This article provides new insight into the local institutional embeddedness of entrepreneurial behaviour. By introducing a sociological institutional framework for place-based entrepreneurship, it adds to the knowledge of the role of regulative, normative and cognitive institutions in local entrepreneurial practices in rural Central Europe. Based on extensive case studies in regions located across five countries, the analysis suggests that the influence of regulative institutions on local entrepreneurship is tempered, if not superseded, by specific place-dependent normative and cognitive institutions, and that the fit between the different institutions is decisive for the emergence of entrepreneurial practices in a specific location. The article provides explanations of why and under which conditions entrepreneurs show different change practices in rural transition and non-transition contexts. The study concludes that institutional mechanisms are place-bound, and that a place-sensitive institutional approach can serve as a fruitful way forward for developing our contextualised knowledge of entrepreneurial behaviour.
AhlstromDBrutonGD (2001) Learning from successful local private firms in China: Establishing legitimacy. Academy of Management Executive15(4): 72–83.
2.
AhlstromDBrutonGD (2002) An institutional perspective on the role of culture in shaping strategic actions by technology focused entrepreneurial firms in China. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice26(4): 53–69.
3.
AldrichHEFiolCM (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review19(4): 645–670.
4.
BattilanaJLecaBBoxenbaumT (2009) How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals3(1): 65–107.
5.
BegleyTMTanWLSchochH (2005) Politico-economic factors associated with interest in starting a business: A multi-country study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29(1): 35–55.
6.
BergerPLuckmannT (1967) The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
7.
BosmaNSSchutjensV (2011) Understanding regional variation in entrepreneurial activity and entrepreneurial attitude in Europe. Annals of Regional Science47(3): 711–742.
8.
BrutonGDAhlstromDLiH-L (2010) Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future?Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice34(3): 421–440.
9.
BusenitzLWGomezCSpencerJW (2000) Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal43(5): 994–1003.
10.
DavidssonPHunterEKlofstenM (2006) Institutional forces: The invisible hand that shapes venture ideas. International Small Business Journal24(2): 115–131.
11.
DiMaggioPJ (1988) Interest and agency in institutional theory. In: ZuckerLG (ed.) Institutional Patterns and Organizations. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp.3–21.
12.
EisenhardtKM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review14(4): 532–550.
13.
European Commission (1997) Agenda 2000: For a Stronger and Wider Union, Bulletin of the European Union, supp. 5/97. Brussels: European Commission.
14.
FornahlD (2003) Entrepreneurial activities in a regional context. In: FornahlDBrennerT (eds) Cooperation, Networks and Institutions in Regional Innovation Systems. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.38–57.
15.
FreytagAThurikAR (2007) Entrepreneurship and its determinants in a cross-country setting. Journal of Evolutionary Economics17(2): 117–131.
16.
GarudRHardyCMaguireS (2007) Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies28(7): 957–969.
17.
GephartRP (2004) Qualitative research and theAcademy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal47(4): 454–462.
18.
GnyawaliDRFogelDS (1994) Environments for entrepreneurship development: Key dimensions and research implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice18(4): 43–62.
19.
GonzálezSHealeyP (2005) A sociological institutionalist approach to the study of innovation in governance capacity. Urban Studies42(11): 2055–2069.
20.
GrahamSHealeyP (1999) Relational concepts of space and place: Issues for planning theory and practice. European Planning Studies7(5): 623–646.
21.
HarveyD (1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
22.
HealeyP (2002) On creating the city as a collective resource. Urban Studies39(10): 1777–1792.
JenningsDGreenwoodRLounsburyD. (2013) Institutions, entrepreneurs, and communities: A special issue on entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing28(1): 1–9.
25.
JeppersonR (1991) Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In: PowellWWDi MaggioPJ (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp.143–163.
26.
JohannissonBRamírezMKarlssonG (2002) The institutional embeddedness of local inter-firm networks: A leverage for business creation. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development14(3): 297–315.
27.
JohnstoneHLionaisD (2004) Depleted communities and community business entrepreneurship: Revaluing space though place. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development16(3): 217–233.
28.
KlapperLLaevanLRajanR (2006) Business environment and firm entry: Evidence from international data. Journal of Financial Economics82(3): 591–629.
29.
LafuenteEVaillantYRialpJ (2007) Regional differences in the influence of role models: Comparing the entrepreneurial process of rural Catalonia. Regional Studies41(6): 779–795.
30.
LafuenteEVaillantYSerarolsC (2010) Location decisions of knowledge-based entrepreneurs: Why some Catalan KISAs choose to be rural. Technovation30(11): 590–600.
31.
LangRRoesslD (2011) Contextualizing the governance of community co-operatives: Evidence from Austria and Germany. Voluntas22(1): 706–730.
32.
LeitzelJ (1997) Rule evasion in transitional Russia. In: NelsonJTillyCWalkerL (eds) Transforming Post-communist Political Economies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp.118–130.
LynnML (1998) Patterns of micro-enterprise diversification in transitional Eurasian economies. International Small Business Journal16(2): 34–49.
35.
ManolovaTEunniRGyoshevB (2008) Institutional environments for entrepreneurship: Evidence from emerging economies in Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice32(1): 203–218.
