Hong Kong has great potential to develop ecotourism as an alternate tourism experience. In order to provide visitors with satisfaction and conserve and sustain natural resources, a comprehensive zoning plan is indispensable to identify areas for various purposes and activities. Geographic information system combined with multi-criteria decision analysis procedure can be used to formulate these plans in an objective and efficient way. This study used this approach to objectively identify potential sites for various ecotourism activities and tourism development potential in Lantau Island, Hong Kong SAR. The results were then used to evaluate the Lantau development plan proposed by the government. By integrating with quality conservation information, the island was further classified into four zones namely sanctuary, nature conservation, outdoor recreation, and tourism development through multi-objective analysis. The results showed that proposed sites for various recreational activities are of medium to high suitability, while other potential sites with high suitability were revealed. In addition, sites with conflicting objectives and those required further protection were also identified. The results can be used as an unbiased guide for Lantau development. This study also demonstrated ecotourism planning and development can be practically supported by geo-information tools combined with proper multi-criteria decision analysis procedures based on which better decision can be made.
Abed MH, Monavari M, Karbasi A, et al. (2011) Site selection using analytical hierarchy process by geographical information system for sustainable coastal tourism. In: International Conference on Environmental and Agriculture Engineering IPCBEE 15, pp. 120–124. Singapore: IACSIT Press.
2.
AminuMMatoriANYusofKW (2014) A spatial decision support system (SDSS) for sustainable tourism planning in Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science18: 1–7.
3.
BahaireTElliott-WhiteM (1999) The application of geographical information systems (GIS) in sustainable tourism planning: A review. Journal of Sustainable Tourism7: 159–174.
BoydSButlerRHaiderW (1994) Identifying areas for ecotourism in Northern Ontario: Application of a Geographical Information System methodology. Journal of Applied Recreation Research19: 41–46.
6.
BuckleyR (2004a) Impacts of ecotourism on birds. In: BuckleyR (ed.) Ecotourism Series No.2: Environmental Impacts of Ecotourism, Cambridge: CABI Publishing, pp. 187–210.
7.
BuckleyR (2004b) Impacts of ecotourism on terrestrial wildlife. In: BuckleyR (ed.) Ecotourism Series No.2: Environmental Impacts of Ecotourism, Cambridge: CABI Publishing, pp. 211–228.
8.
Bunruamkaew K and Murayama Y (2011) Site suitability evaluation for ecotourism using GIS & AHP: A case study of Surat Thani province, Thailand. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences: International Conference Spatial Thinking and Geographic Information Sciences 2011 21: 269-278.
9.
CarverSJ (1991) Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems5: 321–339.
10.
ChenJNewkirkRTDavidsonG (1994) The development of a knowledge-based geographical information system for the zoning of rural areas. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design21: 179–190.
Citizens Party (1998) Alternative Tourism Strategy: Citizens Party's Submission to the Hong Kong Tourist Association, Hong Kong: Citizens Party.
13.
CohonJL (1997) MCDM trends in natural resources and environmental management. In: ClímacoJ (ed.) Multicriteria Analysis, New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 569–573.
14.
ColeDNLandresPB (1995) Indirect effects of recreation on wildlife. In: KnightRLGutzwillerKJ (eds) Wildlife and Recreationists: Coexistence Through Management and Research, Washington DC: Island Press, pp. 183–202.
15.
CollinsMGSteinerFRRushmanMJ (2001) Land-use suitability analysis in the United States: Historical development and promising technological achievements. Environmental Management28: 611–621.
16.
DowlingR (1993) An environmentally-based planning model for regional tourism development. Journal of Sustainable Tourism1: 17–37.
17.
DowlingRFennelD (2003) The context of ecotourism policy and planning. In: DowlingRFennelD (eds) Ecotourism Policy and Planning, New York: CABI Publishing, pp. 1–20.
18.
EaglesPFJMcCoolSF (2002) Tourism in National Parks and Protected Area Planning and Management, New York: CABI Publishing.
19.
EastmanJR (2001) Idrisi 32 Release 2: Guide to GIS and Image Processing: Volume 2, Worcester, MA: Clark Labs, Clark University.
