Web 2.0 in medical related organisations. Health Information and Libraries Journals29(1): 47–60.
16.
ChuaAYKGohDH (2010) A study of Web 2.0 applications in library websites. Library & Information Science Research32(3): 203–211.
17.
CollinsGQuan-HaaseA (2014) Are social media ubiquitous in academic libraries? A longitudinal study of adoption and usage patterns. Journal of Web Librarianship8(1): 48–68.
18.
CreswellJW (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th edn.Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
19.
DavisFD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly13(3): 319–340.
FrederickDE (2016) Libraries, data and the fourth industrial revolution. Library High Tech News33(5): 9–12.
22.
GansterLSchumacherB (2009) Expanding beyond our library walls: Building an active online community through Facebook. Journal of Web Librarianship3(2): 111–128.
23.
HabibMC (2006) Toward academic library 2.0: development and application of a library 2.0 methodology. Master’s Thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
24.
HannaP (2012) Using Internet technologies (such as Skype) as a research medium: A research note. Qualitative Research12(2): 239–242.
25.
HarinarayanaNSRajuVN (2010) Web 2.0 features in university library web sites. The Electronic Library28(1): 69–88.
26.
HayfieldNHuxleyC (2015) Insider and outsider perspectives: Reflections on researcher identities in research with lesbian and bisexual women. Qualitative Research in Psychology12(2): 91–106.
27.
HicksA (2012) Review of ‘Social networking tools for academic libraries’. Collaborative Librarianship4(4): 190–191.
28.
HuvilaIHolmbergKKronqvist-BergM, et al. (2013) What is Librarian 2.0 – New competencies or interactive relations? A library professional viewpoint. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science45(3): 198–205.
29.
KellyKGlazerG (2013) Get @ us! Using social media to market libraries, assist patrons and revitalize outreach efforts. In: PeacockRWurmJ (eds) The New Academic Librarian: Essays on Changing Roles and Responsibilities. Jefferson, NC: MacFarland & Company, pp.18–26.
30.
KwanyaTStilwellCUnderwoodPG (2009) Library 2.0: Revolution or evolution?South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science75(1): 70–75.
LehrWMcKnightLW (2003) Wireless Internet access: 3G vs. WiFi?Telecommunications Policy27(5–6): 351–370.
33.
MabilaTEMalatjeSEAddo-BediakoA, et al. (2006) The role of foundation programmes in science education: The UNIFY programme at the University of Limpopo, South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development26(3): 295–304.
34.
MabweazaraRM (2014) Use of social media tools by library staff at the University of the Western Cape, South Africa and the National University of Science and Technology, Zimbabwe. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of the Western Cape, South Africa. Available at: http://etd.uwc.ac.za/handle/11394/4120 (accessed 4 June 2016).
35.
MabweazaraRMZinnS (2016) Assessing the appropriation of social media by academic librarians in South Africa and Zimbabwe. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science82(1): 1–12.
36.
MahmoodKRichardsonJV (2011) Adoption of Web 2.0 in US academic libraries: A survey of ARL libraries. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems45(4): 365–375.
37.
NestaFMiJ (2011) Library 2.0 or Library III: Returning to leadership. Library Management32(1/2): 85–97.
38.
NkomoN (2012) Differences in ICTs access and use by faculty and students at the University of Zululand: 2001 and 2009. Journal of Gender, Information and Development in Africa: Special Inaugural Issue1(1): 95–116.
39.
NkondoMBrownADickA, et al. (2014) The Library and Information Services (LIS) Transformation Charter. Pretoria: Department of Arts and Culture (DAC) and the National Council for Library and Information Services (NCLIS). Available at: http://www.nlsa.ac.za/Downloads_01/2014_Final_LIS_Transformation_Charter.pdf (accessed 25 September 2016).
40.
OgunleyeDA (2015) Social media and academic performance of library and information science undergraduates: A case study of selected tertiary institutions in Kwara State, Ilorin. In: TellaA (ed.) Social Media Strategies for Dynamic Library Service Development. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 203–229.
Owusu-AnsahCMGontshiVMutibwaL, et al. (2015) Applications of social media and Web 2.0 for research support in selected African academic institutions. Journal of Balkan Libraries Union3(1): 30–39.
43.
PalinkasLAHorwitzSMGreenCA, et al. (2015) Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research42(5): 533–544.
44.
PenzhornC (2009) Quality through improved service: the implementation of social networking tools in an academic library. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IATUL conference, Paper 30. Available at: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2009/papers/30/ (accessed 30 August 2016).
45.
ShillHBTonnerS (2003) Creating a better place: Physical improvements in academic libraries, 1995–2002. College and Research Libraries64(6): 431–466.
46.
ShulmanJYepJToméD (2015) Leveraging the power of a Twitter network for library promotion. Journal of Academic Librarianship41(2): 178–185.
47.
SmidtHSursockA (2011) Engaging in lifelong learning: Shaping Inclusive and Responsive University Strategies. SIRUS. Brussels: European University Association. Available at: http://www.eua.be/pubs/Engaging_in_Lifelong_Learning.pdf (accessed 17 October 2014).
48.
SodtJMSummeyTP (2009) Beyond the library’s walls: Using Library 2.0 tools to reach out to all users. Journal of Library Administration49(1/2): 97–109.
TellaAOlarongbeSAAkanbi-AdemolakeHB, et al. (2013) Use of social networking sites by academic librarians in six selected states of Nigeria. New Review of Academic Librarianship19(3): 274–290.
54.
TripathiMKumarS (2010) Use of Web 2.0 tools in academic libraries: A reconnaissance of the international landscape. International Information & Library Review42(3): 195–207.