36.
MarquisCBattilanaJ (2009) Acting globally but thinking locally? The enduring influence of local communities on organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior29: 283–302.
37.
MarquisCLounsburyM (2007) Vive la résistance: Consolidation and the institutional contingency of professional countermobilization in US banking. Academy of Management Journal50(4): 799–820.
38.
MartiICourpassonDBarbosaD (2013) Living in the fishbowl. Generating an entrepreneurial culture in a local community in Argentina. Journal of Business Venturing28(1): 10–29.
39.
MasseyD (1995) Spatial Divisions of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of Production. London: Macmillan.
40.
MayringP (2008) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Beltz: Weinheim-Basel.
41.
MeyerJWRowanB (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology83(2): 340–363.
42.
MoulaertFNussbaumerJ (2005) Defining the social economy and its governance at the neighbourhood level: A methodological reflection. Urban Studies42(11): 2071–2088.
43.
NorthDSmallboneD (2006) Developing entrepreneurship and enterprise in Europe’s peripheral rural areas: Some issues facing policy-makers. European Planning Studies14(1): 41–60.
44.
NovyAMehmoodAMartinelliFMoulaertF (2012) DEMOLOGOS methodology for the analysis of urban and regional trajectories. In: MartinelliFMoulaertFNovyA (eds) Urban and Regional Development Trajectories in Contemporary Capitalism. London: Routledge, pp.74–91.
45.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2006) The new rural paradigm: Policy and governance, working paper on territorial policy in rural areas. Paris: OECD.
OliverC (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review16(1): 145–179.
48.
PengMW (2000) Business Strategies in Transition Economies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
PezziniM (2001) Rural policy lessons from OECD countries. International Regional Science Review24(1): 134–145.
50.
PufferSMcCarthyDBoisotM (2010) Entrepreneurship in Russia and China: The impact of formal institutional voids. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice34(3): 441–467.
51.
RamstadY (1986) A pragmatist’s quest for holistic knowledge: The scientific methodology of John R. Commons. Journal of Economic Issues20(4): 1067–1105.
52.
RichardsonTJensenO (2003) Linking discourse and space: Towards a cultural sociology of space in analysing spatial policy discourses. Urban Studies40(1): 7–22.
53.
RobertsKZhouC (2000) New private enterprises in three transitional contexts: Central Europe, the former Soviet Union and China. Post-Communist Economies12(2): 187–199.
54.
SayerA (1992) Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. London: Routledge.
55.
SchuetzeF (1977) Die Technik des narrativen Interviews in Interaktionsfeldstudien: dargestellt an einem Projekt zur Erforschung von kommunalen Machtstrukturen, Arbeitsberichte und Forschungsmaterialien No. 1. Bielefeld: Fakultät für Soziologie, Universität Bielefeld.
56.
ScottWR (1995) Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57.
ScottWR (2010) Reflections: The past and future of research on institutions and institutional change. Journal of Change Management10(1): 5–21.
58.
ShaneS (2003) A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual–Opportunity Nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
59.
SmallboneDWelterF (2010) Entrepreneurship and government policy in former Soviet republics: Belarus and Estonia compared. Environment & Planning C28(2): 195–210.
60.
SpencerJWGómezC (2004) The relationship among national institutional structures, economic factors, and domestic entrepreneurial activity: A multicountry study. Journal of Business Research57(10): 1098–1107.
61.
StamE (2010) Entrepreneurship, evolution and geography. In: BoschmaRMartinRL (eds) The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.307–348.
62.
StenholmPZoltanAWuebkerR (2013) Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing28(1): 176–193.
63.
SternbergR (2009) Regional dimensions of entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship5(4): 211–340.
64.
ThorntonP (1999) The sociology of entrepreneurship. Annual Review of Sociology25(4): 19–46.
65.
ThorntonPRibeiro-SorianoDUrbanoD (2011) Socio-cultural factors and entrepreneurial activity: An overview. International Small Business Journal29(2): 1–16.
66.
ThorntonPHFlynnKH (2003) Entrepreneurship, networks, and geographies. In: AcsZAudretschD (eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. New York: Kluwer, pp.401–433.
VaillantYLafuenteE (2007) Do different institutional frameworks condition the influence of local fear of failure and entrepreneurial examples over entrepreneurial activity?Entrepreneurship & Regional Development19(4): 313–337.
69.
Van StelAStoreyDThurikAR (2007) The effect of business regulations on nascent and young business entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics28(2–3): 171–186.
70.
VecianaJMUrbanoD (2008) The institutional approach to entrepreneurship research: Introduction. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal4(2): 365–379.
71.
WelterF (2011) Conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice35(1): 165–184.
72.
WelterFSmallboneD (2008) Women’s entrepreneurship from an institutional perspective: The case of Uzbekistan. International Entrepreneurship & Management Journal4(4): 504–520.
73.
WelterFSmallboneD (2011) Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. Journal of Small Business Management49(1): 107–125.
74.
WinborgJLandströmH (2001) Financial bootstrapping in small businesses: Examining small business managers’ resource acquisition behaviors. Journal of Business Venturing16(3): 235–254.
75.
YinRK (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