20.
Farsari Y (2003) GIS-based support for sustainable tourism planning and policy making. In: Paper presented at the XII International Leisure and Tourism symposium, 3-4 April. Available at: www.iacm.forth.gr/papers/Barcelona.pdf.
21.
FeickRDHallGB (2002) Balancing consensus and conflict with a GIS-based multi-participant, multi-criteria decision support tool. GeoJournal53: 391–406.
22.
FennellDA (2003) Ecotourism: An Introduction, London: Routledge.
23.
GenelettiD (2004) A GIS-based decision support system to identify nature conservation priorities in an alpine valley. Marine and Petroleum Geology21: 149–160.
24.
GunnCA (1994) Environmental designs and land use. In: RitchieJRBGoeldnerCR (eds) Travel, Tourism, and Hospitality Research: A Handbook for Managers and Researchers, New York: Wiley, pp. 229–247.
HamadoucheMAMederbalKKouriL (2014) GIS-based multicriteria analysis: An approach to select priority areas for preservation in the Ahaggar National Park, Algeria. Arabian Journal of Geosciences7: 419–434.
27.
HwangC-LYoonK-S (1981) Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
28.
InskeepE (1991) Tourism Planning: An Integrated and Sustainable Development Approach, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
29.
JankowskiP (1995) Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision making methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems9: 251–273.
30.
JanssenR (2001) On the use of multi-criteria analysis in environmental impact assessment in The Netherlands. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis10: 101–109.
31.
KeislerJMSundellRC (1997) Combining multi-attribute utility and geographic information for boundary decisions: An application to park planning. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis1: 100–119.
32.
KnightRLColeDN (1995) Wildlife responses to recreationists. In: KnightandRLGutzwillerKJ (eds) Wildlife and Recreationists: Coexistence Through Management and Research, Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 51–69.
33.
Lantau Development Task Force (2004) Concept plan for Lantau: Consultation digest. The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Available at: www.pland.gov.hk/pland_en/lantau/en/images/digest/Digest_E.pdf (accessed 12 November 2015).
34.
MalczewskiJ (1999) GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis, New York: John Wiley.
35.
MalczewskiJ (2003) GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: A critical overview. Progress in Planning62: 3–65.
36.
MalczewskiJ (2006) GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: A survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science20: 703–726.
37.
MalczewskiJLiuX (2014) Local ordered weighted averaging in GIS-based multicriteria analysis. Annals of GIS20: 117–129.
38.
MassamBH (1988) Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques in planning. Progress in Planning30: 1–84.
39.
MendozaGAMartinsH (2006) Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. Forest Ecology and Management230: 1–22.
40.
MoffettASarkarS (2006) Incorporating multiple criteria into the design of conservation area networks: A minireview with recommendations. Diversity and Distributions12: 125–137.
PomerolJ-CBarba-RomeroS (2000) Multicriterion Decision in Management: Principles and Practices, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
43.
PriskinJ (2003) Issues and opportunities in planning and managing nature-based tourism in the central coast region of Western Australia. Australian Geographical Studies41: 270–286.
SaatyT (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences1: 83–98.
46.
SharifiMAVan Den ToornWRicoA (2002) Application of GIS and multicriteria evaluation in locating sustainable boundary between the Tunari National Park and Cochabamba City (Bolivia). Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis11: 151–164.
47.
StewartTJFrenchSRiosJ (2013) Integrating multicriteria decision analysis and scenario planning—Review and extension. Omega41: 679–688.
48.
The Ecotourism Society (1993) Ecotourism Guidelines: For Nature Tour Operators, Vermont: The Ecotourism Society.
49.
VelasquezMHesterPT (2013) An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. International Journal of Operations Research10: 56–66.
50.
VillaFTunesiLAgardyT (2002) Zoning marine protected areas through spatial multiple-criteria analysis: The case of the Asinara Island nation marine reserve of Italy. Conservation Biology16: 515–526.
51.
WearingSNeilJ (1999) Ecotourism: Impact, Potential and Possibilities, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
